| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This brings more compatibility with handling of mutual primitive records
in the kernel.
|
|
This is a first step towards the acceptance of mutual record types in the
kernel.
|
|
This was completely wrong, such a term could not even be type-checked by
the kernel as it was internally using a match construct over a negative
record. They were luckily only used in upper layers, namley printing
and extraction.
Recomputing the projection body might be costly in detyping, but this only
happens when the compatibility flag is turned on, which is not the default.
Such flag is probably bound to disappear anyways.
Extraction should be fixed though so as to define directly primitive
projections, similarly to what has been done in native compute.
|
|
This field used to signal that a constant was the compatibility
eta-expansion of a primitive projections, but since a previous cleanup in
the kernel it had become useless.
|
|
Instead of having the projection data in the constant data we have it
independently in the environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We also have to update the checker to deserialize this additional data,
but it is not using it in type-checking yet.
|
|
Also use constant_universes_entry instead of a bool flag to indicate
polymorphism in ParameterEntry.
There are a few places where we convert back to ContextSet because
check_univ_decl returns a UContext, this could be improved.
|
|
We do up to `Term` which is the main bulk of the changes.
|
|
This will allow to merge back `Names` with `API.Names`
|
|
As explained in edf85b9, the original commit that merged the module_body
and module_type_body representations, this was delayed to a later time
assumedly due to OCaml lack of GADTs. Actually, the only thing that was
needed was polymorphic recursion, which has been around already for a
relatively long time (since 3.12).
|
|
The use of template polymorphism in constants was quite limited, as it
only applied to definitions that were exactly inductive types without any
parameter whatsoever. Furthermore, it seems that following the introduction
of polymorphic definitions, the code path enforced regular polymorphism as
soon as the type of a definition was given, which was in practice almost
always.
Removing this feature had no observable effect neither on the test-suite,
nor on any development that we monitor on Travis. I believe it is safe to
assume it was nowadays useless.
|
|
|
|
Instead of returning either an instance or the set of constraints, we rather
return the corresponding abstracted context. We also push back all uses of
abstraction-breaking calls from these functions out of the kernel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
These functions were messing with the deferred universe constraints in an
error-prone way, and were only used for printing as of today. We inline
the one used by the printer instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except I have disabled the minimization of universes after sections as
it seems to interfere with the STM machinery causing files like
test-suite/vio/print.v to loop when processed asynchronously.
This is very peculiar and needs more investigation as the aforementioned
file does not have any sections or any universe polymorphic definitions!
commit fc785326080b9451eb4700b16ccd3f7df214e0ed
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Apr 24 17:14:21 2017 +0200
Revert STL to monomorphic
commit 62b573fb13d290d8fe4c85822da62d3e5e2a6996
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Apr 24 17:02:42 2017 +0200
Try unifying universes before apply subtyping
commit ff393742c37b9241c83498e84c2274967a1a58dc
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Apr 23 13:49:04 2017 +0200
Compile more of STL with universe polymorphism
commit 5c831b41ebd1fc32e2dd976697c8e474f48580d6
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Apr 18 21:26:45 2017 +0200
Made more progress on compiling the standard library
commit b8550ffcce0861794116eb3b12b84e1158c2b4f8
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Sun Apr 16 22:55:19 2017 +0200
Make more number theoretic modules monomorphic
commit 29d126d4d4910683f7e6aada2a25209151e41b10
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Apr 14 16:11:48 2017 +0200
WIP more of standard library compiles
Also: Matthieu fixed a bug in rewrite system which was faulty when
introducing new morphisms (Add Morphism) command.
commit 23bc33b843f098acaba4c63c71c68f79c4641f8c
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Apr 14 11:39:21 2017 +0200
WIP: more of the standard library compiles
We have implemented convertibility of constructors up-to mutual
subtyping of their corresponding inductive types. This is similar to
the behavior of template polymorphism.
commit d0abc5c50d593404fb41b98d588c3843382afd4f
Author: Amin Timany <amintimany@gmail.com>
Date: Wed Apr 12 19:02:39 2017 +0200
WIP: trying to get the standard library compile with universe polymorphism
We are trying to prune universes after section ends. Sections add a
load of universes that are not appearing in the body, type or the
constraints.
|
|
It stores both universe constraints and subtyping information for
blocks of inductive declarations.
