diff options
| author | Maxime Dénès | 2019-06-05 10:11:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Maxime Dénès | 2019-06-05 10:11:26 +0200 |
| commit | c0a695e89b0562eb6450c04ddba5e6e0414e5fd8 (patch) | |
| tree | 376928f87987f440142cc7e6353c6987cb4b2be7 /plugins/funind | |
| parent | 658ae0d320473e25ee60cf158ed808be294f3a69 (diff) | |
| parent | ae87619019adf56acf8985f7f1c4e49246ca9b5a (diff) | |
Merge PR #10215: Refine typing of vernacular commands
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: ejgallego
Ack-by: gares
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml | 9 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml | 11 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/g_indfun.mlg | 66 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/indfun.ml | 64 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/indfun.mli | 10 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/invfun.ml | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/recdef.ml | 25 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/recdef.mli | 26 |
8 files changed, 128 insertions, 91 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml index f2b9ba2ec6..e38ea992ab 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num ] in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type (2) " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (Global.env ()) evd lemma_type); *) - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof (*i The next call to mk_equation_id is valid since we are constructing the lemma Ensures by: obvious i*) @@ -1000,8 +1000,9 @@ let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num lemma_type in let pstate,_ = Pfedit.by (Proofview.V82.tactic prove_replacement) pstate in - let pstate = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None in - pstate, evd + let ontop = Proof_global.push ~ontop:None pstate in + ignore(Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~ontop ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None); + evd let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num all_funs g = @@ -1015,7 +1016,7 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a Ensures by: obvious i*) let equation_lemma_id = (mk_equation_id f_id) in - evd := snd @@ generate_equation_lemma !evd all_funs f fun_num (List.length params) (List.length rev_args_id) rec_arg_num; + evd := generate_equation_lemma !evd all_funs f fun_num (List.length params) (List.length rev_args_id) rec_arg_num; let _ = match e with | Option.IsNone -> diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml index 2c107d39d9..7b26cb0c74 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_types.ml @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ let build_functional_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof old_prin evd := sigma; let hook = Lemmas.mk_hook (hook new_principle_type) in let pstate = - Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None + Lemmas.start_proof new_princ_name (Decl_kinds.Global,false,(Decl_kinds.Proof Decl_kinds.Theorem)) !evd @@ -328,8 +328,7 @@ let build_functional_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof old_prin let { id; entries; persistence } = fst @@ close_proof ~opaque:Transparent ~keep_body_ucst_separate:false (fun x -> x) pstate in match entries with | [entry] -> - let pstate = discard_current pstate in - (id,(entry,persistence)), hook, pstate + (id,(entry,persistence)), hook | _ -> CErrors.anomaly Pp.(str "[build_functional_principle] close_proof returned more than one proof term") @@ -381,7 +380,7 @@ let generate_functional_principle (evd: Evd.evar_map ref) register_with_sort InProp; register_with_sort InSet in - let ((id,(entry,g_kind)),hook,pstate) = + let ((id,(entry,g_kind)),hook) = build_functional_principle evd interactive_proof old_princ_type new_sorts funs i proof_tac hook in @@ -520,7 +519,7 @@ let make_scheme evd (fas : (pconstant*Sorts.family) list) : Safe_typing.private_ s::l_schemes -> s,l_schemes | _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "") in - let ((_,(const,_)),_,pstate) = + let ((_,(const,_)),_) = try build_functional_principle evd false first_type @@ -580,7 +579,7 @@ let make_scheme evd (fas : (pconstant*Sorts.family) list) : Safe_typing.private_ (* If we reach this point, the two principle are not mutually recursive We fall back to the previous method *) - let ((_,(const,_)),_,pstate) = + let ((_,(const,_)),_) = build_functional_principle evd false diff --git a/plugins/funind/g_indfun.mlg b/plugins/funind/g_indfun.mlg index dbfc0fc91d..833ff9f1ed 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/g_indfun.mlg +++ b/plugins/funind/g_indfun.mlg @@ -173,24 +173,41 @@ let () = let raw_printer env sigma _ _ _ (loc,body) = Ppvernac.pr_rec_definition body in Pptactic.declare_extra_vernac_genarg_pprule wit_function_rec_definition_loc raw_printer +let is_proof_termination_interactively_checked recsl = + List.exists (function + | _,((_,( Some { CAst.v = CMeasureRec _ } + | Some { CAst.v = CWfRec _}),_,_,_),_) -> true + | _,((_,Some { CAst.v = CStructRec _ },_,_,_),_) + | _,((_,None,_,_,_),_) -> false) recsl + +let classify_as_Fixpoint recsl = + Vernac_classifier.classify_vernac + (Vernacexpr.