diff options
| author | emakarov | 2007-09-21 13:22:41 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | emakarov | 2007-09-21 13:22:41 +0000 |
| commit | 090c9939616ac7be55b66290bae3c3429d659bdc (patch) | |
| tree | 704a5e0e8e18f26e9b30d8d096afe1de7187b401 /theories/Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMinus.v | |
| parent | 4dc76691537c57cb8344e82d6bb493360ae12aaa (diff) | |
Update on theories/Numbers. Natural numbers are mostly complete,
need to make NZOrdAxiomsSig a subtype of NAxiomsSig.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@10132 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'theories/Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMinus.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | theories/Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMinus.v | 164 |
1 files changed, 164 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/theories/Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMinus.v b/theories/Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMinus.v new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0af5c22fd2 --- /dev/null +++ b/theories/Numbers/Natural/Abstract/NMinus.v @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ +Require Export NTimesOrder. + +Module NMinusPropFunct (Import NAxiomsMod : NAxiomsSig). +Module Export NTimesOrderPropMod := NTimesOrderPropFunct NAxiomsMod. +Open Local Scope NatScope. + +Theorem minus_0_r : forall n : N, n - 0 == n. +Proof minus_0_r. + +Theorem minus_succ_r : forall n m : N, n - (S m) == P (n - m). +Proof minus_succ_r. + +Theorem minus_1_r : forall n : N, n - 1 == P n. +Proof. +intro n; rewrite minus_succ_r; now rewrite minus_0_r. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_0_l : forall n : N, 0 - n == 0. +Proof. +induct n. +apply minus_0_r. +intros n IH; rewrite minus_succ_r; rewrite IH. now apply pred_0. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_succ : forall n m : N, S n - S m == n - m. +Proof. +intro n; induct m. +rewrite minus_succ_r. do 2 rewrite minus_0_r. now rewrite pred_succ. +intros m IH. rewrite minus_succ_r. rewrite IH. now rewrite minus_succ_r. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_diag : forall n : N, n - n == 0. +Proof. +induct n. apply minus_0_r. intros n IH; rewrite minus_succ; now rewrite IH. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_gt : forall n m : N, n > m -> n - m ~= 0. +Proof. +intros n m H; elim H using lt_ind_rel; clear n m H. +solve_rel_wd. +intro; rewrite minus_0_r; apply neq_succ_0. +intros; now rewrite minus_succ. +Qed. + +Theorem plus_minus_assoc : forall n m p : N, p <= m -> n + (m - p) == (n + m) - p. +Proof. +intros n m p; induct p. +intro; now do 2 rewrite minus_0_r. +intros p IH H. do 2 rewrite minus_succ_r. +rewrite <- IH; [now apply le_succ_le |]. +rewrite plus_pred_r. apply minus_gt. now apply <- lt_le_succ. +reflexivity. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_succ_l : forall n m : N, n <= m -> S m - n == S (m - n). +Proof. +intros n m H. rewrite <- (plus_1_l m). rewrite <- (plus_1_l (m - n)). +symmetry; now apply plus_minus_assoc. +Qed. + +Theorem plus_minus : forall n m : N, (n + m) - m == n. +Proof. +intros n m. rewrite <- plus_minus_assoc. apply le_refl. +rewrite minus_diag; now rewrite plus_0_r. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_plus : forall n m : N, n <= m -> (m - n) + n == m. +Proof. +intros n m H. rewrite plus_comm. rewrite plus_minus_assoc; [assumption |]. +rewrite plus_comm. apply plus_minus. +Qed. + +Theorem plus_minus_eq : forall n m p : N, m + p == n -> n - m == p. +Proof. +intros n m p H. symmetry. +assert (H1 : m + p - m == n - m). now rewrite H. +rewrite plus_comm in H1. now rewrite plus_minus in H1. +Qed. + +(* This could be proved by adding m to both sides. Then the proof would +use plus_minus_assoc and le_minus_0, which is proven below. *) +Theorem plus_minus_eq_nz : forall n m p : N, p ~= 0 -> n - m == p -> m + p == n. +Proof. +intros n m p H; double_induct n m. +intros m H1; rewrite minus_0_l in H1. symmetry in H1; false_hyp H1 H. +intro n; rewrite minus_0_r; now rewrite plus_0_l. +intros n m IH H1. rewrite minus_succ in H1. apply IH in H1. +rewrite plus_succ_l; now apply succ_wd. +Qed. + +Theorem minus_plus_distr : forall n m p : N, n - (m + p) == (n - m) - p. +Proof. +intros n m; induct p. +rewrite plus_0_r; now rewrite minus_0_r. +intros p IH. rewrite plus_succ_r; do 2 rewrite minus_succ_r. now rewrite IH. +Qed. + +Theorem plus_minus_swap : forall n m p : N, p <= n -> n + m - p == n - p + m. +Proof. +intros n m p H. +rewrite (plus_comm n m). +rewrite <- plus_minus_assoc; [assumption |]. +now rewrite (plus_comm m (n - p)). +Qed. + +(** Minus and order *) + +Theorem le_minus_l : forall n m : N, n - m <= n. +Proof. +intro n; induct m. +rewrite minus_0_r; le_equal. +intros m IH. rewrite minus_succ_r. +apply le_trans with (n - m); [apply le_pred_l | assumption]. +Qed. + +Theorem le_minus_0 : forall n m : N, n <= m <-> n - m == 0. +Proof. +double_induct n m. +intro m; split; intro; [apply minus_0_l | apply le_0_l]. +intro m; rewrite minus_0_r; split; intro H; +[false_hyp H nle_succ_0 | false_hyp H neq_succ_0]. +intros n m H. rewrite <- succ_le_mono. now rewrite minus_succ. +Qed. + +(** Minus and times *) + +Theorem times_pred_r : forall n m : N, n * (P m) == n * m - n. +Proof. +intro n; nondep_induct m. +now rewrite pred_0, times_0_r, minus_0_l. +intro m; rewrite pred_succ, times_succ_r, <- plus_minus_assoc. +le_equal. +now rewrite minus_diag, plus_0_r. +Qed. + +Theorem times_minus_distr_r : forall n m p : N, (n - m) * p == n * p - m * p. +Proof. +intros n m p; induct n. +now rewrite minus_0_l, times_0_l, minus_0_l. +intros n IH. destruct (le_lt_dec m n) as [H | H]. +rewrite minus_succ_l; [assumption |]. do 2 rewrite times_succ_l. +rewrite (plus_comm ((n - m) * p) p), (plus_comm (n * p) p). +rewrite <- (plus_minus_assoc p (n * p) (m * p)); [now apply times_le_mono_r |]. +now apply <- plus_cancel_l. +assert (H1 : S n <= m); [now apply -> lt_le_succ |]. +setoid_replace (S n - m) with 0 by now apply -> le_minus_0. +setoid_replace ((S n * p) - m * p) with 0 by (apply -> le_minus_0; now apply times_le_mono_r). +apply times_0_l. +Qed. + +Theorem times_minus_distr_l : forall n m p : N, p * (n - m) == p * n - p * m. +Proof. +intros n m p; rewrite (times_comm p (n - m)), (times_comm p n), (times_comm p m). +apply times_minus_distr_r. +Qed. + +End NMinusPropFunct. + + +(* + Local Variables: + tags-file-name: "~/coq/trunk/theories/Numbers/TAGS" + End: +*) |
