| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
We introduce a new package structure for Coq:
- `coq-core`: Coq's OCaml tools code and plugins
- `coq-stdlib`: Coq's stdlib [.vo files]
- `coq`: meta-package that pulls `coq-{core,stdlib}`
This has several advantages, in particular it allows to install Coq
without the stdlib which is useful in several scenarios, it also open
the door towards a versioning of the stdlib at the package level.
The main user-visible change is that Coq's ML development files now
live in `$lib/coq-core`, for compatibility in the regular build we
install a symlink and support both setups for a while.
Note that plugin developers and even `coq_makefile` should actually
rely on `ocamlfind` to locate Coq's OCaml libs as to be more robust.
There is a transient state where we actually look for both
`$coqlib/plugins` and `$coqlib/../coq-core/plugins` as to support
the non-ocamlfind plus custom variables.
This will be much improved once #13617 is merged (which requires this
PR first), then, we will introduce a `coq.boot` library so finally
`coqdep`, `coqchk`, etc... can share the same path setup code.
IMHO the plan should work fine.
|
|
It is the only place where it starts making sense in the whole codebase. It also
fits nicely there since there are other functions manipulating this type in that
module.
In any case this type does not belong to the kernel.
|
|
We replace Coq's use of `Big_int` and `num` by the ZArith OCaml
library which is a more modern version.
We switch the core files and easy plugins only for now, more complex
numerical plugins will be done in their own commit.
We thus keep the num library linked for now until all plugins are
ported.
Co-authored-by: Vincent Laporte <Vincent.Laporte@fondation-inria.fr>
|
|
This makes the test suite Omega.v compatible with Mangle Names
Not sure how `reintroduce` works since it ignores the refreshed name,
considering omega is deprecated it's not worth figuring out so long as
it works (NB making it use intro_mustbe_force makes the test suite
fail so it must be doing something right).
|
|
Current backtraces for tactics leave a bit to desire, for example
given the program:
```coq
Lemma u n : n + 0 = n.
rewrite plus_O_n.
```
the backtrace stops at:
```
Found no subterm matching "0 + ?M160" in the current goal.
Called from file "proofs/proof.ml", line 381, characters 4-42
Called from file "tactics/pfedit.ml", line 102, characters 31-58
Called from file "plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg", line 378, characters 8-84
```
Backtrace information `?info` is as of today optional in some tactics,
such as `tclZERO`, it doesn't cost a lot however to reify backtrace
information indeed in `tclZERO` and provide backtraces for all tactic
errors. The cost should be small if we are not in debug mode.
The backtrace for the failed rewrite is now:
```
Found no subterm matching "0 + ?M160" in the current goal.
Raised at file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 1827, characters 14-73
Called from file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 1929, characters 17-53
Called from file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 1948, characters 22-72
Called from file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 2020, characters 14-56
Re-raised at file "pretyping/unification.ml", line 2021, characters 66-73
Called from file "proofs/clenv.ml", line 254, characters 12-58
Called from file "proofs/clenvtac.ml", line 95, characters 16-53
Called from file "engine/proofview.ml", line 1110, characters 40-46
Called from file "engine/proofview.ml", line 1115, characters 10-34
Re-raised at file "clib/exninfo.ml", line 82, characters 4-38
Called from file "proofs/proof.ml", line 381, characters 4-42
Called from file "tactics/pfedit.ml", line 102, characters 31-58
Called from file "plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg", line 378, characters 8-84
```
which IMO is much better.
|
|
|
|
This completes a pure Dune bootstrap of Coq.
There is still the question if we should modify `coqdep` so it does
output a dependency on `Init.Prelude.vo` in certain cases.
TODO: We still double-add `theories` and `plugins` [in coqinit and in
Dune], this should be easy to clean up.
Setting `libs_init_load_path` does give a correct build indeed;
however we still must call this for compatibility?
|
|
Reviewed-by: ejgallego
Reviewed-by: ppedrot
|
|
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
|
|
|
|
Currently, `.v` under the `Coq.` prefix are found in both `theories`
and `plugins`. Usually these two directories are merged by special
loadpath code that allows double-binding of the prefix.
This adds some complexity to the build and loadpath system; and in
particular, it prevents from handling the `Coq.*` prefix in the
simple, `-R theories Coq` standard way.
We thus move all `.v` files to theories, leaving `plugins` as an
OCaml-only directory, and modify accordingly the loadpath / build
infrastructure.
Note that in general `plugins/foo/Foo.v` was not self-contained, in
the sense that it depended on files in `theories` and files in
`theories` depended on it; moreover, Coq saw all these files as
belonging to the same namespace so it didn't really care where they
lived.
This could also imply a performance gain as we now effectively
traverse less directories when locating a library.
See also discussion in #10003
|
|
The standard use is to repeat the option keywords in lowercase, which
is basically useless.
En passant add doc entry for Dump Arith.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This form is only used in coq-bignums and not documented. I think
removal is the best choice, specially as `zify` is not part of the
omega plugin anymore.
|
|
Changes to the test-suite were backported from PR #11288.
|
|
We also remove trailing whitespace.
