1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
|
(************************************************************************)
(* v * The Coq Proof Assistant / The Coq Development Team *)
(* <O___,, * CNRS-Ecole Polytechnique-INRIA Futurs-Universite Paris Sud *)
(* \VV/ **************************************************************)
(* // * This file is distributed under the terms of the *)
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
(* Evgeny Makarov, INRIA, 2007 *)
(************************************************************************)
(*i i*)
Require Import BinPos.
Require Import NMinus.
(** Definitions *)
Inductive N : Set :=
| N0 : N
| Npos : positive -> N.
Definition succ n :=
match n with
| N0 => Npos 1
| Npos p => Npos (Psucc p)
end.
Definition pred (n : N) :=
match n with
| N0 => N0
| Npos p =>
match p with
| xH => N0
| _ => Npos (Ppred p)
end
end.
Definition plus n m :=
match n, m with
| N0, _ => m
| _, N0 => n
| Npos p, Npos q => Npos (p + q)
end.
Definition minus (n m : N) :=
match n, m with
| N0, _ => N0
| n, N0 => n
| Npos n', Npos m' =>
match Pminus_mask n' m' with
| IsPos p => Npos p
| _ => N0
end
end.
Definition times n m :=
match n, m with
| N0, _ => N0
| _, N0 => N0
| Npos p, Npos q => Npos (p * q)
end.
Definition Ncompare n m :=
match n, m with
| N0, N0 => Eq
| N0, Npos m' => Lt
| Npos n', N0 => Gt
| Npos n', Npos m' => (n' ?= m')%positive Eq
end.
Definition lt (x y : N) := (Ncompare x y) = Lt.
Definition le (x y : N) := (Ncompare x y) <> Gt.
Definition min (n m : N) :=
match Ncompare n m with
| Lt | Eq => n
| Gt => m
end.
Definition max (n m : N) :=
match Ncompare n m with
| Lt | Eq => m
| Gt => n
end.
Delimit Scope NatScope with Nat.
Bind Scope NatScope with N.
Notation "0" := N0 : NatScope.
Notation "1" := (Npos xH) : NatScope.
Infix "+" := plus : NatScope.
Infix "-" := minus : NatScope.
Infix "*" := times : NatScope.
Infix "?=" := Ncompare (at level 70, no associativity) : NatScope.
Infix "<" := lt : NatScope.
Infix "<=" := le : NatScope.
Open Local Scope NatScope.
(** Peano induction on binary natural numbers *)
Definition Nrect
(P : N -> Type) (a : P N0)
(f : forall n : N, P n -> P (succ n)) (n : N) : P n :=
let f' (p : positive) (x : P (Npos p)) := f (Npos p) x in
let P' (p : positive) := P (Npos p) in
match n return (P n) with
| N0 => a
| Npos p => Prect P' (f N0 a) f' p
end.
Theorem Nrect_base : forall P a f, Nrect P a f N0 = a.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem Nrect_step : forall P a f n, Nrect P a f (succ n) = f n (Nrect P a f n).
Proof.
intros P a f; destruct n as [| p]; simpl;
[rewrite Prect_base | rewrite Prect_succ]; reflexivity.
Qed.
(*Definition Nind (P : N -> Prop) := Nrect P.
Definition Nrec (P : N -> Set) := Nrect P.
Theorem Nrec_base : forall P a f, Nrec P a f N0 = a.
Proof.
intros P a f; unfold Nrec; apply Nrect_base.
Qed.
Theorem Nrec_step : forall P a f n, Nrec P a f (Nsucc n) = f n (Nrec P a f n).
Proof.
intros P a f; unfold Nrec; apply Nrect_step.
Qed.*)
(** Results about the order *)
Theorem Ncompare_eq_correct : forall n m : N, (n ?= m) = Eq <-> n = m.
Proof.
destruct n as [| n]; destruct m as [| m]; simpl;
split; intro H; try reflexivity; try discriminate H.
apply Pcompare_Eq_eq in H; now rewrite H.
injection H; intro H1; rewrite H1; apply Pcompare_refl.
Qed.
Theorem Ncompare_diag : forall n : N, n ?= n = Eq.
Proof.
intro n; now apply <- Ncompare_eq_correct.
Qed.
Theorem Ncompare_antisymm :
forall (n m : N) (c : comparison), n ?= m = c -> m ?= n = CompOpp c.
