diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/ltac')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/ltac/extratactics.mlg | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/ltac/g_obligations.mlg | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/ltac/g_rewrite.mlg | 55 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml | 67 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/ltac/rewrite.mli | 35 |
6 files changed, 98 insertions, 89 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/ltac/extratactics.mlg b/plugins/ltac/extratactics.mlg index 5e4969567d..4a2fb425ac 100644 --- a/plugins/ltac/extratactics.mlg +++ b/plugins/ltac/extratactics.mlg @@ -934,7 +934,7 @@ END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND GrabEvars | ![ proof ] [ "Grab" "Existential" "Variables" ] => { classify_as_proofstep } - -> { fun ~pstate -> Option.map (Proof_global.simple_with_current_proof (fun _ p -> Proof.V82.grab_evars p)) pstate } + -> { fun ~pstate -> Proof_global.modify_proof (fun p -> Proof.V82.grab_evars p) pstate } END (* Shelves all the goals under focus. *) @@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND Unshelve | ![ proof ] [ "Unshelve" ] => { classify_as_proofstep } - -> { fun ~pstate -> Option.map (Proof_global.simple_with_current_proof (fun _ p -> Proof.unshelve p)) pstate } + -> { fun ~pstate -> Proof_global.modify_proof (fun p -> Proof.unshelve p) pstate } END (* Gives up on the goals under focus: the goals are considered solved, @@ -1118,7 +1118,7 @@ END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND OptimizeProof | ![ proof ] [ "Optimize" "Proof" ] => { classify_as_proofstep } -> - { fun ~pstate -> Option.map Proof_global.(modify_current_pstate compact_the_proof) pstate } + { fun ~pstate -> Proof_global.compact_the_proof pstate } | [ "Optimize" "Heap" ] => { classify_as_proofstep } -> { Gc.compact () } END diff --git a/plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg b/plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg index 7eb34158e8..9bf5bd1bda 100644 --- a/plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg +++ b/plugins/ltac/g_ltac.mlg @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ let () = declare_int_option { let vernac_solve ~pstate n info tcom b = let open Goal_select in - let pstate, status = Proof_global.with_current_proof (fun etac p -> + let pstate, status = Proof_global.with_proof (fun etac p -> let with_end_tac = if b then Some etac else None in let global = match n with SelectAll | SelectList _ -> true | _ -> false in let info = Option.append info !print_info_trace in @@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ let vernac_solve ~pstate n info tcom b = let p = Proof.maximal_unfocus Vernacentries.command_focus p in p,status) pstate in if not status then Feedback.feedback Feedback.AddedAxiom; - Some pstate + pstate let pr_ltac_selector s = Pptactic.pr_goal_selector ~toplevel:true s @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ VERNAC { tactic_mode } EXTEND VernacSolve | ![ proof ] [ ltac_selector_opt(g) ltac_info_opt(n) tactic(t) ltac_use_default(def) ] => { classify_as_proofstep } -> { let g = Option.default (Goal_select.get_default_goal_selector ()) g in - Vernacentries.vernac_require_open_proof vernac_solve g n t def + vernac_solve g n t def } | ![ proof ] [ "par" ":" ltac_info_opt(n) tactic(t) ltac_use_default(def) ] => { @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ VERNAC { tactic_mode } EXTEND VernacSolve VtLater } -> { let t = rm_abstract t in - Vernacentries.vernac_require_open_proof vernac_solve Goal_select.SelectAll n t def + vernac_solve Goal_select.SelectAll n t def } END diff --git a/plugins/ltac/g_obligations.mlg b/plugins/ltac/g_obligations.mlg index d7918a58ac..c01b97c14d 100644 --- a/plugins/ltac/g_obligations.mlg +++ b/plugins/ltac/g_obligations.mlg @@ -80,25 +80,25 @@ GRAMMAR EXTEND Gram open Obligations -let obligation ~pstate obl tac = Some (Proof_global.push ~ontop:pstate (with_tac (fun t -> Obligations.obligation obl t) tac)) -let next_obligation ~pstate obl tac = Some (Proof_global.push ~ontop:pstate (with_tac (fun t -> Obligations.next_obligation obl t) tac)) +let obligation obl tac = with_tac (fun t -> Obligations.obligation obl t) tac +let next_obligation obl tac = with_tac (fun t -> Obligations.next_obligation obl t) tac let classify_obbl _ = Vernacextend.(VtStartProof (Doesn'tGuaranteeOpacity,[]), VtLater) } VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND Obligations CLASSIFIED BY { classify_obbl } -| ![ proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) "of" ident(name) ":" lglob(t) withtac(tac) ] -> +| ![ open_proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) "of" ident(name) ":" lglob(t) withtac(tac) ] -> { obligation (num, Some name, Some t) tac } -| ![ proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) "of" ident(name) withtac(tac) ] -> +| ![ open_proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) "of" ident(name) withtac(tac) ] -> { obligation (num, Some name, None) tac } -| ![ proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) ":" lglob(t) withtac(tac) ] -> +| ![ open_proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) ":" lglob(t) withtac(tac) ] -> { obligation (num, None, Some t) tac } -| ![ proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) withtac(tac) ] -> +| ![ open_proof ] [ "Obligation" integer(num) withtac(tac) ] -> { obligation (num, None, None) tac } -| ![ proof ] [ "Next" "Obligation" "of" ident(name) withtac(tac) ] -> +| ![ open_proof ] [ "Next" "Obligation" "of" ident(name) withtac(tac) ] -> { next_obligation (Some name) tac } -| ![ proof ] [ "Next" "Obligation" withtac(tac) ] -> { next_obligation None tac } +| ![ open_proof ] [ "Next" "Obligation" withtac(tac) ] -> { next_obligation None tac } END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND Solve_Obligation CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF diff --git a/plugins/ltac/g_rewrite.mlg b/plugins/ltac/g_rewrite.mlg index e3f4b8ef59..bb29323858 100644 --- a/plugins/ltac/g_rewrite.mlg +++ b/plugins/ltac/g_rewrite.mlg @@ -180,34 +180,34 @@ TACTIC EXTEND setoid_rewrite END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddRelation CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n (Some lemma1) (Some lemma2) None } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n (Some lemma1) None None } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "as" ident(n) ] -> + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n None None None } END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddRelation2 CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n None (Some lemma2) None } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n None (Some lemma2) (Some lemma3) } END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddRelation3 CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n (Some lemma1) None (Some lemma3) } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n (Some lemma1) (Some lemma2) (Some lemma3) } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Relation" constr(a) constr(aeq) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts a aeq n None None (Some lemma3) } END @@ -234,66 +234,59 @@ GRAMMAR EXTEND Gram END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddParametricRelation CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n (Some lemma1) (Some lemma2) None } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n (Some lemma1) None None } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "as" ident(n) ] -> + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n None None None } END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddParametricRelation2 CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n None (Some lemma2) None } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n None (Some lemma2) (Some lemma3) } END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddParametricRelation3 CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n (Some lemma1) None (Some lemma3) } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "reflexivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma1) "symmetry" "proved" "by" constr(lemma2) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n (Some lemma1) (Some lemma2) (Some lemma3) } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Relation" binders(b) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) "transitivity" "proved" "by" constr(lemma3) "as" ident(n) ] -> { declare_relation atts ~binders:b a aeq n None None (Some lemma3) } END VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND AddSetoid1 CLASSIFIED AS SIDEFF - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Setoid" constr(a) constr(aeq) constr(t) "as" ident(n) ] -> + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Setoid" constr(a) constr(aeq) constr(t) "as" ident(n) ] -> { add_setoid atts [] a aeq t n } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Setoid" binders(binders) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) constr(t) "as" ident(n) ] -> + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Setoid" binders(binders) ":" constr(a) constr(aeq) constr(t) "as" ident(n) ] -> { add_setoid atts binders a aeq t n } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Morphism" constr(m) ":" ident(n) ] + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ maybe_open_proof ] [ "Add" "Morphism" constr(m) ":" ident(n) ] (* This command may or may not open a goal *) => { (if Lib.is_modtype() then VtSideff([n]) else VtStartProof(GuaranteesOpacity, [n])), VtLater } - -> { - fun ~pstate:ontop -> - Option.cata (fun ps -> Some (Proof_global.push ~ontop ps)) ontop (add_morphism_infer atts m n) - } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Morphism" constr(m) "with" "signature" lconstr(s) "as" ident(n) ] + -> { add_morphism_infer atts m n } + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ open_proof ] [ "Add" "Morphism" constr(m) "with" "signature" lconstr(s) "as" ident(n) ] => { VtStartProof(GuaranteesOpacity,[n]), VtLater } - -> { - add_morphism atts [] m s n - } - | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Morphism" binders(binders) ":" constr(m) + -> { add_morphism atts [] m s n } + | #[ atts = rewrite_attributes; ] ![ open_proof ] [ "Add" "Parametric" "Morphism" binders(binders) ":" constr(m) "with" "signature" lconstr(s) "as" ident(n) ] => { VtStartProof(GuaranteesOpacity,[n]), VtLater } - -> { - add_morphism atts binders m s n - } + -> { add_morphism atts binders m s n } END TACTIC EXTEND setoid_symmetry diff --git a/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml b/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml index efca411754..5d57a2f27f 100644 --- a/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml +++ b/plugins/ltac/rewrite.ml @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ open Tacticals.New open Tactics open Pretype_errors open Typeclasses -open Classes open Constrexpr open Globnames open Evd @@ -1795,17 +1794,17 @@ let declare_an_instance n s args = let declare_instance a aeq n s = declare_an_instance n s [a;aeq] -let anew_instance ~pstate atts binders (name,t) fields = +let anew_instance atts binders (name,t) fields = let program_mode = atts.program in - let _id, pstate = new_instance ~pstate ~program_mode atts.polymorphic + let _id, proof = Classes.new_instance ~program_mode atts.polymorphic name binders t (Some (true, CAst.make @@ CRecord (fields))) ~global:atts.global ~generalize:false Hints.empty_hint_info in - pstate + assert (Option.is_empty proof) (* refine:false with term *) -let declare_instance_refl ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma = +let declare_instance_refl atts binders a aeq n lemma = let instance = declare_instance a aeq (add_suffix n "_Reflexive") "Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.Reflexive" - in anew_instance ~pstate atts binders instance + in anew_instance atts binders instance [(qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "reflexivity"),lemma)] let declare_instance_sym atts binders a aeq n lemma = @@ -1818,41 +1817,41 @@ let declare_instance_trans atts binders a aeq n lemma = in anew_instance atts binders instance [(qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "transitivity"),lemma)] -let declare_relation ~pstate atts ?(binders=[]) a aeq n refl symm trans = +let declare_relation atts ?(binders=[]) a aeq n refl symm trans = init_setoid (); let instance = declare_instance a aeq (add_suffix n "_relation") "Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.RewriteRelation" in - let pstate = anew_instance ~pstate atts binders instance [] in + let () = anew_instance atts binders instance [] in match (refl,symm,trans) with - (None, None, None) -> pstate + (None, None, None) -> () | (Some lemma1, None, None) -> - declare_instance_refl ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma1 + declare_instance_refl atts binders a aeq n lemma1 | (None, Some lemma2, None) -> - declare_instance_sym ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma2 + declare_instance_sym atts binders a aeq n lemma2 | (None, None, Some lemma3) -> - declare_instance_trans ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma3 + declare_instance_trans atts binders a aeq n lemma3 | (Some lemma1, Some lemma2, None) -> - let pstate = declare_instance_refl ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma1 in - declare_instance_sym ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma2 + let () = declare_instance_refl atts binders a aeq n lemma1 in + declare_instance_sym atts binders a aeq n lemma2 | (Some lemma1, None, Some lemma3) -> - let pstate = declare_instance_refl ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma1 in - let pstate = declare_instance_trans ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma3 in + let () = declare_instance_refl atts binders a aeq n lemma1 in + let () = declare_instance_trans atts binders a aeq n lemma3 in let instance = declare_instance a aeq n "Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.PreOrder" in - anew_instance ~pstate atts binders instance + anew_instance atts binders instance [(qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "PreOrder_Reflexive"), lemma1); (qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "PreOrder_Transitive"),lemma3)] | (None, Some lemma2, Some lemma3) -> - let pstate = declare_instance_sym ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma2 in - let pstate = declare_instance_trans ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma3 in + let () = declare_instance_sym atts binders a aeq n lemma2 in + let () = declare_instance_trans atts binders a aeq n lemma3 in let instance = declare_instance a aeq n "Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.PER" in - anew_instance ~pstate atts binders instance + anew_instance atts binders instance [(qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "PER_Symmetric"), lemma2); (qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "PER_Transitive"),lemma3)] | (Some lemma1, Some lemma2, Some lemma3) -> - let pstate = declare_instance_refl ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma1 in - let pstate = declare_instance_sym ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma2 in - let pstate = declare_instance_trans ~pstate atts binders a aeq n lemma3 in + let () = declare_instance_refl atts binders a aeq n lemma1 in + let () = declare_instance_sym atts binders a aeq n lemma2 in + let () = declare_instance_trans atts binders a aeq n lemma3 in let instance = declare_instance a aeq n "Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.Equivalence" in - anew_instance ~pstate atts binders instance + anew_instance atts binders instance [(qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "Equivalence_Reflexive"), lemma1); (qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "Equivalence_Symmetric"), lemma2); (qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "Equivalence_Transitive"), lemma3)] @@ -1951,15 +1950,15 @@ let warn_add_setoid_deprecated = CWarnings.create ~name:"add-setoid" ~category:"deprecated" (fun () -> Pp.