(CAst.make @@ VernacExpr([], VernacFixpoint(Decl_kinds.NoDischarge, List.map snd recsl)))) + +let classify_funind recsl = + match classify_as_Fixpoint recsl with + | Vernacextend.VtSideff ids, _ + when is_proof_termination_interactively_checked recsl -> + Vernacextend.(VtStartProof (GuaranteesOpacity, ids), VtLater) + | x -> x + +let is_interactive recsl = + match classify_funind recsl with + | Vernacextend.VtStartProof _, _ -> true + | _ -> false + } -(* TASSI: n'importe quoi ! *) -VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND Function -| ![ proof ] ["Function" ne_function_rec_definition_loc_list_sep(recsl,"with")] - => { let hard = List.exists (function - | _,((_,(Some { CAst.v = CMeasureRec _ } - | Some { CAst.v = CWfRec _}),_,_,_),_) -> true - | _,((_,Some { CAst.v = CStructRec _ },_,_,_),_) - | _,((_,None,_,_,_),_) -> false) recsl in - match - Vernac_classifier.classify_vernac - (Vernacexpr.(CAst.make @@ VernacExpr([], VernacFixpoint(Decl_kinds.NoDischarge, List.map snd recsl)))) - with - | Vernacextend.VtSideff ids, _ when hard -> - Vernacextend.(VtStartProof (GuaranteesOpacity, ids), VtLater) - | x -> x } - -> { do_generate_principle false (List.map snd recsl) } +VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND Function STATE CUSTOM +| ["Function" ne_function_rec_definition_loc_list_sep(recsl,"with")] + => { classify_funind recsl } + -> { + if is_interactive recsl then + Vernacextend.VtOpenProof (fun () -> + do_generate_principle_interactive (List.map snd recsl)) + else + Vernacextend.VtDefault (fun () -> + do_generate_principle (List.map snd recsl)) } END { @@ -225,33 +242,32 @@ let warning_error names e = } VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND NewFunctionalScheme -| ![ proof ] ["Functional" "Scheme" ne_fun_scheme_arg_list_sep(fas,"with") ] +| ["Functional" "Scheme" ne_fun_scheme_arg_list_sep(fas,"with") ] => { Vernacextend.(VtSideff(List.map pi1 fas), VtLater) } -> - { fun ~pstate -> - begin + { begin try - Functional_principles_types.build_scheme fas; pstate + Functional_principles_types.build_scheme fas with | Functional_principles_types.No_graph_found -> begin match fas with | (_,fun_name,_)::_ -> begin - let pstate = make_graph ~pstate (Smartlocate.global_with_alias fun_name) in - try Functional_principles_types.build_scheme fas; pstate + make_graph (Smartlocate.global_with_alias fun_name); + try Functional_principles_types.build_scheme fas with | Functional_principles_types.No_graph_found -> CErrors.user_err Pp.(str "Cannot generate induction principle(s)") | e when CErrors.noncritical e -> let names = List.map (fun (_,na,_) -> na) fas in - warning_error names e; pstate + warning_error names e end | _ -> assert false (* we can only have non empty list *) end | e when CErrors.noncritical e -> let names = List.map (fun (_,na,_) -> na) fas in - warning_error names e; pstate + warning_error names e end } END @@ -265,6 +281,6 @@ END (***** debug only ***) VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND GenerateGraph CLASSIFIED AS QUERY -| ![ proof ] ["Generate" "graph" "for" reference(c)] -> +| ["Generate" "graph" "for" reference(c)] -> { make_graph (Smartlocate.global_with_alias c) } END diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml index a6b088de0c..241da053b7 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.ml @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ let generate_principle (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) pconstants on_error with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> on_error names e -let register_struct ~pstate is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexpr.decl_notation list) list) = +let register_struct is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexpr.decl_notation list) list) = match fixpoint_exprl with | [(({CAst.v=fname},pl),_,bl,ret_type,body),_] when not is_rec -> let body = match body with | Some body -> body | None -> user_err ~hdr:"Function" (str "Body of Function must be given") in @@ -432,9 +432,9 @@ let register_struct ~pstate is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * V (Evd.from_env (Global.env ()),[]) fixpoint_exprl in - pstate, evd,List.rev rev_pconstants + None, evd,List.rev rev_pconstants | _ -> - let pstate = ComFixpoint.do_fixpoint ~ontop:pstate Global false fixpoint_exprl in + ComFixpoint.do_fixpoint Global false fixpoint_exprl; let evd,rev_pconstants = List.fold_left (fun (evd,l) ((({CAst.v=fname},_),_,_,_,_),_) -> @@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ let register_struct ~pstate is_rec (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * V (Evd.from_env (Global.env ()),[]) fixpoint_exprl in - pstate,evd,List.rev rev_pconstants + None,evd,List.rev rev_pconstants let generate_correction_proof_wf f_ref tcc_lemma_ref @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ let generate_correction_proof_wf f_ref tcc_lemma_ref tcc_lemma_ref is_mes rec_arg_num rec_arg_type relation -let register_wf ?(is_mes=false) fname rec_impls wf_rel_expr wf_arg using_lemmas args ret_type body +let register_wf interactive_proof ?(is_mes=false) fname rec_impls wf_rel_expr wf_arg using_lemmas args ret_type body pre_hook = let type_of_f = Constrexpr_ops.mkCProdN args ret_type in @@ -500,8 +500,8 @@ let register_wf ?(is_mes=false) fname rec_impls wf_rel_expr wf_arg using_lemmas (* No proof done *) () in - Recdef.recursive_definition - is_mes fname rec_impls + Recdef.recursive_definition ~interactive_proof + ~is_mes fname rec_impls type_of_f wf_rel_expr rec_arg_num @@ -510,7 +510,7 @@ let register_wf ?(is_mes=false) fname rec_impls wf_rel_expr wf_arg using_lemmas using_lemmas -let register_mes fname rec_impls wf_mes_expr wf_rel_expr_opt wf_arg using_lemmas args ret_type body = +let register_mes interactive_proof fname rec_impls wf_mes_expr wf_rel_expr_opt wf_arg using_lemmas args ret_type body = let wf_arg_type,wf_arg = match wf_arg with | None -> @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ let register_mes fname rec_impls wf_mes_expr wf_rel_expr_opt wf_arg using_lemmas in wf_rel_with_mes,false in - register_wf ~is_mes:is_mes fname rec_impls wf_rel_from_mes wf_arg + register_wf interactive_proof ~is_mes:is_mes fname rec_impls wf_rel_from_mes wf_arg using_lemmas args ret_type body let map_option f = function @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ let recompute_binder_list (fixpoint_exprl : (Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacex fixpoint_exprl_with_new_bl -let do_generate_principle ~pstate pconstants on_error register_built interactive_proof +let do_generate_principle_aux pconstants on_error register_built interactive_proof (fixpoint_exprl:(Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexpr.decl_notation list) list) : Proof_global.t option = List.iter (fun (_,l) -> if not (List.is_empty l) then error "Function does not support notations for now") fixpoint_exprl; let pstate, _is_struct = @@ -660,8 +660,8 @@ let do_generate_principle ~pstate pconstants on_error register_built interactive true in if register_built - then register_wf name rec_impls wf_rel wf_x.CAst.v using_lemmas args types body pre_hook, false - else pstate, false + then register_wf interactive_proof name rec_impls wf_rel wf_x.CAst.v using_lemmas args types body pre_hook, false + else None, false |[((_,Some {CAst.v = Constrexpr.CMeasureRec(wf_x,wf_mes,wf_rel_opt)},_,_,_),_) as fixpoint_expr] -> let (((({CAst.v=name},_),_,args,types,body)),_) as fixpoint_expr = match recompute_binder_list [fixpoint_expr] with @@ -684,8 +684,8 @@ let do_generate_principle ~pstate pconstants on_error register_built interactive true in if register_built - then register_mes name rec_impls wf_mes wf_rel_opt (map_option (fun x -> x.CAst.v) wf_x) using_lemmas args types body pre_hook, true - else pstate, true + then register_mes interactive_proof name rec_impls wf_mes wf_rel_opt (map_option (fun x -> x.CAst.v) wf_x) using_lemmas args types body pre_hook, true + else None, true | _ -> List.iter (function ((_na,ord,_args,_body,_type),_not) -> match ord with @@ -704,8 +704,8 @@ let do_generate_principle ~pstate pconstants on_error register_built interactive let is_rec = List.exists (is_rec fix_names) recdefs in let pstate,evd,pconstants = if register_built - then register_struct ~pstate is_rec fixpoint_exprl - else pstate, Evd.from_env (Global.env ()), pconstants + then register_struct is_rec fixpoint_exprl + else None, Evd.from_env (Global.env ()), pconstants in let evd = ref evd in generate_principle @@ -839,9 +839,9 @@ let rec get_args b t : Constrexpr.local_binder_expr list * | _ -> [],b,t -let make_graph ~pstate (f_ref : GlobRef.t) = - let sigma, env = Option.cata Pfedit.get_current_context - (let e = Global.env () in Evd.from_env