Script used:
```bash
for i in `find . -name '*.ml' -or -name '*.mli' -or -name '*.mlg'`; do expand -i "$i" | sponge "$i"; sed -e's/[[:space:]]*$//' -i.bak "$i"; done
```
|
|
The logic is implemented in OCaml. By induction over the terms,
guided by registered Coq terms in ZifyInst.v, it generates a rewriting
lemma. The rewriting is only performed if there is some progress. If
the rewriting fails (due to dependencies), a novel hypothesis is
generated.
This PR fixes #5155, fixes #8898, fixes #7886, fixes #10707, fixes #9848
ans fixes #10755.
The zify plugin is placed in the micromega directory.
(Though the reason is unclear, having it in a separate directory is
bad for efficiency.) efficiency impact.
There are also a few improvements of lia/lra that are piggybacked.
- more aggressive pruning of useless hypotheses
- slightly optimised conjunctive normal form
- applies exfalso if conclusion is not in Prop
- removal of Timeout in test-suite
|
|
Reviewed-by: SkySkimmer
Ack-by: ppedrot
|
|
Not pretty, but it had to be done some day, as `Globnames` seems to be
on the way out.
I have taken the opportunity to reduce the number of `open` in the
codebase.
The qualified style would indeed allow us to use a bit nicer names
`GlobRef.Inductive` instead of `IndRef`, etc... once we have the
tooling to do large-scale refactoring that could be tried.
|
|
The changes are large due to `Pervasives` deprecation:
- the `Pervasives` module has been deprecated in favor of `Stdlib`, we
have opted for introducing a few wrapping functions in `Util` and
just unqualified the rest of occurrences. We avoid the shims as in
the previous attempt.
- a bug regarding partial application have been fixed.
- some formatting functions have been deprecated, but previous
versions don't include a replacement, thus the warning has been
disabled.
We may want to clean up things a bit more, in particular
w.r.t. modules once we can move to OCaml 4.07 as the minimum required
version.
Note that there is a clash between 4.08.0 modules `Option` and `Int`
and Coq's ones. It is not clear if we should resolve that clash or
not, see PR #10469 for more discussion.
On the good side, OCaml 4.08.0 does provide a few interesting
functionalities, including nice new warnings useful for devs.
|
|
|
|
Typeclasses resolution is not used anymore for lia.
Typeclasses resolution is still used by lra but only to access a
database of declared constants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kernel should be mostly correct, higher levels do random stuff at
times.
|
|
Z.to_euclidean_division_equations
|
|
Also fold it into `Z.div_mod_to_quot_rem`
Note that the test-suite file is a bit slow. On my machine, it is
```
real 2m32.983s
user 2m32.544s
sys 0m0.492s
```
|
|
Alas, I have not had time to work on imrpoving the performance of nia,
and there has been a request to include this tactic (which is useful on
its own) without bundling it into `zify`. So that is what we do here.
I leave the definition of it in `PreOmega` in case we want to eventually
include it in `zify`/`nia`.
|
|
Disjunctions seem to have a negative performance impact, so let's try
implications instead.
|
|
The various (micr)omega tactics now support `Z.div` and `Z.modulo`.
I briefly looked into supporting `Nat.div` and `Nat.modulo`, but the
conversions between `Z.div` and `Nat.div` are defined in `ZArith.Zdiv`,
which depends on `Omega`, which depends on `PreOmega`, which is where
`zify` is defined.
|
|
|
|
In favor of a constr_of_monomorphic_global function. When people
move to the new Coqlib interface they will also see this deprecation
message encouraging them to think about the best move.
This commit changes a few references to constr_of_global and replaces
them with a constr_of_monomorphic_global which makes it apparent that
this is not the function to call to globalize polymorphic references.
The remaining parts using constr_of_monomorphic_global are easily
identifiable using this: omega, btauto, ring, funind and auto_ind_decl
mainly (this fixes firstorder). What this means is that the symbols
registered for these tactics have to be monomorphic for now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lintian found some spelling errors in the Debian packaging for coq. Fix
them most places they appear in the current source. (Don't change
documentation anchor names, as that would invalidate external
deeplinks.)
This also fixes a bug in coqdoc: prior to this commit, coqdoc would
highlight `instanciate` but not `instantiate`.
|
|
We refactor the `Coqlib` API to locate objects over a namespace
`module.object.property`.
This introduces the vernacular command `Register g as n` to expose the
Coq constant `g` under the name `n` (through the `register_ref`
function). The constant can then be dynamically located using the
`lib_ref` function.
Co-authored-by: Emilio Jesús Gallego Arias <e+git@x80.org>
Co-authored-by: Maxime Dénès <mail@maximedenes.fr>
Co-authored-by: Vincent Laporte <Vincent.Laporte@fondation-inria.fr>
|
|
We remove sections paths from kernel names. This is a cleanup as most of the times this information was unused. This implies a change in the Kernel API and small user visible changes with regards to tactic qualification. In particular, the removal of "global discharge" implies a large cleanup of code.
