1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
|
Functional induction
====================
.. _advanced-recursive-functions:
Advanced recursive functions
----------------------------
The following command is available when the ``FunInd`` library has been loaded via ``Require Import FunInd``:
.. cmd:: Function @fix_definition {* with @fix_definition }
This command is a generalization of :cmd:`Fixpoint`. It is a wrapper
for several ways of defining a function *and* other useful related
objects, namely: an induction principle that reflects the recursive
structure of the function (see :tacn:`functional induction`) and its fixpoint equality.
This defines a function similar to those defined by :cmd:`Fixpoint`.
As in :cmd:`Fixpoint`, the decreasing argument must
be given (unless the function is not recursive), but it might not
necessarily be *structurally* decreasing. Use the :n:`@fixannot` clause
to name the decreasing argument *and* to describe which kind of
decreasing criteria to use to ensure termination of recursive
calls.
:cmd:`Function` also supports the :n:`with` clause to create
mutually recursive definitions, however this feature is limited
to structurally recursive functions (i.e. when :n:`@fixannot` is a :n:`struct`
clause).
See :tacn:`functional induction` and :cmd:`Functional Scheme` for how to use
the induction principle to reason easily about the function.
The form of the :n:`@fixannot` clause determines which definition mechanism :cmd:`Function` uses.
(Note that references to :n:`ident` below refer to the name of the function being defined.):
* If :n:`@fixannot` is not specified, :cmd:`Function`
defines the nonrecursive function :token:`ident` as if it was declared with
:cmd:`Definition`. In addition, the following are defined:
+ :token:`ident`\ ``_rect``, :token:`ident`\ ``_rec`` and :token:`ident`\ ``_ind``,
which reflect the pattern matching structure of :token:`term` (see :cmd:`Inductive`);
+ The inductive :n:`R_@ident` corresponding to the graph of :token:`ident` (silently);
+ :token:`ident`\ ``_complete`` and :token:`ident`\ ``_correct`` which
are inversion information linking the function and its graph.
* If :n:`{ struct ... }` is specified, :cmd:`Function`
defines the structural recursive function :token:`ident` as if it was declared
with :cmd:`Fixpoint`. In addition, the following are defined:
+ The same objects as above;
+ The fixpoint equation of :token:`ident`: :n:`@ident`\ ``_equation``.
* If :n:`{ measure ... }` or :n:`{ wf ... }` are specified, :cmd:`Function`
defines a recursive function by well-founded recursion. The module ``Recdef``
of the standard library must be loaded for this feature.
+ :n:`{measure @one_term__1 {? @ident } {? @one_term__2 } }`\: where :n:`@ident` is the decreasing argument
and :n:`@one_term__1` is a function from the type of :n:`@ident` to :g:`nat` for which
the decreasing argument decreases (for the :g:`lt` order on :g:`nat`)
for each recursive call of the function. The parameters of the function are
bound in :n:`@one_term__1`.
+ :n:`{wf @one_term @ident }`\: where :n:`@ident` is the decreasing argument and
:n:`@one_term` is an ordering relation on the type of :n:`@ident` (i.e. of type
`T`\ :math:`_{\sf ident}` → `T`\ :math:`_{\sf ident}` → ``Prop``) for which the decreasing argument
decreases for each recursive call of the function. The order must be well-founded.
The parameters of the function are bound in :n:`@one_term`.
If the clause is ``measure`` or ``wf``, the user is left with some proof
obligations that will be used to define the function. These proofs
are: proofs that each recursive call is actually decreasing with
respect to the given criteria, and (if the criteria is `wf`) a proof
that the ordering relation is well-founded. Once proof obligations are
discharged, the following objects are defined:
+ The same objects as with the ``struct`` clause;
+ The lemma :n:`@ident`\ ``_tcc`` which collects all proof obligations in one
property;
+ The lemmas :n:`@ident`\ ``_terminate`` and :n:`@ident`\ ``_F`` which will be inlined
during extraction of :n:`@ident`.
The way this recursive function is defined is the subject of several
papers by Yves Bertot and Antonia Balaa on the one hand, and Gilles
Barthe, Julien Forest, David Pichardie, and Vlad Rusu on the other
hand.
.. note::
To obtain the right principle, it is better to put rigid
parameters of the function as first arguments. For example it is
better to define plus like this:
.. coqtop:: reset none
Require Import FunInd.
.. coqtop:: all
Function plus (m n : nat) {struct n} : nat :=
match n with
| 0 => m
| S p => S (plus m p)
end.
than like this:
.. coqtop:: reset none
Require Import FunInd.
.. coqtop:: all
Function plus (n m : nat) {struct n} : nat :=
match n with
| 0 => m
| S p => S (plus p m)
end.
*Limitations*
:token:`term` must be built as a *pure pattern matching tree* (:g:`match … with`)
with applications only *at the end* of each branch.
:cmd:`Function` does not support partial application of the function being
defined. Thus, the following example cannot be accepted due to the
presence of partial application of :g:`wrong` in the body of :g:`wrong`:
.. coqtop:: none
Require List.
Import List.ListNotations.
.. coqtop:: all fail
Function wrong (C:nat) : nat :=
List.hd 0 (List.map wrong (C::nil)).
For now, dependent cases are not treated for non structurally
terminating functions.
.. exn:: The recursive argument must be specified.
:undocumented:
.. exn:: No argument name @ident.
:undocumented:
.. exn:: Cannot use mutual definition with well-founded recursion or measure.
:undocumented:
.. warn:: Cannot define graph for @ident.
The generation of the graph relation (:n:`R_@ident`) used to compute the induction scheme of ident
raised a typing error. Only :token:`ident` is defined; the induction scheme
will not be generated. This error happens generally when:
- the definition uses pattern matching on dependent types,
which :cmd:`Function` cannot deal with yet.
- the definition is not a *pattern matching tree* as explained above.
.. warn:: Cannot define principle(s) for @ident.
The generation of the graph relation (:n:`R_@ident`) succeeded but the induction principle
could not be built. Only :token:`ident` is defined. Please report.
.. warn:: Cannot build functional inversion principle.
:tacn:`functional inversion` will not be available for the function.
Tactics
-------
.. tacn:: functional induction (@qualid {+ @term})
:name: functional induction
The tactic functional induction performs case analysis and induction
following the definition of a function. It makes use of a principle
generated by :cmd:`Function` or :cmd:`Functional Scheme`.
Note that this tactic is only available after a ``Require Import FunInd``.
.. example::
.. coqtop:: reset all
Require Import FunInd.
Functional Scheme minus_ind := Induction for minus Sort Prop.
Check minus_ind.
Lemma le_minus (n m:nat) : n - m <= n.
functional induction (minus n m) using minus_ind; simpl; auto.
Qed.
.. note::
:n:`(@qualid {+ @term})` must be a correct full application
of :n:`@qualid`. In particular, the rules for implicit arguments are the
same as usual. For example use :n:`@@qualid` if you want to write implicit
arguments explicitly.
.. note::
Parentheses around :n:`@qualid {+ @term}` are not mandatory and can be skipped.
.. note::
:n:`functional induction (f x1 x2 x3)` is actually a wrapper for
:n:`induction x1, x2, x3, (f x1 x2 x3) using @qualid` followed by a cleaning
phase, where :n:`@qualid` is the induction principle registered for :g:`f`
(by the :cmd:`Function` or :cmd:`Functional Scheme` command)
corresponding to the sort of the goal. Therefore
:tacn:`functional induction` may fail if the induction scheme :n:`@qualid` is not
defined.
.. note::
There is a difference between obtaining an induction scheme
for a function by using :cmd:`Function`
and by using :cmd:`Functional Scheme` after a normal definition using
:cmd:`Fixpoint` or :cmd:`Definition`.
.. exn:: Cannot find induction information on @qualid.
:undocumented:
.. exn:: Not the right number of induction arguments.
:undocumented:
.. tacv:: functional induction (@qualid {+ @term}) as @simple_intropattern using @term with @bindings_list
Similarly to :tacn:`induction` and :tacn:`elim`, this allows giving
explicitly the name of the introduced variables, the induction principle, and
the values of dependent premises of the elimination scheme, including
*predicates* for mutual induction when :n:`@qualid` is part of a mutually
recursive definition.
.. tacn:: functional inversion @ident
:name: functional inversion
:tacn:`functional inversion` is a tactic that performs inversion on hypothesis
:n:`@ident` of the form :n:`@qualid {+ @term} = @term` or :n:`@term = @qualid
{+ @term}` where :n:`@qualid` must have been defined using :cmd:`Function`.
