aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/coqpp/coqpp_main.ml
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-04-04[coqpp] Add -helpEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Closes #9932
2021-02-11[vernac] pass the loc of the whole command to the interp functionEnrico Tassi
2020-10-30Renaming Numeral into NumberPierre Roux
2020-10-27Rename tactic_expr -> ltac_exprJim Fehrle
2020-09-11[parsing] Rename token NUMERAL to NUMBERPierre Roux
2020-07-08[obligations] Allow to simultaneously open a proof and add obligationsEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
2020-07-08[obligations] Functionalize Program stateEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
In our quest to unify all the declaration paths, an important step is to account for the state pertaining to `Program` declarations. Whereas regular proofs keep are kept in a stack-like structure; obligations for constants defined by `Program` are stored in a global map which is manipulated by almost regular open/close proof primitives. We make this manipulation explicit by handling the program state functionally, in a similar way than we already do for lemmas. This requires to extend the proof DSL a bit; but IMO changes are acceptable given the gain. Most of the PR is routine; only remarkable change is that the hook is called explicitly in `finish_admitted` as it had to learn about the different types of proof_endings. Note that we could have gone deeper and use the type system to refine the core proof type; IMO it is still too preliminary so it is better to do this step as an intermediate one towards a deeper unification.
2020-05-09NumTok.int doesn't exist anymorePierre Roux
It was removed by #11703.
2020-03-25[pcoq] Inline the exported Gramlib interface instead of exposing it as GEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
2020-03-25[gramlib] Remove warning function parameter in favor of standard mechanism.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
If we need more fine-tuning we should manage the warnings with the standard Coq mechanism.
2020-03-25[parsing] Remove extend AST in favor of gramlib constructorsEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We remove Coq's wrapper over gramlib's grammar constructors.
2020-03-25[parsing] Make grammar rules private.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
After the gramlib merge and the type-safe interface added to it, the grammar extension type is redundant; we thus make it private as a first step on consolidating it with the one in gramlib's.
2020-03-25[parsing] Make grammar extension type private.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
After the gramlib merge and the type-safe interface added to it, the grammar extension type is redundant; we thus make it private as a first step on consolidating it with the one in gramlib's.
2020-03-18Update headers in the whole code base.Théo Zimmermann
Add headers to a few files which were missing them.
2020-02-21[parsing] Track need to reinit by typingEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
This PR is in preparation of #9067 (together with #11647) . Before this PR, `grammar_extend` always took an optional `reinit` argument, even if it was never set to `Some ...`. Indeed, there is a single case where reinit is needed; we track it now by using a different extension rule constructor.
2019-07-19Introduce doc_gram, a utilty for extracting Coq's grammar from .mlg filesJim Fehrle
and inserting it into the .rst files
2019-06-17Update headers of files that were stuck on older headers.Théo Zimmermann
Most of these files were introduced after #6543 but used older headers copied from somewhere else.
2019-06-04[vernac] remove VtMaybeOpenProofEnrico Tassi
2019-06-04VernacExtend produces vernac_interp_phase ADT (old name functional_vernac)Gaëtan Gilbert
+ hide interp_functional_vernac in vernacentries
2019-06-04Replace ModifyProofStack by CloseProofGaëtan Gilbert
The only use of ModifyProofStack was in paramcoq for closing a proof.
2019-06-04Vernacextend only returns a proof_global.t option, not a vernacstateGaëtan Gilbert
2019-06-04Alternate syntax for ![]: VERNAC EXTEND Foo STATE proofGaëtan Gilbert
eg ![proof] becomes STATE proof This commits still supports the old ![] so there is redundancy: ~~~ VERNAC EXTEND Foo STATE proof | ... VERNAC EXTEND Foo | ![proof] ... ~~~ with the ![] form being local to the rule and the STATE form applying to the whole EXTEND except for the rules with a ![].
2019-06-04coqpp: add new ![] specifiers for structured proof interactionGaëtan Gilbert
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option` The other specifiers are for the following body types: ~~~ ![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate` ![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option` ![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate` ![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit` ![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit` ~~~ The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning. The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't have to be classified QUERY. ![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future. For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us where it's used.
2019-05-21Fixing typos - Part 1JPR
2019-04-02Add parsing of decimal constants (e.g., 1.02e+01)Pierre Roux
Rather than integers '[0-9]+', numeral constant can now be parsed according to the regexp '[0-9]+ ([.][0-9]+)? ([eE][+-]?[0-9]+)?'. This can be used in one of the two following ways: - using the function `Notation.register_rawnumeral_interpreter` in an OCaml plugin - using `Numeral Notation` with the type `decimal` added to `Decimal.v` See examples of each use case in the next two commits.
2019-04-02Rename the INT token to NUMERALPierre Roux
In anticipation of future uses of this token for non integer numerals.
