aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test-suite/success
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/success')
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/Cases.v5
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/Compat84.v2
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/Scheme.v23
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/boundvars.v14
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/ltac.v20
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/polymorphism.v32
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v21
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/unification.v11
8 files changed, 126 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/success/Cases.v b/test-suite/success/Cases.v
index 49c465b6c6..52fe98ac07 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/Cases.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/Cases.v
@@ -1868,3 +1868,8 @@ Definition transport {A} (P : A->Type) {x y : A} (p : x=y) (u : P x) : P y :=
Check match eq_refl 0 in _=O return O=O with eq_refl => eq_refl end.
Check match niln in listn O return O=O with niln => eq_refl end.
+
+(* A test about nested "as" clauses *)
+(* (was failing up to May 2017) *)
+
+Check fun x => match x with (y,z) as t as w => (y+z,t) = (0,w) end.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/Compat84.v b/test-suite/success/Compat84.v
index db6348fa17..732a024fc1 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/Compat84.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/Compat84.v
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-emacs" "-compat" "8.4") -*- *)
+(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-compat" "8.4") -*- *)
Goal True.
solve [ constructor 1 ]. Undo.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/Scheme.v b/test-suite/success/Scheme.v
index dd5aa81d1d..855f26698c 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/Scheme.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/Scheme.v
@@ -2,3 +2,26 @@
Scheme Induction for eq Sort Prop.
Check eq_ind_dep.
+
+(* This was broken in v8.5 *)
+
+Set Rewriting Schemes.
+Inductive myeq A (a:A) : A -> Prop := myrefl : myeq A a a.
+Unset Rewriting Schemes.
+
+Check myeq_rect.
+Check myeq_ind.
+Check myeq_rec.
+Check myeq_congr.
+Check myeq_sym_internal.
+Check myeq_rew.
+Check myeq_rew_dep.
+Check myeq_rew_fwd_dep.
+Check myeq_rew_r.
+Check internal_myeq_sym_involutive.
+Check myeq_rew_r_dep.
+Check myeq_rew_fwd_r_dep.
+
+Set Rewriting Schemes.
+Inductive myeq_true : bool -> Prop := myrefl_true : myeq_true true.
+Unset Rewriting Schemes.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/boundvars.v b/test-suite/success/boundvars.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..fafe272925
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/success/boundvars.v
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+(* An example showing a bug in the detection of free variables *)
+(* "x" is not free in the common type of "x" and "y" *)
+
+Check forall (x z:unit) (x y : match z as x return x=x with tt => eq_refl end = eq_refl), x=x.
+
+(* An example showing a bug in the detection of bound variables *)
+
+Goal forall x, match x return x = x with 0 => eq_refl | _ => eq_refl end = eq_refl.
+intro.
+match goal with
+|- (match x as y in nat return y = y with O => _ | S n => _ end) = _ => assert (forall y, y = 0) end.
+intro.
+Check x0. (* Check that "y" has been bound to "x0" while matching "match x as x0 return x0=x0 with ... end" *)
+Abort.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/ltac.v b/test-suite/success/ltac.v
index ce90990594..1d35f1ef6c 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/ltac.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/ltac.v
@@ -317,3 +317,23 @@ let T := constr:(fun a b : nat => a) in
end.
exact (eq_refl n).
Qed.
+
+(* A variant of #2602 which was wrongly succeeding because "a", bound to
+ "?m", was then internally turned into a "_" in the second matching *)
+
+Goal exists m, S m > 0.
+eexists.
+Fail match goal with
+ | |- context [ S ?a ] =>
+ match goal with
+ | |- S a > a => idtac
+ end
+end.
+Abort.
+
+(* Test evar syntax *)
+
+Goal True.
+evar (0=0).
+Abort.
+
diff --git a/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v b/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v
index 878875bd92..66ff55edcb 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v
@@ -321,4 +321,34 @@ Definition unwrap' := fun (X : Type) (b : box X) => let (unw) := b in unw.
Fail Definition bad : False := TypeNeqSmallType.paradox (unwrap' Type (wrap _
Type)) eq_refl.
-End Hurkens'. \ No newline at end of file
+End Hurkens'.
+
+Module Anonymous.
+ Set Universe Polymorphism.
+
+ Definition defaultid := (fun x => x) : Type -> Type.
+ Definition collapseid := defaultid@{_ _}.
+ Check collapseid@{_}.
+
+ Definition anonid := (fun x => x) : Type -> Type@{_}.
+ Check anonid@{_}.
+
+ Definition defaultalg := (fun x : Type => x) (Type : Type).
+ Definition usedefaultalg := defaultalg@{_ _ _}.
+ Check usedefaultalg@{_ _}.
+
+ Definition anonalg := (fun x : Type@{_} => x) (Type : Type).
+ Check anonalg@{_ _}.
+
+ Definition unrelated@{i j} := nat.
+ Definition useunrelated := unrelated@{_ _}.
+ Check useunrelated@{_ _}.
+
+ Definition inthemiddle@{i j k} :=
+ let _ := defaultid@{i j} in
+ anonalg@{k j}.
+ (* i <= j < k *)
+ Definition collapsethemiddle := inthemiddle@{i _ j}.
+ Check collapsethemiddle@{_ _}.
+
+End Anonymous.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v b/test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ff4509c4a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Class by_transparent_abstract {T} (x : T) := make_by_transparent_abstract : T.
+Hint Extern 0 (@by_transparent_abstract ?T ?x) => change T; transparent_abstract exact_no_check x : typeclass_instances.
+
+Goal True /\ True.
+Proof.
+ split.
+ transparent_abstract exact I using foo.
+ let x := (eval hnf in foo) in constr_eq x I.
+ let x := constr:(ltac:(constructor) : True) in
+ let T := type of x in
+ let x := constr:(_ : by_transparent_abstract x) in
+ let x := (eval cbv delta [by_transparent_abstract] in (let y : T := x in y)) in
+ pose x as x'.
+ simpl in x'.
+ let v := eval cbv [x'] in x' in tryif constr_eq v I then fail 0 else idtac.
+ hnf in x'.
+ let v := eval cbv [x'] in x' in tryif constr_eq v I then idtac else fail 0.
+ exact x'.
+Defined.
+Check eq_refl : I = foo.
+Eval compute in foo.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/unification.v b/test-suite/success/unification.v
index 296686e16e..6f7498d659 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/unification.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/unification.v
@@ -188,3 +188,14 @@ Proof.
apply idpath.
apply idpath.
Defined.
+
+(* An example where it is necessary to evar-normalize the instance of
+ an evar to evaluate if it is a pattern *)
+
+Check
+ let a := ?[P] in
+ fun (H : forall y (P : nat -> Prop), y = 0 -> P y)
+ x (p:x=0) =>
+ H ?[y] a p : x = 0.
+(* We have to solve "?P ?y[x] == x = 0" knowing from
+ "p : (x=0) == (?y[x] = 0)" that "?y := x" *)