diff options
| author | mohring | 2001-04-09 04:33:39 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | mohring | 2001-04-09 04:33:39 +0000 |
| commit | 297af38f837216091c97f4087e45a0ba0efe48b1 (patch) | |
| tree | 8c15c3bd8ab52e4a197e4f45b113ee67178486ff /doc | |
| parent | 26d8f21478d0df54ed780f33e25ffe15042dd068 (diff) | |
Mise a jour du chapitre library
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@8173 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
| -rwxr-xr-x | doc/Library.tex | 31 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | doc/RefMan-lib.tex | 208 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/RefMan-oth.tex | 2 | ||||
| -rwxr-xr-x | doc/RefMan-pre.tex | 83 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/Reference-Manual.tex | 7 |
5 files changed, 223 insertions, 108 deletions
diff --git a/doc/Library.tex b/doc/Library.tex index bb9ef22c18..d9a67061aa 100755 --- a/doc/Library.tex +++ b/doc/Library.tex @@ -16,29 +16,31 @@ This document is a short description of the \Coq\ standard library. This library comes with the system as a complement of the core library -(the {\bf INIT} library ; see the Reference Manual for a description +(the {\bf Init} library ; see the Reference Manual for a description of this library). It provides a set of modules directly available through the \verb!Require! command. The standard library is composed of the following subdirectories: \medskip -\begin{tabular}{lp{10cm}} - {\bf LOGIC} & Classical logic and dependent equality \\ - {\bf ARITH} & Basic Peano arithmetic \\ - {\bf ZARITH} & Binary integers \\ - {\bf BOOL} & Booleans (basic functions and results) \\ - {\bf LISTS} & Monomorphic and polymorphic lists (basic functions and +\begin{tabular}{lp{12cm}} + {\bf Logic} & Classical logic and dependent equality \\ + {\bf Arith} & Basic Peano arithmetic \\ + {\bf Zarith} & Basic integer arithmetic \\ + {\bf Bool} & Booleans (basic functions and results) \\ + {\bf Lists} & Monomorphic and polymorphic lists (basic functions and results), Streams (infinite sequences defined with co-inductive types) \\ - {\bf SETS} & Sets (classical, constructive, finite, infinite, powerset, + {\bf Sets} & Sets (classical, constructive, finite, infinite, power set, etc.) \\ - {\bf RELATIONS} & Relations (definitions and basic results). There is - a subdirectory about well-founded relations ({\bf WELLFOUNDED}) \\ - {\bf SORTING} & Axiomatizations of sorts \\ - {\bf REALS} & Axiomatization of Real Numbers (classical, basic functions - and results, integer part and fractional part, require ZARITH - library) + {\bf IntMap} & Representation of finite sets by an efficient + structure of map (trees indexed by binary integers).\\ + {\bf Reals} & Axiomatization of Real Numbers (classical, basic functions + and results, integer part and fractional part, + requires the \textbf{Zarith} library).\\ + {\bf Relations} & Relations (definitions and basic results). \\ + {\bf Wellfounded} & Well-founded relations (basic results). \\ + \end{tabular} \medskip @@ -49,7 +51,6 @@ is also a version of this document in HTML format on the WWW, which you can access from the \Coq\ home page at \texttt{http://pauillac.inria.fr/coq/coq-eng.html}. - \input{library/libdoc.tex} \end{document} diff --git a/doc/RefMan-lib.tex b/doc/RefMan-lib.tex index 6af0f55cfc..2ce2e34e89 100755 --- a/doc/RefMan-lib.tex +++ b/doc/RefMan-lib.tex @@ -13,12 +13,12 @@ The \Coq\ library is structured into three parts: various developments of \Coq\ axiomatizations about sets, lists, sorting, arithmetic, etc. This library comes with the system and its modules are directly accessible through the \verb!Require! command - (see~\ref{Require}); + (see section~\ref{Require}); \item[User contributions:] Other specification and proof developments coming from the \Coq\ users' community. These libraries are no longer distributed with the system. They are available by anonymous - FTP (see section \ref{Contributions}). + FTP (see section~\ref{Contributions}). \end{description} This chapter briefly reviews these libraries. @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ This chapter briefly reviews these libraries. This section lists the basic notions and results which are directly available in the standard \Coq\ system \footnote{These constructions are defined in the -{\tt Prelude} module in directory {\tt theories/INIT} at the {\Coq} +{\tt Prelude} module in directory {\tt theories/Init} at the {\Coq} root directory; this includes the modules % {\tt Core} l'inexplicable let {\tt Logic}, @@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ Theorem proj1 : A/\B -> A. Theorem proj2 : A/\B -> B. \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \ttindex{or} \ttindex{or\_introl} @@ -173,7 +172,7 @@ synthesized by the system. Then, we find equality, defined as an inductive relation. That is, given a \verb:Set: \verb:A: and an \verb:x: of type \verb:A:, the -predicate \verb:(eq A x): is the smallest which contains \verb:x:. +predicate \verb:(eq A x): is the smallest one which contains \verb:x:. This definition, due to Christine Paulin-Mohring, is equivalent to define \verb:eq: as the smallest reflexive relation, and it is also equivalent to Leibniz' equality. @@ -197,19 +196,19 @@ Theorem absurd : (A:Prop)(C:Prop) A -> ~A -> C. \begin{coq_eval} Abort. \end{coq_eval} -\ttindex{sym\_equal} -\ttindex{trans\_equal} +\ttindex{sym\_eq} +\ttindex{trans\_eq} \ttindex{f\_equal} -\ttindex{sym\_not\_equal} +\ttindex{sym\_not\_eq} \begin{coq_example*} Section equality. Variable A,B : Set. Variable f : A->B. Variable x,y,z : A. - Theorem sym_equal : x=y -> y=x. - Theorem trans_equal : x=y -> y=z -> x=z. + Theorem sym_eq : x=y -> y=x. + Theorem trans_eq : x=y -> y=z -> x=z. Theorem f_equal : x=y -> (f x)=(f y). - Theorem sym_not_equal : ~(x=y) -> ~(y=x). + Theorem sym_not_eq : ~(x=y) -> ~(y=x). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} Abort. @@ -219,18 +218,38 @@ Abort. \end{coq_eval} \ttindex{eq\_ind\_r} \ttindex{eq\_rec\_r} +\ttindex{eq\_rect} +\ttindex{eq\_rect\_r} \begin{coq_example*} End equality. -Definition eq_ind_r : (A:Set)(x:A)(P:A->Prop)(P x)->(y:A)y=x->(P y). -Definition eq_rec_r : (A:Set)(x:A)(P:A->Set)(P x)->(y:A)y=x->(P y). +Definition eq_ind_r : (A:Set)(x:A)(P:A->Prop)(P x)->(y:A)(y=x)->(P y). +Definition eq_rec_r : (A:Set)(x:A)(P:A->Set)(P x)->(y:A)(y=x)->(P y). +Definition eq_rect: (A:Set)(x:A)(P:A->Type)(P x)->(y:A)(x=y)->(P y). +Definition eq_rect_r : (A:Set)(x:A)(P:A->Type)(P x)->(y:A)(y=x)->(P y). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} Abort. Abort. +Abort. +Abort. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} -Immediate sym_equal sym_not_equal. +Hints Immediate sym_eq sym_not_eq : core. +\end{coq_example*} +\ttindex{f\_equal$i$} + +The theorem {\tt f\_equal} is extended to functions with two to five +arguments. The theorem are names {\tt f\_equal2}, {\tt f\_equal3}, +{\tt f\_equal4} and {\tt f\_equal5}. +For instance {\tt f\_equal3} is defined the following way. +\begin{coq_example*} +Theorem f_equal3 : (A1,A2,A3,B:Set)(f:A1->A2->A3->B) + (x1,y1:A1)(x2,y2:A2)(x3,y3:A3) + (x1=y1) -> (x2=y2) -> (x3=y3)-> (f x1 x2 x3)=(f y1 y2 y3). \end{coq_example*} +\begin{coq_eval} +Abort. +\end{coq_eval} \subsection{Datatypes} \label{Datatypes} @@ -283,13 +302,13 @@ We then define