diff options
| author | Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias | 2020-03-08 01:23:02 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Emilio Jesus Gallego Arias | 2020-04-10 01:17:07 -0400 |
| commit | aedf2c0044b04cf141a52b1398306111b0bc4321 (patch) | |
| tree | db2577695b57145cc5f032b4d6b50ebf49a60e7f /plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml | |
| parent | 795df4b7a194b53b592ed327d2318ef5abc7d131 (diff) | |
[ocamlformat] Enable for funind.
As part of the proof refactoring work I am doing some modifications to
`funind` and indentation of that code is driving me a bit crazy; I'd
much prefer to delegate it to an automatic tool.
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml')
| -rw-r--r-- | plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml | 2619 |
1 files changed, 1250 insertions, 1369 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml index 9749af1e66..ad0891b567 100644 --- a/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml +++ b/plugins/funind/functional_principles_proofs.ml @@ -15,280 +15,265 @@ open Tactics open Indfun_common open Libnames open Context.Rel.Declaration - module RelDecl = Context.Rel.Declaration -let list_chop ?(msg="") n l = - try - List.chop n l - with Failure (msg') -> - failwith (msg ^ msg') +let list_chop ?(msg = "") n l = + try List.chop n l with Failure msg' -> failwith (msg ^ msg') let pop t = Vars.lift (-1) t -let make_refl_eq constructor type_of_t t = -(* let refl_equal_term = Lazy.force refl_equal in *) - mkApp(constructor,[|type_of_t;t|]) - +let make_refl_eq constructor type_of_t t = + (* let refl_equal_term = Lazy.force refl_equal in *) + mkApp (constructor, [|type_of_t; t|]) type pte_info = - { - proving_tac : (Id.t list -> Tacmach.tactic); - is_valid : constr -> bool - } + {proving_tac : Id.t list -> Tacmach.tactic; is_valid : constr -> bool} type ptes_info = pte_info Id.Map.t type 'a dynamic_info = - { - nb_rec_hyps : int; - rec_hyps : Id.t list ; - eq_hyps : Id.t list; - info : 'a - } + {nb_rec_hyps : int; rec_hyps : Id.t list; eq_hyps : Id.t list; info : 'a} type body_info = constr dynamic_info let observe_tac s = observe_tac (fun _ _ -> Pp.str s) let finish_proof dynamic_infos g = - observe_tac "finish" - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic assumption) - g - + observe_tac "finish" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic assumption) g let refine c = Refiner.refiner ~check:true EConstr.Unsafe.(to_constr c) - let thin l = Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.clear l) - let eq_constr sigma u v = EConstr.eq_constr_nounivs sigma u v let is_trivial_eq sigma t = - let res = try - begin + let res = + try match EConstr.kind sigma t with - | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> - eq_constr sigma t1 t2 - | App(f,[|t1;a1;t2;a2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> - eq_constr sigma t1 t2 && eq_constr sigma a1 a2 - | _ -> false - end - with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false + | App (f, [|_; t1; t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> + eq_constr sigma t1 t2 + | App (f, [|t1; a1; t2; a2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> + eq_constr sigma t1 t2 && eq_constr sigma a1 a2 + | _ -> false + with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false in -(* observe (str "is_trivial_eq " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t ++ (if res then str " true" else str " false")); *) + (* observe (str "is_trivial_eq " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr t ++ (if res then str " true" else str " false")); *) res let rec incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 = - let c1,arg1 = decompose_app sigma t1 - and c2,arg2 = decompose_app sigma t2 - in - (not (eq_constr sigma t1 t2)) && - isConstruct sigma c1 && isConstruct sigma c2 && - ( - not (eq_constr sigma c1 c2) || - List.exists2 (incompatible_constructor_terms sigma) arg1 arg2 - ) + let c1, arg1 = decompose_app sigma t1 and c2, arg2 = decompose_app sigma t2 in + (not (eq_constr sigma t1 t2)) + && isConstruct sigma c1 && isConstruct sigma c2 + && ( (not (eq_constr sigma c1 c2)) + || List.exists2 (incompatible_constructor_terms sigma) arg1 arg2 ) let is_incompatible_eq env sigma t = let res = try match EConstr.kind sigma t with - | App(f,[|_;t1;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> - incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 - | App(f,[|u1;t1;u2;t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> - (eq_constr sigma u1 u2 && - incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2) - | _ -> false + | App (f, [|_; t1; t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (Lazy.force eq) -> + incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 + | App (f, [|u1; t1; u2; t2|]) when eq_constr sigma f (jmeq ()) -> + eq_constr sigma u1 u2 && incompatible_constructor_terms sigma t1 t2 + | _ -> false with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> false in if res then observe (str "is_incompatible_eq " ++ pr_leconstr_env env sigma t); res let change_hyp_with_using msg hyp_id t tac : tactic = - fun g -> - let prov_id = pf_get_new_id hyp_id g in - tclTHENS - ((* observe_tac msg *) Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_by (Name prov_id) t (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclCOMPLETE tac)))) - [tclTHENLIST - [ - (* observe_tac "change_hyp_with_using thin" *) (thin [hyp_id]); - (* observe_tac "change_hyp_with_using rename " *) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (rename_hyp [prov_id,hyp_id])) - ]] g + fun g -> + let prov_id = pf_get_new_id hyp_id g in + tclTHENS + ((* observe_tac msg *) Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (assert_by (Name prov_id) t (Proofview.V82.tactic (tclCOMPLETE tac)))) + [ tclTHENLIST + [ (* observe_tac "change_hyp_with_using thin" *) + thin [hyp_id] + ; (* observe_tac "change_hyp_with_using rename " *) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (rename_hyp [(prov_id, hyp_id)]) ] ] + g exception TOREMOVE - -let prove_trivial_eq h_id context (constructor,type_of_term,term) = +let prove_trivial_eq h_id context (constructor, type_of_term, term) = let nb_intros = List.length context in tclTHENLIST - [ - tclDO nb_intros (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); (* introducing context *) + [ tclDO nb_intros (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + ; (* introducing context *) (fun g -> - let context_hyps = - fst (list_chop ~msg:"prove_trivial_eq : " nb_intros (pf_ids_of_hyps g)) - in - let context_hyps' = - (mkApp(constructor,[|type_of_term;term|])):: - (List.map mkVar context_hyps) - in - let to_refine = applist(mkVar h_id,List.rev context_hyps') in - refine to_refine g - ) - ] - - + let context_hyps = + fst + (list_chop ~msg:"prove_trivial_eq : " nb_intros (pf_ids_of_hyps g)) + in + let context_hyps' = + mkApp (constructor, [|type_of_term; term|]) + :: List.map mkVar context_hyps + in + let to_refine = applist (mkVar h_id, List.rev context_hyps') in + refine to_refine g) ] let find_rectype env sigma c = - let (t, l) = decompose_app sigma (Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta sigma c) in + let t, l = decompose_app sigma (Reductionops.whd_betaiotazeta sigma c) in match EConstr.kind sigma t with | Ind ind -> (t, l) - | Construct _ -> (t,l) + | Construct _ -> (t, l) | _ -> raise Not_found - -let isAppConstruct ?(env=Global.env ()) sigma t = +let isAppConstruct ?(env = Global.env ()) sigma t = try - let t',l = find_rectype env sigma t in - observe (str "isAppConstruct : " ++ Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ++ str " -> " ++ - Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma (applist (t',l))); + let t', l = find_rectype env sigma t in + observe + ( str "isAppConstruct : " + ++ Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma t + ++ str " -> " + ++ Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma (applist (t', l)) ); true with Not_found -> false exception NoChange -let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context:rel_context) x t end_of_type = - let nochange ?t' msg = - begin - observe (str ("Not treating ( "^msg^" )") ++ pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ++ str " " ++ - match t' with None -> str "" | Some t -> Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ); - raise NoChange; - end +let change_eq env sigma hyp_id (context : rel_context) x t end_of_type = + let nochange ?t' msg = + observe + ( str ("Not treating ( " ^ msg ^ " )") + ++ pr_leconstr_env env sigma t + ++ str " " + ++ + match t' with + | None -> str "" + | Some t -> Printer.pr_leconstr_env env sigma t ); + raise NoChange in let eq_constr c1 c2 = - try ignore(Evarconv.unify_delay env sigma c1 c2); true - with Evarconv.UnableToUnify _ -> false in - if not (noccurn sigma 1 end_of_type) - then nochange "dependent"; (* if end_of_type depends on this term we don't touch it *) - if not (isApp sigma t) then nochange "not an equality"; - let f_eq,args = destApp sigma t in - let constructor,t1,t2,t1_typ = + try + ignore (Evarconv.unify_delay env sigma c1 c2); + true + with Evarconv.UnableToUnify _ -> false + in + if not (noccurn sigma 1 end_of_type) then nochange "dependent"; + (* if end_of_type depends on this term we don't touch it *) + if not (isApp sigma t) then nochange "not an equality"; + let f_eq, args = destApp sigma t in + let constructor, t1, t2, t1_typ = + try + if eq_constr f_eq (Lazy.force eq) then + let t1 = (args.(1), args.(0)) + and t2 = (args.(2), args.(0)) + and t1_typ = args.(0) in + (Lazy.force refl_equal, t1, t2, t1_typ) + else if eq_constr f_eq (jmeq ()) then + (jmeq_refl (), (args.(1), args.(0)), (args.(3), args.(2)), args.(0)) + else nochange "not an equality" + with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> nochange "not an equality" + in + if not (closed0 sigma (fst t1) && closed0 sigma (snd t1)) then + nochange "not a closed lhs"; + let rec compute_substitution sub t1 t2 = + (* observe (str "compute_substitution : " ++ pr_lconstr t1 ++ str " === " ++ pr_lconstr t2); *) + if isRel sigma t2 then ( + let t2 = destRel sigma t2 in try - if (eq_constr f_eq (Lazy.force eq)) - then - let t1 = (args.(1),args.(0)) - and t2 = (args.(2),args.(0)) - and t1_typ = args.(0) - in - (Lazy.force refl_equal,t1,t2,t1_typ) - else - if (eq_constr f_eq (jmeq ())) - then - (jmeq_refl (),(args.(1),args.(0)),(args.(3),args.(2)),args.(0)) - else nochange "not an equality" - with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> nochange "not an equality" - in - if not ((closed0 sigma (fst t1)) && (closed0 sigma (snd t1)))then nochange "not a closed lhs"; - let rec compute_substitution sub t1 t2 = -(* observe (str "compute_substitution : " ++ pr_lconstr t1 ++ str " === " ++ pr_lconstr t2); *) - if isRel sigma t2 - then - let t2 = destRel sigma t2 in - begin - try - let t1' = Int.Map.find t2 sub in - if not (eq_constr t1 t1') then nochange "twice bound variable"; - sub - with Not_found -> - assert (closed0 sigma t1); - Int.Map.add t2 t1 sub - end - else if isAppConstruct sigma t1 && isAppConstruct sigma t2 - then - begin - let c1,args1 = find_rectype env sigma t1 - and c2,args2 = find_rectype env sigma t2 - in - if not (eq_constr c1 c2) then nochange "cannot solve (diff)"; - List.fold_left2 compute_substitution sub args1 args2 - end - else - if (eq_constr t1 t2) then sub else nochange ~t':(make_refl_eq constructor (Reductionops.whd_all env sigma t1) t2) "cannot solve (diff)" - in - let sub = compute_substitution Int.Map.empty (snd t1) (snd t2) in - let sub = compute_substitution sub (fst t1) (fst t2) in - let end_of_type_with_pop = pop end_of_type in (*the equation will be removed *) - let new_end_of_type = - (* Ugly hack to prevent Map.fold order change between ocaml-3.08.3 and ocaml-3.08.4 - Can be safely replaced by the next comment for Ocaml >= 3.08.4 - *) - let sub = Int.Map.bindings sub in - List.fold_left (fun end_of_type (i,t) -> liftn 1 i (substnl [t] (i-1) end_of_type)) - end_of_type_with_pop + let t1' = Int.Map.find t2 sub in + if not (eq_constr t1 t1') then nochange "twice bound variable"; sub - in - let old_context_length = List.length context + 1 in - let witness_fun = - mkLetIn(make_annot Anonymous Sorts.Relevant,make_refl_eq constructor t1_typ (fst t1),t, - mkApp(mkVar hyp_id,Array.init old_context_length (fun i -> mkRel (old_context_length - i))) - ) - in - let new_type_of_hyp,ctxt_size,witness_fun = - List.fold_left_i - (fun i (end_of_type,ctxt_size,witness_fun) decl -> - try - let witness = Int.Map.find i sub in - if is_local_def decl then anomaly (Pp.str "can not redefine a rel!"); - (pop end_of_type,ctxt_size,mkLetIn (RelDecl.get_annot decl, - witness, RelDecl.get_type decl, witness_fun)) - with Not_found -> - (mkProd_or_LetIn decl end_of_type, ctxt_size + 1, mkLambda_or_LetIn decl witness_fun) - ) - 1 - (new_end_of_type,0,witness_fun) - context - in - let new_type_of_hyp = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota env sigma new_type_of_hyp in - let new_ctxt,new_end_of_type = - decompose_prod_n_assum sigma ctxt_size new_type_of_hyp - in - let prove_new_hyp : tactic = - tclTHEN - (tclDO ctxt_size (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)) - (fun g -> - let all_ids = pf_ids_of_hyps g in - let new_ids,_ = list_chop ctxt_size all_ids in - let to_refine = applist(witness_fun,List.rev_map mkVar new_ids) in - let evm, _ = pf_apply Typing.type_of g to_refine in - tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evm) (refine to_refine) g - ) - in - let simpl_eq_tac = - change_hyp_with_using "prove_pattern_simplification" hyp_id new_type_of_hyp prove_new_hyp - in -(* observe (str "In " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id ++ *) -(* str "removing an equation " ++ fnl ()++ *) -(* str "old_typ_of_hyp :=" ++ *) -(* Printer.pr_lconstr_env *) -(* env *) -(* (it_mkProd_or_LetIn ~init:end_of_type ((x,None,t)::context)) *) -(* ++ fnl () ++ *) -(* str "new_typ_of_hyp := "++ *) -(* Printer.pr_lconstr_env env new_type_of_hyp ++ fnl () *) -(* ++ str "old context := " ++ pr_rel_context env context ++ fnl () *) -(* ++ str "new context := " ++ pr_rel_context env new_ctxt ++ fnl () *) -(* ++ str "old type := " ++ pr_lconstr end_of_type ++ fnl () *) -(* ++ str "new type := " ++ pr_lconstr new_end_of_type ++ fnl () *) -(* ); *) - new_ctxt,new_end_of_type,simpl_eq_tac - - -let is_property sigma (ptes_info:ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = - if isApp sigma t_x - then - let pte,args = destApp sigma t_x in - if isVar sigma pte && Array.for_all (closed0 sigma) args - then + with Not_found -> + assert (closed0 sigma t1); + Int.Map.add t2 t1 sub ) + else if isAppConstruct sigma t1 && isAppConstruct sigma t2 then begin + let c1, args1 = find_rectype env sigma t1 + and c2, args2 = find_rectype env sigma t2 in + if not (eq_constr c1 c2) then nochange "cannot solve (diff)"; + List.fold_left2 compute_substitution sub args1 args2 + end + else if eq_constr t1 t2 then sub + else + nochange + ~t':(make_refl_eq constructor (Reductionops.whd_all env sigma t1) t2) + "cannot solve (diff)" + in + let sub = compute_substitution Int.Map.empty (snd t1) (snd t2) in + let sub = compute_substitution sub (fst t1) (fst t2) in + let end_of_type_with_pop = pop end_of_type in + (*the equation will be removed *) + let new_end_of_type = + (* Ugly hack to prevent Map.fold order change between ocaml-3.08.3 and ocaml-3.08.4 + Can be safely replaced by the next comment for Ocaml >= 3.08.4 + *) + let sub = Int.Map.bindings sub in + List.fold_left + (fun end_of_type (i, t) -> liftn 1 i (substnl [t] (i - 1) end_of_type)) + end_of_type_with_pop sub + in + let old_context_length = List.length context + 1 in + let witness_fun = + mkLetIn + ( make_annot Anonymous Sorts.Relevant + , make_refl_eq constructor t1_typ (fst t1) + , t + , mkApp + ( mkVar hyp_id + , Array.init old_context_length (fun i -> + mkRel (old_context_length - i)) ) ) + in + let new_type_of_hyp, ctxt_size, witness_fun = + List.fold_left_i + (fun i (end_of_type, ctxt_size, witness_fun) decl -> + try + let witness = Int.Map.find i sub in + if is_local_def decl then anomaly (Pp.str "can not redefine a rel!"); + ( pop end_of_type + , ctxt_size + , mkLetIn + ( RelDecl.get_annot decl + , witness + , RelDecl.get_type decl + , witness_fun ) ) + with Not_found -> + ( mkProd_or_LetIn decl end_of_type + , ctxt_size + 1 + , mkLambda_or_LetIn decl witness_fun )) + 1 + (new_end_of_type, 0, witness_fun) + context + in + let new_type_of_hyp = Reductionops.nf_betaiota env sigma new_type_of_hyp in + let new_ctxt, new_end_of_type = + decompose_prod_n_assum sigma ctxt_size new_type_of_hyp + in + let prove_new_hyp : tactic = + tclTHEN + (tclDO ctxt_size (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)) + (fun g -> + let all_ids = pf_ids_of_hyps g in + let new_ids, _ = list_chop ctxt_size all_ids in + let to_refine = applist (witness_fun, List.rev_map mkVar new_ids) in + let evm, _ = pf_apply Typing.type_of g to_refine in + tclTHEN (Refiner.tclEVARS evm) (refine to_refine) g) + in + let simpl_eq_tac = + change_hyp_with_using "prove_pattern_simplification" hyp_id new_type_of_hyp + prove_new_hyp + in + (* observe (str "In " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id ++ *) + (* str "removing an equation " ++ fnl ()++ *) + (* str "old_typ_of_hyp :=" ++ *) + (* Printer.pr_lconstr_env *) + (* env *) + (* (it_mkProd_or_LetIn ~init:end_of_type ((x,None,t)::context)) *) + (* ++ fnl () ++ *) + (* str "new_typ_of_hyp := "++ *) + (* Printer.pr_lconstr_env env new_type_of_hyp ++ fnl () *) + (* ++ str "old context := " ++ pr_rel_context env context ++ fnl () *) + (* ++ str "new context := " ++ pr_rel_context env new_ctxt ++ fnl () *) + (* ++ str "old type := " ++ pr_lconstr end_of_type ++ fnl () *) + (* ++ str "new type := " ++ pr_lconstr new_end_of_type ++ fnl () *) + (* ); *) + (new_ctxt, new_end_of_type, simpl_eq_tac) + +let is_property sigma (ptes_info : ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = + if isApp sigma t_x then + let pte, args = destApp sigma t_x in + if isVar sigma pte && Array.for_all (closed0 sigma) args then try let info = Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_info in info.is_valid full_type_of_hyp @@ -297,19 +282,13 @@ let is_property sigma (ptes_info:ptes_info) t_x full_type_of_hyp = else false let isLetIn sigma t = - match EConstr.kind sigma t with - | LetIn _ -> true - | _ -> false - + match EConstr.kind sigma t with LetIn _ -> true | _ -> false let h_reduce_with_zeta cl = - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (reduce - (Genredexpr.Cbv - {Redops.all_flags - with Genredexpr.rDelta = false; - }) cl) - - + Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (reduce + (Genredexpr.Cbv {Redops.all_flags with Genredexpr.rDelta = false}) + cl) let rewrite_until_var arg_num eq_ids : tactic = (* tests if the declares recursive argument is neither a Constructor nor @@ -318,268 +297,247 @@ let rewrite_until_var arg_num eq_ids : tactic = *) let test_var g = let sigma = project g in - let _,args = destApp sigma (pf_concl g) in - not ((isConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) || isAppConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) + let _, args = destApp sigma (pf_concl g) in + not (isConstruct sigma args.(arg_num) || isAppConstruct sigma args.(arg_num)) in - let rec do_rewrite eq_ids g = - if test_var g - then tclIDTAC g + let rec do_rewrite eq_ids g = + if test_var g then tclIDTAC g else match eq_ids with - | [] -> anomaly (Pp.str "Cannot find a way to prove recursive property."); - | eq_id::eq_ids -> - tclTHEN - (tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL (mkVar eq_id)))) - (do_rewrite eq_ids) - g + | [] -> anomaly (Pp.str "Cannot find a way to prove recursive property.") + | eq_id :: eq_ids -> + tclTHEN + (tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL (mkVar eq_id)))) + (do_rewrite eq_ids) g in do_rewrite eq_ids - let rec_pte_id = Id.of_string "Hrec" + let clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma = - let coq_False = EConstr.of_constr (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.False.type") in - let coq_True = EConstr.of_constr (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.True.type") in - let coq_I = EConstr.of_constr (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.True.I") in - let rec scan_type context type_of_hyp : tactic = + let coq_False = + EConstr.of_constr + (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.False.type") + in + let coq_True = + EConstr.of_constr + (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.True.type") + in + let coq_I = + EConstr.of_constr + (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.True.I") + in + let rec scan_type context type_of_hyp : tactic = if isLetIn sigma type_of_hyp then let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn type_of_hyp context in - let reduced_type_of_hyp = Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta env sigma real_type_of_hyp in + let reduced_type_of_hyp = + Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta env sigma real_type_of_hyp + in (* length of context didn't change ? *) - let new_context,new_typ_of_hyp = - decompose_prod_n_assum sigma (List.length context) reduced_type_of_hyp + let new_context, new_typ_of_hyp = + decompose_prod_n_assum sigma (List.length context) reduced_type_of_hyp in + tclTHENLIST + [ h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id) + ; scan_type new_context new_typ_of_hyp ] + else if isProd sigma type_of_hyp then + let x, t_x, t' = destProd sigma type_of_hyp in + let actual_real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn t' context in + if is_property sigma ptes_infos t_x actual_real_type_of_hyp then + let pte, pte_args = destApp sigma t_x in + let (* fix_info *) prove_rec_hyp = + (Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_infos).proving_tac + in + let popped_t' = pop t' in + let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in + let prove_new_type_of_hyp = + let context_length = List.length context in + tclTHENLIST + [ tclDO context_length (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + ; (fun g -> + let context_hyps_ids = + fst + (list_chop ~msg:"rec hyp : context_hyps" context_length + (pf_ids_of_hyps g)) + in + let rec_pte_id = pf_get_new_id rec_pte_id g in + let to_refine = + applist + ( mkVar hyp_id + , List.rev_map mkVar (rec_pte_id :: context_hyps_ids) ) + in + (* observe_tac "rec hyp " *) + (tclTHENS + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (assert_before (Name rec_pte_id) t_x)) + [ (* observe_tac "prove rec hyp" *) + prove_rec_hyp eq_hyps + ; (* observe_tac "prove rec hyp" *) + refine to_refine ]) + g) ] + in tclTHENLIST - [ h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id); - scan_type new_context new_typ_of_hyp ] - else if isProd sigma type_of_hyp - then - begin - let (x,t_x,t') = destProd sigma type_of_hyp in - let actual_real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn t' context in - if is_property sigma ptes_infos t_x actual_real_type_of_hyp then - begin - let pte,pte_args = (destApp sigma t_x) in - let (* fix_info *) prove_rec_hyp = (Id.Map.find (destVar sigma pte) ptes_infos).proving_tac in - let popped_t' = pop t' in - let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in - let prove_new_type_of_hyp = - let context_length = List.length context in - tclTHENLIST - [ - tclDO context_length (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); - (fun g -> - let context_hyps_ids = - fst (list_chop ~msg:"rec hyp : context_hyps" - context_length (pf_ids_of_hyps g)) - in - let rec_pte_id = pf_get_new_id rec_pte_id g in - let to_refine = - applist(mkVar hyp_id, - List.rev_map mkVar (rec_pte_id::context_hyps_ids) - ) - in -(* observe_tac "rec hyp " *) - (tclTHENS - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_before (Name rec_pte_id) t_x)) - [ - (* observe_tac "prove rec hyp" *) (prove_rec_hyp eq_hyps); -(* observe_tac "prove rec hyp" *) - (refine to_refine) - ]) - g - ) - ] - in - tclTHENLIST - [ -(* observe_tac "hyp rec" *) - (change_hyp_with_using "rec_hyp_tac" hyp_id real_type_of_hyp prove_new_type_of_hyp); - scan_type context popped_t' - ] - end - else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_False then - begin -(* observe (str "Removing : "++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) -(* str " since it has False in its preconds " *) -(* ); *) - raise TOREMOVE; (* False -> .. useless *) - end - else if is_incompatible_eq env sigma t_x then raise TOREMOVE (* t_x := C1 ... = C2 ... *) - else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_True (* Trivial => we remove this precons *) - then -(* observe (str "In "++Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) -(* str " removing useless precond True" *) -(* ); *) - let popped_t' = pop t' in - let real_type_of_hyp = - it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context - in - let prove_trivial = - let nb_intro = List.length context in - tclTHENLIST [ - tclDO nb_intro (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); - (fun g -> - let context_hyps = - fst (list_chop ~msg:"removing True : context_hyps "nb_intro (pf_ids_of_hyps g)) - in - let to_refine = - applist (mkVar hyp_id, - List.rev (coq_I::List.map mkVar context_hyps) - ) - in - refine to_refine g - ) - ] - in - tclTHENLIST[ - change_hyp_with_using "prove_trivial" hyp_id real_type_of_hyp - ((* observe_tac "prove_trivial" *) prove_trivial); - scan_type context popped_t' - ] - else if is_trivial_eq sigma t_x - then (* t_x := t = t => we remove this precond *) - let popped_t' = pop t' in - let real_type_of_hyp = - it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context - in - let hd,args = destApp sigma t_x in - let get_args hd args = - if eq_constr sigma hd (Lazy.force eq) - then (Lazy.force refl_equal,args.