| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
|
|
Reviewed-by: anton-trunov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
|
|
|
|
Most of these files were introduced after #6543 but used older headers
copied from somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
sometimes, to use "intros [= ...]" rather than things like "intros H;
injection H as [= ...]".
Co-Authored-By: Théo Zimmermann <theo.zimmermann@univ-paris-diderot.fr>
|
|
|
|
As reported in #9060, the STM does not handle such constructions
properly. They are anyway fragile, for example Guarded reports a failure
if run at the end of the scripts, so this patch is an improvement.
|
|
We encode the conversion to bits with little-endian right-associative
tuples to ensure that the head of the tuple (the `fst` element) is the
least significant bit. We still enforce that the ordering of bits
matches the order of the `bool`s in the `ascii` inductive type.
|
|
We already have roundtrip proofs for byte<->nat, byte<->N, byte<->ascii,
N<->nat, ascii<->N, ascii<->nat, and this commit shows that all
roundtrips involving byte commute appropriately. This ensures, e.g.,
that we don't mess up and reverse the bits in conversion between byte
and ascii.
|
|
We could move another ~ 1s from Init.Byte to Strings.Byte by moving
`of_bits_to_bits` and `to_bits_of_bits`, but I figured it's probably not
worth it.
After | File Name | Before || Change | % Change
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1m16.75s | Total | 1m21.45s || -0m04.70s | -5.77%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0m08.95s | Strings/Byte | 0m12.41s || -0m03.46s | -27.88%
0m07.24s | Byte | 0m08.76s || -0m01.51s | -17.35%
0m06.37s | plugins/setoid_ring/Ring_polynom | 0m06.24s || +0m00.12s | +2.08%
0m03.14s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZBits | 0m03.20s || -0m00.06s | -1.87%
0m02.44s | ZArith/BinInt | 0m02.44s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m02.24s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NBits | 0m02.20s || +0m00.04s | +1.81%
0m01.97s | Lists/List | 0m01.93s || +0m00.04s | +2.07%
0m01.85s | Numbers/NatInt/NZLog | 0m01.82s || +0m00.03s | +1.64%
0m01.78s | PArith/BinPos | 0m01.78s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m01.74s | plugins/setoid_ring/InitialRing | 0m01.63s || +0m00.11s | +6.74%
0m01.73s | Strings/Ascii | 0m01.58s || +0m00.14s | +9.49%
0m01.39s | NArith/BinNat | 0m01.34s || +0m00.04s | +3.73%
0m01.32s | Numbers/NatInt/NZPow | 0m01.24s || +0m00.08s | +6.45%
0m01.22s | Numbers/NatInt/NZSqrt | 0m01.15s || +0m00.07s | +6.08%
0m01.11s | Arith/PeanoNat | 0m01.16s || -0m00.04s | -4.31%
0m01.10s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZDivTrunc | 0m01.11s || -0m00.01s | -0.90%
0m01.02s | Specif | 0m01.04s || -0m00.02s | -1.92%
0m00.96s | Numbers/NatInt/NZMulOrder | 0m00.84s || +0m00.12s | +14.28%
0m00.95s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZDivFloor | 0m00.97s || -0m00.02s | -2.06%
0m00.85s | plugins/setoid_ring/Ring_theory | 0m00.86s || -0m00.01s | -1.16%
0m00.82s | Structures/GenericMinMax | 0m00.85s || -0m00.03s | -3.52%
0m00.72s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZLcm | 0m00.82s || -0m00.09s | -12.19%
0m00.69s | Numbers/NatInt/NZParity | 0m00.69s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.68s | Numbers/NatInt/NZDiv | 0m00.71s || -0m00.02s | -4.22%
0m00.68s | Strings/String | 0m00.65s || +0m00.03s | +4.61%
0m00.64s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZSgnAbs | 0m00.64s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.64s | ZArith/Zeven | 0m00.48s || +0m00.16s | +33.33%
0m00.63s | ZArith/Zorder | 0m00.61s || +0m00.02s | +3.27%
0m00.57s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZMulOrder | 0m00.67s || -0m00.10s | -14.92%
0m00.56s | Classes/Morphisms | 0m00.58s || -0m00.01s | -3.44%
0m00.55s | Numbers/NatInt/NZOrder | 0m00.51s || +0m00.04s | +7.84%
0m00.48s | ZArith/BinIntDef | 0m00.48s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.46s | Classes/CMorphisms | 0m00.48s || -0m00.01s | -4.16%
