aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/todo
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Aspinall1999-10-06 10:46:04 +0000
committerDavid Aspinall1999-10-06 10:46:04 +0000
commit7219b04037809c7e8538d3ba7a095101b6f50198 (patch)
tree982d2e68b6c934c6efa8e5a8d1abd211818d4ba6 /todo
parent59671e6efc4992445fe8ce4e05f70470828b3d64 (diff)
Admin changes for version 2.2.
Diffstat (limited to 'todo')
-rw-r--r--todo28
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/todo b/todo
index 54e94bf5..d1407c24 100644
--- a/todo
+++ b/todo
@@ -71,16 +71,20 @@ C Internal improvements for marking up proof assistant output.
characters.
Maybe using x-symbol would give another approximation, too, although
I'm put off that because it's not so standardly a part of XEmacs yet.
+ Or maybe w3's code for HTML mark up could be borrowed.
C Usability enhancement:
Enable toolbar in other PG buffers. Should switch to active
scripting buffer first if it is non current.
- (In fact, a sensible subset of scripting commands would
- work from other buffers).
+ In fact, a sensible subset of scripting commands would
+ work from other buffers.
+ This suggestion is based on observation of a user's
+ confusion when the toolbar disappears from other PG buffers.
X Compatibility enhancement:
- Consider sending comments to proof process after all. They might
contain special (e.g. LaTeX) directives or something.
+ Probably only worth considering if/when it becomes a problem.
A Usability enhancement:
Movement of point after assert/retract commands
@@ -92,33 +96,33 @@ A Usability enhancement:
Optional argument to delete region should be removed
from C-c C-u, pressing quickly in succession can delete
from buffer
-B
- Usability enhancement:
+
+B Usability enhancement:
Rationalize next and undo. Make same as toolbar
commands and have different commands for power users
to assert/retract until point.
+ At the moment this is done by binding to the toolbar
+ commands, we need to remove these from proof-toolbar now.
-A Usability enhancement:
+B Usability enhancement:
Have toolbar button/command to goto a point.
Proof General itself should work out whether it's a
retraction or advancement!
-A Usability enhancement:
- Add toolbar button for interrupting.
-
B Web pages: improve screenshots section to include a slideshow, or
at least, a series of pictures of PG in action. (3 hours)
C Nicety enhancement:
- Add messages "retracting buffer ... done" "processing ... done".
- This needs some call backs or setting of variables examined
- by proof-done-{advancing,retracting}
+ Add messages "retracting buffer ... done" "processing ... done".
+ This needs some call backs or setting of variables examined
+ by proof-done-{advancing,retracting}
D bug: outline mode when proof-strict-read-only is nil ought to
work, but there may be problems.
D bug: mentioned by Martin H. with Lego: "don't know what I should
- be doing..." error when it shouldn't happen.
+ be doing..." error when it shouldn't happen.
+ [this item is useless without a more detailed description]
C Improve Makefile.devel, Makefile, ProofGeneral.spec by abstracting
ELISP_DIRS somehow.