| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Porting them is still to be done, but at least we don't rely on the wrapper
everywhere.
|
|
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
|
|
We also remove trailing whitespace.
Script used:
```bash
for i in `find . -name '*.ml' -or -name '*.mli' -or -name '*.mlg'`; do expand -i "$i" | sponge "$i"; sed -e's/[[:space:]]*$//' -i.bak "$i"; done
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kernel should be mostly correct, higher levels do random stuff at
times.
|
|
The previous implementation was calling a lot of useless unification
even though the net effect of the tactic was simply to add a binding to
the environment.
Interestingly the base tactic was used in several higher level tactics,
including evar and ssreflect pose.
Part of the fix for #8245.
|
|
We move the last 3 types to more adequate places.
|
|
We remove most of what was deprecated in `Term`. Now, `intf` and
`kernel` are almost deprecation-free, tho I am not very convinced
about the whole `Term -> Constr` renaming but I'm afraid there is no
way back.
Inconsistencies with the constructor policy (see #6440) remain along
the code-base and I'm afraid I don't see a plan to reconcile them.
The `Sorts` deprecation is hard to finalize, opening `Sorts` is not a
good idea as someone added a `List` module inside it.
|
|
Uses internal to Refiner remain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ocamldoc chokes on the markers {{{ and }}} because { and } are part of
its syntax
|
|
|
|
Ssripats and Ssrview are now written in the Tactic Monad.
Ssripats implements the => tactical.
Ssrview implements the application of forward views.
The code is, according to my tests, 100% backward compatible.
The code is much more documented than before.
Moreover the "ist" (ltac context) used to interpret views is the correct
one (the one at ARGUMENT EXTEND interp time, not the one at TACTIC
EXTEND execution time). Some of the code not touched by this commit
still uses the incorrect ist, so its visibility in TACTIC EXTEND
can't be removed yet.
The main changes in the code are:
- intro patterns are implemented using a state machine (a goal comes
with a state). Ssrcommon.MakeState provides an easy way for a tactic
to enrich the goal with with data of interest, such as the set of
hyps to be cleared. This cleans up the old implementation that, in
order to thread the state, that to redefine a bunch of tclSTUFF
- the interpretation of (multiple) forward views uses the state to
accumulate intermediate results
- the bottom of Sscommon collects a bunch of utilities written in the
tactic monad. Most of them are the rewriting of already existing
utilities. When possible the old version was removed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