0m00.46s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZGcd | 0m00.46s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.46s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NSub | 0m00.48s || -0m00.01s | -4.16%
0m00.45s | Logic | 0m00.44s || +0m00.01s | +2.27%
0m00.45s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NGcd | 0m00.48s || -0m00.02s | -6.24%
0m00.42s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NLcm | 0m00.40s || +0m00.01s | +4.99%
0m00.42s | Structures/OrdersFacts | 0m00.48s || -0m00.06s | -12.50%
0m00.41s | ZArith/Zbool | 0m00.38s || +0m00.02s | +7.89%
0m00.38s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZPow | 0m00.34s || +0m00.03s | +11.76%
0m00.36s | Bool/Bool | 0m00.36s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.36s | Numbers/NatInt/NZGcd | 0m00.35s || +0m00.01s | +2.85%
0m00.36s | ZArith/ZArith_dec | 0m00.38s || -0m00.02s | -5.26%
0m00.34s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZAdd | 0m00.33s || +0m00.01s | +3.03%
0m00.34s | PArith/Pnat | 0m00.31s || +0m00.03s | +9.67%
0m00.32s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NOrder | 0m00.32s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.32s | PArith/BinPosDef | 0m00.31s || +0m00.01s | +3.22%
0m00.32s | ZArith/Zcompare | 0m00.28s || +0m00.03s | +14.28%
0m00.30s | Classes/RelationClasses | 0m00.29s || +0m00.01s | +3.44%
0m00.30s | NArith/Nnat | 0m00.30s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.29s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NAxioms | 0m00.26s || +0m00.02s | +11.53%
0m00.28s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZAddOrder | 0m00.28s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.28s | Structures/Orders | 0m00.30s || -0m00.01s | -6.66%
0m00.27s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZAxioms | 0m00.23s || +0m00.04s | +17.39%
0m00.27s | Numbers/NatInt/NZAxioms | 0m00.26s || +0m00.01s | +3.84%
0m00.26s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZMaxMin | 0m00.25s || +0m00.01s | +4.00%
0m00.26s | Numbers/NatInt/NZAdd | 0m00.28s || -0m00.02s | -7.14%
0m00.26s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMaxMin | 0m00.24s || +0m00.02s | +8.33%
0m00.26s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NParity | 0m00.31s || -0m00.04s | -16.12%
0m00.26s | plugins/setoid_ring/ArithRing | 0m00.22s || +0m00.04s | +18.18%
0m00.26s | plugins/setoid_ring/Ring_tac | 0m00.24s || +0m00.02s | +8.33%
0m00.25s | Logic/Decidable | 0m00.26s || -0m00.01s | -3.84%
0m00.25s | Structures/OrdersTac | 0m00.25s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.24s | Classes/Equivalence | 0m00.25s || -0m00.01s | -4.00%
0m00.24s | Datatypes | 0m00.27s || -0m00.03s | -11.11%
0m00.24s | Numbers/NatInt/NZMul | 0m00.25s || -0m00.01s | -4.00%
0m00.24s | plugins/setoid_ring/Ring | 0m00.20s || +0m00.03s | +19.99%
0m00.23s | Numbers/NatInt/NZAddOrder | 0m00.33s || -0m00.10s | -30.30%
0m00.23s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NAdd | 0m00.17s || +0m00.06s | +35.29%
0m00.22s | Arith/Compare_dec | 0m00.22s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.22s | Classes/CRelationClasses | 0m00.25s || -0m00.03s | -12.00%
0m00.22s | Logic/EqdepFacts | 0m00.19s || +0m00.03s | +15.78%
0m00.22s | NArith/BinNatDef | 0m00.25s || -0m00.03s | -12.00%
0m00.22s | plugins/setoid_ring/Ring_base | 0m00.23s || -0m00.01s | -4.34%
0m00.21s | Arith/Arith | 0m00.19s || +0m00.01s | +10.52%
0m00.21s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NDiv | 0m00.19s || +0m00.01s | +10.52%
0m00.20s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZProperties | 0m00.23s || -0m00.03s | -13.04%
0m00.20s | Relations/Relation_Operators | 0m00.17s || +0m00.03s | +17.64%
0m00.19s | Arith/Between | 0m00.22s || -0m00.03s | -13.63%
0m00.18s | Arith/Wf_nat | 0m00.24s || -0m00.06s | -25.00%
0m00.17s | Arith/Plus | 0m00.16s || +0m00.01s | +6.25%
0m00.17s | Nat | 0m00.18s || -0m00.00s | -5.55%
0m00.17s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NProperties | 0m00.22s || -0m00.04s | -22.72%
0m00.17s | Relations/Relation_Definitions | 0m00.08s || +0m00.09s | +112.50%
