| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, `.v` under the `Coq.` prefix are found in both `theories`
and `plugins`. Usually these two directories are merged by special
loadpath code that allows double-binding of the prefix.
This adds some complexity to the build and loadpath system; and in
particular, it prevents from handling the `Coq.*` prefix in the
simple, `-R theories Coq` standard way.
We thus move all `.v` files to theories, leaving `plugins` as an
OCaml-only directory, and modify accordingly the loadpath / build
infrastructure.
Note that in general `plugins/foo/Foo.v` was not self-contained, in
the sense that it depended on files in `theories` and files in
`theories` depended on it; moreover, Coq saw all these files as
belonging to the same namespace so it didn't really care where they
lived.
This could also imply a performance gain as we now effectively
traverse less directories when locating a library.
See also discussion in #10003
|
|
|
|
- Improved reification for Micromega (support for #8764)
- Fixes #9268: Do not take universes into account in lia reification
Improve #9291 by threading the evar_map during reification.
Universes are unified.
- Remove (potentially cyclic) dependency over lra for Rle_abs
- Towards a complete simplex-based lia
fixes #9615
Lia is now exclusively using cutting plane proofs.
For this to always work, all the variables need to be positive.
Therefore, lia is pre-processing the goal for each variable x
it introduces the constraints x = y - z , y>=0 , z >= 0
for some fresh variable y and z.
For scalability, nia is currently NOT performing this pre-processing.
- Lia is using the FSet library
manual merge of commit #230899e87c51c12b2f21b6fedc414d099a1425e4
to work around a "leaked" hint breaking compatibility of eauto
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Assert a purely arihtmetic sub-goal that is proved independently by reflexion.
(This reduces the stress on the conversion test)
- Does not use 'abstract' anymore (more natural proof-term)
- Fix a parsing bug (certain terms in Prop where not recognized)
|
|
If 'abstract' fails e.g. if there are existentials. The tactic runs an abstract-free alternative.
|
|
(Fixed #4985)
Lqa.v defines the tactics lra and nra working over Q.
Lra.v defines the tactics lra and nra working over R.
|