2019-03-31Improve coqpp error message for SELF in anonymous entryPierre Roux
Something like "("; [ s = SELF -> { s } ]; ")" in a GRAMMAR EXTEND in a mlg file was causing an error message such as OCAMLOPT f.ml File "f.mlg", line 179, characters 55-67: # not in a semantic rule so line doesn't match anything in the mlg file Error: This expression has type ('a, Extend.mayrec, 'a) Extend.symbol but an expression was expected of type ('a, Extend.norec, 'b) Extend.symbol Type Extend.mayrec is not compatible with type Extend.norec It is now COQPP f.mlg Error: 'SELF' or 'NEXT' illegal in anonymous entry level
2019-03-31Multiple payload types in tokensPierre Roux
Instead of just string (and empty strings for tokens without payload)
2019-03-31[parsing] add keyword-protected generic quotationEnrico Tassi
One can now register a quotation using a grammar rule with QUOTATION("name:"). "name:" becomes a keyword and the token is generated for name: followed by a an identifier or a parenthesized text. Eg constr:x string:[....] ltac:(....) ltac:{....} The delimiter is made of 1 or more occurrences of the same parenthesis, eg ((.....)) or [[[[....]]]]. The idea being that if the text happens to contain the closing delimiter, one can make the delimiter longer and avoid confusion (no escaping). Eg string:[[ .. ']' .. ]] Nesting the delimiter is allowed, eg ((..((...))..)) is OK. The text inside the quotation is returned as a string (including the parentheses), so that a third party parser can take care of it. Keywords don't need to end in ':'.
2019-03-31[parsing] Split Tok.t into Tok.t and Tok.patternEnrico Tassi
Tokens were having a double role: - the output of the lexer - the items of grammar entries, especially terminals Now tokens are the output of the lexer, and this paves the way for using a richer data type, eg including Loc.t Patterns, as in Plexing.pattern, only represent patterns (for tokens) and now have a bit more structure (eg the wildcard is represented as None, not as "", while a regular pattern for "x" as Some "x")
2019-03-27[coqpp] [ltac] Adapt to removal of imperative proof state.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We add state handling to tactics. TODO: - [rewrite] `add_morphism_infer` creates problems as it opens a proof. - [g_obligations] with_tac
2019-03-20Stop accessing proof env via Pfedit in printersMaxime Dénès
This should make https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/9129 easier.
2018-12-09[doc] Enable Warning 50 [incorrect doc comment] and fix comments.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
This is a pre-requisite to use automated formatting tools such as `ocamlformat`, also, there were quite a few places where the comments had basically no effect, thus it was confusing for the developer. p.s: Reading some comments was a lot of fun :)
2018-11-27[gramlib] Minor cleanups:Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
- remove duplicate type definitions `gram_assoc`, `gram_position`, - make global `warning_verbose` variable into a parameter.
2018-11-23Only use Coq API in coqpp.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
2018-11-17[vernacextend] Consolidate extension points APIEmilio Jesus Gallego Arias
We group the extension API and datatypes under `Vernacextend`. This means that the base plugin dependency is now `coq.vernac` from `coq.stm`. This is quite important as for example the LSP server won't like to link the STM in. LTAC still depends on the STM by means of the ltac_profile part tho. The next step could be to move the extension point below `Vernacexpr`.
2018-11-13[vernac] Rename Vernacinterp to Vernacextend and move extension functions there.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
This PR fixes an issues that was bugging me for some time, namely that `Vernacinterp` really means `Vernacextend`. We thus rename the file and move the associated functions there, which were incorrectly placed in `Vernacentries`. Note the beneficial effects on reducing the `.mli` API.
2018-11-02coqpp VERNAC EXTEND uses #[ att = attribute; ] syntaxGaëtan Gilbert
I think for instance the new code in this diff is cleaner and more systematic: ~~~diff VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND VernacDeclareTacticDefinition -| [ "Ltac" ne_ltac_tacdef_body_list_sep(l, "with") ] => { +| #[ deprecation; locality; ] [ "Ltac" ne_ltac_tacdef_body_list_sep(l, "with") ] => { VtSideff (List.map (function | TacticDefinition ({CAst.v=r},_) -> r | TacticRedefinition (qid,_) -> qualid_basename qid) l), VtLater } -> { - let deprecation, locality = Attributes.(parse Notations.(deprecation ++ locality) atts) in Tacentries.register_ltac (Locality.make_module_locality locality) ?deprecation l; } END ~~~
2018-10-15Implement ARGUMENT EXTEND in coqpp.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
2018-10-02Make the coqpp VERNAC EXTEND behave as the non-FUNCTIONAL camlp5 one.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
2018-10-02Handling VERNAC EXTEND in coqpp.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
2018-10-02Pass unnamed arguments to ML macros.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
This was imposing a bit of useless burden on the API for no good reason.
