Remove clutter by moving historic unmaintained dev/doc files to an archive subfolder.

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 73 deletions

diff --git a/dev/doc/notes-on-conversion.v b/dev/doc/notes-on-conversion.v
deleted file mode 100644
index a81f170c63..0000000000
--- a/dev/doc/notes-on-conversion.v
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,73 +0,0 @@
-(**********************************************************************)
-(* A few examples showing the current limits of the conversion algorithm *)
-(**********************************************************************)
-
-(*** We define (pseudo-)divergence from Ackermann function ***)
-
-Definition ack (n : nat) :=
-  (fix F (n0 : nat) : nat -> nat :=
-     match n0 with
-     | O => S
-     | S n1 =>
-         fun m : nat =>
-         (fix F0 (n2 : nat) : nat :=
-            match n2 with
-            | O => F n1 1
-            | S n3 => F n1 (F0 n3)
-            end) m
-     end) n.
-
-Notation OMEGA := (ack 4 4).
-
-Definition f (x:nat) := x.
-
-(* Evaluation in tactics can somehow be controlled *)
-Lemma l1 : OMEGA = OMEGA.
-reflexivity.  (* succeed: identity *)
-Qed.          (* succeed: identity *)
-
-Lemma l2 : OMEGA = f OMEGA.
-reflexivity.  (* fail: conversion wants to convert OMEGA with f OMEGA *)
-Abort.        (* but it reduces the right side first! *)
-
-Lemma l3 : f OMEGA = OMEGA.
-reflexivity.  (* succeed: reduce left side first *)
-Qed.          (* succeed: expected concl (the one with f) is on the left *)
-
-Lemma l4 : OMEGA = OMEGA.
-assert (f OMEGA = OMEGA) by reflexivity. (* succeed *)
-unfold f in H.   (* succeed: no type-checking *)
-exact H.         (* succeed: identity *)
-Qed.             (* fail: "f" is on the left *)
-
-(* This example would fail whatever the preferred side is *)
-Lemma l5 : OMEGA = f OMEGA.
-unfold f.
-assert (f OMEGA = OMEGA) by reflexivity.
-unfold f in H.
-exact H.
-Qed. (* needs to convert (f OMEGA = OMEGA) and (OMEGA = f OMEGA) *)
-
-(**********************************************************************)
-(* Analysis of the inefficiency in Nijmegen/LinAlg/LinAlg/subspace_dim.v *)
-(* (proof of span_ind_uninject_prop *)
-
-In the proof, a problem of the form   (Equal S t1 t2)
-is "simpl"ified, then "red"uced to    (Equal S' t1 t1)
-where the new t1's are surrounded by invisible coercions.
-A reflexivity steps conclude the proof.
-
-The trick is that Equal projects the equality in the setoid S, and
-that (Equal S) itself reduces to some (fun x y => Equal S' (f x) (g y)).
-
-At the Qed time, the problem to solve is (Equal S t1 t2) = (Equal S' t1 t1)
-and the algorithm is to first compare S and S', and t1 and t2.
-Unfortunately it does not work, and since t1 and t2 involve concrete
-instances of algebraic structures, it takes a lot of time to realize that
-it is not convertible.
-
-The only hope to improve this problem is to observe that S' hides
-(behind two indirections) a Setoid constructor. This could be the
-argument to solve the problem.
-
-