diff options
| author | Hugo Herbelin | 2014-08-13 18:02:11 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hugo Herbelin | 2014-08-18 18:56:38 +0200 |
| commit | 5c82bcd1f87cc893319f2553c81a73c69b13b54d (patch) | |
| tree | 83ca001f700b5fdb48d0fac8e249c08c589a1d15 /pretyping/typeclasses_errors.ml | |
| parent | d5fece25d8964d5d9fcd55b66164286aeef5fb9f (diff) | |
Reorganisation of intropattern code
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
Diffstat (limited to 'pretyping/typeclasses_errors.ml')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
