aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/plugins
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPierre-Marie Pédrot2016-05-17 22:37:19 +0200
committerPierre-Marie Pédrot2016-05-17 22:38:40 +0200
commitf7fb1918619fcef384d4aa84938246de67c707fa (patch)
tree6f8b1b8ba71681b06b4a74ddeee76d02a3ef09dd /plugins
parentcead0ce54cf290016e088ee7f203d327a3eea957 (diff)
parentdadd4003b6607ccc103658f842b5efbd6d8ab57f (diff)
Putting all the tactics exported by the Tactics module in the new monad API.
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins')
-rw-r--r--plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml26
-rw-r--r--plugins/firstorder/instances.ml8
-rw-r--r--plugins/firstorder/rules.ml14
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml21
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/invfun.ml11
-rw-r--r--plugins/funind/recdef.ml20
-rw-r--r--plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml8
-rw-r--r--plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml42
-rw-r--r--plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml90
-rw-r--r--plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml4
-rw-r--r--plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml2
11 files changed, 111 insertions, 95 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml
index 090b293f5c..be6ce59bd3 100644
--- a/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml
+++ b/plugins/decl_mode/decl_proof_instr.ml
@@ -34,6 +34,22 @@ open Context.Named.Declaration
(* Strictness option *)
+let clear ids { it = goal; sigma } =
+ let ids = List.fold_left (fun accu x -> Id.Set.add x accu) Id.Set.empty ids in
+ let env = Goal.V82.env sigma goal in
+ let sign = Goal.V82.hyps sigma goal in
+ let cl = Goal.V82.concl sigma goal in
+ let evdref = ref (Evd.clear_metas sigma) in
+ let (hyps, concl) =
+ try Evarutil.clear_hyps_in_evi env evdref sign cl ids
+ with Evarutil.ClearDependencyError (id, _) ->
+ errorlabstrm "" (str "Cannot clear " ++ pr_id id)
+ in
+ let sigma = !evdref in
+ let (gl,ev,sigma) = Goal.V82.mk_goal sigma hyps concl (Goal.V82.extra sigma goal) in
+ let sigma = Goal.V82.partial_solution_to sigma goal gl ev in
+ { it = [gl]; sigma }
+
let get_its_info gls = get_info gls.sigma gls.it
let get_strictness,set_strictness =
@@ -469,7 +485,7 @@ let thus_tac c ctyp submetas gls =
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_check proof) gls
else
let refiner = concl_refiner list proof gls in
- Tactics.refine refiner gls
+ Tacmach.refine refiner gls
(* general forward step *)
@@ -1273,7 +1289,7 @@ let rec execute_cases fix_name per_info tacnext args objs nhrec tree gls =
(fun id ->
hrec_for (out_name fix_name) per_info gls1 id)
recs in
- generalize hrecs gls1
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize hrecs) gls1
end;
match bro with
None ->
@@ -1349,7 +1365,7 @@ let end_tac et2 gls =
(default_justification (List.map mkVar clauses))
| ET_Induction,EK_nodep ->
tclTHENLIST
- [generalize (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee]);
+ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee]));
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simple_induct (AnonHyp (succ (List.length pi.per_args))));
default_justification (List.map mkVar clauses)]
| ET_Case_analysis,EK_dep tree ->
@@ -1361,7 +1377,7 @@ let end_tac et2 gls =
(initial_instance_stack clauses) [pi.per_casee] 0 tree
| ET_Induction,EK_dep tree ->
let nargs = (List.length pi.per_args) in
- tclTHEN (generalize (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee]))
+ tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (pi.per_args@[pi.per_casee])))
begin
fun gls0 ->
let fix_id =
@@ -1369,7 +1385,7 @@ let end_tac et2 gls =
let c_id =
pf_get_new_id (Id.of_string "_main_arg") gls0 in
tclTHENLIST
- [fix (Some fix_id) (succ nargs);
+ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix (Some fix_id) (succ nargs));
tclDO nargs (Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf);
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_mustbe_force c_id);
execute_cases (Name fix_id) pi
diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml b/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml
index 0e2a40245b..5eff2f2774 100644
--- a/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml
+++ b/plugins/firstorder/instances.ml
@@ -135,9 +135,9 @@ let left_instance_tac (inst,id) continue seq=
