aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/intf/constrexpr.ml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-04-23[api] Relocate `intf` modules according to dependency-order.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
In a component-based source code organization of Coq `intf` doesn't fit very well, as it sits in bit of "limbo" between different components, and indeed, encourages developers to place types in sometimes random places wrt the hierarchy. For example, lower parts of the system reference `Vernacexpr`, which morally lives in a pretty higher part of the system. We move all the files in `intf` to the lowest place their dependencies can accommodate: - `Misctypes`: is used by Declaremod, thus it has to go in `library` or below. Ideally, this file would disappear. - `Evar_kinds`: it is used by files in `engine`, so that seems its proper placement. - `Decl_kinds`: used in `library`, seems like the right place. [could also be merged. - `Glob_term`: belongs to pretyping, where it is placed. - `Locus`: ditto. - `Pattern`: ditto. - `Genredexpr`: depended by a few modules in `pretyping`, seems like the righ place. - `Constrexpr`: used in `pretyping`, the use is a bit unfortunate and could be fixed, as this module should be declared in `interp` which is the one eliminating it. - `Vernacexpr`: same problem than `Constrexpr`; this one can be fixed as it contains stuff it shouldn't. The right place should be `parsing`. - `Extend`: Is placed in `pretyping` due to being used by `Vernacexpr`. - `Notation_term`: First place used is `interp`, seems like the right place. Additionally, for some files it could be worth to merge files of the form `Foo` with `Foo_ops` in the medium term, as to create proper ADT modules as done in the kernel with `Name`, etc...
2018-03-09[located] More work towards using CAst.tEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We continue with the work of #402 and #6745 and update most of the remaining parts of the AST: - module declarations - intro patterns - top-level sentences Now, parsed documents should be full annotated by `CAst` nodes.
2018-03-07Merge PR #6905: Fix make ml-docMaxime Dénès
2018-03-07Merge PR #6790: Allow universe declarations for [with Definition].Maxime Dénès
2018-03-05Change non-documentation comment from ocamldoc stylemrmr1993
2018-03-05Fix formatting of some ocamldoc comments to reduce warningsmrmr1993
2018-03-05Allow universe declarations for [with Definition].Gaëtan Gilbert
2018-02-27Update headers following #6543.Théo Zimmermann
2018-02-22[ast] Improve precision of Ast location recognition in serialization.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We follow the suggestions in #402 and turn uses of `Loc.located` in `vernac` into `CAst.t`. The impact should be low as this change mostly affects top-level vernaculars. With this change, we are even closer to automatically map a text document to its AST in a programmatic way.
2018-02-20Adding support for parsing subterms of a notation as "pattern".Hugo Herbelin
This allows in particular to define notations with 'pat style binders. E.g.: A non-trivial change in this commit is storing binders and patterns separately from terms. This is not strictly necessary but has some advantages. However, it is relatively common to have binders also used as terms, or binders parsed as terms. Thus, it is already relatively common to embed binders into terms (see e.g. notation for ETA in output test Notations3.v) or to coerce terms to idents (see e.g. the notation for {x|P} where x is parsed as a constr). So, it is as simple to always store idents (and eventually patterns) as terms.
2018-02-20Moving the argument of CProdN/CLambdaN from binder_expr to local_binder_expr.Hugo Herbelin
The motivations are: - To reflect the concrete syntax more closely. - To factorize the different places where "contexts" are internalized: before this patch, there is a different treatment of `Definition f '(x,y) := x+y` and `Definition f := fun '(x,y) => x+y`, and a hack to interpret `Definition f `pat := c : t`. With the patch, the fix to avoid seeing a variable named `pat` works for both `fun 'x => ...` and `Definition f 'x := ...`. The drawbacks are: - Counterpart to reflecting the concrete syntax more closerly, there are more redundancies in the syntax. For instance, the case `CLetIn (na,b,t,c)` can appears also in the form `CProdN (CLocalDef (na,b,t)::rest,d)` and `CLambdaN (CLocalDef (na,b,t)::rest,d)`. - Changes in the API, hence adaptation of plugins referring to `constr_expr` needed.
2018-01-30Use r.(p) syntax to print primitive projections.Maxime Dénès
There is no way today to distinguish primitive projections from compatibility constants, at least in the case of a record without parameters. We remedy to this by always using the r.(p) syntax when printing primitive projections, even with Set Printing All. The input syntax r.(p) is still elaborated to GApp, so that we can preserve the compatibility layer. Hopefully we can make up a plan to get rid of that layer, but it will require fixing a few problems.
2017-12-12Removing cumbersome location in multiple patterns.Hugo Herbelin
This is to have a better symmetry between CCases and GCases.
2017-11-06[api] Move structures deprecated in the API to the core.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We do up to `Term` which is the main bulk of the changes.
2017-09-19Allow declaring universe constraints at definition level.Matthieu Sozeau
Introduce a "+" modifier for universe and constraint declarations to indicate that these can be extended in the final definition/proof. By default [Definition f] is equivalent to [Definition f@{+|+}], i.e universes can be introduced and constraints as well. For [f@{}] or [f@{i j}], the constraints can be extended, no universe introduced, to maintain compatibility with existing developments. Use [f@{i j | }] to indicate that no constraint (nor universe) can be introduced. These kind of definitions could benefit from asynchronous processing. Declarations of universe binders and constraints also works for monomorphic definitions.
2017-07-04Bump year in headers.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
2017-06-14Constrexpr.Numeral stays uninterpreted (string+sign instead of BigInt.t)Pierre Letouzey
This string contains the base-10 representation of the number (big endian) Note that some inner parsing stuff still uses bigints, see egramcoq.ml
2017-06-07Put all plugins behind an "API".Matej Kosik