Continuing 3741c46fe134 on reporting ltac error.

- Do use the flag for_ml for distinguishing coq level and ml level
  ltac definitions.
- Skip ML call from the trace.

There are still differences from 8.4 and trunk. For instance on:

Ltac f x := refine x.
Goal False.
f I.

8.4 says:

In nested Ltac calls to "f" and "x" (with x:=I), last term evaluation failed.
Error: The term "I" has type "True" while it is expected to have type "False".

trunk says:

In nested Ltac calls to "f" and "refine <genarg:uconstr>", last call failed.
Error: The term "I" has type "True" while it is expected to have type "False".

Maybe we would like a mix of both (besides the printing of a
non-elegant "<genarg:uconstr>)?

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions