aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHugo Herbelin2016-07-01 12:48:26 +0200
committerHugo Herbelin2016-07-01 13:57:26 +0200
commitdae240f31d6de1d5b3737d6d0779e009f3d67fa2 (patch)
treeb3d0aa053c80da8a21fd995b73fcf01d7739707c
parentd24997ae295ac4bc80b77273e5499b472f193939 (diff)
Fixing #4882 (anomaly with Declare Implicit Tactic on hole of type with evars).
But there are still bugs with Declare Implicit Tactic, which should probably rather be reimplemented with ltac:(tac). Indeed, it does support evars in the type of the term, and solve_by_implicit_tactic should transfer universe constraints to the main goal. E.g., the following still fails, at Qed time. Definition Foo {T}{a : T} : T := a. Declare Implicit Tactic eassumption. Goal forall A (x : A), A. intros. apply Foo. Qed.
-rw-r--r--proofs/pfedit.ml4
-rw-r--r--test-suite/bugs/closed/4882.v50
2 files changed, 53 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/proofs/pfedit.ml b/proofs/pfedit.ml
index a515c9e750..20cae84a49 100644
--- a/proofs/pfedit.ml
+++ b/proofs/pfedit.ml
@@ -230,8 +230,10 @@ let solve_by_implicit_tactic env sigma evk =
(Environ.named_context env) ->
let tac = Proofview.tclTHEN tac (Proofview.tclEXTEND [] (Proofview.tclZERO (Errors.UserError ("",Pp.str"Proof is not complete."))) []) in
(try
+ let c = Evarutil.nf_evars_universes sigma evi.evar_concl in
+ if Evarutil.has_undefined_evars sigma c then raise Exit;
let (ans, _, _) =
- build_by_tactic env (Evd.evar_universe_context sigma) evi.evar_concl tac in
+ build_by_tactic env (Evd.evar_universe_context sigma) c tac in
ans
with e when Logic.catchable_exception e -> raise Exit)
| _ -> raise Exit
diff --git a/test-suite/bugs/closed/4882.v b/test-suite/bugs/closed/4882.v
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8c26af708b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test-suite/bugs/closed/4882.v
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+
+Definition Foo {T}{a : T} : T := a.
+
+Module A.
+
+ Declare Implicit Tactic eauto.
+
+ Goal forall A (x : A), A.
+ intros.
+ apply Foo. (* Check defined evars are normalized *)
+ (* Qed. *)
+ Abort.
+
+End A.
+
+Module B.
+
+ Definition Foo {T}{a : T} : T := a.
+
+ Declare Implicit Tactic eassumption.
+
+ Goal forall A (x : A), A.
+ intros.
+ apply Foo.
+ (* Qed. *)
+ Abort.
+
+End B.
+
+Module C.
+
+ Declare Implicit Tactic first [exact True|assumption].
+
+ Goal forall (x : True), True.
+ intros.
+ apply (@Foo _ _).
+ Qed.
+
+End C.
+
+Module D.
+
+ Declare Implicit Tactic assumption.
+
+ Goal forall A (x : A), A.
+ intros.
+ exact _.
+ Qed.
+
+End D.