[tclTHENLIST
[Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf;
pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc ->
- (fun gls->generalize
+ (fun gls-> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize
[mkApp(idc,
- [|mkVar (Tacmach.pf_nth_hyp_id gls 1)|])] gls));
+ [|mkVar (Tacmach.pf_nth_hyp_id gls 1)|])]) gls));
Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf;
tclSOLVE [wrap 1 false continue
(deepen (record (id,None) seq))]];
@@ -158,10 +158,10 @@ let left_instance_tac (inst,id) continue seq=
try Typing.type_of (pf_env gl) evmap gt
with e when Errors.noncritical e ->
error "Untypable instance, maybe higher-order non-prenex quantification" in
- tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evmap) (generalize [gt]) gl)
+ tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evmap) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [gt])) gl)
else
pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc ->
- generalize [mkApp(idc,[|t|])])
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [mkApp(idc,[|t|])]))
in
tclTHENLIST
[special_generalize;
diff --git a/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml b/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml
index c05015c538..92b6e828e8 100644
--- a/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml
+++ b/plugins/firstorder/rules.ml
@@ -52,13 +52,13 @@ let basename_of_global=function
| _->assert false
let clear_global=function
- VarRef id->clear [id]
+ VarRef id-> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id])
| _->tclIDTAC
(* connection rules *)
let axiom_tac t seq=
- try pf_constr_of_global (find_left t seq) exact_no_check
+ try pf_constr_of_global (find_left t seq) (fun c -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_no_check c))
with Not_found->tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str "No axiom link")
let ll_atom_tac a backtrack id continue seq=
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ let ll_atom_tac a backtrack id continue seq=
tclTHENLIST
[pf_constr_of_global (find_left a seq) (fun left ->
pf_constr_of_global id (fun id ->
- generalize [mkApp(id, [|left|])]));
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [mkApp(id, [|left|])])));
clear_global id;
Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro]
with Not_found->tclFAIL 0 (Pp.str "No link"))
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ let ll_ind_tac (ind,u as indu) largs backtrack id continue seq gl=
let newhyps idc =List.init lp (myterm idc) in
tclIFTHENELSE
(tclTHENLIST
- [pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> generalize (newhyps idc));
+ [pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (newhyps idc)));
clear_global id;
tclDO lp (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)])
(wrap lp false continue seq) backtrack gl
@@ -151,9 +151,9 @@ let ll_arrow_tac a b c backtrack id continue seq=
clear_global id;
wrap 1 false continue seq];
tclTHENS (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (cut cc))
- [pf_constr_of_global id exact_no_check;
+ [pf_constr_of_global id (fun c -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (exact_no_check c));
tclTHENLIST
- [pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> generalize [d idc]);
+ [pf_constr_of_global id (fun idc -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [d idc]));
clear_global id;
Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf;
Proofview.V82.of_tactic introf;
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ let ll_forall_tac prod backtrack id continue seq=
(fun gls->
let id0=pf_nth_hyp_id gls 1 in
let term=mkApp(idc,[|mkVar(id0)|]) in
- tclTHEN (generalize [term]) (clear [id0]) gls));
+ tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [term])) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id0])) gls));
clear_global id;
Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro;
tclCOMPLETE (wrap 1 false continue (deepen seq))];
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml
index 8395865286..879145c2fa 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml
@@ -127,8 +127,7 @@ let finish_proof dynamic_infos g =
let refine c =
Tacmach.refine c
-let thin l =
- Tacmach.thin_no_check l
+let thin l = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.clear l)
let eq_constr u v = eq_constr_nounivs u v
