aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test-suite
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMaxime Dénès2017-10-09 16:42:28 +0200
committerMaxime Dénès2017-10-09 16:42:28 +0200
commit5ef85c86dc94338c2d0da060946baafea2e5370e (patch)
tree4e0ba603694a7bdea2771ca6f24eda549ce8ca5f /test-suite
parentf927df44202034fa8cf73f72af876ae1e4ca05ba (diff)
parent6526933e3d6a6392aa6bd5235ea0180bb68b6f94 (diff)
Merge PR #1126: [ltac] Warning for deprecated `Add Setoid` and `Add Morphism` forms.
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite')
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/setoid_test.v10
-rw-r--r--test-suite/success/setoid_test2.v16
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/success/setoid_test.v b/test-suite/success/setoid_test.v
index 1f24ef2a6b..c8dfcd2cbf 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/setoid_test.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/setoid_test.v
@@ -33,7 +33,8 @@ Qed.
Add Setoid set same setoid_set as setsetoid.
-Add Morphism In : In_ext.
+Add Morphism In with signature (eq ==> same ==> iff) as In_ext.
+Proof.
unfold same; intros a s t H; elim (H a); auto.
Qed.
@@ -50,10 +51,9 @@ simpl; right.
apply (H2 H1).
Qed.
-Add Morphism Add : Add_ext.
+Add Morphism Add with signature (eq ==> same ==> same) as Add_ext.
split; apply add_aux.
assumption.
-
rewrite H.
reflexivity.
Qed.
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ Qed.
Parameter P : set -> Prop.
Parameter P_ext : forall s t : set, same s t -> P s -> P t.
-Add Morphism P : P_extt.
+Add Morphism P with signature (same ==> iff) as P_extt.
intros; split; apply P_ext; (assumption || apply (Seq_sym _ _ setoid_set); assumption).
Qed.
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Definition f: forall A : Set, A -> A := fun A x => x.
Add Relation (id A) (rel A) as eq_rel.
-Add Morphism (@f A) : f_morph.
+Add Morphism (@f A) with signature (eq ==> eq) as f_morph.
Proof.
unfold rel, f. trivial.
Qed.
diff --git a/test-suite/success/setoid_test2.v b/test-suite/success/setoid_test2.v
index 6baf79701a..79467e549c 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/setoid_test2.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/setoid_test2.v
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ Axiom SetoidS2 : Setoid_Theory S2 eqS2.
Add Setoid S2 eqS2 SetoidS2 as S2setoid.
Axiom f : S1 -> nat -> S2.
-Add Morphism f : f_compat. Admitted.
-Add Morphism f : f_compat2. Admitted.
+Add Morphism f with signature (eqS1 ==> eq ==> eqS2) as f_compat. Admitted.
+Add Morphism f with signature (eqS1 ==> eq ==> eqS2) as f_compat2. Admitted.
Theorem test1: forall x y, (eqS1 x y) -> (eqS2 (f x 0) (f y 0)).
intros.
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Theorem test1': forall x y, (eqS1 x y) -> (eqS2 (f x 0) (f y 0)).
Qed.
Axiom g : S1 -> S2 -> nat.
-Add Morphism g : g_compat. Admitted.
+Add Morphism g with signature (eqS1 ==> eqS2 ==> eq) as g_compat. Admitted.
Axiom P : nat -> Prop.
Theorem test2:
@@ -190,13 +190,13 @@ Theorem test5:
Qed.
Axiom f_test6 : S2 -> Prop.
-Add Morphism f_test6 : f_test6_compat. Admitted.
+Add Morphism f_test6 with signature (eqS2 ==> iff) as f_test6_compat. Admitted.
Axiom g_test6 : bool -> S2.
-Add Morphism g_test6 : g_test6_compat. Admitted.
+Add Morphism g_test6 with signature (eq ==> eqS2) as g_test6_compat. Admitted.
Axiom h_test6 : S1 -> bool.
-Add Morphism h_test6 : h_test6_compat. Admitted.
+Add Morphism h_test6 with signature (eqS1 ==> eq) as h_test6_compat. Admitted.
Theorem test6:
forall E1 E2, (eqS1 E1 E2) -> (f_test6 (g_test6 (h_test6 E2))) ->
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ Add Setoid S1_test8 eqS1_test8 SetoidS1_test8 as S1_test8setoid.
Instance eqS1_test8_default : DefaultRelation eqS1_test8.
Axiom f_test8 : S2 -> S1_test8.
-Add Morphism f_test8 : f_compat_test8. Admitted.
+Add Morphism f_test8 with signature (eqS2 ==> eqS1_test8) as f_compat_test8. Admitted.
Axiom eqS1_test8': S1_test8 -> S1_test8 -> Prop.
Axiom SetoidS1_test8' : Setoid_Theory S1_test8 eqS1_test8'.
@@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ Add Setoid S1_test8 eqS1_test8' SetoidS1_test8' as S1_test8setoid'.
(S1_test8, eqS1_test8'). However this does not happen and
there is still no syntax for it ;-( *)
Axiom g_test8 : S1_test8 -> S2.
-Add Morphism g_test8 : g_compat_test8. Admitted.
+Add Morphism g_test8 with signature (eqS1_test8 ==> eqS2) as g_compat_test8. Admitted.
Theorem test8:
forall x x': S2, (eqS2 x x') ->