| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15715 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
- tauto/intuition now works uniformly on and, prod, or, sum, False,
Empty_set, unit, True (and isomorphic copies of them), iff, ->, and
on all inhabited singleton types with a no-arguments constructor
such as "eq t t" (even though the last case goes out of
propositional logic: this features is so often used that it is
difficult to come back on it).
- New dtauto and dintuition works on all inductive types with one
constructors and no real arguments (for instance, they work on
records such as "Equivalence"), in addition to -> and eq-like types.
- Moreover, both of them no longer unfold inner negations (this is a
souce of incompatibility for intuition and evaluation of the level
of incompatibility on contribs still needs to be done).
Incidentally, and amazingly, fixing bug #2680 made that constants
InfA_compat and InfA_eqA in SetoidList.v lost one argument: old tauto
had indeed destructed a section hypothesis "@StrictOrder A ltA@
thinking it was a conjunction, making this section hypothesis
artificially necessary while it was not.
Renouncing to the unfolding of inner negations made auto/eauto
sometimes succeeding more, sometimes succeeding less. There is by the
way a (standard) problem with not in auto/eauto: even when given as an
"unfold hint", it works only in goals, not in hypotheses, so that auto
is not able to solve something like "forall P, (forall x, ~ P x) -> P
0 -> False". Should we automatically add a lemma of type "HYPS -> A ->
False" in the hint database everytime a lemma ""HYPS -> ~A" is
declared (and "unfold not" is a hint), and similarly for all unfold
hints?
At this occasion, also re-did some proofs of Znumtheory.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15180 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
CompareSpec expects 3 propositions Peq Plt Pgt instead of 2 relations
eq lt and 2 points x y. For the moment, we still always use (Peq=eq x y),
(Plt=lt x y) (Pgt=lt y x), but this may not be always the case,
especially for Pgt. The former CompSpec is now defined in term of
CompareSpec. Compatibility is preserved (except maybe a rare unfold
or red to break the CompSpec definition).
Typically, CompareSpec looks nicer when we have infix notations, e.g.
forall x y, CompareSpec (x=y) (x<y) (y<x) (x?=x)
while CompSpec is shorter when we directly refer to predicates:
forall x y, CompSpec eq lt x y (compare x y)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13914 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13323 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Old stuff DecidableType.v and OrderedType.v stay there and keep their
names for the moment, for compatibility.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12641 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
with Inline)
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12636 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
We can now have a diamond-like approch to extentions of signatures,
instead of a linear-only chains as earlier...
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12529 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
+ adaptation of {Nat,N,P,Z,Q,R}_as_DT for them to provide both eq_dec and eqb
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12488 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
This way we get properties of Rmin / Rmax (almost) for free.
TODO: merge Rbasic_fun and Rminmax...
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@12463 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
