aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGaƫtan Gilbert2019-05-03 14:14:40 +0200
committerEnrico Tassi2019-06-04 13:58:42 +0200
commitb8842c3c8d6e6d9d4c19a75453fca9f94de6fa49 (patch)
tree9c52ce44b68ecc40dfe6805adb559d2ff110032f /plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg
parent8abacf00c6c39ec98085d531737d18edc9c19b2a (diff)
coqpp: add new ![] specifiers for structured proof interaction
![proof_stack] is equivalent to the old meaning of ![proof]: the body has type `pstate:Proof_global.t option -> Proof_global.t option` The other specifiers are for the following body types: ~~~ ![open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate` ![maybe_open_proof] `is_ontop:bool -> pstate option` ![proof] `pstate:pstate -> pstate` ![proof_opt_query] `pstate:pstate option -> unit` ![proof_query] `pstate:pstate -> unit` ~~~ The `is_ontop` is only used for the warning message when declaring a section variable inside a proof, we could also just stop warning. The specifiers look closely related to stm classifiers, but currently they're unconnected. Notably this means that a ![proof_query] doesn't have to be classified QUERY. ![proof_stack] is only used by g_rewrite/rewrite whose behaviour I don't fully understand, maybe we can drop it in the future. For compat we may want to consider keeping ![proof] with its old meaning and using some new name for the new meaning. OTOH fixing plugins to be stricter is easier if we change it as the errors tell us where it's used.
Diffstat (limited to 'plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg')
-rw-r--r--plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg10
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg b/plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg
index d43d90af60..487accbc9b 100644
--- a/plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg
+++ b/plugins/extraction/g_extraction.mlg
@@ -178,12 +178,6 @@ END
(* Show the extraction of the current proof *)
VERNAC COMMAND EXTEND ShowExtraction CLASSIFIED AS QUERY
-| ![ proof ] [ "Show" "Extraction" ]
- -> { fun ~pstate:ontop ->
- let pstate = Option.map Proof_global.get_current_pstate ontop in
- let pstate = match pstate with
- | None -> CErrors.user_err Pp.(str "No ongoing proof")
- | Some pstate -> pstate
- in
- let () = show_extraction ~pstate in ontop }
+| ![ proof_query ] [ "Show" "Extraction" ]
+ -> { show_extraction }
END