@@ -705,7 +704,7 @@ let build_proof
in
tclTHENSEQ
[
- generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps));
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps)));
thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps;
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None);
(fun g -> observe_tac "toto" (
@@ -935,7 +934,7 @@ let generalize_non_dep hyp g =
in
(* observe (str "to_revert := " ++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id to_revert); *)
tclTHEN
- ((* observe_tac "h_generalize" *) (generalize (List.map mkVar to_revert) ))
+ ((* observe_tac "h_generalize" *) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar to_revert) )))
((* observe_tac "thin" *) (thin to_revert))
g
@@ -943,7 +942,7 @@ let id_of_decl decl = Nameops.out_name (get_name decl)
let var_of_decl decl = mkVar (id_of_decl decl)
let revert idl =
tclTHEN
- (generalize (List.map mkVar idl))
+ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar idl)))
(thin idl)
let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num =
@@ -1228,10 +1227,10 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam
if this_fix_info.idx + 1 = 0
then tclIDTAC (* Someone tries to defined a principle on a fully parametric definition declared as a fixpoint (strange but ....) *)
else
- observe_tac_stream (str "h_fix " ++ int (this_fix_info.idx +1) ) (fix (Some this_fix_info.name) (this_fix_info.idx +1))
+ observe_tac_stream (str "h_fix " ++ int (this_fix_info.idx +1) ) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix (Some this_fix_info.name) (this_fix_info.idx +1)))
else
- Tactics.mutual_fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx + 1)
- other_fix_infos 0
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.mutual_fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx + 1)
+ other_fix_infos 0)
| _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Not a valid information")
in
let first_tac : tactic = (* every operations until fix creations *)
@@ -1565,7 +1564,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen
Nameops.out_name (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string ("Acc_"^(Id.to_string rec_arg_id)))))
in
let revert l =
- tclTHEN (Tactics.generalize (List.map mkVar l)) (clear l)
+ tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize (List.map mkVar l))) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear l))
in
let fix_id = Nameops.out_name (fresh_id (Name hrec_id)) in
let prove_rec_arg_acc g =
@@ -1611,7 +1610,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen
in
tclTHENSEQ
[
- generalize [lemma];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [lemma]);
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid);
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Elim.h_decompose_and (mkVar hid));
(fun g ->
@@ -1643,7 +1642,7 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen
(* observe_tac "reverting" *) (revert (List.rev (acc_rec_arg_id::args_ids)));
(* (fun g -> observe (Printer.pr_goal (sig_it g) ++ fnl () ++ *)
(* str "fix arg num" ++ int (List.length args_ids + 1) ); tclIDTAC g); *)
- (* observe_tac "h_fix " *) (fix (Some fix_id) (List.length args_ids + 1));
+ (* observe_tac "h_fix " *) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix (Some fix_id) (List.length args_ids + 1)));
(* (fun g -> observe (Printer.pr_goal (sig_it g) ++ fnl() ++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g ) (pf_unsafe_type_of g (mkVar fix_id) )); tclIDTAC g); *)
h_intros (List.rev (acc_rec_arg_id::args_ids));
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_ref));
diff --git a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml
index 6a5a5ad533..72529fbbe3 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/invfun.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/invfun.ml
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ let nf_zeta =
Environ.empty_env
Evd.empty
+let thin ids gl = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.clear ids) gl
(* (\* [id_to_constr id] finds the term associated to [id] in the global environment *\) *)
(* let id_to_constr id = *)
@@ -464,7 +465,7 @@ let generalize_dependent_of x hyp g =
tclMAP
(function
| LocalAssum (id,t) when not (Id.equal id hyp) &&
- (Termops.occur_var (pf_env g) x t) -> tclTHEN (Tactics.generalize [mkVar id]) (thin [id])