Proof.
destruct n; destruct m; destruct c; simpl; intro H; try discriminate H; try reflexivity;
replace Eq with (CompOpp Eq) by reflexivity; rewrite <- Pcompare_antisym;
now rewrite H.
Qed.
(** Implementation of NAxiomsSig module type *)
Module NBinaryAxiomsMod <: NAxiomsSig.
Module Export NZOrdAxiomsMod <: NZOrdAxiomsSig.
Module Export NZAxiomsMod <: NZAxiomsSig.
Definition NZ := N.
Definition NZeq := (@eq N).
Definition NZ0 := N0.
Definition NZsucc := succ.
Definition NZpred := pred.
Definition NZplus := plus.
Definition NZminus := minus.
Definition NZtimes := times.
Theorem NZeq_equiv : equiv N NZeq.
Proof (eq_equiv N).
Add Relation N NZeq
reflexivity proved by (proj1 NZeq_equiv)
symmetry proved by (proj2 (proj2 NZeq_equiv))
transitivity proved by (proj1 (proj2 NZeq_equiv))
as NZeq_rel.
Add Morphism NZsucc with signature NZeq ==> NZeq as NZsucc_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZpred with signature NZeq ==> NZeq as NZpred_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZplus with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZplus_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZminus with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZminus_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZtimes with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZtimes_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Theorem NZinduction :
forall A : NZ -> Prop, predicate_wd NZeq A ->
A N0 -> (forall n, A n <-> A (NZsucc n)) -> forall n : NZ, A n.
Proof.
intros A A_wd A0 AS. apply Nrect. assumption. intros; now apply -> AS.
Qed.
Theorem NZpred_succ : forall n : NZ, NZpred (NZsucc n) = n.
Proof.
destruct n as [| p]; simpl. reflexivity.
case_eq (Psucc p); try (intros q H; rewrite <- H; now rewrite Ppred_succ).
intro H; false_hyp H Psucc_not_one.
Qed.
Theorem NZplus_0_l : forall n : NZ, N0 + n = n.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem NZplus_succ_l : forall n m : NZ, (NZsucc n) + m = NZsucc (n + m).
Proof.
destruct n; destruct m.
simpl in |- *; reflexivity.
unfold NZsucc, NZplus, succ, plus. rewrite <- Pplus_one_succ_l; reflexivity.
simpl in |- *; reflexivity.
simpl in |- *; rewrite Pplus_succ_permute_l; reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem NZminus_0_r : forall n : NZ, n - N0 = n.
Proof.
now destruct n.
Qed.
Theorem NZminus_succ_r : forall n m : NZ, n - (NZsucc m) = NZpred (n - m).
Proof.
destruct n as [| p]; destruct m as [| q]; try reflexivity.
now destruct p.
simpl. rewrite Pminus_mask_succ_r, Pminus_mask_carry_spec.
now destruct (Pminus_mask p q) as [| r |]; [| destruct r |].
Qed.
Theorem NZtimes_0_l : forall n : NZ, N0 * n = N0.
Proof.
destruct n; reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem NZtimes_succ_l : forall n m : NZ, (NZsucc n) * m = n * m + m.
Proof.
destruct n as [| n]; destruct m as [| m]; simpl; try reflexivity.
now rewrite Pmult_Sn_m, Pplus_comm.
Qed.
End NZAxiomsMod.
Definition NZlt := lt.
Definition NZle := le.
Definition NZmin := min.
Definition NZmax := max.
Add Morphism NZlt with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> iff as NZlt_wd.
Proof.
unfold NZeq; intros x1 x2 H1 y1 y2 H2; rewrite H1; now rewrite H2.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZle with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> iff as NZle_wd.
Proof.
unfold NZeq; intros x1 x2 H1 y1 y2 H2; rewrite H1; now rewrite H2.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZmin with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZmin_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Add Morphism NZmax with signature NZeq ==> NZeq ==> NZeq as NZmax_wd.
Proof.
congruence.
Qed.
Theorem NZlt_eq_cases : forall n m : N, n <= m <-> n < m \/ n = m.
Proof.
intros n m. unfold le, lt. rewrite <- Ncompare_eq_correct.
destruct (n ?= m); split; intro H1; (try discriminate); try (now left); try now right.
now elim H1. destruct H1; discriminate.