At this stage the there is no inference or checking implemented. The
subtyping information simply encodes equality of levels for the condition of
subtyping.
|
|
|
|
composition operator.
Short story:
This pull-request:
(1) removes the definition of the "right-to-left" function composition operator
(2) adds the definition of the "left-to-right" function composition operator
(3) rewrites the code relying on "right-to-left" function composition to rely on "left-to-right" function composition operator instead.
Long story:
In mathematics, function composition is traditionally denoted with ∘ operator.
Ocaml standard library does not provide analogous operator under any name.
Batteries Included provides provides two alternatives:
_ % _
and
_ %> _
The first operator one corresponds to the classical ∘ operator routinely used in mathematics.
I.e.:
(f4 % f3 % f2 % f1) x ≜ (f4 ∘ f3 ∘ f2 ∘ f1) x
We can call it "right-to-left" composition because:
- the function we write as first (f4) will be called as last
- and the function write as last (f1) will be called as first.
The meaning of the second operator is this:
(f1 %> f2 %> f3 %> f4) x ≜ (f4 ∘ f3 ∘ f2 ∘ f1) x
We can call it "left-to-right" composition because:
- the function we write as first (f1) will be called first
- and the function we write as last (f4) will be called last
That is, the functions are written in the same order in which we write and read them.
I think that it makes sense to prefer the "left-to-right" variant because
it enables us to write functions in the same order in which they will be actually called
and it thus better fits our culture
(we read/write from left to right).
|
|
mainly concerning referring to "Context.{Rel,Named}.get_{id,value,type}" functions.
If multiple modules define a function with a same name, e.g.:
Context.{Rel,Named}.get_type
those calls were prefixed with a corresponding prefix
to make sure that it is obvious which function is being called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rational is that
1. further typing flags may be available in the future
2. it makes it easier to trace and document the argument
|
|
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
|
|
Originally, rel-context was represented as:
Context.rel_context = Names.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Rel.t = LocalAssum of Names.Name.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Name.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Originally, named-context was represented as:
Context.named_context = Names.Id.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Named.t = LocalAssum of Names.Id.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Id.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Motivation:
(1) In "tactics/hipattern.ml4" file we define "test_strict_disjunction"
function which looked like this:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [_,None,c] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
Suppose that you do not know about rel-context and named-context.
(that is the case of people who just started to read the source code)
Merlin would tell you that the type of the value you are destructing
by "match" is:
'a * 'b option * Constr.t (* worst-case scenario *)
or
Named.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t (* best-case scenario (?) *)
To me, this is akin to wearing an opaque veil.
It is hard to figure out the meaning of the values you are looking at.
In particular, it is hard to discover the connection between the value
we are destructing above and the datatypes and functions defined
in the "kernel/context.ml" file.
In this case, the connection is there, but it is not visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now consider, what happens when the reader see the same function
presented in the following form:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [LocalAssum (_,c)] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
If the reader haven't seen "LocalAssum" before, (s)he can use Merlin
to jump to the corresponding definition and learn more.
In this case, the connection is there, and it is directly visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
(2) Also, if we already have the concepts such as:
- local declaration
- local assumption
- local definition
and we describe these notions meticulously in the Reference Manual,
then it is a real pity not to reinforce the connection
of the actual code with the abstract description we published.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The structure of the Context module was refined in such a way that:
- Types and functions related to rel-context declarations were put into the Context.Rel.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to rel-context were put into the Context.Rel module.
