aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories/Reals/Abstract/ConstructiveLimits.v
blob: 64dcd2e1ec0fa54161f1ba6994871cbc9a2c8035 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
(************************************************************************)
(*         *   The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team       *)
(*  v      *   INRIA, CNRS and contributors - Copyright 1999-2019       *)
(* <O___,, *       (see CREDITS file for the list of authors)           *)
(*   \VV/  **************************************************************)
(*    //   *    This file is distributed under the terms of the         *)
(*         *     GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1          *)
(*         *     (see LICENSE file for the text of the license)         *)
(************************************************************************)

Require Import QArith Qabs.
Require Import ConstructiveReals.
Require Import ConstructiveAbs.
Require Import ConstructiveSum.

Local Open Scope ConstructiveReals.


(** Definitions and basic properties of limits of real sequences
    and series. *)


Lemma CR_cv_extens
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (xn yn : nat -> CRcarrier R) (l : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, xn n == yn n)
    -> CR_cv R xn l
    -> CR_cv R yn l.
Proof.
  intros. intro p. specialize (H0 p) as [n nmaj]. exists n.
  intros. specialize (nmaj i H0).
  apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (CRminus R (xn i) l))).
  2: exact nmaj. rewrite <- CRabs_def. split.
  - apply (CRle_trans _ (CRminus R (xn i) l)).
    apply CRplus_le_compat_r. specialize (H i) as [H _]. exact H.
    pose proof (CRabs_def R (CRminus R (xn i) l) (CRabs R (CRminus R (xn i) l)))
      as [_ H1].
    apply H1. apply CRle_refl.
  - apply (CRle_trans _ (CRopp R (CRminus R (xn i) l))).
    intro abs. apply CRopp_lt_cancel, CRplus_lt_reg_r in abs.
    specialize (H i) as [_ H]. contradiction.
    pose proof (CRabs_def R (CRminus R (xn i) l) (CRabs R (CRminus R (xn i) l)))
      as [_ H1].
    apply H1. apply CRle_refl.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_opp : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (xn : nat -> CRcarrier R) (l : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R xn l
    -> CR_cv R (fun n => - xn n) (- l).
Proof.
  intros. intro p. specialize (H p) as [n nmaj].
  exists n. intros. specialize (nmaj i H).
  apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (CRminus R (xn i) l))).
  2: exact nmaj. clear nmaj H.
  unfold CRminus. rewrite <- CRopp_plus_distr, CRabs_opp.
  apply CRle_refl.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_plus : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (xn yn : nat -> CRcarrier R) (a b : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R xn a
    -> CR_cv R yn b
    -> CR_cv R (fun n => xn n + yn n) (a + b).
Proof.
  intros. intro p.
  specialize (H (2*p)%positive) as [i imaj].
  specialize (H0 (2*p)%positive) as [j jmaj].
  exists (max i j). intros.
  apply (CRle_trans
           _ (CRabs R (CRplus R (CRminus R (xn i0) a) (CRminus R (yn i0) b)))).
  apply CRabs_morph.
  - unfold CRminus.
    do 2 rewrite <- (Radd_assoc (CRisRing R)).
    apply CRplus_morph. reflexivity. rewrite CRopp_plus_distr.
    destruct (CRisRing R). rewrite Radd_comm, <- Radd_assoc.
    apply CRplus_morph. reflexivity.
    rewrite Radd_comm. reflexivity.
  - apply (CRle_trans _ _ _ (CRabs_triang _ _)).
    apply (CRle_trans _ (CRplus R (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2*p)) (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2*p)))).
    apply CRplus_le_compat. apply imaj, (le_trans _ _ _ (Nat.le_max_l _ _) H).
    apply jmaj, (le_trans _ _ _ (Nat.le_max_r _ _) H).
    apply (CRle_trans _ (CR_of_Q R ((1 # 2 * p) + (1 # 2 * p)))).
    apply CR_of_Q_plus. apply CR_of_Q_le.
    rewrite Qinv_plus_distr. setoid_replace (1 + 1 # 2 * p) with (1 # p).
    apply Qle_refl. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_unique : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (xn : nat -> CRcarrier R)
                       (a b : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R xn a
    -> CR_cv R xn b
    -> a == b.
Proof.
  intros. assert (CR_cv R (fun _ => 0) (CRminus R b a)).
  { apply (CR_cv_extens (fun n => CRminus R (xn n) (xn n))).
    intro n. unfold CRminus. apply CRplus_opp_r.
    apply CR_cv_plus. exact H0. apply CR_cv_opp, H. }
  assert (forall q r : Q, 0 < q -> / q < r -> 1 < q * r)%Q.
  { intros. apply (Qmult_lt_l _ _ q) in H3.
    rewrite Qmult_inv_r in H3. exact H3. intro abs.
    rewrite abs in H2. exact (Qlt_irrefl 0 H2). exact H2. }
  clear H H0 xn. remember (CRminus R b a) as z.
  assert (z == 0). split.
  - intro abs. destruct (CR_Q_dense R _ _ abs) as [q [H0 H]].
    destruct (Qarchimedean (/(-q))) as [p pmaj].
    specialize (H1 p) as [n nmaj].
    specialize (nmaj n (le_refl n)). apply nmaj.
    apply (CRlt_trans _ (CR_of_Q R (-q))). apply CR_of_Q_lt.
    apply H2 in pmaj.
    apply (Qmult_lt_r _ _ (1#p)) in pmaj. 2: reflexivity.
    rewrite Qmult_1_l, <- Qmult_assoc in pmaj.
    setoid_replace ((Z.pos p # 1) * (1 # p))%Q with 1%Q in pmaj.
    rewrite Qmult_1_r in pmaj. exact pmaj. unfold Qeq, Qnum, Qden; simpl.
    do 2 rewrite Pos.mul_1_r. reflexivity.
    apply (Qplus_lt_l _ _ q). ring_simplify.
    apply (lt_CR_of_Q R q 0). exact H.
    apply (CRlt_le_trans _ (CRopp R z)).
    apply (CRle_lt_trans _ (CRopp R (CR_of_Q R q))). apply CR_of_Q_opp.
    apply CRopp_gt_lt_contravar, H0.
    apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (CRopp R z))).
    pose proof (CRabs_def R (CRopp R z) (CRabs R (CRopp R z))) as [_ H1].
    apply H1, CRle_refl.
    apply CRabs_morph. unfold CRminus. symmetry. apply CRplus_0_l.
  - intro abs. destruct (CR_Q_dense R _ _ abs) as [q [H0 H]].
    destruct (Qarchimedean (/q)) as [p pmaj].
    specialize (H1 p) as [n nmaj].
    specialize (nmaj n (le_refl n)). apply nmaj.
    apply (CRlt_trans _ (CR_of_Q R q)). apply CR_of_Q_lt.
    apply H2 in pmaj.
    apply (Qmult_lt_r _ _ (1#p)) in pmaj. 2: reflexivity.
    rewrite Qmult_1_l, <- Qmult_assoc in pmaj.
    setoid_replace ((Z.pos p # 1) * (1 # p))%Q with 1%Q in pmaj.
    rewrite Qmult_1_r in pmaj. exact pmaj. unfold Qeq, Qnum, Qden; simpl.
    do 2 rewrite Pos.mul_1_r. reflexivity.
    apply (lt_CR_of_Q R 0 q). exact H0.
    apply (CRlt_le_trans _ _ _ H).
    apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (CRopp R z))).
    apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R z)).
    pose proof (CRabs_def R z (CRabs R z)) as [_ H1].
    apply H1. apply CRle_refl. apply CRabs_opp.
    apply CRabs_morph. unfold CRminus. symmetry. apply CRplus_0_l.
  - subst z. apply (CRplus_eq_reg_l (CRopp R a)).
    rewrite CRplus_opp_l, CRplus_comm. symmetry. exact H.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_eq : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                   (v u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, u n == v n)
    -> CR_cv R u s
    -> CR_cv R v s.
Proof.
  intros R v u s seq H1 p. specialize (H1 p) as [N H0].
  exists N. intros. unfold CRminus. rewrite <- seq. apply H0, H.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cauchy_eq : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                       (un vn : nat -> CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, un n == vn n)
    -> CR_cauchy R un
    -> CR_cauchy R vn.
Proof.
  intros. intro p. specialize (H0 p) as [n H0].
  exists n. intros. specialize (H0 i j H1 H2).
  unfold CRminus in H0. rewrite <- CRabs_def.
  rewrite <- CRabs_def in H0.
  do 2 rewrite H in H0. exact H0.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_proper : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                       (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (a b : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R un a
    -> a == b
    -> CR_cv R un b.
Proof.
  intros. intro p. specialize (H p) as [n H].
  exists n. intros. unfold CRminus. rewrite <- H0. apply H, H1.
Qed.