+ (Termops.occur_var (pf_env g) x t) -> tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize [mkVar id])) (thin [id])
| _ -> tclIDTAC
)
(pf_hyps g)
@@ -714,7 +715,7 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic =
})
Locusops.onConcl)
;
- generalize (List.map mkVar ids);
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar ids));
thin ids
]
else
@@ -753,7 +754,7 @@ let prove_fun_complete funcs graphs schemes lemmas_types_infos i : tactic =
tclTHENSEQ
[ tclMAP (fun id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro id)) (args_names@[res;hres]);
observe_tac "h_generalize"
- (generalize [mkApp(applist(graph_principle,params),Array.map (fun c -> applist(c,params)) lemmas)]);
+ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [mkApp(applist(graph_principle,params),Array.map (fun c -> applist(c,params)) lemmas)]));
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro graph_principle_id);
observe_tac "" (tclTHEN_i
(observe_tac "elim" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (elim false None (mkVar hres,NoBindings) (Some (mkVar graph_principle_id,NoBindings)))))
@@ -936,7 +937,7 @@ let revert_graph kn post_tac hid g =
let f_args,res = Array.chop (Array.length args - 1) args in
tclTHENSEQ
[
- generalize [applist(mkConst f_complete,(Array.to_list f_args)@[res.(0);mkVar hid])];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [applist(mkConst f_complete,(Array.to_list f_args)@[res.(0);mkVar hid])]);
thin [hid];
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid);
post_tac hid
@@ -980,7 +981,7 @@ let functional_inversion kn hid fconst f_correct : tactic =
in
tclTHENSEQ[
pre_tac hid;
- generalize [applist(f_correct,(Array.to_list f_args)@[res;mkVar hid])];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [applist(f_correct,(Array.to_list f_args)@[res;mkVar hid])]);
thin [hid];
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid);
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Inv.inv FullInversion None (NamedHyp hid));
diff --git a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml
index e98ac5fb5e..10f08d3d13 100644
--- a/plugins/funind/recdef.ml
+++ b/plugins/funind/recdef.ml
@@ -267,8 +267,8 @@ let observe_tclTHENLIST s tacl =
let tclUSER tac is_mes l g =
let clear_tac =
match l with
- | None -> clear []
- | Some l -> tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY (clear [id])) (List.rev l)
+ | None -> tclIDTAC
+ | Some l -> tclMAP (fun id -> tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id]))) (List.rev l)
in
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "tclUSER1")
[
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ let treat_case forbid_new_ids to_intros finalize_tac nb_lam e infos : tactic =
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_using teq_id);
onLastHypId (fun heq ->
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "treat_case2")[
- thin to_intros;
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear to_intros);
h_intros to_intros;
(fun g' ->
let ty_teq = pf_unsafe_type_of g' (mkVar heq) in
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ let rec destruct_bounds_aux infos (bound,hyple,rechyps) lbounds g =
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_elim(mkApp(delayed_force lt_n_O,[|s_max|])));
Proofview.V82.of_tactic default_full_auto];
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "destruct_bounds_aux2")[
- observe_tac (str "clearing k ") (clear [id]);
+ observe_tac (str "clearing k ") (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id]));
h_intros [k;h';def];
observe_tac (str "simple_iter") (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simpl_iter Locusops.onConcl));
observe_tac (str "unfold functional")
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ let rec destruct_bounds_aux infos (bound,hyple,rechyps) lbounds g =
| (_,v_bound)::l ->
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "destruct_bounds_aux3")[
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_elim (mkVar v_bound));
- clear [v_bound];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [v_bound]);
tclDO 2 (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro);
onNthHypId 1
(fun p_hyp ->
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ let mkDestructEq :
to_revert_constr in
pf_typel new_hyps (fun _ ->
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "mkDestructEq")
- [generalize new_hyps;