Additionally, the change implies that some machinery in `library` and `safe_typing` must now take an `~in_section` parameter, as to provide the information whether a section is open or not.
|
|
After the introduction of `EConstr`, "normalization" has become
unnecessary, we thus deprecate the `nf_*` family of functions.
Test-suite and CI pass after the fix for #8513.
|
|
|
|
[Dune](https://github.com/ocaml/dune) is a compositional declarative
build system for OCaml. It provides automatic generation of
`version.ml`, `.merlin`, `META`, `opam`, API documentation; install
management; easy integration with external libraries, test runners,
and modular builds.
In particular, Dune uniformly handles components regardless whether
they live in, or out-of-tree. This greatly simplifies cases where a
plugin [or CoqIde] is checked out in the current working copy but then
distributed separately [and vice-versa]. Dune can thus be used as a
more flexible `coq_makefile` replacement.
For now we provide experimental support for a Dune build. In order to
build Coq + the standard library with Dune type:
```
$ make -f Makefile.dune world
```
This PR includes a preliminary, developer-only preview of Dune for
Coq. There is still ongoing work, see
https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8052 for tracking status towards
full support.
## Technical description.
Dune works out of the box with Coq, once we have fixed some modularity
issues. The main remaining challenge was to support `.vo` files.
As Dune doesn't support custom build rules yet, to properly build
`.vo` files we provide a small helper script `tools/coq_dune.ml`. The
script will scan the Coq library directories and generate the
corresponding rules for `.v -> .vo` and `.ml4 -> .ml` builds. The
script uses `coqdep` as to correctly output the dependencies of
`.v` files. `coq_dune` is akin to `coq_makefile` and should be able to
be used to build Coq projects in the future.
Due to this pitfall, the build process has to proceed in three stages:
1) build `coqdep` and `coq_dune`; 2) generate `dune` files for
`theories` and `plugins`; 3) perform a regular build with all
targets are in scope.
## FAQ
### Why Dune?
Coq has a moderately complex build system and it is not a secret that
many developer-hours have been spent fighting with `make`.
In particular, the current `make`-based system does offer poor support
to verify that the current build rules and variables are coherent, and
requires significant manual, error-prone. Many variables must be
passed by hand, duplicated, etc... Additionally, our make system
offers poor integration with now standard OCaml ecosystem tools such
as `opam`, `ocamlfind` or `odoc`. Another critical point is build
compositionality. Coq is rich in 3rd party contributions, and a big
shortcoming of the current make system is that it cannot be used to
build these projects; requiring us to maintain a custom tool,
`coq_makefile`, with the corresponding cost.
In the past, there has been some efforts to migrate Coq to more
specialized build systems, however these stalled due to a variety of
reasons. Dune, is a declarative, OCaml-specific build tool that is on
the path to become the standard build system for the OCaml ecosystem.
Dune seems to be a good fit for Coq well: it is well-supported, fast,
compositional, and designed for large projects.
### Does Dune replace the make-based build system?
The current, make-based build system is unmodified by this PR and kept
as the default option. However, Dune has the potential
### Is this PR complete? What does it provide?
This PR is ready for developer preview and feedback. The build system
is functional, however, more work is necessary in order to make Dune
the default for Coq.
The main TODOs are tracked at https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8052
This PR allows developers to use most of the features of Dune today:
- Modular organization of the codebase; each component is built only
against declared dependencies so components are checked for
containment more strictly.
- Hygienic builds; Dune places all artifacts under `_build`.
- Automatic generation of `.install` files, simplified OPAM workflow.
- `utop` support, `-opaque` in developer mode, etc...
- `ml4` files are handled using `coqp5`, a native-code customized
camlp5 executable which brings much faster `ml4 -> ml` processing.
### What dependencies does Dune require?
Dune doesn't depend on any 3rd party package other than the OCaml compiler.
### Some Benchs:
```
$ /usr/bin/time make DUNEOPT="-j 1000" -f Makefile.dune states
59.50user 18.81system 0:29.83elapsed 262%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 302996maxresident)k
0inputs+646632outputs (0major+4893811minor)pagefaults 0swaps
$ /usr/bin/time sh -c "./configure -local -native-compiler no && make -j states"
88.21user 23.65system 0:32.96elapsed 339%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 304992maxresident)k
0inputs+1051680outputs (0major+5300680minor)pagefaults 0swaps
```
|
|
|
|
Unused since fd7f056b155b2ebaafa3251a3c136117ebefc3e3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- move_location to proofs/logic.
- intro_pattern_naming to Namegen.
|
|
We remove most of what was deprecated in `Term`. Now, `intf` and
`kernel` are almost deprecation-free, tho I am not very convinced
about the whole `Term -> Constr` renaming but I'm afraid there is no
way back.
Inconsistencies with the constructor policy (see #6440) remain along
the code-base and I'm afraid I don't see a plan to reconcile them.
The `Sorts` deprecation is hard to finalize, opening `Sorts` is not a
good idea as someone added a `List` module inside it.
|
|
We address the easy ones, but they should probably be all removed.
|
|
|