Instance CR_cv_morph
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (un : nat -> CRcarrier R), CMorphisms.Proper
      (CMorphisms.respectful (CReq R) CRelationClasses.iffT) (CR_cv R un).
Proof.
  split. intros. apply (CR_cv_proper un x). exact H0. exact H.
  intros. apply (CR_cv_proper un y). exact H0. symmetry. exact H.
Qed.

Lemma Un_cv_nat_real : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                         (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (l : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R un l
    -> forall eps : CRcarrier R,
      0 < eps
      -> { p : nat & forall i:nat, le p i -> CRabs R (un i - l) < eps }.
Proof.
  intros. destruct (CR_archimedean R (CRinv R eps (inr H0))) as [k kmaj].
  assert (0 < CR_of_Q R (Z.pos k # 1)).
  { apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity. }
  specialize (H k) as [p pmaj].
  exists p. intros.
  apply (CRle_lt_trans _ (CR_of_Q R (1 # k))).
  apply pmaj, H.
  apply (CRmult_lt_reg_l (CR_of_Q R (Z.pos k # 1))). exact H1.
  rewrite <- CR_of_Q_mult.
  apply (CRle_lt_trans _ 1).
  apply CR_of_Q_le.
  unfold Qle; simpl. do 2 rewrite Pos.mul_1_r. apply Z.le_refl.
  apply (CRmult_lt_reg_r (CRinv R eps (inr H0))).
  apply CRinv_0_lt_compat, H0. rewrite CRmult_1_l, CRmult_assoc.
  rewrite CRinv_r, CRmult_1_r. exact kmaj.
Qed.

Lemma Un_cv_real_nat : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                         (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (l : CRcarrier R),
    (forall eps : CRcarrier R,
      0 < eps
      -> { p : nat & forall i:nat, le p i -> CRabs R (un i - l) < eps })
    -> CR_cv R un l.
Proof.
  intros. intros n.
  specialize (H (CR_of_Q R (1#n))) as [p pmaj].
  apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity.
  exists p. intros. apply CRlt_asym. apply pmaj. apply H.
Qed.

Definition series_cv {R : ConstructiveReals}
           (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R) : Set
  := CR_cv R (CRsum un) s.

Definition series_cv_lim_lt {R : ConstructiveReals}
           (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (x : CRcarrier R) : Set
  := { l : CRcarrier R & prod (series_cv un l) (l < x) }.

Definition series_cv_le_lim {R : ConstructiveReals}
           (x : CRcarrier R) (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) : Set
  := { l : CRcarrier R & prod (series_cv un l) (x <= l) }.

