aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'theories')
-rw-r--r--theories/Logic/ConstructiveEpsilon.v4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Logic/ConstructiveEpsilon.v b/theories/Logic/ConstructiveEpsilon.v
index 83d5e002aa..337ee05b60 100644
--- a/theories/Logic/ConstructiveEpsilon.v
+++ b/theories/Logic/ConstructiveEpsilon.v
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ predicate from the regular existence (i.e., [Prop]-existence). One
requires that the underlying set is countable and that the predicate
is decidable. *)
-(** Coq does not allow case analysis on sort [Set] when the goal is in
-[Prop]. Therefore, one cannot eliminate [exists n, P n] in order to
+(** Coq does not allow case analysis on sort [Prop] when the goal is in
+[Set]. Therefore, one cannot eliminate [exists n, P n] in order to
show [{n : nat | P n}]. However, one can perform a recursion on an
inductive predicate in sort [Prop] so that the returning type of the
recursion is in [Set]. This trick is described in Coq'Art book, Sect.