the disjoint sum of \verb:A+B: of two sets \verb:A: and \begin{coq_example*} Inductive sum [A,B:Set] : Set - := inl : A -> A+B - | inr : B -> A+B. -Inductive prod [A,B:Set] : Set := pair : A -> B -> A*B. + := inl : A -> (sum A B) + | inr : B -> (sum A B). +Inductive prod [A,B:Set] : Set := pair : A -> B -> (prod A B). Section projections. Variables A,B:Set. - Definition fst := [H:A*B] Cases H of (x,y) => x end. - Definition snd := [H:A*B] Cases H of (x,y) => y end. + Definition fst := [H:(prod A B)] Cases H of (pair x y) => x end. + Definition snd := [H:(prod A B)] Cases H of (pair x y) => y end. End projections. Syntactic Definition Fst := (fst ? ?). Syntactic Definition Snd := (snd ? ?). @@ -346,13 +365,13 @@ constructor. \begin{coq_example*} Inductive sigS [A:Set;P:A->Set] : Set := existS : (x:A)(P x) -> (sigS A P). -Section projections. +Section sigSprojections. Variable A:Set. Variable P:A->Set. Definition projS1 := [H:(sigS A P)] let (x,h) = H in x. Definition projS2 := [H:(sigS A P)]<[H:(sigS A P)](P (projS1 H))> let (x,h) = H in h. -End projections. +End sigSprojections. Inductive sigS2 [A:Set;P,Q:A->Set] : Set := existS2 : (x:A)(P x) -> (Q x) -> (sigS2 A P Q). \end{coq_example*} @@ -367,8 +386,8 @@ A related non-dependent construct is the constructive sum \begin{coq_example*} Inductive sumbool [A,B:Prop] : Set - := left : A -> ({A}+{B}) - | right : B -> ({A}+{B}). + := left : A -> (sumbool A B) + | right : B -> (sumbool A B). \end{coq_example*} This \verb"sumbool" construct may be used as a kind of indexed boolean @@ -382,8 +401,8 @@ in the \verb"Set" \verb"A+{B}". \begin{coq_example*} Inductive sumor [A:Set;B:Prop] : Set - := inleft : A -> (A+{B}) - | inright : B -> (A+{B}). + := inleft : A -> (sumor A B) + | inright : B -> (sumor A B) . \end{coq_example*} \begin{figure} @@ -446,7 +465,7 @@ Inductive Exc [A:Set] : Set := value : A->(Exc A) \end{coq_example*} -This module ends with one axiom and theorems, +This module ends with theorems, relating the sorts \verb:Set: and \verb:Prop: in a way which is consistent with the realizability interpretation. @@ -457,7 +476,8 @@ interpretation. \ttindex{and\_rec} \begin{coq_example*} -Axiom False_rec : (P:Set)False->P. +Lemma False_rec : (P:Set)False->P. +Lemma False_rect : (P:Type)False->P. Definition except := False_rec. Syntactic Definition Except := (except ?). Theorem absurd_set : (A:Prop)(C:Set)A->(~A)->C. @@ -500,47 +520,42 @@ Definition pred : nat->nat | (S u) => u end). Theorem pred_Sn : (m:nat) m=(pred (S m)). Theorem eq_add_S : (n,m:nat) (S n)=(S m) -> n=m. -Immediate eq_add_S. +Hints Immediate eq_add_S : core. Theorem not_eq_S : (n,m:nat) ~(n=m) -> ~((S n)=(S m)). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} Definition IsSucc : nat->Prop - := [n:nat](<Prop>Cases n of O => False - | (S p) => True end). + := [n:nat](Cases n of O => False + | (S p) => True end). Theorem O_S : (n:nat) ~(O=(S n)). Theorem n_Sn : (n:nat) ~(n=(S n)). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} Fixpoint plus [n:nat] : nat -> nat := - [m:nat](<nat>Cases n of - O => m - | (S p) => (S (plus p m)) end). + [m:nat](Cases n of + O => m + | (S p) => (S (plus p m)) end). Lemma plus_n_O : (n:nat) n=(plus n O). Lemma plus_n_Sm : (n,m:nat) (S (plus n m))=(plus n (S m)). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} Fixpoint mult [n:nat] : nat -> nat := - [m:nat](<nat> Cases n of O => O - | (S p) => (plus m (mult p m)) end). + [m:nat](Cases n of O => O + | (S p) => (plus m (mult p m)) end). Lemma mult_n_O : (n:nat) O=(mult n O). Lemma mult_n_Sm : (n,m:nat) (plus (mult n m) n)=(mult n (S m)). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} Finally, it gives the definition of the usual orderings \verb:le:, @@ -573,7 +588,7 @@ induction principle. Theorem nat_case : (n:nat)(P:nat->Prop)(P O)->((m:nat)(P (S m)))->(P n). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} Theorem nat_double_ind : (R:nat->nat->Prop) @@ -582,7 +597,7 @@ Theorem nat_double_ind : (R:nat->nat->Prop) -> (n,m:nat)(R n m). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \subsection{Well-founded recursion} @@ -617,32 +632,47 @@ Fixpoint Acc_rec [x:A;a:(Acc x)] : (P x) := (F x (Acc_inv x a) [y:A][h:(R y x)](Acc_rec y (Acc_inv x a y h))). End AccRec. Definition well_founded := (a:A)(Acc a). +Hypothesis Rwf : well_founded. Theorem well_founded_induction : - well_founded -> (P:A->Set)((x:A)((y:A)(R y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). +Theorem well_founded_ind : + (P:A->Prop)((x:A)((y:A)(R y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} -\begin{coq_example*} -End Well_founded. -\end{coq_example*} -\begin{coq_example*} - Section Wf_inductor. -Variable A:Set. -Variable R:A->A->Prop. -Theorem well_founded_ind : - (well_founded A R) -> - (P:A->Prop)((x:A)((y:A)(R y x)->(P y))->(P x))->(a:A)(P a). +{\tt Acc\_rec} can be used to define functions by fixpoints using +well-founded relations to justify termination. Assuming +extensionality of the functional used for the recursive call, the +fixpoint equation can be proved. +\ttindex{Fix\_F} +\ttindex{fix\_eq} +\ttindex{Fix\_F\_inv} +\ttindex{Fix\_F\_eq} +\begin{coq_example*} +Section FixPoint. +Variable P : A -> Set. +Variable F : (x:A)((y:A)(R y x)->(P y))->(P x). +Fixpoint Fix_F [x:A;r:(Acc x)] : (P x) := + (F x [y:A][p:(R y x)](Fix_F y (Acc_inv x r y p))). +Definition fix := [x:A](Fix_F x (Rwf x)). +Hypothesis F_ext : + (x:A)(f,g:(y:A)(R y x)->(P y)) + ((y:A)(p:(R y x))((f y p)=(g y p)))->(F x f)=(F x g). +Lemma Fix_F_eq + : (x:A)(r:(Acc x)) + (F x [y:A][p:(R y x)](Fix_F y (Acc_inv x r y p)))=(Fix_F x r). +Lemma Fix_F_inv : (x:A)(r,s:(Acc x))(Fix_F x r)=(Fix_F x s). +Lemma fix_eq : (x:A)(fix x)=(F x [y:A][p:(R y x)](fix y)). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} -End Wf_inductor. +End FixPoint. +End Well_founded. \end{coq_example*} - \subsection{Accessing the {\Type} level} The basic library includes the definitions\footnote{This is in module @@ -665,7 +695,6 @@ The basic library includes the definitions\footnote{This is in module \begin{coq_example*} Definition allT := [A:Type][P:A->Prop](x:A)(P x). - Section universal_quantification. Variable A : Type. Variable P : A->Prop. @@ -673,14 +702,12 @@ Theorem inst : (x:A)(ALLT x | (P x))->(P x). Theorem gen : (B:Prop)(f:(y:A)B->(P y))B->(allT ? P). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} End universal_quantification. Inductive exT [A:Type;P:A->Prop] : Prop := exT_intro : (x:A)(P x)->(exT A P). - Inductive exT2 [A:Type;P,Q:A->Prop] : Prop := exT_intro2 : (x:A)(P x)->(Q x)->(exT2 A P Q). \end{coq_example*} @@ -702,19 +729,17 @@ Inductive eqT [A:Type;x:A] : A -> Prop Section Equality_is_a_congruence. Variables A,B : Type. Variable f : A->B. - Variable x,y,z : A. - Lemma sym_eqT : (x==y) -> (y==x). - Lemma trans_eqT : (x==y) -> (y==z) -> (x==z). - Lemma congr_eqT : (x==y)->((f x)==(f y)). +Variable x,y,z : A. +Lemma sym_eqT : (x==y) -> (y==x). +Lemma trans_eqT : (x==y) -> (y==z) -> (x==z). +Lemma congr_eqT : (x==y)->((f x)==(f y)). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} -Abort. -Abort. -Abort. +Abort All. \end{coq_eval} \begin{coq_example*} End Equality_is_a_congruence. -Immediate sym_eqT sym_not_eqT. +Hints Immediate sym_eqT sym_not_eqT : core. Definition eqT_ind_r: (A:Type)(x:A)(P:A->Prop)(P x)->(y:A)y==x -> (P y). \end{coq_example*} \begin{coq_eval} @@ -763,21 +788,23 @@ The rest of the standard library is structured into the following subdirectories: \begin{tabular}{lp{12cm}} - {\bf LOGIC} & Classical logic and dependent equality \\ - {\bf ARITH} & Basic Peano arithmetic \\ - {\bf ZARITH} & Basic integer arithmetic \\ - {\bf BOOL} & Booleans (basic functions and results) \\ - {\bf LISTS} & Monomorphic and polymorphic lists (basic functions and + {\bf Logic} & Classical logic and dependent equality \\ + {\bf Arith} & Basic Peano arithmetic \\ + {\bf Zarith} & Basic integer arithmetic \\ + {\bf Bool} & Booleans (basic functions and results) \\ + {\bf Lists} & Monomorphic and polymorphic lists (basic functions and results), Streams (infinite sequences defined with co-inductive types) \\ - {\bf SETS} & Sets (classical, constructive, finite, infinite, power set, + {\bf Sets} & Sets (classical, constructive, finite, infinite, power set, etc.) \\ - {\bf RELATIONS} & Relations (definitions and basic results). There is - a subdirectory about well-founded relations ({\bf WELLFOUNDED}) \\ - {\bf SORTING} & Various sorting algorithms \\ - {\bf REALS} & Axiomatization of Real Numbers (classical, basic functions + {\bf IntMap} & Representation of finite sets by an efficient + structure of map (trees indexed by binary integers).\\ + {\bf Reals} & Axiomatization of Real Numbers (classical, basic functions and results, integer part and fractional part, - requires the \textbf{ZARITH} library) + requires the \textbf{Zarith} library).\\ + {\bf Relations} & Relations (definitions and basic results). \\ + {\bf Wellfounded} & Well-founded relations (basic results). \\ + \end{tabular} \medskip @@ -853,6 +880,17 @@ naturals using decimal notation. That is he can write \texttt{(3)} for \texttt{(S (S (S O)))}. The number must be between parentheses. This works also in the left hand side of a \texttt{Cases} expression (see for example section \ref{Refine-example}). +\begin{coq_eval} +Reset Initial. (* Remove the redefinition of nat *) +\end{coq_eval} +\begin{coq_example*} +Require Arith. +Fixpoint even [n:nat] : nat := +Cases n of (0) => true + | (1) => false + | (S (S n)) => (even n) +end. +\end{coq_example*} \section{Users' contributions} \index{Contributions} diff --git a/doc/RefMan-oth.tex b/doc/RefMan-oth.tex index f2c65af761..b2c4585024 100644 --- a/doc/RefMan-oth.tex +++ b/doc/RefMan-oth.tex @@ -324,8 +324,8 @@ its contents is invisible to the user. The implementation file ({\ident}{\tt.vi}) in case of failure. \subsection{\tt Require {\ident}.} -\comindex{Require} \label{Require} +\comindex{Require} This command loads and opens (imports) the module stored in the file {\ident}. The implementation file ({\ident}{\tt .vo}) is searched first, then the specification file ({\ident}{\tt .vi}) in case of failure. diff --git a/doc/RefMan-pre.tex b/doc/RefMan-pre.tex index 36346b88c0..6969ffd565 100755 --- a/doc/RefMan-pre.tex +++ b/doc/RefMan-pre.tex @@ -233,7 +233,6 @@ and Bruno Barras. Lyon, Nov. 18th 1996\\ Christine Paulin \end{flushright} -\newpage \section*{Credits: addendum for version 6.2} %\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Credits: addendum for version V6.2} @@ -284,6 +283,88 @@ Orsay, May 4th 1998\\ Christine Paulin \end{flushright} +\section*{Credits: addendum for version 6.3} +The main changes in version V6.3 was the introduction of a few new tactics +and the extension of the guard condition for fixpoint definitions. + + +B. Barras extended the unification algorithm to complete partial terms +and solved various tricky bugs related to universes.