Lemma CR_cv_minus :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
    (An Bn:nat -> CRcarrier R) (l1 l2:CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R An l1 -> CR_cv R Bn l2
    -> CR_cv R (fun i:nat => An i - Bn i) (l1 - l2).
Proof.
  intros. apply CR_cv_plus. apply H.
  intros p. specialize (H0 p) as [n H0]. exists n.
  intros. setoid_replace (- Bn i - - l2) with (- (Bn i - l2)).
  rewrite CRabs_opp. apply H0, H1. unfold CRminus.
  rewrite CRopp_plus_distr, CRopp_involutive. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_nonneg :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (An:nat -> CRcarrier R) (l:CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R An l
    -> (forall n:nat, 0 <= An n)
    -> 0 <= l.
Proof.
  intros. intro abs.
  destruct (Un_cv_nat_real _ l H (-l)) as [N H1].
  rewrite <- CRopp_0. apply CRopp_gt_lt_contravar. apply abs.
  specialize (H1 N (le_refl N)).
  pose proof (CRabs_def R (An N - l) (CRabs R (An N - l))) as [_ H2].
  apply (CRle_lt_trans _ _ _ (CRle_abs _)) in H1.
  apply (H0 N). apply (CRplus_lt_reg_r (-l)).
  rewrite CRplus_0_l. exact H1.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_unique :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (Un:nat -> CRcarrier R) (l1 l2:CRcarrier R),
    series_cv Un l1 -> series_cv Un l2 -> l1 == l2.
Proof.
  intros. apply (CR_cv_unique (CRsum Un)); assumption.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_scale : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (u : nat -> CRcarrier R)
                      (a : CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R u s -> CR_cv R (fun n => u n * a) (s * a).
Proof.
  intros. intros n.
  destruct (CR_archimedean R (1 + CRabs R a)).
  destruct (H (n * x)%positive).
  exists x0. intros.
  unfold CRminus. rewrite CRopp_mult_distr_l.
  rewrite <- CRmult_plus_distr_r.
  apply (CRle_trans _ ((CR_of_Q R (1 # n * x)) * CRabs R a)).
  rewrite CRabs_mult. apply CRmult_le_compat_r. apply CRabs_pos.
  apply c0, H0.
  setoid_replace (1 # n * x)%Q with ((1 # n) *(1# x))%Q. 2: reflexivity.
  rewrite <- (CRmult_1_r (CR_of_Q R (1#n))).
  rewrite CR_of_Q_mult, CRmult_assoc.
  apply CRmult_le_compat_l.
  apply CR_of_Q_le. discriminate. intro abs.
  apply (CRmult_lt_compat_l (CR_of_Q R (Z.pos x #1))) in abs.
  rewrite CRmult_1_r, <- CRmult_assoc, <- CR_of_Q_mult in abs.
  rewrite (CR_of_Q_morph R ((Z.pos x # 1) * (1 # x))%Q 1%Q) in abs.
  rewrite CRmult_1_l in abs.
  apply (CRlt_asym _ _ abs), (CRlt_trans _ (1 + CRabs R a)).
  2: exact c. rewrite <- CRplus_0_l, <- CRplus_assoc.
  apply CRplus_lt_compat_r. rewrite CRplus_0_r. apply CRzero_lt_one.
  unfold Qmult, Qeq, Qnum, Qden. ring_simplify. rewrite Pos.mul_1_l.
  reflexivity.
  apply (CRlt_trans _ (1+CRabs R a)). 2: exact c.
  rewrite CRplus_comm.
  rewrite <- (CRplus_0_r 0). apply CRplus_le_lt_compat.
  apply CRabs_pos. apply CRzero_lt_one.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_const : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (a : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R (fun n => a) a.
Proof.
  intros a p. exists O. intros.
  unfold CRminus. rewrite CRplus_opp_r.
  rewrite CRabs_right.
  apply CR_of_Q_le. discriminate. apply CRle_refl.
Qed.

Lemma Rcv_cauchy_mod : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                         (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (l : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R un l -> CR_cauchy R un.
Proof.
  intros. intros p. specialize (H (2*p)%positive) as [k H].
  exists k. intros n q H0 H1.
  setoid_replace (1#p)%Q with ((1#2*p) + (1#2*p))%Q.
  rewrite CR_of_Q_plus.
  setoid_replace (un n - un q) with ((un n - l) - (un q - l)).
  apply (CRle_trans _ _ _ (CRabs_triang _ _)).
  apply CRplus_le_compat.
  - apply H, H0.
  - rewrite CRabs_opp. apply H. apply H1.
  - unfold CRminus. rewrite CRplus_assoc. apply CRplus_morph.
    reflexivity. rewrite CRplus_comm, CRopp_plus_distr, CRopp_involutive.
    rewrite CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_r. reflexivity.
  - rewrite Qinv_plus_distr. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_eq : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                       (u v : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, u n == v n)
    -> series_cv u s
    -> series_cv v s.
Proof.
  intros. intros p. specialize (H0 p). destruct H0 as [N H0].
  exists N. intros. unfold CRminus.
  rewrite <- (CRsum_eq u). apply H0, H1. intros. apply H.
Qed.

Lemma CR_growing_transit : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (un : nat -> CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, un n <= un (S n))
    -> forall n p : nat, le n p -> un n <= un p.
Proof.
  induction p.
  - intros. inversion H0. apply CRle_refl.
  - intros. apply Nat.le_succ_r in H0. destruct H0.
    apply (CRle_trans _ (un p)). apply IHp, H0. apply H.
    subst n. apply CRle_refl.
Qed.

