aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid Aspinall1998-12-16 17:13:19 +0000
committerDavid Aspinall1998-12-16 17:13:19 +0000
commit94b921351b5b17c862dbe73381ae8f82fe48637f (patch)
treec693d380fca012335e486cfceb0fe098569c62f6
parent08c364779316eb9ae4c08dd27a7a576f30bca0c3 (diff)
Made outstanding bugs we haven't investigated a single A item.
-rw-r--r--todo18
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/todo b/todo
index 5ea436a7..c03d8eff 100644
--- a/todo
+++ b/todo
@@ -26,8 +26,16 @@ B Polish ProofGeneral.texi and publish LaTeX version as an LFCS
* New line after first sentence of docstrings.
* Several env variables / LEGO name stuff:: make `STUFF' be literal.
-B outline mode when proof-strict-read-only is nil ought to
- work, but there may be problems.
+A BUGS to investigate:
+ - Is there a catch bug on Solaris when a process shell killed?
+ - There is a bizarre process bug with "\"'s on 254th character.
+ This now seems to be the root cause of the Solaris bug mentioned
+ later, and might be XEmacs rather than Solaris.
+ - Thomas has a bizarre .emacs file which causes Seg Faults with
+ Proof General and FSF Emacs. Doesn't happen with "emacs -q".
+ Investigate which package/setting he adds is to blame.
+ - outline mode when proof-strict-read-only is nil ought to
+ work, but there may be problems.
B QUESTION: why do we have proof-shell-proof-completed-regexp's
perhaps objectionable behaviour of forcing the response buffer?
@@ -36,12 +44,6 @@ B QUESTION: why do we have proof-shell-proof-completed-regexp's
completed proof message to appear in the goals buffer since it's
marked up as a proof state output)
-B Is there a catch bug on Solaris when a process shell killed?
-
-B There is a bizarre process bug with "\"'s on 254th character.
- This seems to be the root cause of the Solaris bug mentioned
- later, and might be XEmacs rather than Solaris.
-
B proof-shell-exit has a time delay of 10 secs built-in,
before which the process is killed off.
This should be configurable to allow for proof assistants