diff options
| author | David Aspinall | 1999-10-06 10:46:04 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Aspinall | 1999-10-06 10:46:04 +0000 |
| commit | 7219b04037809c7e8538d3ba7a095101b6f50198 (patch) | |
| tree | 982d2e68b6c934c6efa8e5a8d1abd211818d4ba6 /todo | |
| parent | 59671e6efc4992445fe8ce4e05f70470828b3d64 (diff) | |
Admin changes for version 2.2.
Diffstat (limited to 'todo')
| -rw-r--r-- | todo | 28 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 12 deletions
@@ -71,16 +71,20 @@ C Internal improvements for marking up proof assistant output. characters. Maybe using x-symbol would give another approximation, too, although I'm put off that because it's not so standardly a part of XEmacs yet. + Or maybe w3's code for HTML mark up could be borrowed. C Usability enhancement: Enable toolbar in other PG buffers. Should switch to active scripting buffer first if it is non current. - (In fact, a sensible subset of scripting commands would - work from other buffers). + In fact, a sensible subset of scripting commands would + work from other buffers. + This suggestion is based on observation of a user's + confusion when the toolbar disappears from other PG buffers. X Compatibility enhancement: - Consider sending comments to proof process after all. They might contain special (e.g. LaTeX) directives or something. + Probably only worth considering if/when it becomes a problem. A Usability enhancement: Movement of point after assert/retract commands @@ -92,33 +96,33 @@ A Usability enhancement: Optional argument to delete region should be removed from C-c C-u, pressing quickly in succession can delete from buffer -B - Usability enhancement: + +B Usability enhancement: Rationalize next and undo. Make same as toolbar commands and have different commands for power users to assert/retract until point. + At the moment this is done by binding to the toolbar + commands, we need to remove these from proof-toolbar now. -A Usability enhancement: +B Usability enhancement: Have toolbar button/command to goto a point. Proof General itself should work out whether it's a retraction or advancement! -A Usability enhancement: - Add toolbar button for interrupting. - B Web pages: improve screenshots section to include a slideshow, or at least, a series of pictures of PG in action. (3 hours) C Nicety enhancement: - Add messages "retracting buffer ... done" "processing ... done". - This needs some call backs or setting of variables examined - by proof-done-{advancing,retracting} + Add messages "retracting buffer ... done" "processing ... done". + This needs some call backs or setting of variables examined + by proof-done-{advancing,retracting} D bug: outline mode when proof-strict-read-only is nil ought to work, but there may be problems. D bug: mentioned by Martin H. with Lego: "don't know what I should - be doing..." error when it shouldn't happen. + be doing..." error when it shouldn't happen. + [this item is useless without a more detailed description] C Improve Makefile.devel, Makefile, ProofGeneral.spec by abstracting ELISP_DIRS somehow. |
