diff options
| author | Hugo Herbelin | 2014-08-13 18:02:11 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Hugo Herbelin | 2014-08-18 18:56:38 +0200 |
| commit | 5c82bcd1f87cc893319f2553c81a73c69b13b54d (patch) | |
| tree | 83ca001f700b5fdb48d0fac8e249c08c589a1d15 /dev/doc | |
| parent | d5fece25d8964d5d9fcd55b66164286aeef5fb9f (diff) | |
Reorganisation of intropattern code
- emphasizing the different kinds of patterns
- factorizing code of the non-naming intro-patterns
Still some questions:
- Should -> and <- apply to hypotheses or not (currently they apply to
hypotheses either when used in assert-style tactics or apply in, or
when the term to rewrite is a variable, in which case "subst" is
applied)?
- Should "subst" be used when the -> or <- rewrites an equation x=t
posed by "assert" (i.e. rewrite everywhere and clearing x and hyp)?
- Should -> and <- be applicable in non assert-style if the lemma has
quantifications?
Diffstat (limited to 'dev/doc')
| -rw-r--r-- | dev/doc/changes.txt | 4 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dev/doc/changes.txt b/dev/doc/changes.txt index 036bf1d5e3..4ea33ddbea 100644 --- a/dev/doc/changes.txt +++ b/dev/doc/changes.txt @@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ - API of Inductiveops made more uniform (see commit log or file itself). +- API of intros_pattern style tactic changed; "s" is dropped in + "intros_pattern" and "intros_patterns" is not anymore behaving like + tactic "intros" on the empty list. + ========================================= = CHANGES BETWEEN COQ V8.3 AND COQ V8.4 = ========================================= |