aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/toplevel/vi_checking.ml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-04-25Adding a stm/ folder, as asked during last workgroup. It was essentially movingPierre-Marie Pédrot
files around. A bunch of files from lib/ that were only used in the STM were moved, as well as part of toplevel/ related to the STM.
2014-03-12Stm: smarter delegation policyEnrico Tassi
Stm used to delegate every proof when it was possible, but this may be a bad idea. Small proofs may take less time than the overhead delegation implies (marshalling, etc...). Now it delegates only proofs that take >= 1 second. By default a proof takes 1 second (that may be wrong). If the file was compiled before, it reuses the data stored in the .aux file and assumes the timings are still valid. After a proof is checked, Coq knows how long it takes for real, so it wont predict it wrong again (when the user goes up and down in the file for example). CoqIDE now sends to Coq, as part of the init message, the file name so that Coq can load the .aux file.
2014-02-26vi2vo: new flag -schedule-vi2voEnrico Tassi
2014-02-26New compilation mode -vi2voEnrico Tassi
To obtain a.vo one can now: 1) coqtop -quick -compile a 2) coqtop -vi2vo a.vi To make that possible the .vo structure has been complicated. It is now made of 5 segments. | vo | vi | vi2vo | contents --------------+------+-----+-------+------------------------------------ lib | Yes | Yes | Yes | libstack (modules, notations,...) opauqe_univs | No | Yes | Yes | constraints coming from opaque proofs discharge | No | Yes | No | data needed to close sections tasks | No | Yes | No | STM tasks to produce proof terms opaque_proofs | Yes | Yes | Yes | proof terms --------------+------+-----+-------+------------------------------------ This means one can load only the strictly necessay parts. Usually one does not load the tasks segment of a .vi nor the opaque_proof segment of a .vo, unless one is turning a .vi into a .vo, in which case he load all the segments. Optional segments are marshalled as None. But for lib, all segments are Array.t of: | type --------------+--------------------------------------------------------- lib | a list of Libobject.obj (n'importe quoi) opauqe_univs | Univ.consraints Future.computation discharge | what Cooking.cook_constr needs tasks | Stm.tasks (a task is system_state * vernacexpr list) opaque_proofs | Term.constr Future.computation --------------+------+-----+-------+------------------------------------ Invariant: all Future.computation in a vo file (obtained by a vi2vo compilation or not) have been terminated with Future.join (or Future.sink). This means they are values (inside a box). This invariant does not hold for vi files. E.g. opauqe_proofs can be dangling Future.computation (i.e. NotHere exception). The vi2vo compilation step will replace them by true values. Rationale for opaque_univs: in the vi2vo transformation we want to reuse the lib segment. Hence the missing pieces have to be put on the side, not inside. Opaque proof terms are already in a separte segment. Universe constraints are not, hence the new opauqe_univs segment. Such segment, if present in a .vo file, is always loaded, and Declare.open_constant will add to the environment the constraints stored there. For regular constants this is not necessay since the constraints are already in their enclosing module (and also in the constant_body). With vi2vo the constraints coming from the proof are not in the constant_body (hence not in the enclosing module) but there and are added to the environment explicitly by Declare.open_constant. Rationale for discharge: vi2vo produces a proof term in its original context (in the middle of a section). Then it has to discharge the object. This segment contains the data that is needed in order to do so. It is morally the input that Lib.close_section passes to Cooking (via the insane rewinding of libstack, GlobalRecipe, etc chain). Checksums: the checksum of .vi and a .vo obtain from it is the same. This means that if if b.vo has been compiled using a.vi, and then a.vi is compiled into a.vo, Require Import b works (and recursively loads a.vo).
2014-01-26-schedule-vi-checking ported to spawnEnrico Tassi
2014-01-14-schedule-vi-checking generates better scriptEnrico Tassi
2014-01-05coqtop: -check-vi-tasks and -schedule-vi-checkingEnrico Tassi
The command `coqtop -check-vi-tasks 1,4,2 a` checks tasks 1 4 2, in this precise order, stored in a.vi. The command `coqtop -schedule-vi-checking 4 a b c` reads {a,b,c}.vi and .{a,b,c}.aux and spits 4 command lines to check all the tasks in {a,b,c}.vi trying to equally partition the job between the 4 workers, that can indeed be run in parallel. The aux file contains the time that it took to check the proofs stored in the .vi files last time the file was fully checked. This user interface is still very rough, it should probably run the workers instead of just printing their command line.