aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionsMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: to doMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: to doMatej Kosik
2015-12-10FIX: removing a reference to \Gamma, because it is undefinedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10FIX: making sure that my previous edits do not break HTML generationMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionsMatej Kosik
2015-12-10ENH: examples for 'strict positivity' were expandedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: s/List_A/List~A/gMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: the definition of "type of constructor" was rephrased in order to ↵Matej Kosik
make it more clear
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: to doMatej Kosik
2015-12-10FIX: commit 315f771Matej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: superfluous examples were removedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10ENH: new example: "even"Matej Kosik
2015-12-10ALPHA-CONVERSION: s/Length/has_length/gMatej Kosik
2015-12-10ENH: examplesMatej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHY: Examples of "arity" concept(s) were put to a separate ↵Matej Kosik
\paragraph{...}
2015-12-10ENH: adding a definition of the concept "_ is an arity".Matej Kosik
There already exists a definition of the following concept: "_ is an arity of sort _" I was not 100% sure what the following concept (used later in the text) means: "_ is an arity" so I added this (simple) definition in order to avoid possible confusion.
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHYMatej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHYMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: to doMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: Presentation of examples was changed to make them more comprehensible.Matej Kosik
2015-12-10SILENT: s/coq_example/coq_example*/Matej Kosik
2015-12-10QUESTION: Cannot we simplify the presentation of "Ind" and "Constr" typing ↵Matej Kosik
rules like this?
2015-12-10ENH: The beginning of Section 4.5 (Inductive declarations) was changed in ↵Matej Kosik
order to make it more concrete and more comprehensible. This ver
2015-12-10ENH: the concept of 'inductive declaration' was added to the 'Global Index'Matej Kosik
2015-12-10ENH: a small remark about Prod1 and Prod2 typing-rules was addedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP: the explanation of why eta-reduction is a bad idea was rephrasedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10GRAMMARMatej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHY: getting rid of an extra spaceMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHY: Each of the three 'Ax' and 'Prod' rules now has a unique name.Matej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHYMatej Kosik
2015-12-10GRAMMARMatej Kosik
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: removal of a definition of a concept that is not used ↵Matej Kosik
further in the text
2015-12-10ENH: 'Global Index' was enriched.Matej Kosik
These notions: - local assumption - local definition - global assumption - global definition are now indexed.
2015-12-10SILENT: the anchor for the 'Local context' was moved to a more appropriate ↵Matej Kosik
place.
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: 'declaration' --> 'local declaration'Matej Kosik
If, below, we speak about 'global declarations', here it makes sense to speak about 'local declaration'.
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: this sentence does not help us to better understand the ↵Matej Kosik
semantics of the language
2015-12-10CLEANUP PROPOSITION: The removed paragraph is not essential for this ↵Matej Kosik
chapter. That kind of information is more appropriate for Section 1.2.
2015-12-10TYPOGRAPHY: 'non dependent product', just like 'dependent product' is now ↵Matej Kosik
emphasized
2015-12-10ENH: a new anchor for an existing 'Global Index' keyword 'products' was addedMatej Kosik
2015-12-10COMMENT: questionMatej Kosik