(str "Add Setoid is deprecated, please use Add Parametric Relation.")) -let add_setoid ~pstate atts binders a aeq t n = +let add_setoid atts binders a aeq t n = warn_add_setoid_deprecated ?loc:a.CAst.loc (); init_setoid (); - let pstate = declare_instance_refl ~pstate atts binders a aeq n (mkappc "Seq_refl" [a;aeq;t]) in - let pstate = declare_instance_sym ~pstate atts binders a aeq n (mkappc "Seq_sym" [a;aeq;t]) in - let pstate = declare_instance_trans ~pstate atts binders a aeq n (mkappc "Seq_trans" [a;aeq;t]) in + let () = declare_instance_refl atts binders a aeq n (mkappc "Seq_refl" [a;aeq;t]) in + let () = declare_instance_sym atts binders a aeq n (mkappc "Seq_sym" [a;aeq;t]) in + let () = declare_instance_trans atts binders a aeq n (mkappc "Seq_trans" [a;aeq;t]) in let instance = declare_instance a aeq n "Coq.Classes.RelationClasses.Equivalence" in - anew_instance ~pstate atts binders instance + anew_instance atts binders instance [(qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "Equivalence_Reflexive"), mkappc "Seq_refl" [a;aeq;t]); (qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "Equivalence_Symmetric"), mkappc "Seq_sym" [a;aeq;t]); (qualid_of_ident (Id.of_string "Equivalence_Transitive"), mkappc "Seq_trans" [a;aeq;t])] @@ -1988,7 +1987,7 @@ let add_morphism_infer atts m n : Proof_global.pstate option = (None,(instance,uctx),None), Decl_kinds.IsAssumption Decl_kinds.Logical) in - add_instance (Classes.mk_instance + Classes.add_instance (Classes.mk_instance (PropGlobal.proper_class env evd) Hints.empty_hint_info atts.global (ConstRef cst)); declare_projection n instance_id (ConstRef cst); None @@ -1999,7 +1998,7 @@ let add_morphism_infer atts m n : Proof_global.pstate option = let tac = make_tactic "Coq.Classes.SetoidTactics.add_morphism_tactic" in let hook _ _ _ = function | Globnames.ConstRef cst -> - add_instance (Classes.mk_instance + Classes.add_instance (Classes.mk_instance (PropGlobal.proper_class env evd) Hints.empty_hint_info atts.global (ConstRef cst)); declare_projection n instance_id (ConstRef cst) @@ -2011,7 +2010,7 @@ let add_morphism_infer atts m n : Proof_global.pstate option = let pstate = Lemmas.start_proof ~hook instance_id kind (Evd.from_ctx uctx) (EConstr.of_constr instance) in Some (fst Pfedit.(by (Tacinterp.interp tac) pstate))) () -let add_morphism ~pstate atts binders m s n = +let add_morphism atts binders m s n = init_setoid (); let instance_id = add_suffix n "_Proper" in let instance_name = (CAst.make @@ Name instance_id),None in @@ -2021,12 +2020,12 @@ let add_morphism ~pstate atts binders m s n = [cHole; s; m]) in let tac = Tacinterp.interp (make_tactic "add_morphism_tactic") in - let _, pstate = new_instance ~pstate + let _, pstate = Classes.new_instance ~program_mode:atts.program ~global:atts.global atts.polymorphic instance_name binders instance_t None ~generalize:false ~tac ~hook:(declare_projection n instance_id) Hints.empty_hint_info in - pstate + Option.get pstate (* no instance body -> always open proof *) (** Bind to "rewrite" too *) diff --git a/plugins/ltac/rewrite.mli b/plugins/ltac/rewrite.mli index cab7d0065e..e1cbc46b3b 100644 --- a/plugins/ltac/rewrite.mli +++ b/plugins/ltac/rewrite.mli @@ -81,18 +81,35 @@ val cl_rewrite_clause : val is_applied_rewrite_relation : env -> evar_map -> rel_context -> constr -> types option -val declare_relation : pstate:Proof_global.t option -> rewrite_attributes -> - ?binders:local_binder_expr list -> constr_expr -> constr_expr -> Id.t -> - constr_expr option -> constr_expr option -> constr_expr option -> Proof_global.t option - -val add_setoid : pstate:Proof_global.t option -> - rewrite_attributes -> local_binder_expr list -> constr_expr -> constr_expr -> constr_expr -> - Id.t -> Proof_global.t option +val declare_relation + : rewrite_attributes + -> ?binders:local_binder_expr list + -> constr_expr + -> constr_expr + -> Id.t + -> constr_expr option + -> constr_expr option + -> constr_expr option + -> unit + +val add_setoid + : rewrite_attributes + -> local_binder_expr list + -> constr_expr + -> constr_expr + -> constr_expr + -> Id.t + -> unit val add_morphism_infer : rewrite_attributes -> constr_expr -> Id.t -> Proof_global.pstate option -val add_morphism : pstate:Proof_global.t option -> - rewrite_attributes -> local_binder_expr list -> constr_expr -> constr_expr -> Id.t -> Proof_global.t option +val add_morphism + : rewrite_attributes + -> local_binder_expr list + -> constr_expr + -> constr_expr + -> Id.t + -> Proof_global.pstate val get_reflexive_proof : env -> evar_map -> constr -> constr -> evar_map * constr |