| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We place `Proof_using` in the proper place [`vernac`] and we remove
gross parsing hacks.
The new placement should allow to use the printers and more convenient
structure, and reduce strange coupling between parsing and internal
representation.
|
|
Also add an output test for Suggest Proof Using.
This changes the .aux output: instead of getting a key
>context_used "$hyps;$suggest"
where $hyps is a list of the used hypotheses and $suggest is the
;-separated suggestions (or the empty string if Suggest Proof Using is
unset), there is a key
>context_used "$hyps"
and if Suggest Proof Using is set also a key
>suggest_proof_using "$suggest"
For instance instead of
112 116 context_used "B A;A B;All"
we get
112 116 context_used "B A"
112 116 suggest_proof_using "A B;All"
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inspired by https://coq.inria.fr/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5229 , which
this PR solves, I propose to remove support for non-synchronous
options.
It seems the few uses of `optsync = false` we legacy and shouldn't
have any impact.
Moreover, non synchronous options may create particularly tricky
situations as for instance, they won't be propagated to workers.
|
|
Now it is a private field, locations are optional.
|
|
|
|
- We avoid unnecessary use of Pp -> string conversion functions.
and the creation of intermediate buffers on logging.
- We rename local functions that share the name with the Coq stdlib,
this is usually dangerous as if the normal function is removed, code
may pick up the one in the stdlib, with different semantics.
|
|
mainly concerning referring to "Context.{Rel,Named}.get_{id,value,type}" functions.
If multiple modules define a function with a same name, e.g.:
Context.{Rel,Named}.get_type
those calls were prefixed with a corresponding prefix
to make sure that it is obvious which function is being called.
|
|
|
|
This patch splits pretty printing representation from IO operations.
- `Pp` is kept in charge of the abstract pretty printing representation.
- The `Feedback` module provides interface for doing printing IO.
The patch continues work initiated for 8.5 and has the following effects:
- The following functions in `Pp`: `pp`, `ppnl`, `pperr`, `pperrnl`,
`pperr_flush`, `pp_flush`, `flush_all`, `msg`, `msgnl`, `msgerr`,
`msgerrnl`, `message` are removed. `Feedback.msg_*` functions must be
used instead.
- Feedback provides different backends to handle output, currently,
`stdout`, `emacs` and CoqIDE backends are provided.
- Clients cannot specify flush policy anymore, thus `pp_flush` et al are
gone.
- `Feedback.feedback` takes an `edit_or_state_id` instead of the old
mix.
Lightly tested: Test-suite passes, Proof General and CoqIDE seem to work.
|
|
Originally, rel-context was represented as:
Context.rel_context = Names.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Rel.t = LocalAssum of Names.Name.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Name.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Originally, named-context was represented as:
Context.named_context = Names.Id.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Named.t = LocalAssum of Names.Id.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Id.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Motivation:
(1) In "tactics/hipattern.ml4" file we define "test_strict_disjunction"
function which looked like this:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [_,None,c] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
Suppose that you do not know about rel-context and named-context.
(that is the case of people who just started to read the source code)
Merlin would tell you that the type of the value you are destructing
by "match" is:
'a * 'b option * Constr.t (* worst-case scenario *)
or
Named.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t (* best-case scenario (?) *)
To me, this is akin to wearing an opaque veil.
It is hard to figure out the meaning of the values you are looking at.
In particular, it is hard to discover the connection between the value
we are destructing above and the datatypes and functions defined
in the "kernel/context.ml" file.
In this case, the connection is there, but it is not visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now consider, what happens when the reader see the same function
presented in the following form:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [LocalAssum (_,c)] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
If the reader haven't seen "LocalAssum" before, (s)he can use Merlin
to jump to the corresponding definition and learn more.
In this case, the connection is there, and it is directly visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
(2) Also, if we already have the concepts such as:
- local declaration
- local assumption
- local definition
and we describe these notions meticulously in the Reference Manual,
then it is a real pity not to reinforce the connection
of the actual code with the abstract description we published.
|
|
|
|
- "Proof using p*" means: use p and any section var about p.
- Simplify the grammar/parser for proof using <expression>.
- Section variables with a body (let-in) are pulled in automatically
since they are safe to be used (add no extra quantification)
- automatic clear of "unused" section variables made optional:
Set Proof Using Clear Unused.
since clearing section hypotheses does not "always work" (e.g. hint
databases are not really cleaned)
- term_typing: trigger a "suggest proof using" message also for Let
theorems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proof using can be followed by:
- All : all variables
- Type : all variables occurring in the type
- expr:
- (a b .. c) : set
- expr + expr : set union
- expr - expr : set difference
- -expr : set complement (All - expr)
Exceptions:
- a singleton set can be written without parentheses. This also allows
the implementation of named sets sharing the same name space of
section hyps ans write
- bla - x : where bla is defined as (a b .. x y) elsewhere.
- if expr is just a set, then parentheses can be omitted
This module also implements some AI to tell the user how he could
decorate "Proof" with a "using BLA" clause.
Finally, one can Set Default Proof Using "str" to any string that is
used whenever the "using ..." part is missing. The coding of this
sucks a little since it is the parser that applies the default.
|
