aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/make-opcodes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPierre Letouzey2015-01-03 18:50:53 +0100
committerPierre Letouzey2015-01-11 09:56:39 +0100
commitedf85b925939cb13ca82a10873ced589164391da (patch)
tree557735a0f0233f08a49e00169bb2f6afb6f695e2 /kernel/make-opcodes
parentd103a645df233dd40064e968fa8693607defa6a7 (diff)
Declarations.mli refactoring: module_type_body = module_body
After this commit, module_type_body is a particular case of module_type. For a [module_type_body], the implementation field [mod_expr] is supposed to be always [Abstract]. This is verified by coqchk, even if this isn't so crucial, since [mod_expr] is never read in the case of a module type. Concretely, this amounts to the following rewrite on field names for module_type_body: - typ_expr --> mod_type - typ_expr_alg --> mod_type_alg - typ_* --> mod_* and adding two new fields to mtb: - mod_expr (always containing Abstract) - mod_retroknowledge (always containing []) This refactoring should be completely transparent for the user. Pros: code sharing, for instance subst_modtype = subst_module. Cons: a runtime invariant (mod_expr = Abstract) which isn't enforced by typing. I tried a polymorphic typing of mod_expr, to share field names while not having mtb = mb, but the OCaml typechecker isn't clever enough with polymorphic mutual fixpoints, and reject code sharing (e.g. between subst_modtype and subst_module). In the future (with ocaml>=4), some GADT could maybe help here, but for now the current solution seems good enough.
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/make-opcodes')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions