diff options
| author | herbelin | 2008-12-09 21:40:22 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | herbelin | 2008-12-09 21:40:22 +0000 |
| commit | 70af80aad166bc54e4bbc80dfc9427cfee32aae6 (patch) | |
| tree | 03f2c436640156a5ec3f2e138985fc251a1db799 /CHANGES | |
| parent | 2c173fa6ef5de944c03b29590b672b7c893d0eb9 (diff) | |
About "apply in":
- Added "simple apply in" (cf wish 1917) + conversion and descent
under conjunction + contraction of useless beta-redex in "apply in"
+ support for open terms.
- Did not solve the "problem" that "apply in" generates a let-in which
is type-checked using a kernel conversion in the opposite side of what
the proof indicated (hence leading to a potential unexpected penalty
at Qed time).
- When applyng a sequence of lemmas, it would have been nice to allow
temporary evars as intermediate steps but this was too long to implement.
Smoother API in tactics.mli for assert_by/assert_as/pose_proof.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://scm.gforge.inria.fr/svn/coq/trunk@11662 85f007b7-540e-0410-9357-904b9bb8a0f7
Diffstat (limited to 'CHANGES')
| -rw-r--r-- | CHANGES | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
@@ -285,14 +285,14 @@ Tactics - New syntax "rename a into b, c into d" for "rename a into b; rename c into d" - New tactics "dependent induction/destruction H [ generalizing id_1 .. id_n ]" to do induction-inversion on instantiated inductive families à la BasicElim. -- Tactic "apply" now able to reason modulo unfolding of constants - (possible source of incompatibility in situations where apply may fail, - e.g. as argument of a try or a repeat and in a ltac function); - version of apply that does not unfold is renamed into "simple apply" - (usable for compatibility or for automation). -- Tactic "apply" now able to traverse conjunctions and to select the first - matching lemma among the components of the conjunction; tactic apply also - able to apply lemmas of conclusion an empty type. +- Tactics "apply" and "apply in" now able to reason modulo unfolding of + constants (possible source of incompatibility in situations where apply + may fail, e.g. as argument of a try or a repeat and in a ltac function); + versions that do not unfold are renamed into "simple apply" and + "simple apply in" (usable for compatibility or for automation). +- Tactics "apply" and "apply in" now able to traverse conjunctions and to + select the first matching lemma among the components of the conjunction; + tactic "apply" also able to apply lemmas of conclusion an empty type. - Tactic "apply" now supports application of several lemmas in a row. - Tactics "set" and "pose" can set functions using notation "(f x1..xn := c)". - New tactic "instantiate" (without argument). |