Lemma growing_ineq :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (Un:nat -> CRcarrier R) (l:CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, Un n <= Un (S n))
    -> CR_cv R Un l -> forall n:nat, Un n <= l.
Proof.
  intros. intro abs.
  destruct (Un_cv_nat_real _ l H0 (Un n - l)) as [N H1].
  rewrite <- (CRplus_opp_r l). apply CRplus_lt_compat_r. exact abs.
  specialize (H1 (max n N) (Nat.le_max_r _ _)).
  apply (CRle_lt_trans _ _ _ (CRle_abs _)) in H1.
  apply CRplus_lt_reg_r in H1.
  apply (CR_growing_transit Un H n (max n N)). apply Nat.le_max_l.
  exact H1.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_open_below
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
      (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (m l : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R un l
    -> m < l
    -> { n : nat & forall i:nat, le n i -> m < un i }.
Proof.
  intros. apply CRlt_minus in H0.
  pose proof (Un_cv_nat_real _ l H (l-m) H0) as [n nmaj].
  exists n. intros. specialize (nmaj i H1).
  apply CRabs_lt in nmaj.
  destruct nmaj as [_ nmaj]. unfold CRminus in nmaj.
  rewrite CRopp_plus_distr, CRopp_involutive, CRplus_comm in nmaj.
  apply CRplus_lt_reg_l in nmaj.
  apply (CRplus_lt_reg_l R (-m)). rewrite CRplus_opp_l.
  apply (CRplus_lt_reg_r (-un i)). rewrite CRplus_0_l.
  rewrite CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_r. exact nmaj.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_open_above
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
      (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (m l : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R un l
    -> l < m
    -> { n : nat & forall i:nat, le n i -> un i < m }.
Proof.
  intros. apply CRlt_minus in H0.
  pose proof (Un_cv_nat_real _ l H (m-l) H0) as [n nmaj].
  exists n. intros. specialize (nmaj i H1).
  apply CRabs_lt in nmaj.
  destruct nmaj as [nmaj _]. apply CRplus_lt_reg_r in nmaj.
  exact nmaj.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_bound_down : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                           (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (A l : CRcarrier R) (N : nat),
    (forall n:nat, le N n -> A <= u n)
    -> CR_cv R u l
    -> A <= l.
Proof.
  intros. intro r.
  apply (CRplus_lt_compat_r (-l)) in r. rewrite CRplus_opp_r in r.
  destruct (Un_cv_nat_real _ l H0 (A - l) r) as [n H1].
  apply (H (n+N)%nat).
  rewrite <- (plus_0_l N). rewrite Nat.add_assoc.
  apply Nat.add_le_mono_r. apply le_0_n.
  specialize (H1 (n+N)%nat). apply (CRplus_lt_reg_r (-l)).
  assert (n + N >= n)%nat. rewrite <- (plus_0_r n). rewrite <- plus_assoc.
  apply Nat.add_le_mono_l. apply le_0_n. specialize (H1 H2).
  apply (CRle_lt_trans _ (CRabs R (u (n + N)%nat - l))).
  apply CRle_abs. assumption.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_bound_up : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                         (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (A l : CRcarrier R) (N : nat),
    (forall n:nat, le N n -> u n <= A)
    -> CR_cv R u l
    -> l <= A.
Proof.
  intros. intro r.
  apply (CRplus_lt_compat_r (-A)) in r. rewrite CRplus_opp_r in r.
  destruct (Un_cv_nat_real _ l H0 (l-A) r) as [n H1].
  apply (H (n+N)%nat).
  - rewrite <- (plus_0_l N). apply Nat.add_le_mono_r. apply le_0_n.
  - specialize (H1 (n+N)%nat). apply (CRplus_lt_reg_l R (l - A - u (n+N)%nat)).
    unfold CRminus. repeat rewrite CRplus_assoc.
    rewrite CRplus_opp_l, CRplus_0_r, (CRplus_comm (-A)).
    rewrite CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_r.
    apply (CRle_lt_trans _ _ _ (CRle_abs _)).
    fold (l - u (n+N)%nat). rewrite CRabs_minus_sym. apply H1.
    rewrite <- (plus_0_r n). rewrite <- plus_assoc.
    apply Nat.add_le_mono_l. apply le_0_n.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_maj : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                        (un vn : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, CRabs R (un n) <= vn n)
    -> series_cv vn s
    -> { l : CRcarrier R & prod (series_cv un l) (l <= s) }.
Proof.
  intros. destruct (CR_complete R (CRsum un)).
  - intros n.
    specialize (H0 (2*n)%positive) as [N maj].
    exists N. intros i j H0 H1.
    apply (CRle_trans _ (CRsum vn (max i j) - CRsum vn (min i j))).
    apply Abs_sum_maj. apply H.
    setoid_replace (CRsum vn (max i j) - CRsum vn (min i j))
      with (CRabs R (CRsum vn (max i j) - (CRsum vn (min i j)))).
    setoid_replace (CRsum vn (Init.Nat.max i j) - CRsum vn (Init.Nat.min i j))
      with (CRsum vn (Init.Nat.max i j) - s - (CRsum vn (Init.Nat.min i j) - s)).
    apply (CRle_trans _ _ _ (CRabs_triang _ _)).
    setoid_replace (1#n)%Q with ((1#2*n) + (1#2*n))%Q.
    rewrite CR_of_Q_plus.
    apply CRplus_le_compat.
    apply maj. apply (le_trans _ i). assumption. apply Nat.le_max_l.
    rewrite CRabs_opp. apply maj.
    apply Nat.min_case. apply (le_trans _ i). assumption. apply le_refl.
    assumption. rewrite Qinv_plus_distr. reflexivity.
    unfold CRminus. rewrite CRplus_assoc. apply CRplus_morph.
    reflexivity. rewrite CRopp_plus_distr, CRopp_involutive.
    rewrite CRplus_comm, CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_r.
    reflexivity.
    rewrite CRabs_right. reflexivity.
    rewrite <- (CRplus_opp_r (CRsum vn (Init.Nat.min i j))).
    apply CRplus_le_compat. apply pos_sum_more.
    intros. apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (un k))). apply CRabs_pos.
    apply H. apply (le_trans _ i). apply Nat.le_min_l. apply Nat.le_max_l.
    apply CRle_refl.
  - exists x. split. assumption.
    (* x <= s *)
    apply (CRplus_le_reg_r (-x)). rewrite CRplus_opp_r.
    apply (CR_cv_bound_down (fun n => CRsum vn n - CRsum un n) _ _ 0).
    intros. rewrite <- (CRplus_opp_r (CRsum un n)).
    apply CRplus_le_compat. apply sum_Rle.
    intros. apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (un k))).
    apply CRle_abs. apply H. apply CRle_refl.
    apply CR_cv_plus. assumption.
    apply CR_cv_opp. assumption.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_abs_lt
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (un vn : nat -> CRcarrier R) (l : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, CRabs R (un n) <= vn n)
    -> series_cv_lim_lt vn l
    -> series_cv_lim_lt un l.
Proof.
  intros. destruct H0 as [x [H0 H1]].
  destruct (series_cv_maj un vn x H H0) as [x0 H2].
  exists x0. split. apply H2. apply (CRle_lt_trans _ x).
  apply H2. apply H1.
Qed.

