| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
We'd like to cleanup the `proof_end` type so we can have a smaller
path in proof save. Note that the construction:
```
Goal Type.
⋮
Save id.
```
has to be handled by the STM in the same path as Defined (but with an
opaque flag), as `Save id` will alter the environment and cannot be
processed in parallel.
We thus try to simply such paths a bit, as complexity of `lemmas.ml`
seems like an issue these days. The form `Save Theorem id` doesn't
really seem used, and moreover we should really add a type of "Goal",
and unify syntax.
It is often the case that beginners try `Goal addnC n : n + 0 = n."
etc...
|
|
let-ins
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were actually no syntax for it, and I'm still unsure what good
syntax to give to it, even more that it would be useful to have one.
|
|
|
|
This is the good parts of PR #360.
IIUC, these vernacular were meant mostly for debugging and they are
not supposed to be of any use these days.
Back and join are still there not to break the testing infrastructure,
but some day they should go away.
|
|
This is a bit long, but it is to keep a symmetry with constr_expr.
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit b00e039b957b8428c21faec5c76f3a3484cde2cf, reversing
changes made to ca9e00ff9b2a8ee17430398a5e0bef2345c39341.
It turns out that calling from fake_ide the STM commands that were removed
by this PR requires an extension of the XML protocol. So postponing the
integration.
|
|
I think these commands never make a lot of sense on scripts other than
debugging and we have better methods now.
The last remaining command, used for the tty emulation has been renamed
to VtBack, but it should go away at some point too once the legacy
interfaces are removed.
|
|
In addition to a priority, cleanup the interfaces for passing this
information as well. The pattern, if given, takes priority over the
inferred one.
We only allow Existing Instances gr ... gr | pri. for now, without
pattern, as before.
Make the API compatible to 8.5 as well.
|
|
|
|
The main point of this change is to fix #3035: Avoiding trailing
arguments in the Arguments command, and related issues occurring in
HoTT for instance. When the "assert" flag is not specified, we now
accept prefixes of the list of arguments.
The semantics of _ w.r.t. to renaming has changed. Previously, it meant
"restore the original name inferred from the type". Now it means "don't
change the current name".
The syntax of arguments is now restricted. Modifiers like /, ! and
scopes are allowed only in the first arguments list.
We also add *a lot* of missing checks on input values and fix various
bugs.
Note that this code is still way too complex for what it does, due to
the complexity of the implicit arguments, reduction behaviors and renaming
APIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For now, the only meaningful user is "Set Warnings". Example:
Section Bar.
Local Set Warnings Append "-foo".
(* warning foo is now disabled *)
End Bar.
(* foo is now reenabled, assuming it was before entering the section *)
|
|
Was PR#299: Fix bug #4869, allow Prop, Set, and level names in
constraints.
|
|
This is a quick fix. The Metasyntax module should be thoroughly revised
in trunk, because it starts featuring a lot of spaghetti code and redundant
data.
|
|
It seems warnings are not taken into account in output/
tests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit documents par:, fixes its semantics so that is
behaves like all:, supports (toplevel) abstract and optimizes
toplevel solve.
`par: solve [tac]` is equivalent to `Ltac tac1 := solve[tac]...par: tac1`
but is optimized for failures: if one goal fails all are aborted
immediately.
`par: abstract tac` runs abstract on the generated proof terms. Nested
abstract calls are not supported.
|
|
Suggested by R. Krebbers and C. Cohen, this makes modes
more applicable, by allowing to trigger resolution on partially
instantiated indices. This is a rough but fast approximation of the
pattern on which one would like instances to apply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This allows to write things like this:
split; 2: intro _; exact I
or like this:
eexists ?[x]; ?[x]: exact 0; trivial
This has the side-effect on making the '?' before '[x]' mandatory.
|
|
You can now write [[1, 3-5]:tac.] to apply [tac] on the subgoals
numbered 1 and 3 to 5.
|
|
|
|
This commit introduces the concept of proof blocks that are
resilient to errors. They are represented as ErrorBound boxes
in the STM document with the topological invariant that they never
overlap.
The detection and error recovery of ErrorBound boxes is defined outside
the STM. One can define a box by providing a function to detect it
statically by crawling the parsed document and a function to recover
from an error at run time.
|
|
|
|
into JasonGross-trunk-function_scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually the identifier was never used and just carried along.
|
|
|
|
The definition of Vernacexpr.VernacDeclareTacticDefinition was changed.
The original definition allowed us to represent non-sensical value such as:
VernacDeclareTacticDefinition(Qualid ..., false, ...)
The new definition prevents that.
|
|
command is mapped.
|
|
Originally, "VernacTime" and "VernacRedirect" were defined like this:
type vernac_expr =
...
| VernacTime of vernac_list
| VernacRedirect of string * vernac_list
...
where
type vernac_list = located_vernac_expr list
Currently, that list always contained one and only one element.
So I propose changing the definition of these two variants in the following way:
| VernacTime of located_vernac_expr
| VernacRedirect of string * located_vernac_expr
which covers all our current needs and enforces the invariant
related to the number of commands that are part of the
"VernacTime" and "VernacRedirect" variants.
|
|
|
