diff options
| author | Jason Gross | 2014-05-14 05:44:49 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jason Gross | 2014-06-10 19:46:56 -0400 |
| commit | 04678b87925fea19ee754f84267a3584258fb3b9 (patch) | |
| tree | 7b92ee1e6ff8148164bc1e9aeccc33b8d5a625a5 /test-suite | |
| parent | 1d9a159b64497c838618753ca1696e1f5f8937fe (diff) | |
Add a test-case for bug #3314 proving False
Diffstat (limited to 'test-suite')
| -rw-r--r-- | test-suite/bugs/opened/3314.v | 146 |
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test-suite/bugs/opened/3314.v b/test-suite/bugs/opened/3314.v new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..96b327e75a --- /dev/null +++ b/test-suite/bugs/opened/3314.v @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +Set Universe Polymorphism. +Definition Lift +: $(let U1 := constr:(Type) in + let U0 := constr:(Type : U1) in + exact (U0 -> U1))$ + := fun T => T. + +Fail Check nat:Prop. (* The command has indeed failed with message: +=> Error: +The term "nat" has type "Set" while it is expected to have type "Prop". *) +Set Printing All. +Set Printing Universes. +Check Lift nat : Prop. (* Lift (* Top.8 Top.9 Top.10 *) nat:Prop + : Prop +(* Top.10 + Top.9 + Top.8 |= Top.10 < Top.9 + Top.9 < Top.8 + Top.9 <= Prop + *) + *) +Eval compute in Lift nat : Prop. +(* = nat + : Prop *) + +Section Hurkens. + + Monomorphic Definition Type2 := Type. + Monomorphic Definition Type1 := Type : Type2. + + (** Assumption of a retract from Type into Prop *) + + Variable down : Type1 -> Prop. + Variable up : Prop -> Type1. + + Hypothesis back : forall A, up (down A) -> A. + + Hypothesis forth : forall A, A -> up (down A). + + Hypothesis backforth : forall (A:Type) (P:A->Type) (a:A), + P (back A (forth A a)) -> P a. + + Hypothesis backforth_r : forall (A:Type) (P:A->Type) (a:A), + P a -> P (back A (forth A a)). + + (** Proof *) + + Definition V : Type1 := forall A:Prop, ((up A -> Prop) -> up A -> Prop) -> up A -> Prop. + Definition U : Type1 := V -> Prop. + + Definition sb (z:V) : V := fun A r a => r (z A r) a. + Definition le (i:U -> Prop) (x:U) : Prop := x (fun A r a => i (fun v => sb v A r a)). + Definition le' (i:up (down U) -> Prop) (x:up (down U)) : Prop := le (fun a:U => i (forth _ a)) (back _ x). + Definition induct (i:U -> Prop) : Type1 := forall x:U, up (le i x) -> up (i x). + Definition WF : U := fun z => down (induct (fun a => z (down U) le' (forth _ a))). + Definition I (x:U) : Prop := + (forall i:U -> Prop, up (le i x) -> up (i (fun v => sb v (down U) le' (forth _ x)))) -> False. + + Lemma Omega : forall i:U -> Prop, induct i -> up (i WF). + Proof. + intros i y. + apply y. + unfold le, WF, induct. + apply forth. + intros x H0. + apply y. + unfold sb, le', le. + compute. + apply backforth_r. + exact H0. + Qed. + + Lemma lemma1 : induct (fun u => down (I u)). + Proof. + unfold induct. + intros x p. + apply forth. + intro q. + generalize (q (fun u => down (I u)) p). + intro r. + apply back in r. + apply r. + intros i j. + unfold le, sb, le', le in j |-. + apply backforth in j. + specialize q with (i := fun y => i (fun v:V => sb v (down U) le' (forth _ y))). + apply q. + exact j. + Qed. + + Lemma lemma2 : (forall i:U -> Prop, induct i -> up (i WF)) -> False. + Proof. + intro x. + generalize (x (fun u => down (I u)) lemma1). + intro r; apply back in r. + apply r. + intros i H0. + apply (x (fun y => i (fun v => sb v (down U) le' (forth _ y)))). + unfold le, WF in H0. + apply back in H0. + exact H0. + Qed. + + Theorem paradox : False. + Proof. + exact (lemma2 Omega). + Qed. + +End Hurkens. + +Definition informative (x : bool) := + match x with + | true => Type + | false => Prop + end. + +Definition depsort (T : Type) (x : bool) : informative x := + match x with + | true => T + | false => True + end. + +(** This definition should fail *) +Definition Box (T : Type1) : Prop := Lift T. + +Definition prop {T : Type1} (t : Box T) : T := t. +Definition wrap {T : Type1} (t : T) : Box T := t. + +Definition down (x : Type1) : Prop := Box x. +Definition up (x : Prop) : Type1 := x. + +Definition back A : up (down A) -> A := @prop A. + +Definition forth (A : Type1) : A -> up (down A) := @wrap A. + +Definition backforth (A:Type1) (P:A->Type) (a:A) : + P (back A (forth A a)) -> P a := fun H => H. + +Definition backforth_r (A:Type1) (P:A->Type) (a:A) : + P a -> P (back A (forth A a)) := fun H => H. + +Theorem pandora : False. + apply (paradox down up back forth backforth backforth_r). +Qed. + +Print Assumptions pandora. |