\\ +D. Delahaye developed the \texttt{AutoRewrite} tactic. He also designed the new +behavior of \texttt{Intro} and provided the tacticals \texttt{First} and +\texttt{Solve}.\\ +J.-C. Filli\^atre developed the \texttt{Correctness} tactic.\\ +E. Gim\'enez extended the guard condition in fixpoints.\\ +H. Herbelin designed the new syntax for definitions and extended the +\texttt{Induction} tactic.\\ +P. Loiseleur developed the \texttt{Quote} tactic and +the new design of the \texttt{Auto} +tactic, he also introduced the index of +errors in the documentation.\\ +C. Paulin wrote the \texttt{Focus} command and introduced +the reduction functions in definitions, this last feature +was proposed by J.-F. Monin from CNET Lannion. + +\begin{flushright} +Orsay, Dec. 1999\\ +Christine Paulin +\end{flushright} +\newpage + +\section*{Credits: version 7.0} + +The current version V7 is a new implementation started in September +1999 by J-C. Filliâtre. This is a major revision with respect to the +internal architecture of the system. + +J-C. Filliâtre designed the architecture of the new system, he +introduced a new representation for environments and wrote a new kernel +for type-checking terms. His approach was to use functional +data-structures in order to get more sharing, to prepare the addition +of modules and also to get closer to a certified kernel. + + +H. Herbelin introduced a new structure of terms with local +definitions and redesigned the translation from the high-level +language of Coq to the internal representation, in particular +pattern-matching compiling. + +D. Delahaye introduced a new language for tactics. General tactics +using pattern-matching on goals and context can directly be written +from the Coq toplevel. He also provided primitives for the design +of user-defined tactics in Caml. + +J.-C. Filliâtre and P. Letouzey redesigned a new extraction procedure +from Coq terms to Caml programs. This new extraction procedure, unlike +the one implemented in previous version of \Coq{} is able +to handle all terms in the Calculus of Inductive Constructions, +even involving universes and strong elimination. + +B. Barras improved the reduction strategy for lazy evaluation. + +Y. Bertot designed the \texttt{SearchPattern} and +\texttt{SearchRewrite} tools. + +A library for efficient representation of finite sets by binary trees +contributed by J. Goubault was integrated in the basic theories.\\ + +The development was coordinated by C. Paulin. + +Many discussions within the Démons team and the LogiCal project +influenced significantly the design of Coq especially with J. +Chrz\k{a}szcz, J. Courant, P. Courtieu, J. Duprat, J. Goubault, A. Miquel, +C. Marché, M. Mayero, B. Monate and B. Werner. + +Intensive users suggested improvements of the system : +Y. Bertot, L. Pottier, L. Théry , P. Zimmerman from INRIA +C. Alvarado, P. Crégut, J.-F. Monin from France Telecom R \& D. +\begin{flushright} +Orsay, Apr. 2001\\ +Christine Paulin +\end{flushright} +\newpage + + % $Id$ %%% Local Variables: diff --git a/doc/Reference-Manual.tex b/doc/Reference-Manual.tex index cdcf3274fa..60afdee359 100644 --- a/doc/Reference-Manual.tex +++ b/doc/Reference-Manual.tex @@ -16,12 +16,7 @@ \begin{document} \tophtml{} -\coverpage{Reference Manual}{Bruno~Barras, Samuel~Boutin, - Cristina~Cornes, Judicaël~Courant, Yann~Coscoy, David~Delahaye, - Daniel~de~Rauglaudre, Jean-Christophe~Filliâtre, Eduardo~Giménez, - Hugo~Herbelin, Gérard~Huet, Henri~Laulhère, César~Muñoz, - Chetan~Murthy, Catherine~Parent-Vigouroux, Patrick~Loiseleur, - Christine~Paulin-Mohring, Amokrane~Saïbi, Benjamin~Werner} +\coverpage{Reference Manual}{The Coq Development Team} %\defaultheaders \include{RefMan-int}% Introduction |