Definition series_cv_abs {R : ConstructiveReals} (u : nat -> CRcarrier R)
  : CR_cauchy R (CRsum (fun n => CRabs R (u n)))
    -> { l : CRcarrier R & series_cv u l }.
Proof.
  intros. apply CR_complete in H. destruct H.
  destruct (series_cv_maj u (fun k => CRabs R (u k)) x).
  intro n. apply CRle_refl. assumption. exists x0. apply p.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_abs_eq
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (a : CRcarrier R)
           (cau : CR_cauchy R (CRsum (fun n => CRabs R (u n)))),
    series_cv u a
    -> (a == (let (l,_):= series_cv_abs u cau in l))%ConstructiveReals.
Proof.
  intros. destruct (series_cv_abs u cau).
  apply (series_cv_unique u). exact H. exact s.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_abs_cv
  : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (u : nat -> CRcarrier R)
           (cau : CR_cauchy R (CRsum (fun n => CRabs R (u n)))),
    series_cv u (let (l,_):= series_cv_abs u cau in l).
Proof.
  intros. destruct (series_cv_abs u cau). exact s.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_opp : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                        (s : CRcarrier R) (u : nat -> CRcarrier R),
    series_cv u s
    -> series_cv (fun n => - u n) (- s).
Proof.
  intros. intros p. specialize (H p) as [N H].
  exists N. intros n H0.
  setoid_replace (CRsum (fun n0 : nat => - u n0) n - - s)
    with (-(CRsum (fun n0 : nat => u n0) n - s)).
  rewrite CRabs_opp.
  apply H, H0. unfold CRminus.
  rewrite sum_opp. rewrite CRopp_plus_distr. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_scale : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                          (a : CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R) (u : nat -> CRcarrier R),
    series_cv u s
    -> series_cv (fun n => (u n) * a) (s * a).
Proof.
  intros.
  apply (CR_cv_eq _ (fun n => CRsum u n * a)).
  intro n. rewrite sum_scale. reflexivity. apply CR_cv_scale, H.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_plus : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                         (u v : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s t : CRcarrier R),
    series_cv u s
    -> series_cv v t
    -> series_cv (fun n => u n + v n) (s + t).
Proof.
  intros. apply (CR_cv_eq _ (fun n => CRsum u n + CRsum v n)).
  intro n. symmetry. apply sum_plus. apply CR_cv_plus. exact H. exact H0.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_nonneg : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                           (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, 0 <= u n) -> series_cv u s -> 0 <= s.
Proof.
  intros. apply (CRle_trans 0 (CRsum u 0)). apply H.
  apply (growing_ineq (CRsum u)). intro n. simpl.
  rewrite <- CRplus_0_r. apply CRplus_le_compat.
  rewrite CRplus_0_r. apply CRle_refl. apply H. apply H0.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_le : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                   (u v : nat -> CRcarrier R) (a b : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, u n <= v n)
    -> CR_cv R u a
    -> CR_cv R v b
    -> a <= b.
Proof.
  intros. apply (CRplus_le_reg_r (-a)). rewrite CRplus_opp_r.
  apply (CR_cv_bound_down (fun i:nat => v i - u i) _ _ 0).
  intros. rewrite <- (CRplus_opp_l (u n)).
  unfold CRminus.
  rewrite (CRplus_comm (v n)). apply CRplus_le_compat_l.
  apply H. apply CR_cv_plus. exact H1. apply CR_cv_opp, H0.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_abs_cont : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                         (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R u s
    -> CR_cv R (fun n => CRabs R (u n)) (CRabs R s).
Proof.
  intros. intros eps. specialize (H eps) as [N lim].
  exists N. intros n H.
  apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (u n - s))). apply CRabs_triang_inv2.
  apply lim. assumption.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_dist_cont : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                          (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (a s : CRcarrier R),
    CR_cv R u s
    -> CR_cv R (fun n => CRabs R (a - u n)) (CRabs R (a - s)).
Proof.
  intros. apply CR_cv_abs_cont.
  intros eps. specialize (H eps) as [N lim].
  exists N. intros n H.
  setoid_replace (a - u n - (a - s)) with (s - (u n)).
  specialize (lim n).
  rewrite CRabs_minus_sym.
  apply lim. assumption.
  unfold CRminus. rewrite CRopp_plus_distr, CRopp_involutive.
  rewrite (CRplus_comm a), (CRplus_comm s).
  rewrite CRplus_assoc. apply CRplus_morph. reflexivity.
  rewrite <- CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_l. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_triangle : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                             (u : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s sAbs : CRcarrier R),
    series_cv u s
    -> series_cv (fun n => CRabs R (u n)) sAbs
    -> CRabs R s <= sAbs.
Proof.
  intros.
  apply (CR_cv_le (fun n => CRabs R (CRsum u n))
                   (CRsum (fun n => CRabs R (u n)))).
  intros. apply multiTriangleIneg. apply CR_cv_abs_cont. assumption. assumption.
Qed.