2018-10-01Print location in OCaml code output by coqpp.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
Fixes #8018.
2018-09-06deprecation is CODE instead of IDENTVincent Laporte
2018-09-06coqpp: allow DEPRECATED when declaring tacticsVincent Laporte
2018-09-05[build] Preliminary support for building Coq with `dune`.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
[Dune](https://github.com/ocaml/dune) is a compositional declarative build system for OCaml. It provides automatic generation of `version.ml`, `.merlin`, `META`, `opam`, API documentation; install management; easy integration with external libraries, test runners, and modular builds. In particular, Dune uniformly handles components regardless whether they live in, or out-of-tree. This greatly simplifies cases where a plugin [or CoqIde] is checked out in the current working copy but then distributed separately [and vice-versa]. Dune can thus be used as a more flexible `coq_makefile` replacement. For now we provide experimental support for a Dune build. In order to build Coq + the standard library with Dune type: ``` $ make -f Makefile.dune world ``` This PR includes a preliminary, developer-only preview of Dune for Coq. There is still ongoing work, see https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8052 for tracking status towards full support. ## Technical description. Dune works out of the box with Coq, once we have fixed some modularity issues. The main remaining challenge was to support `.vo` files. As Dune doesn't support custom build rules yet, to properly build `.vo` files we provide a small helper script `tools/coq_dune.ml`. The script will scan the Coq library directories and generate the corresponding rules for `.v -> .vo` and `.ml4 -> .ml` builds. The script uses `coqdep` as to correctly output the dependencies of `.v` files. `coq_dune` is akin to `coq_makefile` and should be able to be used to build Coq projects in the future. Due to this pitfall, the build process has to proceed in three stages: 1) build `coqdep` and `coq_dune`; 2) generate `dune` files for `theories` and `plugins`; 3) perform a regular build with all targets are in scope. ## FAQ ### Why Dune? Coq has a moderately complex build system and it is not a secret that many developer-hours have been spent fighting with `make`. In particular, the current `make`-based system does offer poor support to verify that the current build rules and variables are coherent, and requires significant manual, error-prone. Many variables must be passed by hand, duplicated, etc... Additionally, our make system offers poor integration with now standard OCaml ecosystem tools such as `opam`, `ocamlfind` or `odoc`. Another critical point is build compositionality. Coq is rich in 3rd party contributions, and a big shortcoming of the current make system is that it cannot be used to build these projects; requiring us to maintain a custom tool, `coq_makefile`, with the corresponding cost. In the past, there has been some efforts to migrate Coq to more specialized build systems, however these stalled due to a variety of reasons. Dune, is a declarative, OCaml-specific build tool that is on the path to become the standard build system for the OCaml ecosystem. Dune seems to be a good fit for Coq well: it is well-supported, fast, compositional, and designed for large projects. ### Does Dune replace the make-based build system? The current, make-based build system is unmodified by this PR and kept as the default option. However, Dune has the potential ### Is this PR complete? What does it provide? This PR is ready for developer preview and feedback. The build system is functional, however, more work is necessary in order to make Dune the default for Coq. The main TODOs are tracked at https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/8052 This PR allows developers to use most of the features of Dune today: - Modular organization of the codebase; each component is built only against declared dependencies so components are checked for containment more strictly. - Hygienic builds; Dune places all artifacts under `_build`. - Automatic generation of `.install` files, simplified OPAM workflow. - `utop` support, `-opaque` in developer mode, etc... - `ml4` files are handled using `coqp5`, a native-code customized camlp5 executable which brings much faster `ml4 -> ml` processing. ### What dependencies does Dune require? Dune doesn't depend on any 3rd party package other than the OCaml compiler. ### Some Benchs: ``` $ /usr/bin/time make DUNEOPT="-j 1000" -f Makefile.dune states 59.50user 18.81system 0:29.83elapsed 262%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 302996maxresident)k 0inputs+646632outputs (0major+4893811minor)pagefaults 0swaps $ /usr/bin/time sh -c "./configure -local -native-compiler no && make -j states" 88.21user 23.65system 0:32.96elapsed 339%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 304992maxresident)k 0inputs+1051680outputs (0major+5300680minor)pagefaults 0swaps ```
2018-07-25Fix static declaration of plugins in coqpp.Pierre-Marie Pédrot
The module was not properly registered with dynlink turned off, leading to a failure of compilation of the prelude.
2018-07-11[coqpp] Move to its own directory.Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias
Coqpp has nothing to do with `grammar`, we thus place it in its own directory, which will prove convenient in more modular build systems. Note that we add `coqpp` to the list of global includes, we could have indeed added some extra rules, but IMHO not worth it as hopefully proper containment will be soon checked by Dune.