e, e) pstate in +let make_graph (f_ref : GlobRef.t) = + let env = Global.env() in + let sigma = Evd.from_env env in let c,c_body = match f_ref with | ConstRef c -> @@ -902,11 +902,27 @@ let make_graph ~pstate (f_ref : GlobRef.t) = [((CAst.make id,None),None,nal_tas,t,Some b),[]] in let mp = Constant.modpath c in - let pstate = do_generate_principle ~pstate [c,Univ.Instance.empty] error_error false false expr_list in + let pstate = do_generate_principle_aux [c,Univ.Instance.empty] error_error false false expr_list in + assert (Option.is_empty pstate); (* We register the infos *) List.iter (fun ((({CAst.v=id},_),_,_,_,_),_) -> add_Function false (Constant.make2 mp (Label.of_id id))) - expr_list; - pstate) - -let do_generate_principle = do_generate_principle [] warning_error true + expr_list) + +(* *************** statically typed entrypoints ************************* *) + +let do_generate_principle_interactive fixl : Proof_global.t = + match + do_generate_principle_aux [] warning_error true true fixl + with + | Some pstate -> pstate + | None -> + CErrors.anomaly + (Pp.str"indfun: leaving no open proof in interactive mode") + +let do_generate_principle fixl : unit = + match do_generate_principle_aux [] warning_error true false fixl with + | Some _pstate -> + CErrors.anomaly + (Pp.str"indfun: leaving a goal open in non-interactive mode") + | None -> () diff --git a/plugins/funind/indfun.mli b/plugins/funind/indfun.mli index acf85f539e..1ba245a45d 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/indfun.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/indfun.mli @@ -5,10 +5,12 @@ val warn_cannot_define_graph : ?loc:Loc.t -> Pp.t * Pp.t -> unit val warn_cannot_define_principle : ?loc:Loc.t -> Pp.t * Pp.t -> unit -val do_generate_principle : pstate:Proof_global.t option -> - bool -> +val do_generate_principle : + (Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexpr.decl_notation list) list -> unit + +val do_generate_principle_interactive : (Vernacexpr.fixpoint_expr * Vernacexpr.decl_notation list) list -> - Proof_global.t option + Proof_global.t val functional_induction : bool -> @@ -17,4 +19,4 @@ val functional_induction : Ltac_plugin.Tacexpr.or_and_intro_pattern option -> Goal.goal Evd.sigma -> Goal.goal list Evd.sigma -val make_graph : pstate:Proof_global.t option -> GlobRef.t -> Proof_global.t option +val make_graph : GlobRef.t -> unit diff --git a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml index 2a0140f02c..03568fc6c7 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml @@ -803,7 +803,7 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme (funs: pconstant list) (graphs:inductive list i*) let lem_id = mk_correct_id f_id in let (typ,_) = lemmas_types_infos.(i) in - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof lem_id (Decl_kinds.Global,false,((Decl_kinds.Proof Decl_kinds.Theorem))) !evd @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme (funs: pconstant list) (graphs:inductive list let pstate = fst @@ Pfedit.by (Proofview.V82.tactic (observe_tac ("prove correctness ("^(Id.to_string f_id)^")") (proving_tac i))) pstate in - let _ = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None in + let () = Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None in let finfo = find_Function_infos (fst f_as_constant) in (* let lem_cst = fst (destConst (Constrintern.global_reference lem_id)) in *) let _,lem_cst_constr = Evd.fresh_global @@ -865,13 +865,13 @@ let derive_correctness make_scheme (funs: pconstant list) (graphs:inductive list Ensures by: obvious i*) let lem_id = mk_complete_id f_id in - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None lem_id + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof lem_id (Decl_kinds.Global,false,(Decl_kinds.Proof Decl_kinds.Theorem)) sigma (fst lemmas_types_infos.(i)) in let pstate = fst (Pfedit.by (Proofview.V82.tactic (observe_tac ("prove completeness ("^(Id.to_string f_id)^")") (proving_tac i))) pstate) in - let _pstate = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None in + let () = Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None in let finfo = find_Function_infos (fst f_as_constant) in let _,lem_cst_constr = Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (Libnames.qualid_of_ident lem_id)) in diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml index de1b592337..e2321d233c 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ let declare_fun f_id kind ?univs value = let ce = definition_entry ?univs value (*FIXME *) in ConstRef(declare_constant f_id (DefinitionEntry ce, kind));; -let defined pstate = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None +let defined