| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Almost all of ml4 were removed in the process. The only remaining files
are in the test-suite and probably need a bit of fiddling with coq_makefile,
and there only two really remaning ml4 files containing code.
|
|
This fixes #8401
Supersedes / closes #8407
Vernacular-command-registered numeral notations now live in the summary,
and the interpretation function for them is hard-coded.
Plugin-registered numeral notations are still unsynchronized, and only
the UIDs of these functions gets synchronized. I am not 100% sure why
this is fine, but the test-suite file working suggests that it is fine.
I think it is because worker delegation correctly handles
non-synchronized state which is declared at `Declare ML Module`-time.
This final commit changes the synchronization of numeral notations (and
deletes no-longer-used declarations in notation.mli that were introduced
temporarily in the last commit). Since the interpretation can now be
done in notation.ml, we no longer need to register unique ids for
numeral notation (un)interp functions, and can instead synchronize the
underlying constants with the document state. This is the change that
actually fixes #8401.
|
|
Move most of the rest of the stuff from numeral.ml to notation.ml. Now
that we use exceptions to print error messages, all of the
interpretation code for numeral notations can be moved to notation.ml.
This is commit 1/4 in the fix for #8401.
This is a pure cut/paste commit, modulo fixing name qualifications due
to moved things, and exposing some stuff in notation.mli (to be removed
in the next commit, where we finish the numeral notation reworking).
|
|
Move various things from from numeral.ml to notation.ml and
notation.mli; this is required to allow the vernac command to continue
living in numeral.ml while preparing to move all of the numeral notation
interpretation logic to notation.ml
This is commit 1/4 in the fix for #8401.
This is a pure cut/paste commit, modulo adding section-heading comments.
|
|
Thanks to Emilio and Pierre-Marie Pédrot for pointers.
|
|
As per https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8064#pullrequestreview-145971522
|
|
As per https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8064#discussion_r209875616
I decided to make it a warning because it seems more flexible that way;
users to are flipping back and forth between option types and not option
types while designing won't have to update their `abstract after`
directives to do so, and users who don't want to allow this can make it an
actual error message.
|
|
Also make `Check S` no longer anomaly
Add a couple more test cases for numeral notations
Also add another possibly-confusing error message to the doc.
Respond to Hugo's doc request with Zimmi48's suggestion
From https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/8064/files#r204191608
|
|
|
|
Some of this code is cargo-culted or kludged to work.
As I understand it, the situation is as follows:
There are two sorts of use-cases that need to be supported:
1. A plugin registers an OCaml function as a numeral interpreter. In
this case, the function registration must be synchronized with the
document state, but the functions should not be marshelled / stored
in the .vo.
2. A vernacular registers a Gallina function as a numeral interpreter.
In this case, the registration must be synchronized, and the function
should be marshelled / stored in the .vo.
In case (1), we can compare functions by pointer equality, and we should
be able to rely on globally unique keys, even across backtracking.
In case (2), we cannot compare functions by pointer equality (because
they must be regenerated on unmarshelling when `Require`ing a .vo file),
and we also cannot rely on any sort of unique key being both unique and
persistent across files.
The solution we use here is that we ask clients to provide "unique"
keys, and that clients tell us whether or not to overwrite existing
registered functions, i.e., to tell us whether or not we should expect
interpreter functions to be globally unique under pointer equality. For
plugins, a simple string suffices, as long as the string does not clash
between different plugins. In the case of vernacular-registered
functions, use marshell a description of all of the data used to
generate the function, and use that string as a unique key which is
expected to persist across files. Because we cannot rely on
function-pointer uniqueness here, we tell the
interpretation-registration to allow overwriting.
----
Some of this code is response to comments on the PR
----
Some code is to fix an issue that bignums revealed:
Both Int31 and bignums registered numeral notations in int31_scope. We
now prepend a globally unique identifier when registering numeral
notations from OCaml plugins. This is permissible because we don't
store the uid information for such notations in .vo files (assuming I'm
understanding the code correctly).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```
git grep --name-only 'should goes' | xargs sed s'/should goes/should go/g' -i
```
|
|
This way, we could fully bypass bigint.ml.
The previous mechanism of parsing/printing Z is kept for now.
Currently, the conversion functions accepted by Numeral Notation foo
may have the following types.
for parsing:
int -> foo
int -> option foo
uint -> foo
uint -> option foo
Z -> foo
Z -> option foo
for printing:
foo -> int
foo -> option int
foo -> uint
foo -> option uint
foo -> Z
foo -> option Z
Notes:
- The Declare ML Module is directly done in Prelude
- When doing a Numeral Notation, having the Z datatype around
isn't mandatory anymore (but the error messages suggest that
it can still be used).
- An option (abstract after ...) allows to keep large numbers in
an abstract form such as (Nat.of_uint 123456) instead of reducing
to (S (S (S ...))) and ending immediately with Stack Overflow.
- After checking with Matthieu, there is now a explicit check
and an error message in case of polymorphic inductive types
|
|
|
|
This is a portion of roglo's PR#156 introducing a Numeral Notation
command : we deal here with inductive types via conversion fonctions
from/to Z written in Coq.
For an example, see plugins/syntax/NatSyntaxViaZ.v
This commit does not include the part about printing via some ltac.
Using ltac was meant for dealing with real numbers, let's see first what
become PR#415 about a compact representation for real literals.
|