Lemma CR_double : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (x:CRcarrier R),
    CR_of_Q R 2 * x == x + x.
Proof.
  intros R x. rewrite (CR_of_Q_morph R 2 (1+1)).
  2: reflexivity. rewrite CR_of_Q_plus.
  rewrite CRmult_plus_distr_r, CRmult_1_l. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma GeoCvZero : forall {R : ConstructiveReals},
    CR_cv R (fun n:nat => CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1#2)) n) 0.
Proof.
  intro R. assert (forall n:nat, INR n < CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) n).
  { induction n. unfold INR; simpl.
    apply CRzero_lt_one. unfold INR. fold (1+n)%nat.
    rewrite Nat2Z.inj_add.
    rewrite (CR_of_Q_morph R _ ((Z.of_nat 1 # 1) + (Z.of_nat n #1))).
    2: symmetry; apply Qinv_plus_distr.
    rewrite CR_of_Q_plus.
    replace (CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) (1 + n))
      with (CR_of_Q R 2 * CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) n).
    2: reflexivity. rewrite CR_double.
    apply CRplus_le_lt_compat.
    2: exact IHn. simpl.
    apply pow_R1_Rle. apply CR_of_Q_le. discriminate. }
  intros p. exists (Pos.to_nat p). intros.
  unfold CRminus. rewrite CRopp_0. rewrite CRplus_0_r.
  rewrite CRabs_right.
  2: apply pow_le; apply CR_of_Q_le; discriminate.
  apply CRlt_asym.
  apply (CRmult_lt_reg_l (CR_of_Q R (Z.pos p # 1))).
  apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity. rewrite <- CR_of_Q_mult.
  rewrite (CR_of_Q_morph R ((Z.pos p # 1) * (1 # p)) 1).
  2: unfold Qmult, Qeq, Qnum, Qden; ring_simplify; reflexivity.
  apply (CRmult_lt_reg_r (CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) i)).
  apply pow_lt. simpl.
  apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity.
  rewrite CRmult_assoc. rewrite pow_mult.
  rewrite (pow_proper (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2) * CR_of_Q R 2) 1), pow_one.
  rewrite CRmult_1_r, CRmult_1_l.
  apply (CRle_lt_trans _ (INR i)). 2: exact (H i). clear H.
  apply CR_of_Q_le. unfold Qle,Qnum,Qden.
  do 2 rewrite Z.mul_1_r.
  rewrite <- positive_nat_Z. apply Nat2Z.inj_le, H0.
  rewrite <- CR_of_Q_mult. setoid_replace ((1#2)*2)%Q with 1%Q.
  reflexivity. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma GeoFiniteSum : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (n:nat),
    CRsum (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1#2))) n == CR_of_Q R 2 - CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1#2)) n.
Proof.
  induction n.
  - unfold CRsum, CRpow. simpl (1%ConstructiveReals).
    unfold CRminus. rewrite (CR_of_Q_plus R 1 1).
    rewrite CRplus_assoc.
    rewrite CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_r. reflexivity.
  - setoid_replace (CRsum (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2))) (S n))
      with (CRsum (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2))) n + CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) (S n)).
    2: reflexivity.
    rewrite IHn. clear IHn. unfold CRminus.
    rewrite CRplus_assoc. apply CRplus_morph. reflexivity.
    apply (CRplus_eq_reg_l
             (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) n + CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) (S n))).
    rewrite (CRplus_assoc _ _ (-CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) (S n))),
    CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_r.
    rewrite (CRplus_comm (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) n)), CRplus_assoc.
    rewrite <- (CRplus_assoc (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) n)), CRplus_opp_r,
    CRplus_0_l, <- CR_double.
    setoid_replace (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) (S n))
      with (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2) * CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) n).
    2: reflexivity.
    rewrite <- CRmult_assoc, <- CR_of_Q_mult.
    setoid_replace (2 * (1 # 2))%Q with 1%Q.
    apply CRmult_1_l. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma GeoHalfBelowTwo : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (n:nat),
    CRsum (CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1#2))) n < CR_of_Q R 2.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite <- (CRplus_0_r (CR_of_Q R 2)), GeoFiniteSum.
  apply CRplus_lt_compat_l. rewrite <- CRopp_0.
  apply CRopp_gt_lt_contravar.
  apply pow_lt. apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma GeoHalfTwo : forall {R : ConstructiveReals},
    series_cv (fun n => CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1#2)) n) (CR_of_Q R 2).
Proof.
  intro R.
  apply (CR_cv_eq _ (fun n => CR_of_Q R 2 - CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) n)).
  - intro n. rewrite GeoFiniteSum. reflexivity.
  - assert (forall n:nat, INR n < CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) n).
    { induction n. unfold INR; simpl.
      apply CRzero_lt_one. apply (CRlt_le_trans _ (CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) n + 1)).
      unfold INR.
      rewrite Nat2Z.inj_succ, <- Z.add_1_l.
      rewrite (CR_of_Q_morph R _ (1 + (Z.of_nat n #1))).
      2: symmetry; apply Qinv_plus_distr. rewrite CR_of_Q_plus.
      rewrite CRplus_comm.
      apply CRplus_lt_compat_r, IHn.
      setoid_replace (CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) (S n))
        with (CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) n + CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) n).
      apply CRplus_le_compat. apply CRle_refl.
      apply pow_R1_Rle. apply CR_of_Q_le. discriminate.
      rewrite <- CR_double. reflexivity. }
    intros n. exists (Pos.to_nat n). intros.
    setoid_replace (CR_of_Q R 2 - CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) i - CR_of_Q R 2)
      with (- CRpow (CR_of_Q R (1 # 2)) i).
    rewrite CRabs_opp. rewrite CRabs_right.
    assert (0 < CR_of_Q R 2).
    { apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity. }
    rewrite (pow_proper _ (CRinv R (CR_of_Q R 2) (inr H1))).
    rewrite pow_inv. apply CRlt_asym.
    apply (CRmult_lt_reg_l (CRpow (CR_of_Q R 2) i)). apply pow_lt, H1.
    rewrite CRinv_r.
    apply (CRmult_lt_reg_r (CR_of_Q R (Z.pos n#1))).
    apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity.
    rewrite CRmult_1_l, CRmult_assoc.
    rewrite <- CR_of_Q_mult.
    rewrite (CR_of_Q_morph R ((1 # n) * (Z.pos n # 1)) 1). 2: reflexivity.
    rewrite CRmult_1_r. apply (CRle_lt_trans _ (INR i)).
    2: apply H. apply CR_of_Q_le.
    unfold Qle, Qnum, Qden. do 2 rewrite Z.mul_1_r. destruct i.
    exfalso. inversion H0. pose proof (Pos2Nat.is_pos n).
    rewrite H3 in H2. inversion H2.
    apply Pos2Z.pos_le_pos. apply Pos2Nat.inj_le.
    apply (le_trans _ _ _ H0). rewrite SuccNat2Pos.id_succ. apply le_refl.
    apply (CRmult_eq_reg_l (CR_of_Q R 2)). right. exact H1.
    rewrite CRinv_r. rewrite <- CR_of_Q_mult.
    setoid_replace (2 * (1 # 2))%Q with 1%Q.
    reflexivity. reflexivity.
    apply CRlt_asym, pow_lt.
    apply CR_of_Q_lt. reflexivity.
    unfold CRminus. rewrite CRplus_comm, <- CRplus_assoc.
    rewrite CRplus_opp_l, CRplus_0_l. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_remainder_maj : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (u : nat -> CRcarrier R)
                                  (s eps : CRcarrier R)
                                  (N : nat),
    series_cv u s
    -> 0 < eps
    -> (forall n:nat, 0 <= u n)
    -> CRabs R (CRsum u N - s) <= eps
    -> forall n:nat, CRsum (fun k=> u (N + S k)%nat) n <= eps.
Proof.
  intros. pose proof (sum_assoc u N n).
  rewrite <- (CRsum_eq (fun k : nat => u (S N + k)%nat)).
  apply (CRplus_le_reg_l (CRsum u N)). rewrite <- H3.
  apply (CRle_trans _ s). apply growing_ineq.
  2: apply H.
  intro k. simpl. rewrite <- CRplus_0_r, CRplus_assoc.
  apply CRplus_le_compat_l. rewrite CRplus_0_l. apply H1.
  rewrite CRabs_minus_sym in H2.
  rewrite CRplus_comm. apply (CRplus_le_reg_r (-CRsum u N)).
  rewrite CRplus_assoc. rewrite CRplus_opp_r. rewrite CRplus_0_r.
  apply (CRle_trans _ (CRabs R (s - CRsum u N))). apply CRle_abs.
  assumption. intros. rewrite Nat.add_succ_r. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_abs_remainder : forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (u : nat -> CRcarrier R)
                                  (s sAbs : CRcarrier R)
                                  (n : nat),
    series_cv u s
    -> series_cv (fun n => CRabs R (u n)) sAbs
    -> CRabs R (CRsum u n - s)
      <= sAbs - CRsum (fun n => CRabs R (u n)) n.
Proof.
  intros.
  apply (CR_cv_le (fun N => CRabs R (CRsum u n - (CRsum u (n + N))))
                   (fun N => CRsum (fun n : nat => CRabs R (u n)) (n + N)
                          - CRsum (fun n : nat => CRabs R (u n)) n)).
  - intro N. destruct N. rewrite plus_0_r. unfold CRminus.
    rewrite CRplus_opp_r. rewrite CRplus_opp_r.
    rewrite CRabs_right. apply CRle_refl. apply CRle_refl.
    rewrite Nat.add_succ_r.
    replace (S (n + N)) with (S n + N)%nat. 2: reflexivity.
    unfold CRminus. rewrite sum_assoc. rewrite sum_assoc.
    rewrite CRopp_plus_distr.
    rewrite <- CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_r, CRplus_0_l, CRabs_opp.
    rewrite CRplus_comm, <- CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_l.
    rewrite CRplus_0_l. apply multiTriangleIneg.
  - apply CR_cv_dist_cont. intros eps.
    specialize (H eps) as [N lim].
    exists N. intros. rewrite plus_comm. apply lim. apply (le_trans N i).
    assumption. rewrite <- (plus_0_r i). rewrite <- plus_assoc.
    apply Nat.add_le_mono_l. apply le_0_n.
  - apply CR_cv_plus. 2: apply CR_cv_const. intros eps.
    specialize (H0 eps) as [N lim].
    exists N. intros. rewrite plus_comm. apply lim. apply (le_trans N i).
    assumption. rewrite <- (plus_0_r i). rewrite <- plus_assoc.
    apply Nat.add_le_mono_l. apply le_0_n.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_minus : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                          (u v : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s t : CRcarrier R),
    series_cv u s
    -> series_cv v t
    -> series_cv (fun n => u n - v n) (s - t).
Proof.
  intros. apply (CR_cv_eq _ (fun n => CRsum u n - CRsum v n)).
  intro n. symmetry. unfold CRminus. rewrite sum_plus.
  rewrite sum_opp. reflexivity.
  apply CR_cv_plus. exact H. apply CR_cv_opp. exact H0.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_le : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                       (un vn : nat -> CRcarrier R) (a b : CRcarrier R),
    (forall n:nat, un n <= vn n)
    -> series_cv un a
    -> series_cv vn b
    -> a <= b.
Proof.
  intros. apply (CRplus_le_reg_r (-a)). rewrite CRplus_opp_r.
  apply (series_cv_nonneg (fun n => vn n - un n)).
  intro n. apply (CRplus_le_reg_r (un n)).
  rewrite CRplus_0_l. unfold CRminus.
  rewrite CRplus_assoc, CRplus_opp_l, CRplus_0_r.
  apply H. apply series_cv_minus; assumption.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_series : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                           (u : nat -> nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : nat -> CRcarrier R) (n : nat),
    (forall i:nat, le i n -> series_cv (u i) (s i))
    -> series_cv (fun i => CRsum (fun j => u j i) n) (CRsum s n).
Proof.
  induction n.
  - intros. simpl. specialize (H O).
    apply (series_cv_eq (u O)). reflexivity. apply H. apply le_refl.
  - intros. simpl. apply (series_cv_plus). 2: apply (H (S n)).
    apply IHn. 2: apply le_refl. intros. apply H.
    apply (le_trans _ n _ H0). apply le_S. apply le_refl.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_shift :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals} f k l,
    CR_cv R (fun n => f (n + k)%nat) l -> CR_cv R f l.
Proof.
  intros. intros eps.
  specialize (H eps) as [N Nmaj].
  exists (N+k)%nat. intros n H.
  destruct (Nat.le_exists_sub k n).
  apply (le_trans _ (N + k)). 2: exact H.
  apply (le_trans _ (0 + k)). apply le_refl.
  rewrite <- Nat.add_le_mono_r. apply le_0_n.
  destruct H0.
  subst n. apply Nmaj. unfold ge in H.
  rewrite <- Nat.add_le_mono_r in H. exact H.
Qed.

