aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/plugin_tutorial/tuto1/src/g_tuto1.mlg
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-06-26[declare] Reify Proof.t API into the Proof module.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
This is in preparation for the next commit which will clean-up the current API flow in `Declare`.
2020-06-26[declare] Move proof information to declare.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
At this point the record in lemmas was just a stub; next commit will stop exposing the internals of mutual information, and pave the way for the refactoring of `Info.t` handling in the Declare interface.
2020-04-15[declare] Rename `Declare.t` to `Declare.Proof.t`Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
This still needs API cleanup but we defer it to the moment we are ready to make the internals private.
2020-04-15[proof] Merge `Proof_global` into `Declare`Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We place creation and saving of interactive proofs in the same module; this will allow to make `proof_entry` private, improving invariants and control over clients, and to reduce the API [for example next commit will move abstract declaration into this module, removing the exported ad-hoc `build_constant_by_tactic`] Next step will be to unify all the common code in the interactive / non-interactive case; but we need to tweak the handling of obligations first.
2020-04-15[proof] Move proof_global functionality to Proof_global from PfeditEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
This actually gets `Pfedit` out of the dependency picture [can be almost merged with `Proof` now, as it is what it manipulates] and would allow to reduce the exported low-level API from `Proof_global`, as `map_fold_proof` is not used anymore.
2019-06-09[proof] Move proofs that have an associated constant to `Lemmas`Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
The main idea of this PR is to distinguish the types of "proof object" `Proof_global.t` and the type of "proof object associated to a constant, the new `Lemmas.t`. This way, we can move the terminator setup to the higher layer in `vernac`, which is the one that really knows about constants, paving the way for further simplification and in particular for a unified handling of constant saving by removal of the control inversion here. Terminators are now internal to `Lemmas`, as it is the only part of the code applying them. As a consequence, proof nesting is now handled by `Lemmas`, and `Proof_global.t` is just a single `Proof.t` plus some environmental meta-data. We are also enable considerable simplification in a future PR, as this patch makes `Proof.t` and `Proof_global.t` essentially the same, so we should expect to handle them under a unified interface.
2019-06-06Clean, document, and expand plugin tutorials 0 and 1Talia Ringer
2019-06-04coqpp: add new ![] specifiers for structured proof interactionGaëtan Gilbert
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option` The other specifiers are for the following body types: ~~~ ![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate` ![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option` ![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate` ![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit` ![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit` ~~~ The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning. The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't have to be classified QUERY. ![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future. For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us where it's used.
2019-06-04Proof_global: pass only 1 pstate when we don't want the proof stackGaëtan Gilbert
Typically instead of [start_proof : ontop:Proof_global.t option -> bla -> Proof_global.t] we have [start_proof : bla -> Proof_global.pstate] and the pstate is pushed on the stack by a caller around the vernacentries/mlg level. Naming can be a bit awkward, hopefully it can be improved (maybe in a followup PR). We can see some patterns appear waiting for nicer combinators, eg in mlg we often only want to work with the current proof, not the stack. Behaviour should be similar modulo bugs, let's see what CI says.
2019-06-03Update tutorial plugin to use sigma, in keeping with doc recommendationsTalia Ringer
2019-03-27[plugin tutorial] Adapt to removal of imperative state.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
2019-01-08Add 'doc/plugin_tutorial/' from commit ↵Gaëtan Gilbert
'168a13dab1c9987f592994150997e692d4d7e40b' git-subtree-dir: doc/plugin_tutorial git-subtree-mainline: 8c040974facb733682d24c488dc89941671f4ab7 git-subtree-split: 168a13dab1c9987f592994150997e692d4d7e40b