- Types and functions related to named-context declarations were put into the Context.Named.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-context were put into the Context.Named module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context declarations were put into Context.NamedList.Declaration module.
- Types and functions related to named-list-context were put into Context.NamedList module.
Some missing comments were added to the *.mli file.
The output of ocamldoc was checked whether it looks in a reasonable way.
"TODO: cleanup" was removed
The order in which are exported functions listed in the *.mli file was changed.
(as in a mature modules, this order usually is not random)
The order of exported functions in Context.{Rel,Named} modules is now consistent.
(as there is no special reason why that order should be different)
The order in which are functions defined in the *.ml file is the same as the order in which they are listed in the *.mli file.
(as there is no special reason to define them in a different order)
The name of the original fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} functions was changed to better indicate what those functions do.
(Now they are called Context.{Rel,Named}.fold_{inside,outside})
The original comments originally attached to the fold_{rel,named}_context{,_reverse} did not full make sense so they were updated.
Thrown exceptions are now documented.
Naming of formal parameters was made more consistent across different functions.
Comments of similar functions in different modules are now consistent.
Comments from *.mli files were copied to *.ml file.
(We need that information in *.mli files because that is were ocamldoc needs it.
It is nice to have it also in *.ml files because when we are using Merlin and jump to the definion of the function,
we can see the comments also there and do not need to open a different file if we want to see it.)
When we invoke ocamldoc, we instruct it to generate UTF-8 HTML instead of (default) ISO-8859-1.
(UTF-8 characters are used in our ocamldoc markup)
"open Context" was removed from all *.mli and *.ml files.
(Originally, it was OK to do that. Now it is not.)
An entry to dev/doc/changes.txt file was added that describes how the names of types and functions have changed.
|
|
Note: they do not even seem to have a debugging purpose, so better remove
them before they bitrot.
|
|
Modules inserted into the environment were not hashconsed, leading to an
important redundancy, especially in module signatures that are always fully
expanded.
This patch divides by two the size and memory consumption of module-heavy
files by hashconsing modules before putting them in the environment. Note
that this is not a real hashconsing, in the sense that we only hashcons the
inner terms contained in the modules, that are only mapped over. Compilation
time should globally decrease, even though some files definining a lot of
modules may see their compilation time increase.
Some remaining overhead may persist, as for instance module inclusion is not
hashconsed.
|
|
Side effects are now an opaque data type, called private_constant, you can
only obtain from safe_typing. When add_constant is called on a
definition_entry that contains private constants, they are either
- inlined in the main proof term but not re-checked
- declared globally without re-checking them
As a safety measure, the opaque data type contains a pointer to the
revstruct (an internal field of safe_env that changes every time a new
constant is added), and such pointer is compared with the current value
store in safe_env when the private_constant is inlined. Only when the
comparison is successful the private_constant is not re-checked. Otherwise
else it is. In short, we accept into the kernel private constant only
when they arrive in the very same order and on top of the very same env
they arrived when we fist checked them.
Note: private_constants produced by workers never pass the safety
measure (the revstruct pointer is an Ephemeron). Sending back the
entire revstruct is possible but: 1. we lack a way to quickly compare
two revstructs, 2. it can be large.
|
|
assumed.
|
|
positivity is assumed.
|
|
more than 245 constructors (unsupported by OCaml's runtime).
|
|
One remaining issue: aliased constants raise an anomaly when some unsubstituted
universe variables remain. VM may suffer from the same problem.
|
|
|
|
Before the union was performed as a UContext.t union, that
concatenates the instances arrays, while one wants to avoid
duplicates.
We also assert that polymorphic constants have all constraints
in the constant_body (field const_universes), since the extra body
univs (stored in the opaque tables) are just for regular constants
processed asynchronously.
|
|
This generalizes the BuildVi flag and lets one choose which
opaque proofs are done and which not.
|
|
Now the seff contains it directly, no need to force the future
or to hope that it is a Direct opaque proof.
|