+ [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize new_hyps);
(fun g2 ->
let changefun patvars = { run = fun sigma ->
let redfun = pattern_occs [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], expr] in
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ let rec destruct_hex expr_info acc l =
| (v,hex)::l ->
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "destruct_hex")[
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkVar hex));
- clear [hex];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [hex]);
tclDO 2 (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro);
onNthHypId 1 (fun hp ->
onNthHypId 2 (fun p ->
@@ -1116,10 +1116,10 @@ let termination_proof_header is_mes input_type ids args_id relation
[observe_tac (str "generalize")
(onNLastHypsId (nargs+1)
(tclMAP (fun id ->
- tclTHEN (Tactics.generalize [mkVar id]) (clear [id]))
+ tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize [mkVar id])) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id])))
))
;
- observe_tac (str "fix") (fix (Some hrec) (nargs+1));
+ observe_tac (str "fix") (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix (Some hrec) (nargs+1)));
h_intros args_id;
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro wf_rec_arg);
observe_tac (str "tac") (tac wf_rec_arg hrec wf_rec_arg acc_inv)
@@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ let open_new_goal build_proof sigma using_lemmas ref_ goal_name (gls_type,decomp
let hid = next_ident_away_in_goal h_id (pf_ids_of_hyps gls) in
observe_tclTHENLIST (str "")
[
- generalize [lemma];
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [lemma]);
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid);
(fun g ->
let ids = pf_ids_of_hyps g in
diff --git a/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml b/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml
index 5c0a8226a7..0fcfbfc711 100644
--- a/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml
+++ b/plugins/micromega/coq_micromega.ml
@@ -1464,7 +1464,7 @@ let micromega_order_change spec cert cert_typ env ff (*: unit Proofview.tactic*
]
(Tacmach.pf_concl gl))
;
- Tactics.new_generalize env ;
+ Tactics.generalize env ;
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST (List.map (fun id -> (Tactics.introduction id)) ids)
]
end }
@@ -1726,7 +1726,7 @@ let micromega_gen
| Some (ids,ff',res') ->
(Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST
[
- Tactics.new_generalize (List.map Term.mkVar ids) ;
+ Tactics.generalize (List.map Term.mkVar ids) ;
micromega_order_change spec res'
(Term.mkApp(Lazy.force coq_list, [|spec.proof_typ|])) env ff'
])
@@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ let micromega_order_changer cert env ff =
("__wit", cert, cert_typ)
]
(Tacmach.pf_concl gl)));
- Tactics.new_generalize env ;
+ Tactics.generalize env ;
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST (List.map (fun id -> (Tactics.introduction id)) ids)
]
end }
@@ -1812,7 +1812,7 @@ let micromega_genr prover =
(List.filter (fun (n,_) -> List.mem n ids) hyps) concl in
(Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST
[
- Tactics.new_generalize (List.map Term.mkVar ids) ;
+ Tactics.generalize (List.map Term.mkVar ids) ;
micromega_order_changer res' env (abstract_wrt_formula ff' ff)
])
with
diff --git a/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4 b/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4
index 0da6305304..5f906a8dad 100644
--- a/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4
+++ b/plugins/nsatz/g_nsatz.ml4
@@ -13,5 +13,5 @@ DECLARE PLUGIN "nsatz_plugin"
DECLARE PLUGIN "nsatz_plugin"
TACTIC EXTEND nsatz_compute
-| [ "nsatz_compute" constr(lt) ] -> [ Proofview.V82.tactic (Nsatz.nsatz_compute lt) ]
+| [ "nsatz_compute" constr(lt) ] -> [ Nsatz.nsatz_compute lt ]
END
diff --git a/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml b/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml
index 1f420cf6ae..0bf30e7fd8 100644
--- a/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml
+++ b/plugins/omega/coq_omega.ml
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ let exists_tac c = constructor_tac false (Some 1) 1 (ImplicitBindings [c])
let generalize_tac t = generalize t
let elim t = simplest_elim t
-let exact t = Tactics.refine t
+let exact t = Tacmach.refine t
let unfold s = Tactics.unfold_in_concl [Locus.AllOccurrences, Lazy.force s]
