diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/sphinx/proof-engine')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/sphinx/proof-engine/ssreflect-proof-language.rst | 16 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/ssreflect-proof-language.rst b/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/ssreflect-proof-language.rst index 75897fec45..04d0503ff4 100644 --- a/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/ssreflect-proof-language.rst +++ b/doc/sphinx/proof-engine/ssreflect-proof-language.rst @@ -3756,8 +3756,11 @@ involves the following steps: the corresponding intro pattern :n:`@i_pattern__i` in each goal. 4. Then :tacn:`under` checks that the first n subgoals - are (quantified) equalities or double implications between a - term and an evar (e.g. ``m - m = ?F2 m`` in the running example). + are (quantified) Leibniz equalities, double implications or + registered relations (w.r.t. Class ``RewriteRelation``) between a + term and an evar, e.g. ``m - m = ?F2 m`` in the running example. + (This support for setoid-like relations is enabled as soon as we do + both ``Require Import ssreflect.`` and ``Require Setoid.``) 5. If so :tacn:`under` protects these n goals against an accidental instantiation of the evar. @@ -3769,7 +3772,10 @@ involves the following steps: by using a regular :tacn:`rewrite` tactic. 7. Interactive editing of the first n goals has to be signalled by - using the :tacn:`over` tactic or rewrite rule (see below). + using the :tacn:`over` tactic or rewrite rule (see below), which + requires that the underlying relation is reflexive. (The running + example deals with Leibniz equality, but ``PreOrder`` relations are + also supported, for example.) 8. Finally, a post-processing step is performed in the main goal to keep the name(s) for the bound variables chosen by the user in @@ -3795,6 +3801,10 @@ displayed as ``'Under[ … ]``): This is a variant of :tacn:`over` in order to close ``'Under[ … ]`` goals, relying on the ``over`` rewrite rule. +Note that a rewrite rule ``UnderE`` is available as well, if one wants +to "unprotect" the evar, without closing the goal automatically (e.g., +to instantiate it manually with another rule than reflexivity). + .. _under_one_liner: One-liner mode |