0m00.16s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZLt | 0m00.16s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.16s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NBase | 0m00.19s || -0m00.03s | -15.78%
0m00.16s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NPow | 0m00.15s || +0m00.01s | +6.66%
0m00.15s | Classes/Morphisms_Prop | 0m00.18s || -0m00.03s | -16.66%
0m00.14s | Arith/Mult | 0m00.12s || +0m00.02s | +16.66%
0m00.14s | Arith/Peano_dec | 0m00.16s || -0m00.01s | -12.49%
0m00.14s | Numbers/NatInt/NZBase | 0m00.13s || +0m00.01s | +7.69%
0m00.14s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMulOrder | 0m00.13s || +0m00.01s | +7.69%
0m00.14s | Relations/Operators_Properties | 0m00.13s || +0m00.01s | +7.69%
0m00.14s | plugins/setoid_ring/BinList | 0m00.16s || -0m00.01s | -12.49%
0m00.13s | Arith/EqNat | 0m00.18s || -0m00.04s | -27.77%
0m00.13s | Structures/Equalities | 0m00.17s || -0m00.04s | -23.52%
0m00.12s | Arith/Lt | 0m00.11s || +0m00.00s | +9.09%
0m00.12s | Arith/Minus | 0m00.13s || -0m00.01s | -7.69%
0m00.12s | Decimal | 0m00.16s || -0m00.04s | -25.00%
0m00.12s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZBase | 0m00.09s || +0m00.03s | +33.33%
0m00.12s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZMul | 0m00.12s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.12s | Numbers/Integer/Abstract/ZParity | 0m00.11s || +0m00.00s | +9.09%
0m00.12s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NAddOrder | 0m00.12s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.11s | Arith/Factorial | 0m00.11s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.11s | Lists/ListTactics | 0m00.13s || -0m00.02s | -15.38%
0m00.11s | Logic/Eqdep_dec | 0m00.12s || -0m00.00s | -8.33%
0m00.11s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NLog | 0m00.10s || +0m00.00s | +9.99%
0m00.11s | Peano | 0m00.10s || +0m00.00s | +9.99%
0m00.11s | Program/Basics | 0m00.07s || +0m00.03s | +57.14%
0m00.10s | Arith/Gt | 0m00.13s || -0m00.03s | -23.07%
0m00.10s | Bool/Sumbool | 0m00.10s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.10s | Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NSqrt | 0m00.12s || -0m00.01s | -16.66%
0m00.10s | Wf | 0m00.11s || -0m00.00s | -9.09%
0m00.09s | Arith/Arith_base | 0m00.09s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.09s | Logic_Type | 0m00.08s || +0m00.00s | +12.49%
0m00.08s | Arith/Le | 0m00.11s || -0m00.03s | -27.27%
0m00.08s | Numbers/BinNums | 0m00.06s || +0m00.02s | +33.33%
0m00.08s | Numbers/NatInt/NZBits | 0m00.12s || -0m00.03s | -33.33%
0m00.08s | Numbers/NatInt/NZProperties | 0m00.09s || -0m00.00s | -11.11%
0m00.08s | Program/Tactics | 0m00.08s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.07s | Tactics | 0m00.10s || -0m00.03s | -30.00%
0m00.06s | Classes/SetoidTactics | 0m00.06s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.06s | Numbers/NumPrelude | 0m00.06s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.05s | Classes/Init | 0m00.04s || +0m00.01s | +25.00%
0m00.05s | Prelude | 0m00.09s || -0m00.03s | -44.44%
0m00.05s | Setoids/Setoid | 0m00.08s || -0m00.03s | -37.50%
0m00.04s | Relations/Relations | 0m00.04s || +0m00.00s | +0.00%
0m00.04s | Tauto | 0m00.09s || -0m00.05s | -55.55%
0m00.02s | Notations | 0m00.04s || -0m00.02s | -50.00%
|
|
Users can now register string notations for custom inductives.
Much of the code and documentation was copied from numeral notations.
I chose to use a 256-constructor inductive for primitive string syntax
because (a) it is easy to convert between character codes and
constructors, and (b) it is more efficient than the existing `ascii`
type.
Some choices about proofs of the new `byte` type were made based on
efficiency. For example, https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8517 means
that we cannot simply use `Scheme Equality` for this type, and I have
taken some care to ensure that the proofs of decidable equality and
conversion are fast. (Unfortunately, the `Init/Byte.v` file is the
slowest one in the prelude (it takes a couple of seconds to build), and
I'm not sure where the slowness is.)