let rev_assoc k =
@@ -1067,12 +1067,12 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
let p_initial = [P_APP 1;P_TYPE] in
let tac= shuffle_mult_right p_initial e1.body k e2.body in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA17, [|
val_of eq1;
val_of eq2;
mk_integer k;
- mkVar id1; mkVar id2 |])]);
+ mkVar id1; mkVar id2 |])];
Proofview.V82.tactic (mk_then tac);
(intros_using [aux]);
Proofview.V82.tactic (resolve_id aux);
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
mkVar (hyp_of_tag e1.id);
mkVar (hyp_of_tag e2.id) |])
in
- Proofview.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTHEN (generalize_tac [theorem]) (mk_then tac))) (solve_le)
+ Proofview.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize_tac [theorem])) (mk_then tac))) (solve_le)
| DIVIDE_AND_APPROX (e1,e2,k,d) :: l ->
let id = hyp_of_tag e1.id in
let eq1 = val_of(decompile e1)
@@ -1119,20 +1119,20 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
[ Tacticals.New.tclTHENS
(Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA1,
[| eq1; rhs; mkVar aux; mkVar id |])]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux;id]);
+ (clear [aux;id]);
(intros_using [id]);
(cut (mk_gt kk dd)) ])
[ Tacticals.New.tclTHENS
(cut (mk_gt kk izero))
[ Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux1; aux2]);
- (Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_Zmult_le_approx,
- [| kk;eq2;dd;mkVar aux1;mkVar aux2; mkVar id |])]));
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux1;aux2;id]);
+ [| kk;eq2;dd;mkVar aux1;mkVar aux2; mkVar id |])]);
+ (clear [aux1;aux2;id]);
(intros_using [id]);
(loop l) ];
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
@@ -1157,10 +1157,10 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
[ Tacticals.New.tclTHENS (cut (mk_gt kk dd))
[Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux2;aux1]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA4,
[| dd;kk;eq2;mkVar aux1; mkVar aux2 |])]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux1;aux2]);
+ (clear [aux1;aux2]);
unfold sp_not;
(intros_using [aux]);
Proofview.V82.tactic (resolve_id aux);
@@ -1187,10 +1187,10 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
(cut state_eq)
[Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux1]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA18,
[| eq1;eq2;kk;mkVar aux1; mkVar id |])]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux1;id]);
+ (clear [aux1;id]);
(intros_using [id]);
(loop l) ];
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (mk_then tac)) reflexivity ]
@@ -1202,10 +1202,10 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
(cut (mk_gt kk izero))
[Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux2;aux1]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA3,
[| eq1; eq2; kk; mkVar aux2; mkVar aux1;mkVar id|])]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux1;aux2;id]);
+ (clear [aux1;aux2;id]);
(intros_using [id]);
(loop l) ];
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
@@ -1229,9 +1229,9 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
(cut (mk_eq eq1 (mk_inv eq2)))
[Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac [mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA8,
+ (generalize_tac [mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA8,
[| eq1;eq2;mkVar id1;mkVar id2; mkVar aux|])]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [id1;id2;aux]);
+ (clear [id1;id2;aux]);
(intros_using [id]);
(loop l) ];
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (mk_then tac)) reflexivity]
@@ -1263,13 +1263,13 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
[Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux]);
(elim_id aux);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux]);
+ (clear [aux]);
(intros_using [vid; aux]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA9,
[| mkVar vid;eq2;eq1;mm; mkVar id2;mkVar aux |])]);
Proofview.V82.tactic (mk_then tac);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux]);
+ (clear [aux]);
(intros_using [id]);
(loop l) ];
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (exists_tac eq1) reflexivity ]
@@ -1304,7 +1304,7 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
if e1.kind == DISE then [P_APP 1; P_TYPE] else [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] in
