A test on the different ways to indicate the levels of a rule.

This is in preparation of changes in level_eq, to check that the
semantics is preserved.

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/test-suite/success/Notations2.v b/test-suite/success/Notations2.v
index 7c2cf3ee52..d01ebfb18e 100644
--- a/test-suite/success/Notations2.v
+++ b/test-suite/success/Notations2.v
@@ -126,3 +126,11 @@ Notation "'myexists' x , p" := (ex (fun x => p))
   (at level 200, x ident, p at level 200, right associativity) : type_scope.
 Check myexists I, I = 0. (* Should not be seen as a constructor *)
 End M14.
+
+(* 15. Testing different ways to give the same levels without failing *)
+
+Module M15.
+  Local Notation "###### x" := (S x) (right associativity, at level 79, x at next level).
+  Fail Local Notation "###### x" := (S x) (right associativity, at level 79).
+  Local Notation "###### x" := (S x) (at level 79).
+End M15.