| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As part of the proof refactoring work I am doing some modifications to
`funind` and indentation of that code is driving me a bit crazy; I'd
much prefer to delegate it to an automatic tool.
|
|
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We turn the tuples used for (co)-fixpoints into records, cleaning up
their users.
More cleanup is be possible, in particular a few functions can now
shared among co and fixpoints, also `structured_fixpoint_expr` could
like be folded into the new record.
Feedback on the naming of the records fields is welcome.
This is a step towards cleaning up code in `funind`, as it is the main
consumer of this data structure, as it does quite a bit of fixpoint
manipulation.
cc: #6019
|
|
The main idea of this PR is to distinguish the types of "proof object"
`Proof_global.t` and the type of "proof object associated to a
constant, the new `Lemmas.t`.
This way, we can move the terminator setup to the higher layer in
`vernac`, which is the one that really knows about constants, paving
the way for further simplification and in particular for a unified
handling of constant saving by removal of the control inversion here.
Terminators are now internal to `Lemmas`, as it is the only part of
the code applying them.
As a consequence, proof nesting is now handled by `Lemmas`, and
`Proof_global.t` is just a single `Proof.t` plus some environmental
meta-data.
We are also enable considerable simplification in a future PR, as this
patch makes `Proof.t` and `Proof_global.t` essentially the same, so we
should expect to handle them under a unified interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body
has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option`
The other specifiers are for the following body types:
~~~
![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate`
![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option`
![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate`
![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit`
![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit`
~~~
The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a
section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning.
The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently
they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't
have to be classified QUERY.
![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I
don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future.
For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old
meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing
plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us
where it's used.
|
|
Typically instead of [start_proof : ontop:Proof_global.t option -> bla ->
Proof_global.t] we have [start_proof : bla -> Proof_global.pstate] and
the pstate is pushed on the stack by a caller around the
vernacentries/mlg level.
Naming can be a bit awkward, hopefully it can be improved (maybe in a
followup PR).
We can see some patterns appear waiting for nicer combinators, eg in
mlg we often only want to work with the current proof, not the stack.
Behaviour should be similar modulo bugs, let's see what CI says.
|
|
|
|
- move_location to proofs/logic.
- intro_pattern_naming to Namegen.
|
|
In #6092, `global_reference` was moved to `kernel`. It makes sense to
go further and use the current kernel style for names.
This has a good effect on the dependency graph, as some core modules
don't depend on library anymore.
A question about providing equality for the GloRef module remains, as
there are two different notions of equality for constants. In that
sense, `KerPair` seems suspicious and at some point it should be
looked at.
|
|
Unfortunately, mli-only files cannot be included in packs, so we have
the weird situation that the scope for `Tacexpr` is wrong. So we
cannot address the module as `Ltac_plugin.Tacexpr` but it lives in the
global namespace instead.
This creates problem when using other modular build/packing strategies
[such as #6857] This could be indeed considered a bug in the OCaml
compiler.
In order to remedy this situation we face two choices:
- leave the module out of the pack (!)
- create an implementation for the module
I chose the second solution as it seems to me like the most sensible
choice.
cc: #6512.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unluckily, this forces replacing a lot of code in plugins, because the API
defined the type of goals and tactics in Proof_type, and by the no-alias rule,
this was the only one. But Proof_type was already implicitly deprecated, so
that the API should have relied on Tacmach instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the user side, coqtop and coqc take a list of warning names or categories
after -w. No prefix means activate the warning, a "-" prefix means deactivate
it, and "+" means turn the warning into an error. Special categories include
"all", and "default" which contains the warnings enabled by default.
We also provide a vernacular Set Warnings which takes the same flags as argument.
Note that coqc now prints warnings.
The name and category of a warning are printed with the warning itself.
On the developer side, Feedback.msg_warning is still accessible, but the
recommended way to print a warning is in two steps:
1) create it by:
let warn_my_warning =
CWarnings.create ~name:"my-warning" ~category:"my-category"
(fun args -> Pp.strbrk ...)
2) print it by:
warn_my_warning args
|
|
can be given with second H bound by the first one.
Not very satisfied by passing closure to tactics.ml, but otherwise
tactics would have to be aware of glob_constr.
|
|
"pat/term" for "apply term on current_hyp as pat".
|
|
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
|
|
With ocaml 4.01, the 'unused open' warning also checks the mli :-)
Beware: some open are reported as useless when compiling with camlp5,
but are necessary for compatibility with camlp4. These open are now
marked with a comment.
|
|
were closed (i.e. the only remaining ones are those of printing/parsing).
Meanwhile, a simplified interface is provided in loc.mli.
This also permits to put Pp in Clib, because it does not depend on
CAMLP4/5 anymore.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15475 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15392 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
grammar.cma
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15384 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Corresponding operations in locusops.ml and miscops.ml
The type of occurrences is now a clear algebraic one instead of
a bool*list hard to understand.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15372 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
Util only depends on Ocaml stdlib and Utf8 tables.
Generic pretty printing and loc functions are in Pp.
Generic errors are in Errors.
+ Training white-spaces, useless open, prlist copies random erasure.
Too many "open Errors" on the contrary.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@15020 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13744 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
|
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@13094 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
|