In String.v, some uses of `0` as a `nat` were replaced by `O`, because
the file initially refused to check interactively otherwise (it
complained that `0` could not be interpreted in `string_scope` before
loading `Coq.Strings.String`).
There is unfortunately a decent amount of code duplication between
numeral notations and string notations.
I have not put too much thought into chosing names; most names have been
chosen to be similar to numeral notations, though I chose the name
`byte` from
https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8483#issuecomment-421671785.
Unfortunately, this feature does not support declaring string syntax for
`list ascii`, unless that type is wrapped in a record or other inductive
type. This is not a fundamental limitation; it should be relatively
easy for someone who knows the API of the reduction machinery in Coq to
extend both this and numeral notations to support any type whose hnf
starts with an inductive type. (The reason for needing an inductive
type to bottom out at is that this is how the plugin determines what
constructors are the entry points for printing the given notation.
However, see also https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8964 for
complications that are more likely to arise if inductive type families
are supported.)
N.B. I generated the long lists of constructors for the `byte` type with
short python scripts.
Closes #8853
|
|
module
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We refactor the `Coqlib` API to locate objects over a namespace
`module.object.property`.
This introduces the vernacular command `Register g as n` to expose the
Coq constant `g` under the name `n` (through the `register_ref`
function). The constant can then be dynamically located using the
`lib_ref` function.
Co-authored-by: Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <e+git@x80.org>
Co-authored-by: Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Laporte <Vincent.Laporte@fondation-inria.fr>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lemma types and names coppied from [Search Z.eqb].
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
automatically instead
|
|
|
|
There were three versions of injection:
1. "injection term" without "as" clause:
was leaving hypotheses on the goal in reverse order
2. "injection term as ipat", first version:
was introduction hypotheses using ipat in reverse order without
checking that the number of ipat was the size of the injection
(activated with "Unset Injection L2R Pattern Order")
3. "injection term as ipat", second version:
was introduction hypotheses using ipat in left-to-right order
checking that the number of ipat was the size of the injection
and clearing the injecting term by default if an hypothesis
(activated with "Set Injection L2R Pattern Order", default one from 8.5)
There is now:
4. "injection term" without "as" clause, new version:
introducing the components of the injection in the context in
left-to-right order using default intro-patterns "?"
and clearing the injecting term by default if an hypothesis
(activated with "Set Structural Injection")
The new versions 3. and 4. are the "expected" ones in the sense that
they have the following good properties:
- introduction in the context is in the natural left-to-right order
- "injection" behaves the same with and without "as", always
introducing the hypotheses in the goal what corresponds to the
natural expectation as the changes I made in the proof scripts for
adaptation confirm
- clear the "injection" hypothesis when an hypothesis which is the
natural expectation as the changes I made in the proof scripts for
adaptation confirm
The compatibility can be preserved by "Unset Structural Injection" or
by calling "simple injection".
The flag is currently off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The earlier proof-of-concept file NPeano (which instantiates
the "Numbers" framework for nat) becomes now the entry point
in the Arith lib, and gets renamed PeanoNat. It still provides
an inner module "Nat" which sums up everything about type nat
(functions, predicates and properties of them).
This inner module Nat is usable as soon as you Require Import Arith,
or just Arith_base, or simply PeanoNat.
- Definitions of operations over type nat are now grouped in a new
file Init/Nat.v. This file is meant to be used without "Import",
hence providing for instance Nat.add or Nat.sqrt as soon as coqtop
starts (but no proofs about them).
- The definitions that used to be in Init/Peano.v (pred, plus, minus, mult)
are now compatibility notations (for Nat.pred, Nat.add, Nat.sub, Nat.mul
where here Nat is Init/Nat.v).
- This Coq.Init.Nat module (with only pure definitions) is Include'd
in the aforementioned Coq.Arith.PeanoNat.Nat. You might see Init.Nat
sometimes instead of just Nat (for instance when doing "Print plus").
Normally it should be ok to just ignore these "Init" since
Init.Nat is included in the full PeanoNat.Nat. I'm investigating if
it's possible to get rid of these "Init" prefixes.
- Concerning predicates, orders le and lt are still defined in Init/Peano.v,
with their notations "<=" and "<". Properties in PeanoNat.Nat directly
refer to these predicates in Peano. For instantation reasons, PeanoNat.Nat
also contains a Nat.le and Nat.lt (defined via "Definition le := Peano.le",
we cannot yet include an Inductive to implement a Parameter), but these
aliased predicates won't probably be very convenient to use.