Note that this tactic is only available after a ``Require Import FunInd``.
.. exn:: Hypothesis @ident must contain at least one Function.
:undocumented:
.. exn:: Cannot find inversion information for hypothesis @ident.
This error may be raised when some inversion lemma failed to be generated by
Function.
.. tacv:: functional inversion @num
This does the same thing as :n:`intros until @num` followed by
:n:`functional inversion @ident` where :token:`ident` is the
identifier for the last introduced hypothesis.
.. tacv:: functional inversion @ident @qualid
functional inversion @num @qualid
If the hypothesis :token:`ident` (or :token:`num`) has a type of the form
:n:`@qualid__1 {+ @term__i } = @qualid__2 {+ @term__j }` where
:n:`@qualid__1` and :n:`@qualid__2` are valid candidates to
functional inversion, this variant allows choosing which :token:`qualid`
is inverted.
.. _functional-scheme:
Generation of induction principles with ``Functional`` ``Scheme``
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.. cmd:: Functional Scheme @ident__0 := Induction for @ident' Sort @sort {* with @ident__i := Induction for @ident__i' Sort @sort}
This command is a high-level experimental tool for
generating automatically induction principles corresponding to
(possibly mutually recursive) functions. First, it must be made
available via ``Require Import FunInd``.
Each :n:`@ident__i` is a different mutually defined function
name (the names must be in the same order as when they were defined). This
command generates the induction principle for each :n:`@ident__i`, following
the recursive structure and case analyses of the corresponding function
:n:`@ident__i'`.
.. warning::
There is a difference between induction schemes generated by the command
:cmd:`Functional Scheme` and these generated by the :cmd:`Function`. Indeed,
:cmd:`Function` generally produces smaller principles that are closer to how
a user would implement them. See :ref:`advanced-recursive-functions` for details.
.. example::
Induction scheme for div2.
We define the function div2 as follows:
.. coqtop:: all
Require Import FunInd.
Require Import Arith.
Fixpoint div2 (n:nat) : nat :=
match n with
| O => 0
| S O => 0
| S (S n') => S (div2 n')
end.
The definition of a principle of induction corresponding to the
recursive structure of `div2` is defined by the command:
.. coqtop:: all
Functional Scheme div2_ind := Induction for div2 Sort Prop.
You may now look at the type of div2_ind:
.. coqtop:: all
Check div2_ind.
We can now prove the following lemma using this principle:
.. coqtop:: all
Lemma div2_le' : forall n:nat, div2 n <= n.
intro n.
pattern n, (div2 n).
apply div2_ind; intros.
auto with arith.
auto with arith.
simpl; auto with arith.
Qed.
We can use directly the functional induction (:tacn:`functional induction`) tactic instead
of the pattern/apply trick:
.. coqtop:: all
Reset div2_le'.
Lemma div2_le : forall n:nat, div2 n <= n.
intro n.
functional induction (div2 n).
auto with arith.
auto with arith.
auto with arith.
Qed.
.. example::
Induction scheme for tree_size.
We define trees by the following mutual inductive type:
.. original LaTeX had "Variable" instead of "Axiom", which generates an ugly warning
.. coqtop:: reset all
Axiom A : Set.
Inductive tree : Set :=
node : A -> forest -> tree
with forest : Set :=
| empty : forest
| cons : tree -> forest -> forest.
We define the function tree_size that computes the size of a tree or a
forest. Note that we use ``Function`` which generally produces better
principles.
.. coqtop:: all
Require Import FunInd.
Function tree_size (t:tree) : nat :=
match t with
| node A f => S (forest_size f)
end
with forest_size (f:forest) : nat :=
match f with
| empty => 0
| cons t f' => (tree_size t + forest_size f')
end.
Notice that the induction principles ``tree_size_ind`` and ``forest_size_ind``
generated by ``Function`` are not mutual.
.. coqtop:: all
Check tree_size_ind.
Mutual induction principles following the recursive structure of ``tree_size``
and ``forest_size`` can be generated by the following command:
.. coqtop:: all
Functional Scheme tree_size_ind2 := Induction for tree_size Sort Prop
with forest_size_ind2 := Induction for forest_size Sort Prop.
You may now look at the type of `tree_size_ind2`:
.. coqtop:: all
Check tree_size_ind2.
|