pstate = Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None let def_of_const t = match (Constr.kind t) with @@ -1367,10 +1367,9 @@ let open_new_goal pstate build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type ) g) in - let _pstate = Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None in - () + Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None in - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:(Some pstate) + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof na (Decl_kinds.Global, false (* FIXME *), Decl_kinds.Proof Decl_kinds.Lemma) sigma gls_type ~hook:(Lemmas.mk_hook hook) in @@ -1396,12 +1395,10 @@ let open_new_goal pstate build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type ) tclIDTAC) g end) pstate in - try - Some (fst @@ by (Proofview.V82.tactic tclIDTAC) pstate) (* raises UserError _ if the proof is complete *) - with UserError _ -> - defined pstate + if Proof_global.get_open_goals pstate = 0 then (defined pstate; None) else Some pstate let com_terminate + interactive_proof tcc_lemma_name tcc_lemma_ref is_mes @@ -1413,7 +1410,7 @@ let com_terminate nb_args ctx hook = let start_proof env ctx (tac_start:tactic) (tac_end:tactic) = - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None thm_name + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof thm_name (Global, false (* FIXME *), Proof Lemma) ~sign:(Environ.named_context_val env) ctx (EConstr.of_constr (compute_terminate_type nb_args fonctional_ref)) ~hook in let pstate = fst @@ by (Proofview.V82.tactic (observe_tac (fun _ _ -> str "starting_tac") tac_start)) pstate in @@ -1431,7 +1428,8 @@ let com_terminate with EmptySubgoals -> (* a non recursive function declared with measure ! *) tcc_lemma_ref := Not_needed; - defined pstate + if interactive_proof then Some pstate + else (defined pstate; None) let start_equation (f:GlobRef.t) (term_f:GlobRef.t) (cont_tactic:Id.t list -> tactic) g = @@ -1459,7 +1457,7 @@ let com_eqn sign uctx nb_arg eq_name functional_ref f_ref terminate_ref equation let evd = Evd.from_ctx uctx in let f_constr = constr_of_monomorphic_global f_ref in let equation_lemma_type = subst1 f_constr equation_lemma_type in - let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~ontop:None eq_name (Global, false, Proof Lemma) ~sign evd + let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof eq_name (Global, false, Proof Lemma) ~sign evd (EConstr.of_constr equation_lemma_type) in let pstate = fst @@ by (Proofview.V82.tactic (start_equation f_ref terminate_ref @@ -1489,12 +1487,12 @@ let com_eqn sign uctx nb_arg eq_name functional_ref f_ref terminate_ref equation } ) )) pstate in - let _ = Flags.silently (fun () -> Lemmas.save_proof_proved ?proof:None ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None) () in + let _ = Flags.silently (fun () -> Lemmas.save_pstate_proved ~pstate ~opaque:opacity ~idopt:None) () in () (* Pp.msgnl (fun _ _ -> str "eqn finished"); *) -let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num eq +let recursive_definition ~interactive_proof ~is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num eq generate_induction_principle using_lemmas : Proof_global.t option = let open Term in let open Constr in @@ -1585,6 +1583,7 @@ let recursive_definition is_mes function_name rec_impls type_of_f r rec_arg_num (* XXX STATE Why do we need this... why is the toplevel protection not enough *) funind_purify (fun () -> let pstate = com_terminate + interactive_proof tcc_lemma_name tcc_lemma_constr is_mes functional_ref diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.mli b/plugins/funind/recdef.mli index a006c2c354..b92ac3a0ec 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/recdef.mli +++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.mli @@ -5,15 +5,19 @@ val tclUSER_if_not_mes : bool -> Names.Id.t list option -> Tacmach.tactic -val recursive_definition : -bool -> - Names.Id.t -> - Constrintern.internalization_env -> - Constrexpr.constr_expr -> - Constrexpr.constr_expr -> - int -> Constrexpr.constr_expr -> (pconstant -> - Indfun_common.tcc_lemma_value ref -> - pconstant -> - pconstant -> int -> EConstr.types -> int -> EConstr.constr -> unit) -> Constrexpr.constr_expr list -> Proof_global.t option - +val recursive_definition : + interactive_proof:bool -> + is_mes:bool -> + Names.Id.t -> + Constrintern.internalization_env -> + Constrexpr.constr_expr -> + Constrexpr.constr_expr -> + int -> + Constrexpr.constr_expr -> + (pconstant -> + Indfun_common.tcc_lemma_value ref -> + pconstant -> + pconstant -> int -> EConstr.types -> int -> EConstr.constr -> unit) -> + Constrexpr.constr_expr list -> + Proof_global.t option |
