| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
by extraction.
The goal was to use Coq's partial evaluation capabilities to do manually some
inlining that Ocaml couldn't do. It may be critical as we are defining higher
order combinators in term of others and no inlining means a lot of
unnecessary, short-lived closures built.
With this modification we get back some (but not all) of the loss of performance introduced by threading the monadic type all over the place.
I still have an estimated 15% longer compilation time for Coq.
Makes use of Set Extraction Conservative Types and Set Extraction File Comment
to maintain the relationship between the functions and their types.
Uses an intermediate layer Proofview_monad between Proofview_gen and
Proofview in order to use a hand-written mli to catch potential errors in the
generated file (it uses Extract Constant a lot).
A bug in the extraction of signatures forces to remove the generated
proofview_gen.mli which does not have the correct types.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16981 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
It is highlighted in yellow in Coqide.
The unsafe status is tracked throughout the execution of tactics such that
nested calls to admit are caught.
Many function (mainly those building constr with tactics such as typeclass
related stuff, and Function, and a few other like eauto's use of Hint Extern)
drop the unsafe status. This is unfortunate, but a lot of refactoring would
be in order.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16977 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16976 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
It doesn't matter much, it's simply a matter of aesthetic, so that all functions
in the interface of [Monads.IO] are pure ([IO.run] being the only impure
function but it's not part of the generic interface).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16974 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
It allowed to restore the timeout tactics. It also prepares for the debugging
mechanism to be restored.
['a IO.t] is just [unit -> 'a].
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16970 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
On the compilation of Coq, we can see an increase of ~20% compile time on
my completely non-scientific tests. Hopefully this can be fixed.
There are a lot of low hanging fruits, but this is an iso-functionality commit.
With a few exceptions which were not necessary for the compilation of the theories:
- The declarative mode is not yet ported
- The timeout tactical is currently deactivated because it needs some subtle
I/O. The framework is ready to handle it, but I haven't done it yet.
- For much the same reason, the ltac debugger is unplugged. It will be more
difficult, but will eventually be back.
A few comments:
I occasionnally used a coercion from [unit Proofview.tactic] to the old
[Prooftype.tactic]. It should work smoothely, but loses any backtracking
information: the coerced tactics has at most one success.
- It is used in autorewrite (it shouldn't be a problem there). Autorewrite's
code is fairly old and tricky
- It is used in eauto, mostly for "Hint Extern". It may be an issue as time goes
as we might want to have various success in a "Hint Extern". But it would
require a heavy port of eauto.ml4
- It is used in typeclass eauto, but with a little help from Matthieu, it should
be easy to port the whole thing to the new tactic engine, actually simplifying
the code.
- It is used in fourier. I believe it to be inocuous.
- It is used in firstorder and congruence. I think it's ok. Their code is
somewhat intricate and I'm not sure they would be easy to actually port.
- It is used heavily in Function. And honestly, I have no idea whether it can do
harm or not.
Updates:
(11 June 2013) Pierre-Marie Pédrot contributed the rebase over his new stream based
architecture for Ltac matching (r16533), which avoid painfully and expensively
working around the exception-throwing control flow of the previous API.
(11 October 2013) Rebasing over recent commits (somewhere in r16721-r16730)
rendered a major bug in my implementation of Tacticals.New.tclREPEAT_MAIN
apparent. It caused Field_theory.v to loop. The bug made rewrite !lemma,
rewrite ?lemma and autorewrite incorrect (tclREPEAT_MAIN was essentially
tclREPEAT, causing rewrites to be tried in the side-conditions of conditional
rewrites as well). The new implementation makes Coq faster, but it is
pretty much impossible to tell if it is significant at all.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16967 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@16161 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
All the purely monadic code has been moved to a new module Monads,
where, I'm afraid to confess, I got to use a number of proof transformers
to modularise the definition of tactics. It is still not easy to understand (why
would it with backtracking support?) but at least it's more robust, cleaner,
and more extensible. Plus there is now a Proofview.tclORELSE which will
be used to interprete the Ltac tactical (t1 || t2).
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15596 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
