diff options
| author | Matej Kosik | 2015-11-03 13:32:59 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hugo Herbelin | 2015-12-10 09:35:14 +0100 |
| commit | 5a155b13b6a6820a1c0417025c67170a3e22fedc (patch) | |
| tree | 86fe10f8e9f1f59695f33d8f946972952bd970f3 | |
| parent | fc73973844f848fafb61b6aa39a327e95f09c129 (diff) | |
COMMENT: question
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex | 3 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex index c3dc80b1a6..c15ee9ffdd 100644 --- a/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex +++ b/doc/refman/RefMan-cic.tex @@ -820,6 +820,9 @@ in one of the following two cases: \item $T$ is $(I~t_1\ldots ~t_n)$ \item $T$ is $\forall x:U,T^\prime$ where $T^\prime$ is also a type of constructor of $I$ \end{itemize} +% QUESTION: Are we above sufficiently precise? +% Shouldn't we say also what is "n"? +% "n" couldn't be "0", could it? \paragraph[Examples]{Examples} $\nat$ and $\nat\ra\nat$ are types of constructors of $\nat$.\\ |