(0),args.(1)) - else (jmeq_refl (),args.(0),args.(1)) - in + [ (* observe_tac "hyp rec" *) + change_hyp_with_using "rec_hyp_tac" hyp_id real_type_of_hyp + prove_new_type_of_hyp + ; scan_type context popped_t' ] + else if eq_constr sigma t_x coq_False then + (* observe (str "Removing : "++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) + (* str " since it has False in its preconds " *) + (* ); *) + raise TOREMOVE (* False -> .. useless *) + else if is_incompatible_eq env sigma t_x then raise TOREMOVE + (* t_x := C1 ... = C2 ... *) + else if + eq_constr sigma t_x coq_True (* Trivial => we remove this precons *) + then + (* observe (str "In "++Ppconstr.pr_id hyp_id++ *) + (* str " removing useless precond True" *) + (* ); *) + let popped_t' = pop t' in + let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in + let prove_trivial = + let nb_intro = List.length context in tclTHENLIST - [ - change_hyp_with_using - "prove_trivial_eq" - hyp_id - real_type_of_hyp - ((* observe_tac "prove_trivial_eq" *) - (prove_trivial_eq hyp_id context (get_args hd args))); - scan_type context popped_t' - ] - else - begin - try - let new_context,new_t',tac = change_eq env sigma hyp_id context x t_x t' in - tclTHEN - tac - (scan_type new_context new_t') - with NoChange -> - (* Last thing todo : push the rel in the context and continue *) - scan_type (LocalAssum (x,t_x) :: context) t' - end - end - else - tclIDTAC - in - try - scan_type [] (Typing.type_of_variable env hyp_id), [hyp_id] - with TOREMOVE -> - thin [hyp_id],[] - - -let clean_goal_with_heq ptes_infos continue_tac (dyn_infos:body_info) = - fun g -> - let env = pf_env g - and sigma = project g - in - let tac,new_hyps = - List.fold_left ( - fun (hyps_tac,new_hyps) hyp_id -> - let hyp_tac,new_hyp = - clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos dyn_infos.eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma + [ tclDO nb_intro (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + ; (fun g -> + let context_hyps = + fst + (list_chop ~msg:"removing True : context_hyps " nb_intro + (pf_ids_of_hyps g)) + in + let to_refine = + applist + ( mkVar hyp_id + , List.rev (coq_I :: List.map mkVar context_hyps) ) + in + refine to_refine g) ] + in + tclTHENLIST + [ change_hyp_with_using "prove_trivial" hyp_id real_type_of_hyp + (* observe_tac "prove_trivial" *) prove_trivial + ; scan_type context popped_t' ] + else if is_trivial_eq sigma t_x then + (* t_x := t = t => we remove this precond *) + let popped_t' = pop t' in + let real_type_of_hyp = it_mkProd_or_LetIn popped_t' context in + let hd, args = destApp sigma t_x in + let get_args hd args = + if eq_constr sigma hd (Lazy.force eq) then + (Lazy.force refl_equal, args.(0), args.(1)) + else (jmeq_refl (), args.(0), args.(1)) + in + tclTHENLIST + [ change_hyp_with_using "prove_trivial_eq" hyp_id real_type_of_hyp + ((* observe_tac "prove_trivial_eq" *) + prove_trivial_eq hyp_id context (get_args hd args)) + ; scan_type context popped_t' ] + else + try + let new_context, new_t', tac = + change_eq env sigma hyp_id context x t_x t' in - (tclTHEN hyp_tac hyps_tac),new_hyp@new_hyps - ) - (tclIDTAC,[]) - dyn_infos.rec_hyps - in - let new_infos = - { dyn_infos with - rec_hyps = new_hyps; - nb_rec_hyps = List.length new_hyps - } - in - tclTHENLIST - [ - tac ; - (* observe_tac "clean_hyp_with_heq continue" *) (continue_tac new_infos) - ] - g + tclTHEN tac (scan_type new_context new_t') + with NoChange -> + (* Last thing todo : push the rel in the context and continue *) + scan_type (LocalAssum (x, t_x) :: context) t' + else tclIDTAC + in + try (scan_type [] (Typing.type_of_variable env hyp_id), [hyp_id]) + with TOREMOVE -> (thin [hyp_id], []) + +let clean_goal_with_heq ptes_infos continue_tac (dyn_infos : body_info) g = + let env = pf_env g and sigma = project g in + let tac, new_hyps = + List.fold_left + (fun (hyps_tac, new_hyps) hyp_id -> + let hyp_tac, new_hyp = + clean_hyp_with_heq ptes_infos dyn_infos.eq_hyps hyp_id env sigma + in + (tclTHEN hyp_tac hyps_tac, new_hyp @ new_hyps)) + (tclIDTAC, []) dyn_infos.rec_hyps + in + let new_infos = + {dyn_infos with rec_hyps = new_hyps; nb_rec_hyps = List.length new_hyps} + in + tclTHENLIST + [tac; (* observe_tac "clean_hyp_with_heq continue" *) continue_tac new_infos] + g let heq_id = Id.of_string "Heq" -let treat_new_case ptes_infos nb_prod continue_tac term dyn_infos = - fun g -> - let nb_first_intro = nb_prod - 1 - dyn_infos.nb_rec_hyps in - tclTHENLIST - [ - (* We first introduce the variables *) - tclDO nb_first_intro (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_avoiding (Id.Set.of_list dyn_infos.rec_hyps))); - (* Then the equation itself *) - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_using heq_id); - onLastHypId (fun heq_id -> tclTHENLIST [ - (* Then the new hypothesis *) - tclMAP (fun id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (introduction id)) dyn_infos.rec_hyps; - observe_tac "after_introduction" (fun g' -> - (* We get infos on the equations introduced*) - let new_term_value_eq = pf_get_hyp_typ g' heq_id in - (* compute the new value of the body *) - let new_term_value = - match EConstr.kind (project g') new_term_value_eq with - | App(f,[| _;_;args2 |]) -> args2 - | _ -> - observe (str "cannot compute new term value : " ++ pr_gls g' ++ fnl () ++ str "last hyp is" ++ - pr_leconstr_env (pf_env g') (project g') new_term_value_eq - ); - anomaly (Pp.str "cannot compute new term value.") - in - let g', termtyp = tac_type_of g' term in - let fun_body = - mkLambda(make_annot Anonymous Sorts.Relevant, - termtyp, - Termops.replace_term (project g') term (mkRel 1) dyn_infos.info - ) - in - let new_body = pf_nf_betaiota g' (mkApp(fun_body,[| new_term_value |])) in - let new_infos = - {dyn_infos with - info = new_body; - eq_hyps = heq_id::dyn_infos.eq_hyps - } - in - clean_goal_with_heq ptes_infos continue_tac new_infos g' - )]) - ] - g - +let treat_new_case ptes_infos nb_prod continue_tac term dyn_infos g = + let nb_first_intro = nb_prod - 1 - dyn_infos.nb_rec_hyps in + tclTHENLIST + [ (* We first introduce the variables *) + tclDO nb_first_intro + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (intro_avoiding (Id.Set.of_list dyn_infos.rec_hyps))) + ; (* Then the equation itself *) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intro_using heq_id) + ; onLastHypId (fun heq_id -> + tclTHENLIST + [ (* Then the new hypothesis *) + tclMAP + (fun id -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (introduction id)) + dyn_infos.rec_hyps + ; observe_tac "after_introduction" (fun g' -> + (* We get infos on the equations introduced*) + let new_term_value_eq = pf_get_hyp_typ g' heq_id in + (* compute the new value of the body *) + let new_term_value = + match EConstr.kind (project g') new_term_value_eq with + | App (f, [|_; _; args2|]) -> args2 + | _ -> + observe + ( str "cannot compute new term value : " + ++ pr_gls g' ++ fnl () ++ str "last hyp is" + ++ pr_leconstr_env (pf_env g') (project g') + new_term_value_eq ); + anomaly (Pp.str "cannot compute new term value.") + in + let g', termtyp = tac_type_of g' term in + let fun_body = + mkLambda + ( make_annot Anonymous Sorts.Relevant + , termtyp + , Termops.replace_term (project g') term (mkRel 1) + dyn_infos.info ) + in + let new_body = + pf_nf_betaiota g' (mkApp (fun_body, [|new_term_value|])) + in + let new_infos = + { dyn_infos with + info = new_body + ; eq_hyps = heq_id :: dyn_infos.eq_hyps } + in + clean_goal_with_heq ptes_infos continue_tac new_infos g') ]) + ] + g let my_orelse tac1 tac2 g = - try - tac1 g + try tac1 g with e when CErrors.noncritical e -> -(* observe (str "using snd tac since : " ++ CErrors.print e); *) + (* observe (str "using snd tac since : " ++ CErrors.print e); *) tac2 g -let instantiate_hyps_with_args (do_prove:Id.t list -> tactic) hyps args_id = - let args = Array.of_list (List.map mkVar args_id) in +let instantiate_hyps_with_args (do_prove : Id.t list -> tactic) hyps args_id = + let args = Array.of_list (List.map mkVar args_id) in let instantiate_one_hyp hid = my_orelse - ( (* we instantiate the hyp if possible *) - fun g -> - let prov_hid = pf_get_new_id hid g in - let c = mkApp(mkVar hid,args) in - let evm, _ = pf_apply Typing.type_of g c in - tclTHENLIST[ - Refiner.tclEVARS evm; - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pose_proof (Name prov_hid) c); - thin [hid]; - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (rename_hyp [prov_hid,hid]) - ] g - ) - ( (* + (fun (* we instantiate the hyp if possible *) + g -> + let prov_hid = pf_get_new_id hid g in + let c = mkApp (mkVar hid, args) in + let evm, _ = pf_apply Typing.type_of g c in + tclTHENLIST + [ Refiner.tclEVARS evm + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pose_proof (Name prov_hid) c) + ; thin [hid] + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (rename_hyp [(prov_hid, hid)]) ] + g) + (fun (* if not then we are in a mutual function block and this hyp is a recursive hyp on an other function. @@ -587,350 +545,314 @@ let instantiate_hyps_with_args (do_prove:Id.t list -> tactic) hyps args_id = principle so that we can trash it *) - (fun g -> -(* observe (str "Instantiation: removing hyp " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id hid); *) - thin [hid] g - ) - ) + g -> + (* observe (str "Instantiation: removing hyp " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id hid); *) + thin [hid] g) in - if List.is_empty args_id - then - tclTHENLIST [ - tclMAP (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) hyps; - do_prove hyps - ] + if List.is_empty args_id then + tclTHENLIST + [ tclMAP (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) hyps + ; do_prove hyps ] else tclTHENLIST - [ - tclMAP (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) hyps; - tclMAP instantiate_one_hyp hyps; - (fun g -> - let all_g_hyps_id = - List.fold_right Id.Set.add (pf_ids_of_hyps g) Id.Set.empty - in - let remaining_hyps = - List.filter (fun id -> Id.Set.mem id all_g_hyps_id) hyps - in - do_prove remaining_hyps g - ) - ] + [ tclMAP (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) hyps + ; tclMAP instantiate_one_hyp hyps + ; (fun g -> + let all_g_hyps_id = + List.fold_right Id.Set.add (pf_ids_of_hyps g) Id.Set.empty + in + let remaining_hyps = + List.filter (fun id -> Id.Set.mem id all_g_hyps_id) hyps + in + do_prove remaining_hyps g) ] -let build_proof - (interactive_proof:bool) - (fnames:Constant.t list) - ptes_infos - dyn_infos - : tactic = +let build_proof (interactive_proof : bool) (fnames : Constant.t list) ptes_infos + dyn_infos : tactic = let rec build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos : tactic = - fun g -> - let env = pf_env g in - let sigma = project g in -(* observe (str "proving on " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) term);*) - match EConstr.kind sigma dyn_infos.info with - | Case(ci,ct,t,cb) -> - let do_finalize_t dyn_info' = - fun g -> - let t = dyn_info'.info in - let dyn_infos = {dyn_info' with info = - mkCase(ci,ct,t,cb)} in - let g_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in - let g, type_of_term = tac_type_of g t in - let term_eq = - make_refl_eq (Lazy.force refl_equal) type_of_term t - in - tclTHENLIST - [ - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (term_eq::(List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps))); - thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps; - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (pattern_option [Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1],t] None); - (fun g -> observe_tac "toto" ( - tclTHENLIST [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t); - (fun g' -> - let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g') (pf_concl g') in - let nb_instantiate_partial = g'_nb_prod - g_nb_prod in - observe_tac "treat_new_case" - (treat_new_case - ptes_infos - nb_instantiate_partial - (build_proof do_finalize) - t - dyn_infos) - g' - ) - - ]) g - ) - ] - g - in - build_proof do_finalize_t {dyn_infos with info = t} g - | Lambda(n,t,b) -> - begin - match EConstr.kind sigma (pf_concl g) with - | Prod _ -> - tclTHEN - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) - (fun g' -> - let open Context.Named.Declaration in - let id = pf_last_hyp g' |> get_id in - let new_term = - pf_nf_betaiota g' - (mkApp(dyn_infos.info,[|mkVar id|])) - in - let new_infos = {dyn_infos with info = new_term} in - let do_prove new_hyps = - build_proof do_finalize - {new_infos with - rec_hyps = new_hyps; - nb_rec_hyps = List.length new_hyps - } - in -(* observe_tac "Lambda" *) (instantiate_hyps_with_args do_prove new_infos.rec_hyps [id]) g' - (* build_proof do_finalize new_infos g' *) - ) g - | _ -> - do_finalize dyn_infos g - end - | Cast(t,_,_) -> - build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = t} g - | Const _ | Var _ | Meta _ | Evar _ | Sort _ | Construct _ | Ind _ | Int _ | Float _ -> - do_finalize dyn_infos g - | App(_,_) -> - let f,args = decompose_app sigma dyn_infos.info in - begin - match EConstr.kind sigma f with - | Int _ -> user_err Pp.