aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/Cases.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/Cases.tex')
-rw-r--r--doc/Cases.tex4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/Cases.tex b/doc/Cases.tex
index 11e20d1101..9fcd8430c7 100644
--- a/doc/Cases.tex
+++ b/doc/Cases.tex
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ In all the previous examples the elimination predicate does not depend
on the object(s) matched. But it may depend and the typical case
is when we write a proof by induction or a function that yields an
object of dependent type. An example of proof using \texttt{Cases} in
-given in section \ref{Refine-example}
+given in section \ref{refine-example}
For example, we can write
the function \texttt{buildlist} that given a natural number
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ elimination predicate ${\cal P}$ should be of the form:
$[\vec{d_1}:\vec{D_1}][x_1:T_1]\ldots [\vec{d_n}:\vec{D_n}][x_n:T_n]Q.$
The user can also use \texttt{Cases} in combination with the tactic
-\texttt{Refine} (see section \ref{Refine}) to build incomplete proofs
+\texttt{refine} (see section \ref{refine}) to build incomplete proofs
beginning with a \texttt{Cases} construction.
\asection{Pattern-matching on inductive objects involving local