diff options
| author | Pierre-Marie Pédrot | 2017-05-19 10:48:30 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Pierre-Marie Pédrot | 2017-05-19 10:48:30 +0200 |
| commit | 0a67131d9a63e26ea2ea85d9ed51d76d8464295e (patch) | |
| tree | 980727a88f63908ce1f25f317e43126a0d3d0ad8 /test-suite/success | |
| parent | 37e84b83739fec666264904bc06fd32b46b83140 (diff) | |
| parent | 9f11adda4bff194a3c6a66d573ce7001d4399886 (diff) | |
Merge branch 'master' into ltac2-hooks
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite/success')
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/Cases.v | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/Compat84.v | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/Scheme.v | 23 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/boundvars.v | 14 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/ltac.v | 20 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/polymorphism.v | 32 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v | 21 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/success/unification.v | 11 |
8 files changed, 126 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/success/Cases.v b/test-suite/success/Cases.v index 49c465b6c6..52fe98ac07 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/Cases.v +++ b/test-suite/success/Cases.v @@ -1868,3 +1868,8 @@ Definition transport {A} (P : A->Type) {x y : A} (p : x=y) (u : P x) : P y := Check match eq_refl 0 in _=O return O=O with eq_refl => eq_refl end. Check match niln in listn O return O=O with niln => eq_refl end. + +(* A test about nested "as" clauses *) +(* (was failing up to May 2017) *) + +Check fun x => match x with (y,z) as t as w => (y+z,t) = (0,w) end. diff --git a/test-suite/success/Compat84.v b/test-suite/success/Compat84.v index db6348fa17..732a024fc1 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/Compat84.v +++ b/test-suite/success/Compat84.v @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-emacs" "-compat" "8.4") -*- *) +(* -*- coq-prog-args: ("-compat" "8.4") -*- *) Goal True. solve [ constructor 1 ]. Undo. diff --git a/test-suite/success/Scheme.v b/test-suite/success/Scheme.v index dd5aa81d1d..855f26698c 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/Scheme.v +++ b/test-suite/success/Scheme.v @@ -2,3 +2,26 @@ Scheme Induction for eq Sort Prop. Check eq_ind_dep. + +(* This was broken in v8.5 *) + +Set Rewriting Schemes. +Inductive myeq A (a:A) : A -> Prop := myrefl : myeq A a a. +Unset Rewriting Schemes. + +Check myeq_rect. +Check myeq_ind. +Check myeq_rec. +Check myeq_congr. +Check myeq_sym_internal. +Check myeq_rew. +Check myeq_rew_dep. +Check myeq_rew_fwd_dep. +Check myeq_rew_r. +Check internal_myeq_sym_involutive. +Check myeq_rew_r_dep. +Check myeq_rew_fwd_r_dep. + +Set Rewriting Schemes. +Inductive myeq_true : bool -> Prop := myrefl_true : myeq_true true. +Unset Rewriting Schemes. diff --git a/test-suite/success/boundvars.v b/test-suite/success/boundvars.v new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fafe272925 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/success/boundvars.v @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +(* An example showing a bug in the detection of free variables *) +(* "x" is not free in the common type of "x" and "y" *) + +Check forall (x z:unit) (x y : match z as x return x=x with tt => eq_refl end = eq_refl), x=x. + +(* An example showing a bug in the detection of bound variables *) + +Goal forall x, match x return x = x with 0 => eq_refl | _ => eq_refl end = eq_refl. +intro. +match goal with +|- (match x as y in nat return y = y with O => _ | S n => _ end) = _ => assert (forall y, y = 0) end. +intro. +Check x0. (* Check that "y" has been bound to "x0" while matching "match x as x0 return x0=x0 with ... end" *) +Abort. diff --git a/test-suite/success/ltac.v b/test-suite/success/ltac.v index ce90990594..1d35f1ef6c 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/ltac.v +++ b/test-suite/success/ltac.v @@ -317,3 +317,23 @@ let T := constr:(fun a b : nat => a) in end. exact (eq_refl n). Qed. + +(* A variant of #2602 which was wrongly succeeding because "a", bound to + "?m", was then internally turned into a "_" in the second matching *) + +Goal exists m, S m > 0. +eexists. +Fail match goal with + | |- context [ S ?a ] => + match goal with + | |- S a > a => idtac + end +end. +Abort. + +(* Test evar syntax *) + +Goal True. +evar (0=0). +Abort. + diff --git a/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v b/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v index 878875bd92..66ff55edcb 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v +++ b/test-suite/success/polymorphism.v @@ -321,4 +321,34 @@ Definition unwrap' := fun (X : Type) (b : box X) => let (unw) := b in unw. Fail Definition bad : False := TypeNeqSmallType.paradox (unwrap' Type (wrap _ Type)) eq_refl. -End Hurkens'.
\ No newline at end of file +End Hurkens'. + +Module Anonymous. + Set Universe Polymorphism. + + Definition defaultid := (fun x => x) : Type -> Type. + Definition collapseid := defaultid@{_ _}. + Check collapseid@{_}. + + Definition anonid := (fun x => x) : Type -> Type@{_}. + Check anonid@{_}. + + Definition defaultalg := (fun x : Type => x) (Type : Type). + Definition usedefaultalg := defaultalg@{_ _ _}. + Check usedefaultalg@{_ _}. + + Definition anonalg := (fun x : Type@{_} => x) (Type : Type). + Check anonalg@{_ _}. + + Definition unrelated@{i j} := nat. + Definition useunrelated := unrelated@{_ _}. + Check useunrelated@{_ _}. + + Definition inthemiddle@{i j k} := + let _ := defaultid@{i j} in + anonalg@{k j}. + (* i <= j < k *) + Definition collapsethemiddle := inthemiddle@{i _ j}. + Check collapsethemiddle@{_ _}. + +End Anonymous. diff --git a/test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v b/test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ff4509c4a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/success/transparent_abstract.v @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Class by_transparent_abstract {T} (x : T) := make_by_transparent_abstract : T. +Hint Extern 0 (@by_transparent_abstract ?T ?x) => change T; transparent_abstract exact_no_check x : typeclass_instances. + +Goal True /\ True. +Proof. + split. + transparent_abstract exact I using foo. + let x := (eval hnf in foo) in constr_eq x I. + let x := constr:(ltac:(constructor) : True) in + let T := type of x in + let x := constr:(_ : by_transparent_abstract x) in + let x := (eval cbv delta [by_transparent_abstract] in (let y : T := x in y)) in + pose x as x'. + simpl in x'. + let v := eval cbv [x'] in x' in tryif constr_eq v I then fail 0 else idtac. + hnf in x'. + let v := eval cbv [x'] in x' in tryif constr_eq v I then idtac else fail 0. + exact x'. +Defined. +Check eq_refl : I = foo. +Eval compute in foo. diff --git a/test-suite/success/unification.v b/test-suite/success/unification.v index 296686e16e..6f7498d659 100644 --- a/test-suite/success/unification.v +++ b/test-suite/success/unification.v @@ -188,3 +188,14 @@ Proof. apply idpath. apply idpath. Defined. + +(* An example where it is necessary to evar-normalize the instance of + an evar to evaluate if it is a pattern *) + +Check + let a := ?[P] in + fun (H : forall y (P : nat -> Prop), y = 0 -> P y) + x (p:x=0) => + H ?[y] a p : x = 0. +(* We have to solve "?P ?y[x] == x = 0" knowing from + "p : (x=0) == (?y[x] = 0)" that "?y := x" *) |
