diff options
| author | Hugo Herbelin | 2015-12-21 22:19:34 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hugo Herbelin | 2016-06-18 13:09:16 +0200 |
| commit | f841c27c1cfd38aada72f3c8f90e2ed1ec22db6a (patch) | |
| tree | 1595db648f65e4f381034a2385f4faa3b88f60cb /tactics | |
| parent | 1744e371d8fa2a612e3906c643fb5558a54a484f (diff) | |
Adding an "as" clause to specialize.
Comments
--------
- The tactic specialize conveys a somehow intuitive reasoning concept
and I would support continuing maintaining it even if the design
comes in my opinion with some oddities. (Note that the experience of
MathComp and SSReflect also suggests that specialize is an
interesting concept in itself).
There are two variants to specialize:
- specialize (H args) with H an hypothesis looks natural: we
specialize H with extra arguments and the "as pattern" clause comes
naturally as an extension of it, destructuring the result using the
pattern.
- specialize term with bindings makes the choice of fully applying the
term filling missing expressions with bindings and to then behave as
generalize. Wouldn't we like a more fine-grained approach and the
result to remain in the context?
In this second case, the "as" clause works as if the term were posed
in the context with "pose proof".
Diffstat (limited to 'tactics')
| -rw-r--r-- | tactics/tactics.ml | 42 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | tactics/tactics.mli | 2 |
2 files changed, 28 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/tactics/tactics.ml b/tactics/tactics.ml index 23aadf3933..d4158d7872 100644 --- a/tactics/tactics.ml +++ b/tactics/tactics.ml @@ -2859,7 +2859,7 @@ let quantify lconstr = (* Modifying/Adding an hypothesis *) -let specialize (c,lbind) = +let specialize (c,lbind) ipat = Proofview.Goal.enter { enter = begin fun gl -> let env = Proofview.Goal.env gl in let sigma = Sigma.to_evar_map (Proofview.Goal.sigma gl) in @@ -2880,24 +2880,36 @@ let specialize (c,lbind) = let term = applist(thd,List.map (nf_evar clause.evd) tstack) in if occur_meta term then errorlabstrm "" (str "Cannot infer an instance for " ++ + pr_name (meta_name clause.evd (List.hd (collect_metas term))) ++ str "."); clause.evd, term in let typ = Retyping.get_type_of env sigma term in - match kind_of_term (fst(decompose_app (snd(decompose_lam_assum c)))) with - | Var id when Id.List.mem id (Tacmach.New.pf_ids_of_hyps gl) -> - Tacticals.New.tclTHEN - (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS sigma) - (Tacticals.New.tclTHENFIRST - (assert_before_replacing id typ) - (exact_no_check term)) - | _ -> - (* To deprecate in favor of generalize? *) - Tacticals.New.tclTHEN - (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS sigma) - (Tacticals.New.tclTHENLAST - (cut typ) - (exact_no_check term)) + let tac = + match kind_of_term (fst(decompose_app (snd(decompose_lam_assum c)))) with + | Var id when Id.List.mem id (Tacmach.New.pf_ids_of_hyps gl) -> + (* Like assert (id:=id args) but with the concept of specialization *) + let naming,tac = + prepare_intros false (IntroIdentifier id) MoveLast ipat in + let repl = do_replace (Some id) naming in + Tacticals.New.tclTHENFIRST + (assert_before_then_gen repl naming typ tac) + (exact_no_check term) + | _ -> + match ipat with + | None -> + (* Like generalize with extra support for "with" bindings *) + (* even though the "with" bindings forces full application *) + Tacticals.New.tclTHENLAST (cut typ) (exact_no_check term) + | Some (loc,ipat) -> + (* Like pose proof with extra support for "with" bindings *) + (* even though the "with" bindings forces full application *) + let naming,tac = prepare_intros_loc loc false IntroAnonymous MoveLast ipat in + Tacticals.New.tclTHENFIRST + (assert_before_then_gen false naming typ tac) + (exact_no_check term) + in + Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.Unsafe.tclEVARS sigma) tac end } (*****************************) diff --git a/tactics/tactics.mli b/tactics/tactics.mli index 012c75091a..fb033363e8 100644 --- a/tactics/tactics.mli +++ b/tactics/tactics.mli @@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ val unfold_body : Id.t -> unit Proofview.tactic val keep : Id.t list -> unit Proofview.tactic val apply_clear_request : clear_flag -> bool -> constr -> unit Proofview.tactic -val specialize : constr with_bindings -> unit Proofview.tactic +val specialize : constr with_bindings -> intro_pattern option -> unit Proofview.tactic val move_hyp : Id.t -> Id.t move_location -> unit Proofview.tactic val rename_hyp : (Id.t * Id.t) list -> unit Proofview.tactic |