(str "integer cannot be applied") - | Float _ -> user_err Pp.(str "float cannot be applied") - | App _ -> assert false (* we have collected all the app in decompose_app *) - | Proj _ -> assert false (*FIXME*) - | Var _ | Construct _ | Rel _ | Evar _ | Meta _ | Ind _ | Sort _ | Prod _ -> - let new_infos = - { dyn_infos with - info = (f,args) - } - in - build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize new_infos g - | Const (c,_) when not (List.mem_f Constant.equal c fnames) -> - let new_infos = - { dyn_infos with - info = (f,args) - } - in -(* Pp.msgnl (str "proving in " ++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) dyn_infos.info); *) - build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize new_infos g - | Const _ -> - do_finalize dyn_infos g - | Lambda _ -> - let new_term = - Reductionops.nf_beta env sigma dyn_infos.info in - build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = new_term} - g - | LetIn _ -> - let new_infos = - { dyn_infos with info = Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta env sigma dyn_infos.info } - in - - tclTHENLIST - [tclMAP - (fun hyp_id -> - h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) - dyn_infos.rec_hyps; - h_reduce_with_zeta Locusops.onConcl; - build_proof do_finalize new_infos - ] - g - | Cast(b,_,_) -> - build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = b } g - | Case _ | Fix _ | CoFix _ -> - let new_finalize dyn_infos = - let new_infos = - { dyn_infos with - info = dyn_infos.info,args - } - in - build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize new_infos - in - build_proof new_finalize {dyn_infos with info = f } g - end - | Fix _ | CoFix _ -> - user_err Pp.(str ( "Anonymous local (co)fixpoints are not handled yet")) - - - | Proj _ -> user_err Pp.(str "Prod") - | Prod _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g - | LetIn _ -> - let new_infos = - { dyn_infos with - info = Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta env sigma dyn_infos.info - } - in - - tclTHENLIST - [tclMAP - (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) - dyn_infos.rec_hyps; - h_reduce_with_zeta Locusops.onConcl; - build_proof do_finalize new_infos - ] g - | Rel _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Free var in goal conclusion!") - and build_proof do_finalize dyn_infos g = -(* observe (str "proving with "++Printer.pr_lconstr dyn_infos.info++ str " on goal " ++ pr_gls g); *) - Indfun_common.observe_tac (fun env sigma -> - str "build_proof with " ++ pr_leconstr_env env sigma dyn_infos.info ) (build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos) g - and build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize dyn_infos (* f_args' args *) :tactic = - fun g -> - let (f_args',args) = dyn_infos.info in - let tac : tactic = - fun g -> - match args with - | [] -> - do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = f_args'} g - | arg::args -> - (* observe (str "build_proof_args with arg := "++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) arg++ *) - (* fnl () ++ *) - (* pr_goal (Tacmach.sig_it g) *) - (* ); *) - let do_finalize dyn_infos = - let new_arg = dyn_infos.info in - (* tclTRYD *) - (build_proof_args env sigma - do_finalize - {dyn_infos with info = (mkApp(f_args',[|new_arg|])), args} - ) - in + fun g -> + let env = pf_env g in + let sigma = project g in + (* observe (str "proving on " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) term);*) + match EConstr.kind sigma dyn_infos.info with + | Case (ci, ct, t, cb) -> + let do_finalize_t dyn_info' g = + let t = dyn_info'.info in + let dyn_infos = {dyn_info' with info = mkCase (ci, ct, t, cb)} in + let g_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in + let g, type_of_term = tac_type_of g t in + let term_eq = make_refl_eq (Lazy.force refl_equal) type_of_term t in + tclTHENLIST + [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (generalize (term_eq :: List.map mkVar dyn_infos.rec_hyps)) + ; thin dyn_infos.rec_hyps + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (pattern_option [(Locus.AllOccurrencesBut [1], t)] None) + ; (fun g -> + observe_tac "toto" + (tclTHENLIST + [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.case t) + ; (fun g' -> + let g'_nb_prod = nb_prod (project g') (pf_concl g') in + let nb_instantiate_partial = g'_nb_prod - g_nb_prod in + observe_tac "treat_new_case" + (treat_new_case ptes_infos nb_instantiate_partial + (build_proof do_finalize) t dyn_infos) + g') ]) + g) ] + g + in + build_proof do_finalize_t {dyn_infos with info = t} g + | Lambda (n, t, b) -> ( + match EConstr.kind sigma (pf_concl g) with + | Prod _ -> + tclTHEN + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + (fun g' -> + let open Context.Named.Declaration in + let id = pf_last_hyp g' |> get_id in + let new_term = + pf_nf_betaiota g' (mkApp (dyn_infos.info, [|mkVar id|])) + in + let new_infos = {dyn_infos with info = new_term} in + let do_prove new_hyps = build_proof do_finalize - {dyn_infos with info = arg } - g + { new_infos with + rec_hyps = new_hyps + ; nb_rec_hyps = List.length new_hyps } + in + (* observe_tac "Lambda" *) + (instantiate_hyps_with_args do_prove new_infos.rec_hyps [id]) g' + (* build_proof do_finalize new_infos g' *)) + g + | _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g ) + | Cast (t, _, _) -> build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = t} g + | Const _ | Var _ | Meta _ | Evar _ | Sort _ | Construct _ | Ind _ | Int _ + |Float _ -> + do_finalize dyn_infos g + | App (_, _) -> ( + let f, args = decompose_app sigma dyn_infos.info in + match EConstr.kind sigma f with + | Int _ -> user_err Pp.(str "integer cannot be applied") + | Float _ -> user_err Pp.(str "float cannot be applied") + | App _ -> + assert false (* we have collected all the app in decompose_app *) + | Proj _ -> assert false (*FIXME*) + | Var _ | Construct _ | Rel _ | Evar _ | Meta _ | Ind _ | Sort _ | Prod _ + -> + let new_infos = {dyn_infos with info = (f, args)} in + build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize new_infos g + | Const (c, _) when not (List.mem_f Constant.equal c fnames) -> + let new_infos = {dyn_infos with info = (f, args)} in + (* Pp.msgnl (str "proving in " ++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) dyn_infos.info); *) + build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize new_infos g + | Const _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g + | Lambda _ -> + let new_term = Reductionops.nf_beta env sigma dyn_infos.info in + build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = new_term} g + | LetIn _ -> + let new_infos = + { dyn_infos with + info = Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta env sigma dyn_infos.info } + in + tclTHENLIST + [ tclMAP + (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) + dyn_infos.rec_hyps + ; h_reduce_with_zeta Locusops.onConcl + ; build_proof do_finalize new_infos ] + g + | Cast (b, _, _) -> build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = b} g + | Case _ | Fix _ | CoFix _ -> + let new_finalize dyn_infos = + let new_infos = {dyn_infos with info = (dyn_infos.info, args)} in + build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize new_infos + in + build_proof new_finalize {dyn_infos with info = f} g ) + | Fix _ | CoFix _ -> + user_err Pp.(str "Anonymous local (co)fixpoints are not handled yet") + | Proj _ -> user_err Pp.(str "Prod") + | Prod _ -> do_finalize dyn_infos g + | LetIn _ -> + let new_infos = + { dyn_infos with + info = Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta env sigma dyn_infos.info } in - (* observe_tac "build_proof_args" *) (tac ) g + tclTHENLIST + [ tclMAP + (fun hyp_id -> h_reduce_with_zeta (Locusops.onHyp hyp_id)) + dyn_infos.rec_hyps + ; h_reduce_with_zeta Locusops.onConcl + ; build_proof do_finalize new_infos ] + g + | Rel _ -> anomaly (Pp.str "Free var in goal conclusion!") + and build_proof do_finalize dyn_infos g = + (* observe (str "proving with "++Printer.pr_lconstr dyn_infos.info++ str " on goal " ++ pr_gls g); *) + Indfun_common.observe_tac + (fun env sigma -> + str "build_proof with " ++ pr_leconstr_env env sigma dyn_infos.info) + (build_proof_aux do_finalize dyn_infos) + g + and build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize dyn_infos : tactic = + (* f_args' args *) + fun g -> + let f_args', args = dyn_infos.info in + let tac : tactic = + fun g -> + match args with + | [] -> do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = f_args'} g + | arg :: args -> + (* observe (str "build_proof_args with arg := "++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env g) arg++ *) + (* fnl () ++ *) + (* pr_goal (Tacmach.sig_it g) *) + (* ); *) + let do_finalize dyn_infos = + let new_arg = dyn_infos.info in + (* tclTRYD *) + build_proof_args env sigma do_finalize + {dyn_infos with info = (mkApp (f_args', [|new_arg|]), args)} + in + build_proof do_finalize {dyn_infos with info = arg} g + in + (* observe_tac "build_proof_args" *) tac g in let do_finish_proof dyn_infos = - (* tclTRYD *) (clean_goal_with_heq - ptes_infos - finish_proof dyn_infos) + (* tclTRYD *) clean_goal_with_heq ptes_infos finish_proof dyn_infos in - (* observe_tac "build_proof" *) + (* observe_tac "build_proof" *) fun g -> build_proof (clean_goal_with_heq ptes_infos do_finish_proof) dyn_infos g - (* Proof of principles from structural functions *) type static_fix_info = - { - idx : int; - name : Id.t; - types : types; - offset : int; - nb_realargs : int; - body_with_param : constr; - num_in_block : int - } - - - -let prove_rec_hyp_for_struct fix_info = - (fun eq_hyps -> tclTHEN - (rewrite_until_var (fix_info.idx) eq_hyps) - (fun g -> - let _,pte_args = destApp (project g) (pf_concl g) in - let rec_hyp_proof = - mkApp(mkVar fix_info.name,array_get_start pte_args) - in - refine rec_hyp_proof g - )) + { idx : int + ; name : Id.t + ; types : types + ; offset : int + ; nb_realargs : int + ; body_with_param : constr + ; num_in_block : int } + +let prove_rec_hyp_for_struct fix_info eq_hyps = + tclTHEN (rewrite_until_var fix_info.idx eq_hyps) (fun g -> + let _, pte_args = destApp (project g) (pf_concl g) in + let rec_hyp_proof = + mkApp (mkVar fix_info.name, array_get_start pte_args) + in + refine rec_hyp_proof g) -let prove_rec_hyp fix_info = - { proving_tac = prove_rec_hyp_for_struct fix_info - ; - is_valid = fun _ -> true - } +let prove_rec_hyp fix_info = + {proving_tac = prove_rec_hyp_for_struct fix_info; is_valid = (fun _ -> true)} let generalize_non_dep hyp g = -(* observe (str "rec id := " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp); *) + (* observe (str "rec id := " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id hyp); *) let hyps = [hyp] in let env = Global.env () in let hyp_typ = pf_get_hyp_typ g hyp in - let to_revert,_ = + let to_revert, _ = let open Context.Named.Declaration in - Environ.fold_named_context_reverse (fun (clear,keep) decl -> - let decl = map_named_decl EConstr.of_constr decl in - let hyp = get_id decl in - if Id.List.mem hyp hyps - || List.exists (Termops.occur_var_in_decl env (project g) hyp) keep - || Termops.occur_var env (project g) hyp hyp_typ - || Termops.is_section_variable hyp (* should be dangerous *) - then (clear,decl::keep) - else (hyp::clear,keep)) - ~init:([],[]) (pf_env g) + Environ.fold_named_context_reverse + (fun (clear, keep) decl -> + let decl = map_named_decl EConstr.of_constr decl in + let hyp = get_id decl in + if + Id.List.mem hyp hyps + || List.exists (Termops.occur_var_in_decl env (project g) hyp) keep + || Termops.occur_var env (project g) hyp hyp_typ + || Termops.is_section_variable hyp + (* should be dangerous *) + then (clear, decl :: keep) + else (hyp :: clear, keep)) + ~init:([], []) (pf_env g) in -(* observe (str "to_revert := " ++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id to_revert); *) + (* observe (str "to_revert := " ++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id to_revert); *) tclTHEN - ((* observe_tac "h_generalize" *) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar to_revert) ))) - ((* observe_tac "thin" *) (thin to_revert)) + ((* observe_tac "h_generalize" *) Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (generalize (List.map mkVar to_revert))) + ((* observe_tac "thin" *) thin to_revert) g let id_of_decl = RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id let var_of_decl = id_of_decl %> mkVar + let revert idl = - tclTHEN - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar idl))) - (thin idl) + tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize (List.map mkVar idl))) (thin idl) -let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num = -(* observe (str "nb_args := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_args)); *) -(* observe (str "nb_params := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_params)); *) -(* observe (str "rec_args_num := " ++ str (string_of_int (rec_args_num + 1) )); *) +let generate_equation_lemma evd fnames f fun_num nb_params nb_args rec_args_num + = + (* observe (str "nb_args := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_args)); *) + (* observe (str "nb_params := " ++ str (string_of_int nb_params)); *) + (* observe (str "rec_args_num := " ++ str (string_of_int (rec_args_num + 1) )); *) let f_def = Global.lookup_constant (fst (destConst evd f)) in - let eq_lhs = mkApp(f,Array.init (nb_params + nb_args) (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params + nb_args - i))) in - let (f_body, _, _) = Option.get (Global.body_of_constant_body Library.indirect_accessor f_def) in + let eq_lhs = + mkApp + ( f + , Array.init (nb_params + nb_args) (fun i -> + mkRel (nb_params + nb_args - i)) ) + in + let f_body, _, _ = + Option.get (Global.body_of_constant_body Library.indirect_accessor f_def) + in let f_body = EConstr.of_constr f_body in - let params,f_body_with_params = decompose_lam_n evd nb_params f_body in - let (_,num),(_,_,bodies) = destFix evd f_body_with_params in + let params, f_body_with_params = decompose_lam_n evd nb_params f_body in + let (_, num), (_, _, bodies) = destFix evd f_body_with_params in let fnames_with_params = - let params = Array.init nb_params (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params - i)) in - let fnames = List.rev (Array.to_list (Array.map (fun f -> mkApp(f,params)) fnames)) in + let params = Array.init nb_params (fun i -> mkRel (nb_params - i)) in + let fnames = + List.rev (Array.to_list (Array.map (fun f -> mkApp (f, params)) fnames)) + in fnames in -(* observe (str "fnames_with_params " ++ prlist_with_sep fnl pr_lconstr fnames_with_params); *) -(* observe (str "body " ++ pr_lconstr bodies.(num)); *) - let f_body_with_params_and_other_fun = substl fnames_with_params bodies.(num) in -(* observe (str "f_body_with_params_and_other_fun " ++ pr_lconstr f_body_with_params_and_other_fun); *) - let eq_rhs = Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta (Global.env ()) evd (mkApp(compose_lam params f_body_with_params_and_other_fun,Array.init (nb_params + nb_args) (fun i -> mkRel(nb_params + nb_args - i)))) in + (* observe (str "fnames_with_params " ++ prlist_with_sep fnl pr_lconstr fnames_with_params); *) + (* observe (str "body " ++ pr_lconstr bodies.(num)); *) + let f_body_with_params_and_other_fun = + substl fnames_with_params bodies.(num) + in + (* observe (str "f_body_with_params_and_other_fun " ++ pr_lconstr f_body_with_params_and_other_fun); *) + let eq_rhs = + Reductionops.nf_betaiotazeta (Global.env ()) evd + (mkApp + ( compose_lam params f_body_with_params_and_other_fun + , Array.init (nb_params + nb_args) (fun i -> + mkRel (nb_params + nb_args - i)) )) + in (* observe (str "eq_rhs " ++ pr_lconstr eq_rhs); *) - let (type_ctxt,type_of_f),evd = - let evd,t = Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd f - in - decompose_prod_n_assum evd - (nb_params + nb_args) t,evd + let (type_ctxt, type_of_f), evd = + let evd, t = Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) evd f in + (decompose_prod_n_assum evd (nb_params + nb_args) t, evd) in - let eqn = mkApp(Lazy.force eq,[|type_of_f;eq_lhs;eq_rhs|]) in + let eqn = mkApp (Lazy.force eq, [|type_of_f; eq_lhs; eq_rhs|]) in let lemma_type = it_mkProd_or_LetIn eqn type_ctxt in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr lemma_type ++ fnl () ++ str "f_body " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr f_body); *) let f_id = Label.to_id (Constant.label (fst (destConst evd f))) in let prove_replacement = tclTHENLIST - [ - tclDO (nb_params + rec_args_num + 1) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); - observe_tac "" (fun g -> - let rec_id = pf_nth_hyp_id g 1 in - tclTHENLIST - [observe_tac "generalize_non_dep in generate_equation_lemma" (generalize_non_dep rec_id); - observe_tac "h_case" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkVar rec_id))); - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intros_reflexivity)] g - ) - ] + [ tclDO (nb_params + rec_args_num + 1) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + ; observe_tac "" (fun g -> + let rec_id = pf_nth_hyp_id g 1 in + tclTHENLIST + [ observe_tac "generalize_non_dep in generate_equation_lemma" + (generalize_non_dep rec_id) + ; observe_tac "h_case" + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (simplest_case (mkVar rec_id))) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic intros_reflexivity ] + g) ] in (* Pp.msgnl (str "lemma type (2) " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr_env (Global.env ()) evd lemma_type); *) (*i The next call to mk_equation_id is valid since we are constructing the lemma Ensures by: obvious i*) - let lemma = Lemmas.start_lemma ~name:(mk_equation_id f_id) ~poly:false evd lemma_type in - let lemma,_ = Lemmas.by (Proofview.V82.tactic prove_replacement) lemma in - let () = Lemmas.save_lemma_proved ~lemma ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None in + let lemma = + Lemmas.start_lemma ~name:(mk_equation_id f_id) ~poly:false evd lemma_type + in + let lemma, _ = Lemmas.by (Proofview.V82.tactic prove_replacement) lemma in + let () = + Lemmas.save_lemma_proved ~lemma ~opaque:Proof_global.Transparent ~idopt:None + in evd -let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num all_funs g = +let do_replace (evd : Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num + all_funs g = let equation_lemma = try let finfos = @@ -939,376 +861,366 @@ let do_replace (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) params rec_arg_num rev_args_id f fun_num a | Some finfos -> finfos in mkConst (Option.get finfos.equation_lemma) - with (Not_found | Option.IsNone as e) -> + with (Not_found | Option.IsNone) as e -> let f_id = Label.to_id (Constant.label (fst (destConst !evd f))) in (*i The next call to mk_equation_id is valid since we will construct the lemma Ensures by: obvious i*) - let equation_lemma_id = (mk_equation_id f_id) in - evd := generate_equation_lemma !evd all_funs f fun_num (List.length params) (List.length rev_args_id) rec_arg_num; + let equation_lemma_id = mk_equation_id f_id in + evd := + generate_equation_lemma !evd all_funs f fun_num (List.length params) + (List.length rev_args_id) rec_arg_num; let _ = match e with - | Option.IsNone -> - let finfos = match find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) with - | None -> raise Not_found - | Some finfos -> finfos - in - update_Function - {finfos with - equation_lemma = Some ( - match Nametab.locate (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id) with - | GlobRef.ConstRef c -> c - | _ -> CErrors.anomaly (Pp.str "Not a constant.") - ) - } - | _ -> () + | Option.IsNone -> + let finfos = + match find_Function_infos (fst (destConst !evd f)) with + | None -> raise Not_found + | Some finfos -> finfos + in + update_Function + { finfos with + equation_lemma = + Some + ( match Nametab.locate (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id) with + | GlobRef.ConstRef c -> c + | _ -> CErrors.anomaly (Pp.str "Not a constant.") ) } + | _ -> () in (* let res = Constrintern.construct_reference (pf_hyps g) equation_lemma_id in *) - let evd',res = - Evd.fresh_global - (Global.env ()) !evd + let evd', res = + Evd.fresh_global (Global.env ()) !evd (Constrintern.locate_reference (qualid_of_ident equation_lemma_id)) in - evd:=evd'; + evd := evd'; let sigma, _ = Typing.type_of ~refresh:true (Global.env ()) !evd res in evd := sigma; res in let nb_intro_to_do = nb_prod (project g) (pf_concl g) in - tclTHEN - (tclDO nb_intro_to_do (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)) - ( - fun g' -> - let just_introduced = nLastDecls nb_intro_to_do g' in - let open Context.Named.Declaration in - let just_introduced_id = List.map get_id just_introduced in - tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR equation_lemma)) - (revert just_introduced_id) g' - ) - g + tclTHEN + (tclDO nb_intro_to_do (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)) + (fun g' -> + let just_introduced = nLastDecls nb_intro_to_do g' in + let open Context.Named.Declaration in + let just_introduced_id = List.map get_id just_introduced in + tclTHEN + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR equation_lemma)) + (revert just_introduced_id) + g') + g -let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnames all_funs _nparams : tactic = - fun g -> +let prove_princ_for_struct (evd : Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num + fnames all_funs _nparams : tactic = + fun g -> let princ_type = pf_concl g in (* Pp.msgnl (str "princ_type " ++ Printer.pr_lconstr princ_type); *) (* Pp.msgnl (str "all_funs "); *) (* Array.iter (fun c -> Pp.msgnl (Printer.pr_lconstr c)) all_funs; *) - let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project g) princ_type in - let fresh_id = - let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps g) in - (fun na -> - let new_id = - match na with - Name id -> fresh_id !avoid (Id.to_string id) - | Anonymous -> fresh_id !avoid "H" - in - avoid := new_id :: !avoid; - (Name new_id) - ) - in - let fresh_decl = RelDecl.map_name fresh_id in - let princ_info : elim_scheme = - { princ_info with - params = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.params; - predicates = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.predicates; - branches = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.branches; - args = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.args - } - in - let get_body const = - match Global.body_of_constant Library.indirect_accessor const with - | Some (body, _, _) -> - let env = Global.env () in - let sigma = Evd.from_env env in - Tacred.cbv_norm_flags - (CClosure.RedFlags.mkflags [CClosure.RedFlags.fZETA]) - env - sigma - (EConstr.of_constr body) - | None -> user_err Pp.(str "Cannot define a principle over an axiom ") - in - let fbody = get_body fnames.