aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst')
-rw-r--r--doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst b/doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst
index 0ae9fab7ab..29877e1b32 100644
--- a/doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst
+++ b/doc/sphinx/language/extensions/arguments-command.rst
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ Effects of :cmd:`Arguments` on unfolding
Bidirectionality hints
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-When type-checking an application, Coq normally does not use information from
+When type-checking an application, |Coq| normally does not use information from
the context to infer the types of the arguments. It only checks after the fact
that the type inferred for the application is coherent with the expected type.
Bidirectionality hints make it possible to specify that after type-checking the
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ the context to help inferring the types of the remaining arguments.
* *type inference*, with is inferring the type of a construct by analyzing the construct.
Methods that combine these approaches are known as *bidirectional typing*.
- Coq normally uses only the first approach to infer the types of arguments,
+ |Coq| normally uses only the first approach to infer the types of arguments,
then later verifies that the inferred type is consistent with the expected type.
*Bidirectionality hints* specify to use both methods: after type checking the
first arguments of an application (appearing before the `&` in :cmd:`Arguments`),
@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ type check the remaining arguments (in :n:`@arg_specs__2`).
Definition b2n (b : bool) := if b then 1 else 0.
Coercion b2n : bool >-> nat.
- Coq cannot automatically coerce existential statements over ``bool`` to
+ |Coq| cannot automatically coerce existential statements over ``bool`` to
statements over ``nat``, because the need for inserting a coercion is known
only from the expected type of a subterm:
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ type check the remaining arguments (in :n:`@arg_specs__2`).
Arguments ex_intro _ _ & _ _.
Check (ex_intro _ true _ : exists n : nat, n > 0).
-Coq will attempt to produce a term which uses the arguments you
+|Coq| will attempt to produce a term which uses the arguments you
provided, but in some cases involving Program mode the arguments after
the bidirectionality starts may be replaced by convertible but
syntactically different terms.