let tac = shuffle_mult_right p_initial e1.body k2 e2.body in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (tac_thm, [| eq1; eq2; kk; mkVar id1; mkVar id2 |])]);
Proofview.V82.tactic (mk_then tac);
(intros_using [id]);
@@ -1320,12 +1320,12 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
(cut (mk_gt kk2 izero))
[Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
(intros_using [aux2;aux1]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_OMEGA7, [|
eq1;eq2;kk1;kk2;
mkVar aux1;mkVar aux2;
mkVar id1;mkVar id2 |])]);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [aux1;aux2]);
+ (clear [aux1;aux2]);
Proofview.V82.tactic (mk_then tac);
(intros_using [id]);
(loop l) ];
@@ -1338,12 +1338,12 @@ let replay_history tactic_normalisation =
simpl_in_concl;
reflexivity ] ]
| CONSTANT_NOT_NUL(e,k) :: l ->
- Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac [mkVar (hyp_of_tag e)])) Equality.discrConcl
+ Tacticals.New.tclTHEN ((generalize_tac [mkVar (hyp_of_tag e)])) Equality.discrConcl
| CONSTANT_NUL(e) :: l ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (resolve_id (hyp_of_tag e))) reflexivity
| CONSTANT_NEG(e,k) :: l ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac [mkVar (hyp_of_tag e)]);
+ (generalize_tac [mkVar (hyp_of_tag e)]);
unfold sp_Zle;
simpl_in_concl;
unfold sp_not;
@@ -1366,8 +1366,8 @@ let normalize_equation id flag theorem pos t t1 t2 (tactic,defs) =
let (tac,t') = normalize p_initial t in
let shift_left =
tclTHEN
- (generalize_tac [mkApp (theorem, [| t1; t2; mkVar id |]) ])
- (tclTRY (clear [id]))
+ (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize_tac [mkApp (theorem, [| t1; t2; mkVar id |]) ]))
+ (tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear [id])))
in
if not (List.is_empty tac) then
let id' = new_identifier () in
@@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ let destructure_omega gl tac_def (id,c) =
let reintroduce id =
(* [id] cannot be cleared if dependent: protect it by a try *)
- Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTRY (clear [id]))) (intro_using id)
+ Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (Tacticals.New.tclTRY (clear [id])) (intro_using id)
open Proofview.Notations
@@ -1435,7 +1435,7 @@ let coq_omega =
(simplest_elim (applist (Lazy.force coq_intro_Z, [t])));
(intros_using [v; id]);
(elim_id id);
- Proofview.V82.tactic (clear [id]);
+ (clear [id]);
(intros_using [th;id]);
tac ]),
{kind = INEQ;
@@ -1546,7 +1546,7 @@ let nat_inject =
begin try match destructurate_prop t with
Kapp(Le,[t1;t2]) ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_inj_le, [| t1;t2;mkVar i |]) ]);
(explore [P_APP 1; P_TYPE] t1);
(explore [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] t2);
@@ -1555,7 +1555,7 @@ let nat_inject =
]
| Kapp(Lt,[t1;t2]) ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_inj_lt, [| t1;t2;mkVar i |]) ]);
(explore [P_APP 1; P_TYPE] t1);
(explore [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] t2);
@@ -1564,7 +1564,7 @@ let nat_inject =
]
| Kapp(Ge,[t1;t2]) ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_inj_ge, [| t1;t2;mkVar i |]) ]);
(explore [P_APP 1; P_TYPE] t1);
(explore [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] t2);
@@ -1573,7 +1573,7 @@ let nat_inject =
]
| Kapp(Gt,[t1;t2]) ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_inj_gt, [| t1;t2;mkVar i |]) ]);
(explore [P_APP 1; P_TYPE] t1);
(explore [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] t2);
@@ -1582,7 +1582,7 @@ let nat_inject =
]
| Kapp(Neq,[t1;t2]) ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_inj_neq, [| t1;t2;mkVar i |]) ]);
(explore [P_APP 1; P_TYPE] t1);
(explore [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] t2);
@@ -1592,7 +1592,7 @@ let nat_inject =
| Kapp(Eq,[typ;t1;t2]) ->
if is_conv typ (Lazy.force coq_nat) then
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_inj_eq, [| t1;t2;mkVar i |]) ]);
(explore [P_APP 2; P_TYPE] t1);
(explore [P_APP 3; P_TYPE] t2);
@@ -1674,7 +1674,7 @@ let onClearedName id tac =
(* We cannot ensure that hyps can be cleared (because of dependencies), *)
(* so renaming may be necessary *)
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN
- (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTRY (clear [id])))
+ (Tacticals.New.tclTRY (clear [id]))
(Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl ->
let id = Tacmach.New.of_old (fresh_id [] id) gl in
