diff options
| author | Matej Kosik | 2016-01-29 10:13:12 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Matej Kosik | 2016-02-09 15:58:17 +0100 |
| commit | 34ef02fac1110673ae74c41c185c228ff7876de2 (patch) | |
| tree | a688eb9e2c23fc5353391f0c8b4ba1d7ba327844 /ide | |
| parent | e9675e068f9e0e92bab05c030fb4722b146123b8 (diff) | |
CLEANUP: Context.{Rel,Named}.Declaration.t
Originally, rel-context was represented as:
Context.rel_context = Names.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Rel.t = LocalAssum of Names.Name.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Name.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Originally, named-context was represented as:
Context.named_context = Names.Id.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t
Now it is represented as:
Context.Named.t = LocalAssum of Names.Id.t * Constr.t
| LocalDef of Names.Id.t * Constr.t * Constr.t
Motivation:
(1) In "tactics/hipattern.ml4" file we define "test_strict_disjunction"
function which looked like this:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [_,None,c] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
Suppose that you do not know about rel-context and named-context.
(that is the case of people who just started to read the source code)
Merlin would tell you that the type of the value you are destructing
by "match" is:
'a * 'b option * Constr.t (* worst-case scenario *)
or
Named.Name.t * Constr.t option * Constr.t (* best-case scenario (?) *)
To me, this is akin to wearing an opaque veil.
It is hard to figure out the meaning of the values you are looking at.
In particular, it is hard to discover the connection between the value
we are destructing above and the datatypes and functions defined
in the "kernel/context.ml" file.
In this case, the connection is there, but it is not visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now consider, what happens when the reader see the same function
presented in the following form:
let test_strict_disjunction n lc =
Array.for_all_i (fun i c ->
match (prod_assum (snd (decompose_prod_n_assum n c))) with
| [LocalAssum (_,c)] -> isRel c && Int.equal (destRel c) (n - i)
| _ -> false) 0 lc
If the reader haven't seen "LocalAssum" before, (s)he can use Merlin
to jump to the corresponding definition and learn more.
In this case, the connection is there, and it is directly visible
(between the function above and the "Context" module).
(2) Also, if we already have the concepts such as:
- local declaration
- local assumption
- local definition
and we describe these notions meticulously in the Reference Manual,
then it is a real pity not to reinforce the connection
of the actual code with the abstract description we published.
Diffstat (limited to 'ide')
| -rw-r--r-- | ide/ide_slave.ml | 11 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/ide/ide_slave.ml b/ide/ide_slave.ml index 20cf48d7f8..12ef0e0751 100644 --- a/ide/ide_slave.ml +++ b/ide/ide_slave.ml @@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ let annotate phrase = (** Goal display *) -let hyp_next_tac sigma env (id,_,ast) = +let hyp_next_tac sigma env decl = + let (id,_,ast) = Context.Named.Declaration.to_tuple decl in let id_s = Names.Id.to_string id in let type_s = string_of_ppcmds (pr_ltype_env env sigma ast) in [ @@ -187,8 +188,12 @@ let process_goal sigma g = Richpp.richpp_of_pp (pr_goal_concl_style_env env sigma norm_constr) in let process_hyp d (env,l) = - let d = Context.NamedList.Declaration.map (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma) d in - let d' = List.map (fun x -> (x, pi2 d, pi3 d)) (pi1 d) in + let d = Context.NamedList.Declaration.map_constr (Reductionops.nf_evar sigma) d in + let d' = List.map (fun name -> let open Context.Named.Declaration in + match pi2 d with + | None -> LocalAssum (name, pi3 d) + | Some value -> LocalDef (name, value, pi3 d)) + (pi1 d) in (List.fold_right Environ.push_named d' env, (Richpp.richpp_of_pp (pr_var_list_decl env sigma d)) :: l) in let (_env, hyps) = |