- Technical remark: I've split the previous property functor NProp in
two parts (NBasicProp and NExtraProp), it helps a lot for building
PeanoNat.Nat incrementally. Roughly speaking, we have the following schema:
Module Nat.
Include Coq.Init.Nat. (* definition of operations : add ... sqrt ... *)
... (** proofs of specifications for basic ops such as + * - *)
Include NBasicProp. (** generic properties of these basic ops *)
... (** proofs of specifications for advanced ops (pow sqrt log2...)
that may rely on proofs for + * - *)
Include NExtraProp. (** all remaining properties *)
End Nat.
- All other files in directory Arith are now taking advantage of PeanoNat :
they are now filled with compatibility notations (when earlier lemmas
have exact counterpart in the Nat module) or lemmas with one-line proofs
based on the Nat module. All hints for database "arith" remain declared
in these old-style file (such as Plus.v, Lt.v, etc). All the old-style
files are still Require'd (or not) by Arith.v, just as before.
- Compatibility should be almost complete. For instance in the stdlib,
the only adaptations were due to .ml code referring to some Coq constant
name such as Coq.Init.Peano.pred, which doesn't live well with the
new compatibility notations.
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15715 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Most of these heavyweight annotations were introduced a long time ago
by the automatic 7.x -> 8.0 translator
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15518 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15517 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
- For instance, refl_equal --> eq_refl
- Npos, Zpos, Zneg now admit more uniform qualified aliases
N.pos, Z.pos, Z.neg.
- A new module BinInt.Pos2Z with results about injections from
positive to Z
- A result about Z.pow pushed in the generic layer
- Zmult_le_compat_{r,l} --> Z.mul_le_mono_nonneg_{r,l}
- Using tactic Z.le_elim instead of Zle_lt_or_eq
- Some cleanup in ring, field, micromega
(use of "Equivalence", "Proper" ...)
- Some adaptions in QArith (for instance changed Qpower.Qpower_decomp)
- In ZMake and ZMake, functor parameters are now named NN and ZZ
instead of N and Z for avoiding confusions
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15515 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
constructors as non relevant for injection. Also made injection
failing in such situation.
Incidentally, this fixes a loop in Invfun.reflexivity_with_destruct_cases
(observed in the compilation of CoinductiveReals.LNP_Digit). The
most probable explanation is that this loop was formerly protected by
a failing rewrite which stopped failing after revision 14549 made
second-order pattern-matching more powerful.
Also suppressed dead code in Invfun.intros_with_rewrite.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14577 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13323 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
nat-->ascii-->nat
- ascii_of_pos isn't tail-recursive anymore, but recursivity is at most of depth 8.
- (brutal) proof that N_of_ascii (ascii_of_N n) = n for all n<256, same for nat.
Ideally, we could say someday that N_of_ascii (ascii_of_N n) = n mod 256
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13077 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
- Many of them were broken, some of them after Pierre B's rework
of mli for ocamldoc, but not only (many bad annotation, many files
with no svn property about Id, etc)
- Useless for those of us that work with git-svn (and a fortiori
in a forthcoming git-only setting)
- Even in svn, they seem to be of little interest
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12972 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
in */*/vo.itarget
On the way: no more -fsets (yes|no) and -reals (yes|no) option of configure
if you want a partial build, make a specific rule such as theories-light
Beware: these vo.itarget should not contain comments. Even if this is legal
for ocamlbuild, the $(shell cat ...) we do in Makefile can't accept that.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12574 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12458 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
1) compilation of Library.tex was failing on a "Ext_" in Diaconescu.v
In fact coqdoc was trying to recognize the end of a _emphasis_ and
hence inserted a bogus }. For the moment I've enclosed the phrase
with [ ], but this emphasis "feature" of coqdoc seems _really_
easy to broke. Matthieu ?
2) By the way, this Library document was made from latin1 and utf8
source file, hence bogus characters. All .v containing special
characters are converted to utf8, and their first line is now
mentionning this. (+ killed some old french comments and some
other avoidable special characters).
PLEASE: let's stick to this convention and avoid latin1, at least
in .v files.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12363 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12337 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Idea: make coqtop more independant of the standard library.
In the future, we can imagine loading the syntax for numerals right
after their definition. For the moment, it is easier to stay lazy
and load the syntax plugins slightly before the definitions.
After this commit, the main (sole ?) references to theories/
from the core ml files are in Coqlib (but many parts of coqlib
are only used by plugins), and it mainly concerns Init
(+ Logic/JMeq and maybe a few others).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12024 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|