Lemma CR_cv_shift' :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals} f k l,
    CR_cv R f l -> CR_cv R (fun n => f (n + k)%nat) l.
Proof.
  intros R f' k l cvf eps; destruct (cvf eps) as [N Pn].
  exists N; intros n nN; apply Pn; auto with arith.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_shift :
  forall {R : ConstructiveReals} (f : nat -> CRcarrier R) k l,
    series_cv (fun n => f (S k + n)%nat) l
    -> series_cv f (l + CRsum f k).
Proof.
  intros. intro p. specialize (H p) as [n nmaj].
  exists (S k+n)%nat. intros. destruct (Nat.le_exists_sub (S k) i).
  apply (le_trans _ (S k + 0)). rewrite Nat.add_0_r. apply le_refl.
  apply (le_trans _ (S k + n)). apply Nat.add_le_mono_l, le_0_n.
  exact H. destruct H0. subst i.
  rewrite Nat.add_comm in H. rewrite <- Nat.add_le_mono_r in H.
  specialize (nmaj x H). unfold CRminus.
  rewrite Nat.add_comm, (sum_assoc f k x).
  setoid_replace (CRsum f k + CRsum (fun k0 : nat => f (S k + k0)%nat) x - (l + CRsum f k))
    with (CRsum (fun k0 : nat => f (S k + k0)%nat) x - l).
  exact nmaj. unfold CRminus. rewrite (CRplus_comm (CRsum f k)).
  rewrite CRplus_assoc. apply CRplus_morph. reflexivity.
  rewrite CRplus_comm, CRopp_plus_distr, CRplus_assoc.
  rewrite CRplus_opp_l, CRplus_0_r. reflexivity.
Qed.

