diff options
| author | Maxime Dénès | 2019-06-05 10:11:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Maxime Dénès | 2019-06-05 10:11:26 +0200 |
| commit | c0a695e89b0562eb6450c04ddba5e6e0414e5fd8 (patch) | |
| tree | 376928f87987f440142cc7e6353c6987cb4b2be7 /plugins/funind/recdef.ml | |
| parent | 658ae0d320473e25ee60cf158ed808be294f3a69 (diff) | |
| parent | ae87619019adf56acf8985f7f1c4e49246ca9b5a (diff) | |
Merge PR #10215: Refine typing of vernacular commands
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind/recdef.ml')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/recdef.ml | 25 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml index de1b592337..e2321d233c 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ let declare_fun f_id kind ?univs value = let ce = definition_entry ?univs value (*FIXME *) in ConstRef(declare_constant f_id (DefinitionEntry ce, kind));; -let defined pstate = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None +let defined pstate = Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None let def_of_const t = match (Constr.kind t) with @@ -1367,10 +1367,9 @@ let open_new_goal pstate build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type ) g) in - let _pstate = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None in - () + Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None in - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:(Some pstate) + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof na (Decl_kinds.Global, false (* FIXME *), Decl_kinds.Proof Decl_kinds.Lemma) sigma gls_type ~hook:(Lemmas.mk_hook hook) in @@ -1396,12 +1395,10 @@ let open_new_goal pstate build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type ) tclIDTAC) g end) pstate in - try - Some (fst @@ by (Proofview.V82.tactic tclIDTAC) pstate) (* raises UserError _ if the proof is complete *) - with UserError _ -> - defined pstate + if Proof_global.get_open_goals pstate = 0 then (defined pstate; None) else Some pstate let com_terminate + interactive_proof tcc_lemma_name tcc_lemma_ref is_mes @@ -1413,7 +1410,7 @@ let com_terminate nb_args ctx hook = let start_proof env ctx (tac_start:tactic) (tac_end:tactic) = - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None thm_name + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof thm_name (Global, false (* FIXME *), Proof Lemma) ~sign:(Environ.named_context_val env) ctx (EConstr.of_constr (compute_terminate_type nb_args fonctional_ref)) ~hook in let pstate = fst @@ by (Proofview.V82.tactic (observe_tac (fun _ _ -> str "starting_tac") tac_start)) pstate in @@ -1431,7 +1428,8 @@ let com_terminate with EmptySubgoals -> (* a non recursive function declared with measure ! *) tcc_lemma_ref := Not_needed; - defined pstate + if interactive_proof then Some pstate + else (defined pstate; None) let start_equation (f:GlobRef.t) (term_f:GlobRef.t) (cont_tactic:Id.t list -> tactic) g = @@ -1459,7 +1457,7 @@ let com_eqn sign uctx nb_arg eq_name functional_ref f_ref terminate_ref equation let evd = Evd.from_ctx uctx in let f_constr = constr_of_monomorphic_global f_ref in let equation_lemma_type = subst1 f_constr equation_lemma_type in - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None eq_name (Global, false, Proof Lemma) ~sign evd + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof eq_name (Global, false, Proof Lemma) ~sign evd (EConstr.of_constr equation_lemma_type) in let pstate = fst @@ by (Proofview.V82.tactic (start_equation f_ref terminate_ref @@ -1489,12 +1487,12 @@ let com_eqn sign uctx nb_arg eq_name functional_ref f_ref terminate_ref equation } ) )) pstate in - let _ = Flags.silently (fun () -> Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None) () in + let _ = Flags.silently (fun () -> Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None) () in () (* Pp.msgnl (fun _ _ -> str "eqn finished"); *) -let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num eq +let recursive_definition ~interactive_proof ~is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num eq generate_induction_principle using_lemmas : Proof_global.t option = let open Term in let open Constr in @@ -1585,6 +1583,7 @@ let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num (* XXX STATE Why do we need this... why is the toplevel protection not enough *) funind_purify (fun () -> let pstate = com_terminate + interactive_proof tcc_lemma_name tcc_lemma_constr is_mes functional_ref |