(fun_num) in - let f_ctxt,f_body = decompose_lam (project g) fbody in - let f_ctxt_length = List.length f_ctxt in - let diff_params = princ_info.nparams - f_ctxt_length in - let full_params,princ_params,fbody_with_full_params = - if diff_params > 0 - then - let princ_params,full_params = - list_chop diff_params princ_info.params - in - (full_params, (* real params *) - princ_params, (* the params of the principle which are not params of the function *) - substl (* function instantiated with real params *) - (List.map var_of_decl full_params) - f_body - ) - else - let f_ctxt_other,f_ctxt_params = - list_chop (- diff_params) f_ctxt in - let f_body = compose_lam f_ctxt_other f_body in - (princ_info.params, (* real params *) - [],(* all params are full params *) - substl (* function instantiated with real params *) - (List.map var_of_decl princ_info.params) - f_body - ) - in - observe (str "full_params := " ++ - prlist_with_sep spc (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> Ppconstr.pr_id) - full_params - ); - observe (str "princ_params := " ++ - prlist_with_sep spc (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> Ppconstr.pr_id) - princ_params - ); - observe (str "fbody_with_full_params := " ++ - pr_leconstr_env (Global.env ()) !evd fbody_with_full_params - ); - let all_funs_with_full_params = - Array.map (fun f -> applist(f, List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) all_funs - in - let fix_offset = List.length princ_params in - let ptes_to_fix,infos = - match EConstr.kind (project g) fbody_with_full_params with - | Fix((idxs,i),(names,typess,bodies)) -> - let bodies_with_all_params = - Array.map - (fun body -> - Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) - (applist(substl (List.rev (Array.to_list all_funs_with_full_params)) body, - List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)) - ) - bodies + let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project g) princ_type in + let fresh_id = + let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps g) in + fun na -> + let new_id = + match na with + | Name id -> fresh_id !avoid (Id.to_string id) + | Anonymous -> fresh_id !avoid "H" + in + avoid := new_id :: !avoid; + Name new_id + in + let fresh_decl = RelDecl.map_name fresh_id in + let princ_info : elim_scheme = + { princ_info with + params = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.params + ; predicates = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.predicates + ; branches = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.branches + ; args = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.args } + in + let get_body const = + match Global.body_of_constant Library.indirect_accessor const with + | Some (body, _, _) -> + let env = Global.env () in + let sigma = Evd.from_env env in + Tacred.cbv_norm_flags + (CClosure.RedFlags.mkflags [CClosure.RedFlags.fZETA]) + env sigma (EConstr.of_constr body) + | None -> user_err Pp.(str "Cannot define a principle over an axiom ") + in + let fbody = get_body fnames.(fun_num) in + let f_ctxt, f_body = decompose_lam (project g) fbody in + let f_ctxt_length = List.length f_ctxt in + let diff_params = princ_info.nparams - f_ctxt_length in + let full_params, princ_params, fbody_with_full_params = + if diff_params > 0 then + let princ_params, full_params = list_chop diff_params princ_info.params in + ( full_params + , (* real params *) + princ_params + , (* the params of the principle which are not params of the function *) + substl (* function instantiated with real params *) + (List.map var_of_decl full_params) + f_body ) + else + let f_ctxt_other, f_ctxt_params = list_chop (-diff_params) f_ctxt in + let f_body = compose_lam f_ctxt_other f_body in + ( princ_info.params + , (* real params *) + [] + , (* all params are full params *) + substl (* function instantiated with real params *) + (List.map var_of_decl princ_info.params) + f_body ) + in + observe + ( str "full_params := " + ++ prlist_with_sep spc + (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> Ppconstr.pr_id) + full_params ); + observe + ( str "princ_params := " + ++ prlist_with_sep spc + (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> Ppconstr.pr_id) + princ_params ); + observe + ( str "fbody_with_full_params := " + ++ pr_leconstr_env (Global.env ()) !evd fbody_with_full_params ); + let all_funs_with_full_params = + Array.map + (fun f -> applist (f, List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) + all_funs + in + let fix_offset = List.length princ_params in + let ptes_to_fix, infos = + match EConstr.kind (project g) fbody_with_full_params with + | Fix ((idxs, i), (names, typess, bodies)) -> + let bodies_with_all_params = + Array.map + (fun body -> + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) + (applist + ( substl + (List.rev (Array.to_list all_funs_with_full_params)) + body + , List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params ))) + bodies + in + let info_array = + Array.mapi + (fun i types -> + let types = + prod_applist (project g) types + (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params) in - let info_array = - Array.mapi - (fun i types -> - let types = prod_applist (project g) types (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params) in - { idx = idxs.(i) - fix_offset; - name = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id names.(i).binder_name); - types = types; - offset = fix_offset; - nb_realargs = - List.length - (fst (decompose_lam (project g) bodies.(i))) - fix_offset; - body_with_param = bodies_with_all_params.(i); - num_in_block = i - } - ) - typess + { idx = idxs.(i) - fix_offset + ; name = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id names.(i).binder_name) + ; types + ; offset = fix_offset + ; nb_realargs = + List.length (fst (decompose_lam (project g) bodies.(i))) + - fix_offset + ; body_with_param = bodies_with_all_params.(i) + ; num_in_block = i }) + typess + in + let pte_to_fix, rev_info = + List.fold_left_i + (fun i (acc_map, acc_info) decl -> + let pte = RelDecl.get_name decl in + let infos = info_array.(i) in + let type_args, _ = decompose_prod (project g) infos.types in + let nargs = List.length type_args in + let f = + applist + (mkConst fnames.(i), List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_info.params) in - let pte_to_fix,rev_info = - List.fold_left_i - (fun i (acc_map,acc_info) decl -> - let pte = RelDecl.get_name decl in - let infos = info_array.(i) in - let type_args,_ = decompose_prod (project g) infos.types in - let nargs = List.length type_args in - let f = applist(mkConst fnames.(i), List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_info.params) in - let first_args = Array.init nargs (fun i -> mkRel (nargs -i)) in - let app_f = mkApp(f,first_args) in - let pte_args = (Array.to_list first_args)@[app_f] in - let app_pte = applist(mkVar (Nameops.Name.get_id pte),pte_args) in - let body_with_param,num = - let body = get_body fnames.(i) in - let body_with_full_params = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) ( - applist(body,List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) - in - match EConstr.kind (project g) body_with_full_params with - | Fix((_,num),(_,_,bs)) -> - Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) - ( - (applist - (substl - (List.rev - (Array.to_list all_funs_with_full_params)) - bs.(num), - List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)) - ),num - | _ -> user_err Pp.(str "Not a mutual block") - in - let info = - {infos with - types = compose_prod type_args app_pte; - body_with_param = body_with_param; - num_in_block = num - } - in -(* observe (str "binding " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id (Nameops.Name.get_id pte) ++ *) -(* str " to " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id info.name); *) - (Id.Map.add (Nameops.Name.get_id pte) info acc_map,info::acc_info) - ) - 0 - (Id.Map.empty,[]) - (List.rev princ_info.predicates) + let first_args = Array.init nargs (fun i -> mkRel (nargs - i)) in + let app_f = mkApp (f, first_args) in + let pte_args = Array.to_list first_args @ [app_f] in + let app_pte = applist (mkVar (Nameops.Name.get_id pte), pte_args) in + let body_with_param, num = + let body = get_body fnames.(i) in + let body_with_full_params = + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) + (applist (body, List.rev_map var_of_decl full_params)) + in + match EConstr.kind (project g) body_with_full_params with + | Fix ((_, num), (_, _, bs)) -> + ( Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) + (applist + ( substl + (List.rev (Array.to_list all_funs_with_full_params)) + bs.(num) + , List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params )) + , num ) + | _ -> user_err Pp.(str "Not a mutual block") in - pte_to_fix,List.rev rev_info - | _ -> - Id.Map.empty,[] - in - let mk_fixes : tactic = - let pre_info,infos = list_chop fun_num infos in - match pre_info,infos with - | _,[] -> tclIDTAC - | _, this_fix_info::others_infos -> - let other_fix_infos = - List.map - (fun fi -> fi.name,fi.idx + 1 ,fi.types) - (pre_info@others_infos) + let info = + { infos with + types = compose_prod type_args app_pte + ; body_with_param + ; num_in_block = num } in - if List.is_empty other_fix_infos - then - if this_fix_info.idx + 1 = 0 - then tclIDTAC (* Someone tries to defined a principle on a fully parametric definition declared as a fixpoint (strange but ....) *) - else - Indfun_common.observe_tac (fun _ _ -> str "h_fix " ++ int (this_fix_info.idx +1)) - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx +1))) - else - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.mutual_fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx + 1) - other_fix_infos 0) - in - let first_tac : tactic = (* every operations until fix creations *) + (* observe (str "binding " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id (Nameops.Name.get_id pte) ++ *) + (* str " to " ++ Ppconstr.pr_id info.name); *) + (Id.Map.add (Nameops.Name.get_id pte) info acc_map, info :: acc_info)) + 0 (Id.Map.empty, []) + (List.rev princ_info.predicates) + in + (pte_to_fix, List.rev rev_info) + | _ -> (Id.Map.empty, []) + in + let mk_fixes : tactic = + let pre_info, infos = list_chop fun_num infos in + match (pre_info, infos) with + | _, [] -> tclIDTAC + | _, this_fix_info :: others_infos -> + let other_fix_infos = + List.map + (fun fi -> (fi.name, fi.idx + 1, fi.types)) + (pre_info @ others_infos) + in + if List.is_empty other_fix_infos then + if this_fix_info.idx + 1 = 0 then tclIDTAC + (* Someone tries to defined a principle on a fully parametric definition declared as a fixpoint (strange but ....) *) + else + Indfun_common.observe_tac + (fun _ _ -> str "h_fix " ++ int (this_fix_info.idx + 1)) + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx + 1))) + else + Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (Tactics.mutual_fix this_fix_info.name (this_fix_info.idx + 1) + other_fix_infos 0) + in + let first_tac : tactic = + (* every operations until fix creations *) + tclTHENLIST + [ observe_tac "introducing params" + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.params))) + ; observe_tac "introducing predictes" + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.predicates))) + ; observe_tac "introducing branches" + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches))) + ; observe_tac "building fixes" mk_fixes ] + in + let intros_after_fixes : tactic = + fun gl -> + let ctxt, pte_app = decompose_prod_assum (project gl) (pf_concl gl) in + let pte, pte_args = decompose_app (project gl) pte_app in + try + let pte = + try destVar (project gl) pte + with DestKO -> anomaly (Pp.str "Property is not a variable.") + in + let fix_info = Id.Map.find pte ptes_to_fix in + let nb_args = fix_info.nb_realargs in tclTHENLIST - [ observe_tac "introducing params" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.params))); - observe_tac "introducing predictes" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.predicates))); - observe_tac "introducing branches" (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (intros_using (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches))); - observe_tac "building fixes" mk_fixes; - ] - in - let intros_after_fixes : tactic = - fun gl -> - let ctxt,pte_app = (decompose_prod_assum (project gl) (pf_concl gl)) in - let pte,pte_args = (decompose_app (project gl) pte_app) in - try - let pte = - try destVar (project gl) pte - with DestKO -> anomaly (Pp.str "Property is not a variable.") - in - let fix_info = Id.Map.find pte ptes_to_fix in - let nb_args = fix_info.nb_realargs in - tclTHENLIST - [ - (* observe_tac ("introducing args") *) (tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro)); - (fun g -> (* replacement of the function by its body *) - let args = nLastDecls nb_args g in - let fix_body = fix_info.body_with_param in -(* observe (str "fix_body := "++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env gl) fix_body); *) - let open Context.Named.Declaration in - let args_id = List.map get_id args in - let dyn_infos = - { - nb_rec_hyps = -100; - rec_hyps = []; - info = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) - (applist(fix_body,List.rev_map mkVar args_id)); - eq_hyps = [] - } + [ (* observe_tac ("introducing args") *) + tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + ; (fun g -> + (* replacement of the function by its body *) + let args = nLastDecls nb_args g in + let fix_body = fix_info.body_with_param in + (* observe (str "fix_body := "++ pr_lconstr_env (pf_env gl) fix_body); *) + let open Context.Named.Declaration in + let args_id = List.map get_id args in + let dyn_infos = + { nb_rec_hyps = -100 + ; rec_hyps = [] + ; info = + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) + (applist (fix_body, List.rev_map mkVar args_id)) + ; eq_hyps = [] } + in + tclTHENLIST + [ observe_tac "do_replace" + (do_replace evd full_params + (fix_info.idx + List.length princ_params) + ( args_id + @ List.map + (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) + princ_params ) + all_funs.