aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2018-03-15[Sphinx] Move chapter 4 to new infrastructureMaxime Dénès
2017-10-25Rename \Tree to \NatTreeJohannes Kloos
2017-10-24Fix #5763: Strictly positive example is out of order.jkloos
I also renamed the type to nattree (see discussion on https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/5979) to disambiguate from another, earlier example.
2017-09-22Avoid generated names for html pages of the reference manual (bug #4742).Guillaume Melquiond
2017-08-16Merge PR #831: Port ssreflect user manual to Coq's latex/hevea styleMaxime Dénès
2017-08-02Port ssr manual to Coq's latex/hevea styleEnrico Tassi
Work done by Assia Mahboubi and Enrico Tassi
2017-07-28Fix some coq-tex errors in the reference manual.Guillaume Melquiond
2017-06-16Document cumulativity for inductive typesAmin Timany
2017-04-24refman: remember the old name of template polymorphism.Gaetan Gilbert
2017-04-11Use "template polymorphism" in the documentation.Gaetan Gilbert
2017-04-11Mention template polymorphism in the documentation.Gaetan Gilbert
Since About mentions it the doc should as well.
2016-04-12FIX: HTML version of Chapter 4 of the Reference ManualMatej Kosik
2016-04-12TYPOGRAPHY: adding missing \noindent macrosMatej Kosik
2015-12-14Fix \label which was meants to be \ref in doc of CIC terms.Maxime Dénès
2015-12-10Refman, ch. 4: A few fixes.Hugo Herbelin
2015-12-10ENH: redundant examples were removedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10FIX: wrong reference to a figureMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: putting examples inside "figure" environmentMatej Kosik
2015-12-10ENH: The definition of the "_ ; _" operation on local context was added.Matej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHY: adjustmentsMatej Kosik
2015-12-10PROPOSITION: the side-condition was made more specific.Matej Kosik
2015-12-10PROPOSITION: rephrasing of the explanation of the meaning of '[I:A|B]'Matej Kosik
2015-12-10PROPOSITION: Added an explicit definition of the notation for enriching the ↵Matej Kosik
global environment (we use throughout the document)
2015-12-10PROPOSITION: Added "if" and "then" words missing in the original sentence.Matej Kosik
2015-12-10PROPOSITION: Example was simplifiedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10DONEMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHYMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: to doMatej Kosik
2015-12-10GRAMMAR: added punctuationMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: rephrasing the original idea in a simpler wayMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: existing example was removed because it is not urgently ↵Matej Kosik
needed
2015-12-10ENH: existing example was changed so that it is now linked to the results ↵Matej Kosik
shown in the previous example
2015-12-10ENH: an existing example was further expanded.Matej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: Existing example was removed.Matej Kosik
We have expanded the example above. For consistency reasons, it would make sense to do the same also for this example. However, due to the size of the terms, it is hard to typeset it nicely. I propose to remove it.
2015-12-10ENH: existing example was expandedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10ENH: define the meaning of 'p'Matej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: does it make sense to refer to 'I' as 'inductive ↵Matej Kosik
definition'? Doesn't make more sense to refer to it as 'inductive type'?
2015-12-10CLEANUP: We decided to call these guys E[Γ] ⊢ (Γi := Γc) as inductive ↵Matej Kosik
definition.
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: removing a superfluous indexMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10GRAMMARMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: noteMatej Kosik