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN (introduction id) (tac id)
@@ -1682,7 +1682,7 @@ let onClearedName id tac =
let onClearedName2 id tac =
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN
- (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclTRY (clear [id])))
+ (Tacticals.New.tclTRY (clear [id]))
(Proofview.Goal.nf_enter { enter = begin fun gl ->
let id1 = Tacmach.New.of_old (fresh_id [] (add_suffix id "_left")) gl in
let id2 = Tacmach.New.of_old (fresh_id [] (add_suffix id "_right")) gl in
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
then
let d1 = decidability t1 in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac [mkApp (Lazy.force coq_imp_simp,
+ (generalize_tac [mkApp (Lazy.force coq_imp_simp,
[| t1; t2; d1; mkVar i|])]);
(onClearedName i (fun i ->
(loop (LocalAssum (i,mk_or (mk_not t1) t2) :: lit))))
@@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
begin match destructurate_prop t with
Kapp(Or,[t1;t2]) ->
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_not_or,[| t1; t2; mkVar i |])]);
(onClearedName i (fun i ->
(loop (LocalAssum (i,mk_and (mk_not t1) (mk_not t2)) :: lit))))
@@ -1742,7 +1742,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
| Kapp(And,[t1;t2]) ->
let d1 = decidability t1 in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_not_and,
[| t1; t2; d1; mkVar i |])]);
(onClearedName i (fun i ->
@@ -1752,7 +1752,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
let d1 = decidability t1 in
let d2 = decidability t2 in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_not_iff,
[| t1; t2; d1; d2; mkVar i |])]);
(onClearedName i (fun i ->
@@ -1764,7 +1764,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
For t1, being decidable implies being Prop. *)
let d1 = decidability t1 in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_not_imp,
[| t1; t2; d1; mkVar i |])]);
(onClearedName i (fun i ->
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
| Kapp(Not,[t]) ->
let d = decidability t in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force coq_not_not, [| t; d; mkVar i |])]);
(onClearedName i (fun i -> (loop (LocalAssum (i,t) :: lit))))
]
@@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ let destructure_hyps =
(try
let thm = not_binop op in
Tacticals.New.tclTHENLIST [
- Proofview.V82.tactic (generalize_tac
+ (generalize_tac
[mkApp (Lazy.force thm, [| t1;t2;mkVar i|])]);
(onClearedName i (fun _ -> loop lit))
]
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ let destructure_goal =
try
let dec = decidability t in
Tacticals.New.tclTHEN
- (Proofview.V82.tactic (Tactics.refine
+ (Proofview.V82.tactic (Tacmach.refine
(mkApp (Lazy.force coq_dec_not_not, [| t; dec; mkNewMeta () |]))))
intro
with Undecidable -> Tactics.elim_type (build_coq_False ())
diff --git a/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml b/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml
index 177c870b3c..dca46cbcf7 100644
--- a/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml
+++ b/plugins/romega/refl_omega.ml
@@ -1280,8 +1280,8 @@ let resolution env full_reified_goal systems_list =
CCHyp{o_hyp=id_concl;o_path=[]} :: hyp_stated_vars @ initial_context in
let decompose_tactic = decompose_tree env context solution_tree in
- Tactics.generalize
- (l_generalize_arg @ List.map Term.mkVar (List.tl l_hyps)) >>
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize
+ (l_generalize_arg @ List.map Term.mkVar (List.tl l_hyps))) >>
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.change_concl reified) >>
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.apply (app coq_do_omega [|decompose_tactic; normalization_trace|])) >>
show_goal >>
diff --git a/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml b/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml
index 2f3a3e5514..73dc13e72e 100644
--- a/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml
+++ b/plugins/rtauto/refl_tauto.ml
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ let rtauto_tac gls=
if !check then
Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.exact_check term) gls
else
- Tactics.exact_no_check term gls in
+ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.exact_no_check term) gls in
let tac_end_time = System.get_time () in
let _ =
if !check then msg_info (str "Proof term type-checking is on");