aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorletouzey2011-06-20 17:18:39 +0000
committerletouzey2011-06-20 17:18:39 +0000
commitca96d3477993d102d6cc42166eab52516630d181 (patch)
tree073b17efe149637da819caf527b23cf09f15865d /theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v
parentca1848177a50e51bde0736e51f506e06efc81b1d (diff)
Arithemtic: more concerning compare, eqb, leb, ltb
Start of a uniform treatment of compare, eqb, leb, ltb: - We now ensure that they are provided by N,Z,BigZ,BigN,Nat and Pos - Some generic properties are derived in OrdersFacts.BoolOrderFacts In BinPos, more work about sub_mask with nice implications on compare (e.g. simplier proof of lt_trans). In BinNat/BinPos, for uniformity, compare_antisym is now (y ?= x) = CompOpp (x ?=y) instead of the symmetrical result. In BigN / BigZ, eq_bool is now eqb In BinIntDef, gtb and geb are kept for the moment, but a comment advise to rather use ltb and leb. Z.div now uses Z.ltb and Z.leb. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@14227 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v')
-rw-r--r--theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v62
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v b/theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v
index 84682820db..878e46fea5 100644
--- a/theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v
+++ b/theories/Numbers/Natural/SpecViaZ/NSigNAxioms.v
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
(* * GNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1 *)
(************************************************************************)
-Require Import ZArith Nnat Ndigits NAxioms NDiv NSig.
+Require Import ZArith OrdersFacts Nnat Ndigits NAxioms NDiv NSig.
(** * The interface [NSig.NType] implies the interface [NAxiomsSig] *)
@@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ Module NTypeIsNAxioms (Import N : NType').
Hint Rewrite
spec_0 spec_1 spec_2 spec_succ spec_add spec_mul spec_pred spec_sub
- spec_div spec_modulo spec_gcd spec_compare spec_eq_bool spec_sqrt
- spec_log2 spec_max spec_min spec_pow_pos spec_pow_N spec_pow
+ spec_div spec_modulo spec_gcd spec_compare spec_eqb spec_ltb spec_leb
+ spec_sqrt spec_log2 spec_max spec_min spec_pow_pos spec_pow_N spec_pow
spec_even spec_odd spec_testbit spec_shiftl spec_shiftr
spec_land spec_lor spec_ldiff spec_lxor spec_div2 spec_of_N
: nsimpl.
@@ -126,36 +126,66 @@ Qed.
(** Order *)
-Lemma compare_spec : forall x y, CompareSpec (x==y) (x<y) (y<x) (compare x y).
+Lemma eqb_eq x y : eqb x y = true <-> x == y.
Proof.
- intros. zify. destruct (Zcompare_spec [x] [y]); auto.
+ zify. apply Z.eqb_eq.
Qed.
-Definition eqb := eq_bool.
+Lemma leb_le x y : leb x y = true <-> x <= y.
+Proof.
+ zify. apply Z.leb_le.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma ltb_lt x y : ltb x y = true <-> x < y.
+Proof.
+ zify. apply Z.ltb_lt.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma compare_eq_iff n m : compare n m = Eq <-> n == m.
+Proof.
+ intros. zify. apply Z.compare_eq_iff.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma compare_lt_iff n m : compare n m = Lt <-> n < m.
+Proof.
+ intros. zify. reflexivity.
+Qed.
+
+Lemma compare_le_iff n m : compare n m <> Gt <-> n <= m.
+Proof.
+ intros. zify. reflexivity.
+Qed.
-Lemma eqb_eq : forall x y, eq_bool x y = true <-> x == y.
+Lemma compare_antisym n m : compare m n = CompOpp (compare n m).
Proof.
- intros. zify. symmetry. apply Zeq_is_eq_bool.
+ intros. zify. apply Z.compare_antisym.
Qed.
+Include BoolOrderFacts N N N [no inline].
+
Instance compare_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> Logic.eq) compare.
Proof.
-intros x x' Hx y y' Hy. rewrite 2 spec_compare, Hx, Hy; intuition.
+intros x x' Hx y y' Hy. zify. now rewrite Hx, Hy.
Qed.
-Instance lt_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> iff) lt.
+Instance eqb_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> Logic.eq) eqb.
Proof.
-intros x x' Hx y y' Hy; unfold lt; rewrite Hx, Hy; intuition.
+intros x x' Hx y y' Hy. zify. now rewrite Hx, Hy.
Qed.
-Theorem lt_eq_cases : forall n m, n <= m <-> n < m \/ n == m.
+Instance ltb_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> Logic.eq) ltb.
Proof.
-intros. zify. omega.
+intros x x' Hx y y' Hy. zify. now rewrite Hx, Hy.
Qed.
-Theorem lt_irrefl : forall n, ~ n < n.
+Instance leb_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> Logic.eq) leb.
Proof.
-intros. zify. omega.
+intros x x' Hx y y' Hy. zify. now rewrite Hx, Hy.
+Qed.
+
+Instance lt_wd : Proper (eq ==> eq ==> iff) lt.
+Proof.
+intros x x' Hx y y' Hy; unfold lt; rewrite Hx, Hy; intuition.
Qed.
Theorem lt_succ_r : forall n m, n < (succ m) <-> n <= m.
@@ -474,5 +504,5 @@ Qed.
End NTypeIsNAxioms.
Module NType_NAxioms (N : NType)
- <: NAxiomsSig <: HasCompare N <: HasEqBool N <: HasMinMax N
+ <: NAxiomsSig <: OrderFunctions N <: HasMinMax N
:= N <+ NTypeIsNAxioms.