Qed.
Theorem NZlt_irrefl : forall n : NZ, ~ n < n.
Proof.
intro n; unfold lt; now rewrite Ncompare_diag.
Qed.
Theorem NZlt_succ_r : forall n m : NZ, n < (NZsucc m) <-> n <= m.
Proof.
intros n m; unfold lt, le; destruct n as [| p]; destruct m as [| q]; simpl;
split; intro H; try reflexivity; try discriminate.
destruct p; simpl; intros; discriminate. elimtype False; now apply H.
apply -> Pcompare_p_Sq in H. destruct H as [H | H].
now rewrite H. now rewrite H, Pcompare_refl.
apply <- Pcompare_p_Sq. case_eq ((p ?= q)%positive Eq); intro H1.
right; now apply Pcompare_Eq_eq. now left. elimtype False; now apply H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmin_l : forall n m : N, n <= m -> NZmin n m = n.
Proof.
unfold NZmin, min, le; intros n m H.
destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmin_r : forall n m : N, m <= n -> NZmin n m = m.
Proof.
unfold NZmin, min, le; intros n m H.
case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
now apply -> Ncompare_eq_correct.
apply Ncompare_antisymm in H1. now elim H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmax_l : forall n m : N, m <= n -> NZmax n m = n.
Proof.
unfold NZmax, max, le; intros n m H.
case_eq (n ?= m); intro H1; try reflexivity.
symmetry; now apply -> Ncompare_eq_correct.
apply Ncompare_antisymm in H1. now elim H.
Qed.
Theorem NZmax_r : forall n m : N, n <= m -> NZmax n m = m.
Proof.
unfold NZmax, max, le; intros n m H.
destruct (n ?= m); try reflexivity. now elim H.
Qed.
End NZOrdAxiomsMod.
Definition recursion (A : Set) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A) (n : N) :=
Nrect (fun _ => A) a f n.
Implicit Arguments recursion [A].
Theorem pred_0 : pred N0 = N0.
Proof.
reflexivity.
Qed.
Theorem recursion_wd :
forall (A : Set) (Aeq : relation A),
forall a a' : A, Aeq a a' ->
forall f f' : N -> A -> A, fun2_eq NZeq Aeq Aeq f f' ->
forall x x' : N, x = x' ->
Aeq (recursion a f x) (recursion a' f' x').
Proof.
unfold fun2_wd, NZeq, fun2_eq.
intros A Aeq a a' Eaa' f f' Eff'.
intro x; pattern x; apply Nrect.
intros x' H; now rewrite <- H.
clear x.
intros x IH x' H; rewrite <- H.
unfold recursion in *. do 2 rewrite Nrect_step.
now apply Eff'; [| apply IH].
Qed.
Theorem recursion_0 :
forall (A : Set) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A), recursion a f N0 = a.
Proof.
intros A a f; unfold recursion; now rewrite Nrect_base.
Qed.
Theorem recursion_succ :
forall (A : Set) (Aeq : relation A) (a : A) (f : N -> A -> A),
Aeq a a -> fun2_wd NZeq Aeq Aeq f ->
forall n : N, Aeq (recursion a f (succ n)) (f n (recursion a f n)).
Proof.
unfold NZeq, recursion, fun2_wd; intros A Aeq a f EAaa f_wd n; pattern n; apply Nrect.
rewrite Nrect_step; rewrite Nrect_base; now apply f_wd.
clear n; intro n; do 2 rewrite Nrect_step; intro IH. apply f_wd; [reflexivity|].
now rewrite Nrect_step.
Qed.
End NBinaryAxiomsMod.
Module Export NBinaryMinusPropMod := NMinusPropFunct NBinaryAxiomsMod.
(* Some fun comparing the efficiency of the generic log defined
by strong (course-of-value) recursion and the log defined by recursion
on notation *)
(* Time Eval compute in (log 100000). *) (* 98 sec *)
(*
Fixpoint binposlog (p : positive) : N :=
match p with
| xH => 0
| xO p' => Nsucc (binposlog p')
| xI p' => Nsucc (binposlog p')
end.
Definition binlog (n : N) : N :=
match n with
| 0 => 0
| Npos p => binposlog p
end.
*)
(* Eval compute in (binlog 1000000000000000000). *) (* Works very fast *)
|