(fix_info.num_in_block) + fix_info.num_in_block all_funs) + ; (let do_prove = + build_proof interactive_proof (Array.to_list fnames) + (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) in - tclTHENLIST - [ - observe_tac "do_replace" - (do_replace evd - full_params - (fix_info.idx + List.length princ_params) - (args_id@(List.map (RelDecl.get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_params)) - (all_funs.(fix_info.num_in_block)) - fix_info.num_in_block - all_funs - ); - let do_prove = - build_proof - interactive_proof - (Array.to_list fnames) - (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) - in - let prove_tac branches = - let dyn_infos = - {dyn_infos with - rec_hyps = branches; - nb_rec_hyps = List.length branches - } - in - observe_tac "cleaning" (clean_goal_with_heq - (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) - do_prove - dyn_infos) - in -(* observe (str "branches := " ++ *) -(* prlist_with_sep spc (fun decl -> Ppconstr.pr_id (id_of_decl decl)) princ_info.branches ++ fnl () ++ *) -(* str "args := " ++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id args_id *) - -(* ); *) - (* observe_tac "instancing" *) (instantiate_hyps_with_args prove_tac - (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches) - (List.rev args_id)) - ] - g - ); - ] gl - with Not_found -> - let nb_args = min (princ_info.nargs) (List.length ctxt) in - tclTHENLIST - [ - tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro); - (fun g -> (* replacement of the function by its body *) - let args = nLastDecls nb_args g in - let open Context.Named.Declaration in - let args_id = List.map get_id args in - let dyn_infos = - { - nb_rec_hyps = -100; - rec_hyps = []; - info = - Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) - (applist(fbody_with_full_params, - (List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params)@ - (List.rev_map mkVar args_id) - )); - eq_hyps = [] - } + let prove_tac branches = + let dyn_infos = + { dyn_infos with + rec_hyps = branches + ; nb_rec_hyps = List.length branches } + in + observe_tac "cleaning" + (clean_goal_with_heq + (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) + do_prove dyn_infos) in - let fname = destConst (project g) (fst (decompose_app (project g) (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) in - tclTHENLIST - [Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]); - let do_prove = - build_proof - interactive_proof - (Array.to_list fnames) - (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) - in - let prove_tac branches = - let dyn_infos = - {dyn_infos with - rec_hyps = branches; - nb_rec_hyps = List.length branches - } - in - clean_goal_with_heq - (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) - do_prove - dyn_infos - in - instantiate_hyps_with_args prove_tac - (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches) - (List.rev args_id) - ] - g - ) - ] - gl - in - tclTHEN - first_tac - intros_after_fixes - g - - - - - + (* observe (str "branches := " ++ *) + (* prlist_with_sep spc (fun decl -> Ppconstr.pr_id (id_of_decl decl)) princ_info.branches ++ fnl () ++ *) + (* str "args := " ++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id args_id *) + + (* ); *) + (* observe_tac "instancing" *) + instantiate_hyps_with_args prove_tac + (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches) + (List.rev args_id)) ] + g) ] + gl + with Not_found -> + let nb_args = min princ_info.nargs (List.length ctxt) in + tclTHENLIST + [ tclDO nb_args (Proofview.V82.of_tactic intro) + ; (fun g -> + (* replacement of the function by its body *) + let args = nLastDecls nb_args g in + let open Context.Named.Declaration in + let args_id = List.map get_id args in + let dyn_infos = + { nb_rec_hyps = -100 + ; rec_hyps = [] + ; info = + Reductionops.nf_betaiota (pf_env g) (project g) + (applist + ( fbody_with_full_params + , List.rev_map var_of_decl princ_params + @ List.rev_map mkVar args_id )) + ; eq_hyps = [] } + in + let fname = + destConst (project g) + (fst (decompose_app (project g) (List.hd (List.rev pte_args)))) + in + tclTHENLIST + [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (unfold_in_concl + [(Locus.AllOccurrences, Names.EvalConstRef (fst fname))]) + ; (let do_prove = + build_proof interactive_proof (Array.to_list fnames) + (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) + in + let prove_tac branches = + let dyn_infos = + { dyn_infos with + rec_hyps = branches + ; nb_rec_hyps = List.length branches } + in + clean_goal_with_heq + (Id.Map.map prove_rec_hyp ptes_to_fix) + do_prove dyn_infos + in + instantiate_hyps_with_args prove_tac + (List.rev_map id_of_decl princ_info.branches) + (List.rev args_id)) ] + g) ] + gl + in + tclTHEN first_tac intros_after_fixes g (* Proof of principles of general functions *) (* let hrec_id = Recdef.hrec_id *) @@ -1319,132 +1231,119 @@ let prove_princ_for_struct (evd:Evd.evar_map ref) interactive_proof fun_num fnam (* and list_rewrite = Recdef.list_rewrite *) (* and evaluable_of_global_reference = Recdef.evaluable_of_global_reference *) - - - - let prove_with_tcc tcc_lemma_constr eqs : tactic = match !tcc_lemma_constr with | Undefined -> anomaly (Pp.str "No tcc proof !!") | Value lemma -> - fun gls -> -(* let hid = next_ident_away_in_goal h_id (pf_ids_of_hyps gls) in *) -(* let ids = hid::pf_ids_of_hyps gls in *) - tclTHENLIST - [ -(* generalize [lemma]; *) -(* h_intro hid; *) -(* Elim.h_decompose_and (mkVar hid); *) - tclTRY(list_rewrite true eqs); -(* (fun g -> *) -(* let ids' = pf_ids_of_hyps g in *) -(* let ids = List.filter (fun id -> not (List.mem id ids)) ids' in *) -(* rewrite *) -(* ) *) - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Eauto.gen_eauto (false,5) [] (Some [])) - ] - gls + fun gls -> + (* let hid = next_ident_away_in_goal h_id (pf_ids_of_hyps gls) in *) + (* let ids = hid::pf_ids_of_hyps gls in *) + tclTHENLIST + [ (* generalize [lemma]; *) + (* h_intro hid; *) + (* Elim.h_decompose_and (mkVar hid); *) + tclTRY (list_rewrite true eqs) + ; (* (fun g -> *) + (* let ids' = pf_ids_of_hyps g in *) + (* let ids = List.filter (fun id -> not (List.mem id ids)) ids' in *) + (* rewrite *) + (* ) *) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Eauto.gen_eauto (false, 5) [] (Some [])) ] + gls | Not_needed -> tclIDTAC let backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs : tactic = - fun gls -> - let eqs = List.map mkVar eqs in - let rewrite = - tclFIRST (List.map (fun x -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL x)) eqs ) - in - let _,hrec_concl = decompose_prod (project gls) (pf_get_hyp_typ gls hrec) in - let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project gls) hrec_concl)) in - let f = (fst (destApp (project gls) f_app)) in - let rec backtrack : tactic = - fun g -> - let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project g) (pf_concl g))) in - match EConstr.kind (project g) f_app with - | App(f',_) when eq_constr (project g) f' f -> tclIDTAC g - | _ -> tclTHEN rewrite backtrack g - in - backtrack gls - + fun gls -> + let eqs = List.map mkVar eqs in + let rewrite = + tclFIRST + (List.map (fun x -> Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteRL x)) eqs) + in + let _, hrec_concl = decompose_prod (project gls) (pf_get_hyp_typ gls hrec) in + let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project gls) hrec_concl)) in + let f = fst (destApp (project gls) f_app) in + let rec backtrack : tactic = + fun g -> + let f_app = Array.last (snd (destApp (project g) (pf_concl g))) in + match EConstr.kind (project g) f_app with + | App (f', _) when eq_constr (project g) f' f -> tclIDTAC g + | _ -> tclTHEN rewrite backtrack g + in + backtrack gls let rec rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs = match eqs with - | [] -> tclIDTAC - | eq::eqs -> - - tclTHEN - (tclMAP - (fun id gl -> - observe_tac - (Format.sprintf "rewrite %s in %s " (Id.to_string eq) (Id.to_string id)) - (tclTRY (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.general_rewrite_in true Locus.AllOccurrences - true (* dep proofs also: *) true id (mkVar eq) false))) - gl - ) - eqs - ) - (rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs) + | [] -> tclIDTAC + | eq :: eqs -> + tclTHEN + (tclMAP + (fun id gl -> + observe_tac + (Format.sprintf "rewrite %s in %s " (Id.to_string eq) + (Id.to_string id)) + (tclTRY + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (Equality.general_rewrite_in true Locus.AllOccurrences true + (* dep proofs also: *) true id (mkVar eq) false))) + gl) + eqs) + (rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs) let new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv hrec tcc_hyps eqs : tactic = - fun gls -> - (tclTHENLIST - [ - backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs; - (* observe_tac ("new_prove_with_tcc ( applying "^(Id.to_string hrec)^" )" ) *) - (tclTHENS (* We must have exactly ONE subgoal !*) - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (mkVar hrec))) - [ tclTHENLIST - [ - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (keep (tcc_hyps@eqs))); - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (Lazy.force acc_inv))); - (fun g -> - if is_mes - then - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (unfold_in_concl [(Locus.AllOccurrences, evaluable_of_global_reference (delayed_force ltof_ref))]) g - else tclIDTAC g - ); - observe_tac "rew_and_finish" - (tclTHENLIST - [tclTRY(list_rewrite false (List.map (fun v -> (mkVar v,true)) eqs)); - observe_tac "rewrite_eqs_in_eqs" (rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs); - (observe_tac "finishing using" - ( - tclCOMPLETE( - Proofview.V82.of_tactic @@ - Eauto.eauto_with_bases - (true,5) + fun gls -> + (tclTHENLIST + [ backtrack_eqs_until_hrec hrec eqs + ; (* observe_tac ("new_prove_with_tcc ( applying "^(Id.to_string hrec)^" )" ) *) + tclTHENS (* We must have exactly ONE subgoal !*) + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (mkVar hrec))) + [ tclTHENLIST + [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (keep (tcc_hyps @ eqs)) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (apply (Lazy.force acc_inv)) + ; (fun g -> + if is_mes then + Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (unfold_in_concl + [ ( Locus.AllOccurrences + , evaluable_of_global_reference + (delayed_force ltof_ref) ) ]) + g + else tclIDTAC g) + ; observe_tac "rew_and_finish" + (tclTHENLIST + [ tclTRY + (list_rewrite false + (List.map (fun v -> (mkVar v, true)) eqs)) + ; observe_tac "rewrite_eqs_in_eqs" (rewrite_eqs_in_eqs eqs) + ; observe_tac "finishing using" + (tclCOMPLETE + ( Proofview.V82.of_tactic + @@ Eauto.eauto_with_bases (true, 5) [(fun _ sigma -> (sigma, Lazy.force refl_equal))] - [Hints.Hint_db.empty TransparentState.empty false] - ) - ) - ) - ] - ) - ] - ]) - ]) - gls - + [ Hints.Hint_db.empty TransparentState.empty + false ] )) ]) ] ] ]) + gls let is_valid_hypothesis sigma predicates_name = - let predicates_name = List.fold_right Id.Set.add predicates_name Id.Set.empty in + let predicates_name = + List.fold_right Id.Set.add predicates_name Id.Set.empty + in let is_pte typ = - if isApp sigma typ - then - let pte,_ = destApp sigma typ in - if isVar sigma pte - then Id.Set.mem (destVar sigma pte) predicates_name + if isApp sigma typ then + let pte, _ = destApp sigma typ in + if isVar sigma pte then Id.Set.mem (destVar sigma pte) predicates_name else false else false in let rec is_valid_hypothesis typ = - is_pte typ || - match EConstr.kind sigma typ with - | Prod(_,pte,typ') -> is_pte pte && is_valid_hypothesis typ' - | _ -> false + is_pte typ + || + match EConstr.kind sigma typ with + | Prod (_, pte, typ') -> is_pte pte && is_valid_hypothesis typ' + | _ -> false in is_valid_hypothesis -let prove_principle_for_gen - (f_ref,functional_ref,eq_ref) tcc_lemma_ref is_mes +let prove_principle_for_gen (f_ref, functional_ref, eq_ref) tcc_lemma_ref is_mes rec_arg_num rec_arg_type relation gl = let princ_type = pf_concl gl in let princ_info = compute_elim_sig (project gl) princ_type in @@ -1452,9 +1351,9 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen let avoid = ref (pf_ids_of_hyps gl) in fun na -> let new_id = - match na with - | Name id -> fresh_id !avoid (Id.to_string id) - | Anonymous -> fresh_id !avoid "H" + match na with + | Name id -> fresh_id !avoid (Id.to_string id) + | Anonymous -> fresh_id !avoid "H" in avoid := new_id :: !avoid; Name new_id @@ -1462,200 +1361,182 @@ let prove_principle_for_gen let fresh_decl = map_name fresh_id in let princ_info : elim_scheme = { princ_info with - params = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.params; - predicates = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.predicates; - branches = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.branches; - args = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.args - } + params = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.params + ; predicates = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.predicates + ; branches = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.branches + ; args = List.map fresh_decl princ_info.args } in let wf_tac = - if is_mes - then - (fun b -> - Proofview.V82.of_tactic @@ - Recdef.tclUSER_if_not_mes Tacticals.New.tclIDTAC b None) + if is_mes then fun b -> + Proofview.V82.of_tactic + @@ Recdef.tclUSER_if_not_mes Tacticals.New.tclIDTAC b None else fun _ -> prove_with_tcc tcc_lemma_ref [] in let real_rec_arg_num = rec_arg_num - princ_info.nparams in let npost_rec_arg = princ_info.nargs - real_rec_arg_num + 1 in -(* observe ( *) -(* str "princ_type := " ++ pr_lconstr princ_type ++ fnl () ++ *) -(* str "princ_info.nparams := " ++ int princ_info.nparams ++ fnl () ++ *) - -(* str "princ_info.nargs := " ++ int princ_info.nargs ++ fnl () ++ *) -(* str "rec_arg_num := " ++ int rec_arg_num ++ fnl() ++ *) -(* str "real_rec_arg_num := " ++ int real_rec_arg_num ++ fnl () ++ *) -(* str "npost_rec_arg := " ++ int npost_rec_arg ); *) - let (post_rec_arg,pre_rec_arg) = + (* observe ( *) + (* str "princ_type := " ++ pr_lconstr princ_type ++ fnl () ++ *) + (* str "princ_info.nparams := " ++ int princ_info.nparams ++ fnl () ++ *) + + (* str "princ_info.nargs := " ++ int princ_info.nargs ++ fnl () ++ *) + (* str "rec_arg_num := " ++ int rec_arg_num ++ fnl() ++ *) + (* str "real_rec_arg_num := " ++ int real_rec_arg_num ++ fnl () ++ *) + (* str "npost_rec_arg := " ++ int npost_rec_arg ); *) + let post_rec_arg, pre_rec_arg = Util.List.chop npost_rec_arg princ_info.args in let rec_arg_id = match List.rev post_rec_arg with - | (LocalAssum ({binder_name=Name id},_) | LocalDef ({binder_name=Name id},_,_)) :: _ -> id - | _ -> assert false + | ( LocalAssum ({binder_name = Name id}, _) + | LocalDef ({binder_name = Name id}, _, _) ) + :: _ -> + id + | _ -> assert false + in + (* observe (str "rec_arg_id := " ++ pr_lconstr (mkVar rec_arg_id)); *) + let subst_constrs = + List.map + (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> mkVar) + (pre_rec_arg @ princ_info.params) in -(* observe (str "rec_arg_id := " ++ pr_lconstr (mkVar rec_arg_id)); *) - let subst_constrs = List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id %> mkVar) (pre_rec_arg@princ_info.params) in let relation = substl subst_constrs relation in let input_type = substl subst_constrs rec_arg_type in let wf_thm_id = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string "wf_R"))) in let acc_rec_arg_id = - Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string ("Acc_"^(Id.to_string rec_arg_id))))) + Nameops.Name.get_id + (fresh_id (Name (Id.of_string ("Acc_" ^ Id.to_string rec_arg_id)))) in let revert l = - tclTHEN (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize (List.map mkVar l))) (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear l)) + tclTHEN + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.generalize (List.map mkVar l))) + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (clear l)) in let fix_id = Nameops.Name.get_id (fresh_id (Name hrec_id)) in let prove_rec_arg_acc g = - ((* observe_tac "prove_rec_arg_acc" *) - (tclCOMPLETE - (tclTHEN - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (assert_by (Name wf_thm_id) - (mkApp (delayed_force well_founded,[|input_type;relation|])) - (Proofview.V82.tactic (fun g -> (* observe_tac "prove wf" *) (tclCOMPLETE (wf_tac is_mes)) g)))) - ( - (* observe_tac *) -(* "apply wf_thm" *) - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Tactics.Simple.apply (mkApp(mkVar wf_thm_id,[|mkVar rec_arg_id|]))) - ) - ) - ) - ) + ((* observe_tac "prove_rec_arg_acc" *) + tclCOMPLETE + (tclTHEN + (Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (assert_by (Name wf_thm_id) + (mkApp (delayed_force well_founded, [|input_type; relation|])) + (Proofview.V82.tactic (fun g -> + (* observe_tac "prove wf" *) + (tclCOMPLETE (wf_tac is_mes)) g)))) + ((* observe_tac *) + (* "apply wf_thm" *) + Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (Tactics.Simple.apply + (mkApp (mkVar wf_thm_id, [|mkVar rec_arg_id|])))))) g in let args_ids = List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.args in let lemma = match !tcc_lemma_ref with - | Undefined -> user_err Pp.(str "No tcc proof !!") - | Value lemma -> EConstr.of_constr lemma - | Not_needed -> EConstr.of_constr (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.True.I") + | Undefined -> user_err Pp.(str "No tcc proof !!") + | Value lemma -> EConstr.of_constr lemma + | Not_needed -> + EConstr.of_constr + (UnivGen.constr_of_monomorphic_global @@ Coqlib.lib_ref "core.True.I") in -(* let rec list_diff del_list check_list = *) -(* match del_list with *) -(* [] -> *) -(* [] *) -(* | f::r -> *) -(* if List.mem f check_list then *) -(* list_diff r check_list *) -(* else *) -(* f::(list_diff r check_list) *) -(* in *) + (* let rec list_diff del_list check_list = *) + (* match del_list with *) + (* [] -> *) + (* [] *) + (* | f::r -> *) + (* if List.mem f check_list then *) + (* list_diff r check_list *) + (* else *) + (* f::(list_diff r check_list) *) + (* in *) let tcc_list = ref [] in let start_tac gls = let hyps = pf_ids_of_hyps gls in - let hid = - next_ident_away_in_goal - (Id.of_string "prov") - (Id.Set.of_list hyps) - in - tclTHENLIST - [ - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [lemma]); - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid); - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Elim.h_decompose_and (mkVar hid)); - (fun g -> - let new_hyps = pf_ids_of_hyps g in - tcc_list := List.rev (List.subtract Id.equal new_hyps (hid::hyps)); - if List.is_empty !tcc_list - then - begin - tcc_list := [hid]; - tclIDTAC g - end - else thin [hid] g - ) - ] - gls + let hid = + next_ident_away_in_goal (Id.of_string "prov") (Id.Set.of_list hyps) + in + tclTHENLIST + [ Proofview.V82.of_tactic (generalize [lemma]) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Simple.intro hid) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Elim.h_decompose_and (mkVar hid)) + ; (fun g -> + let new_hyps = pf_ids_of_hyps g in + tcc_list := List.rev (List.subtract Id.equal new_hyps (hid :: hyps)); + if List.is_empty !tcc_list then begin + tcc_list := [hid]; + tclIDTAC g + end + else thin [hid] g) ] + gls in tclTHENLIST - [ - observe_tac "start_tac" start_tac; - h_intros - (List.rev_map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) - (princ_info.args@princ_info.branches@princ_info.predicates@princ_info.params) - ); - Proofview.V82.of_tactic - (assert_by - (Name acc_rec_arg_id) - (mkApp (delayed_force acc_rel,[|input_type;relation;mkVar rec_arg_id|])) - (Proofview.V82.tactic prove_rec_arg_acc)); - (revert (List.rev (acc_rec_arg_id::args_ids))); - (Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix fix_id (List.length args_ids + 1))); - h_intros (List.rev (acc_rec_arg_id::args_ids)); - Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_ref)); - (fun gl' -> - let body = - let _,args = destApp (project gl') (pf_concl gl') in - Array.last args - in - let body_info rec_hyps = - { - nb_rec_hyps = List.length rec_hyps; - rec_hyps = rec_hyps; - eq_hyps = []; - info = body - } - in - let acc_inv = - lazy ( - mkApp ( - delayed_force acc_inv_id, - [|input_type;relation;mkVar rec_arg_id|] - ) - ) - in - let acc_inv = lazy (mkApp(Lazy.force acc_inv, [|mkVar acc_rec_arg_id|])) in - let predicates_names = - List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.predicates - in - let pte_info = - { proving_tac = - (fun eqs -> -(* msgnl (str "tcc_list := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id !tcc_list); *) -(* msgnl (str "princ_info.args := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.Name.get_id na)) princ_info.args)); *) -(* msgnl (str "princ_info.params := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.Name.get_id na)) princ_info.params)); *) -(* msgnl (str "acc_rec_arg_id := "++ Ppconstr.pr_id acc_rec_arg_id); *) -(* msgnl (str "eqs := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id eqs); *) - - (* observe_tac "new_prove_with_tcc" *) - (new_prove_with_tcc - is_mes acc_inv fix_id - - (!tcc_list@(List.map - (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) - (princ_info.args@princ_info.params) - )@ ([acc_rec_arg_id])) eqs - ) - - ); - is_valid = is_valid_hypothesis (project gl') predicates_names - } - in - let ptes_info : pte_info Id.Map.t = - List.fold_left - (fun map pte_id -> - Id.Map.add pte_id - pte_info - map - ) - Id.Map.empty - predicates_names - in - let make_proof rec_hyps = - build_proof - false - [f_ref] - ptes_info - (body_info rec_hyps) - in - (* observe_tac "instantiate_hyps_with_args" *) - (instantiate_hyps_with_args - make_proof - (List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.branches) - (List.rev args_ids) - ) - gl' - ) - - ] + [ observe_tac "start_tac" start_tac + ; h_intros + (List.rev_map + (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) + ( princ_info.args @ princ_info.branches @ princ_info.predicates + @ princ_info.params )) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic + (assert_by (Name acc_rec_arg_id) + (mkApp + (delayed_force acc_rel, [|input_type; relation; mkVar rec_arg_id|])) + (Proofview.V82.tactic prove_rec_arg_acc)) + ; revert (List.rev (acc_rec_arg_id :: args_ids)) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (fix fix_id (List.length args_ids + 1)) + ; h_intros (List.rev (acc_rec_arg_id :: args_ids)) + ; Proofview.V82.of_tactic (Equality.rewriteLR (mkConst eq_ref)) + ; (fun gl' -> + let body = + let _, args = destApp (project gl') (pf_concl gl') in + Array.last args + in + let body_info rec_hyps = + { nb_rec_hyps = List.length rec_hyps + ; rec_hyps + ; eq_hyps = [] + ; info = body } + in + let acc_inv = + lazy + (mkApp + ( delayed_force acc_inv_id + , [|input_type; relation; mkVar rec_arg_id|] )) + in + let acc_inv = + lazy (mkApp (Lazy.force acc_inv, [|mkVar acc_rec_arg_id|])) + in + let predicates_names = + List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.predicates + in + let pte_info = + { proving_tac = + (fun eqs -> + (* msgnl (str "tcc_list := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id !tcc_list); *) + (* msgnl (str "princ_info.args := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.Name.get_id na)) princ_info.args)); *) + (* msgnl (str "princ_info.params := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id (List.map (fun (na,_,_) -> (Nameops.Name.get_id na)) princ_info.params)); *) + (* msgnl (str "acc_rec_arg_id := "++ Ppconstr.pr_id acc_rec_arg_id); *) + (* msgnl (str "eqs := "++ prlist_with_sep spc Ppconstr.pr_id eqs); *) + + (* observe_tac "new_prove_with_tcc" *) + new_prove_with_tcc is_mes acc_inv fix_id + ( !tcc_list + @ List.map + (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) + (princ_info.args @ princ_info.params) + @ [acc_rec_arg_id] ) + eqs) + ; is_valid = is_valid_hypothesis (project gl') predicates_names } + in + let ptes_info : pte_info Id.Map.t = + List.fold_left + (fun map pte_id -> Id.Map.add pte_id pte_info map) + Id.Map.empty predicates_names + in + let make_proof rec_hyps = + build_proof false [f_ref] ptes_info (body_info rec_hyps) + in + (* observe_tac "instantiate_hyps_with_args" *) + (instantiate_hyps_with_args make_proof + (List.map (get_name %> Nameops.Name.get_id) princ_info.branches) + (List.rev args_ids)) + gl') ] gl |