Lemma series_cv_shift' : forall {R : ConstructiveReals}
                           (un : nat -> CRcarrier R) (s : CRcarrier R) (shift : nat),
    series_cv un s
    -> series_cv (fun n => un (n+shift)%nat)
                       (s - match shift with
                            | O => 0
                            | S p => CRsum un p
                            end).
Proof.
  intros. destruct shift as [|p].
  - unfold CRminus. rewrite CRopp_0. rewrite CRplus_0_r.
    apply (series_cv_eq un). intros.
    rewrite plus_0_r. reflexivity. apply H.
  - apply (CR_cv_eq _ (fun n => CRsum un (n + S p) - CRsum un p)).
    intros. rewrite plus_comm. unfold CRminus.
    rewrite sum_assoc. simpl. rewrite CRplus_comm, <- CRplus_assoc.
    rewrite CRplus_opp_l, CRplus_0_l.
    apply CRsum_eq. intros. rewrite (plus_comm i). reflexivity.
    apply CR_cv_plus. apply (CR_cv_shift' _ (S p) _ H).
    intros n. exists (Pos.to_nat n). intros.
    unfold CRminus. simpl.
    rewrite CRopp_involutive, CRplus_opp_l. rewrite CRabs_right.
    apply CR_of_Q_le. discriminate. apply CRle_refl.
Qed.